Hillary Clinton Titles New Book "What Happened"

[Anonymous 6]

http://thefederalist.com/2017/07/27/we-already-know-what-happened-hillary/#.WXoV7yiaNWA.twitter

________________

In her upcoming “tell-all” memoir, “What Happened,” you write: “In the past, for reasons I try to explain, I’ve often felt I had to be careful in public, like I was up on a wire without a net. Now I’m letting my guard down.” After over 30 years of living with this calculating, fictional character, most of the public is looking forward to finally getting to know the real Hillary Clinton.

The problem, of course, is that we all know exactly what happened in 2016: You lost to Donald Trump.

Your memoir, according to sources, will focus on how the Russians and former FBI director James Comey cost you the White House. So, basically, you will be peddling the same self-soothing revisionism about the 2016 election that’s been peddled by most Democrats since the day they realized they had actually picked the candidate who lost to Donald Trump.

Presumably, this fact is embarrassing to you– and others– and I completely get it. But the reasons Why It Happened are pretty clear.

First of all, no one really likes you. I don’t say this out of political or personal malice. I assume few people like me, either. But being inherently unlikeable is an awkward attribute to have when you have designs on public office. A recent Bloomberg poll found that only 39 percent of Americans have an unfavorable view of you. People like you less than Donald Trump, who you lost to, even though all you’ve been doing is hiking since exiting national politics.

Now, granted, this might have something to do with your long history of corruption, mendacity and malleable political principles. Or maybe it’s just something about your personality. Whatever the case, no amount of whataboutism regarding Donald Trump can erase living history.

It’s also probably difficult for voters to be stirred by someone who wants to be president as badly as you do. The ambition, it oozes from you. And because you’ll say anything polls tell you to say, you are extraordinarily uninspiring. Your politics are a sort of a lagging indicator. By the time you embrace them, the moment has passed us by.

It must have been exhilarating for the rank and file of the Democratic Party to get behind a charismatic newcomer in 2008, who could blend populism and idealism with progressive policy goals. People might forget this now, but Barack Obama was a longshot underdog in 2007 when he entered the race as the anti-war candidate. (Remember when you pretended to be for the war and then against it? People noticed.) After your defeat, liberals had probably fooled themselves into believing that Clintonian hegemony was thankfully over. But you’re not a quitter.

Some politicians can get over their shadiness and disagreeable nature by excelling at retail politics and/or strategic thinking. You’re not that person. You came to prominence on the back of your husband’s success – a politician who happens, despite his many faults, to be exceptionally gifted in this area. You learned little from your failed forays into politics–Hillarycare, for instance. And your carpet-bagging senate run saw you beating a lightweight Republican strawman. You confused nepotistic luck with talent. In the meantime, you probably crowded out women with far more talent. It happens.

While Bill, and Trump, and Joe Biden, and Obama, could, on one level or another, connect with the average Americans, you struggled. “What happened was that this was the first campaign that I can recall where my party did not talk about what it always stood for — and that was how to maintain a burgeoning middle class,” Biden said after the election. “You didn’t hear a single solitary sentence in the last campaign about that guy working on the assembly line making $60,000 a year and a wife making $32,000 as a hostess.” Not one.

Hey, I don’t like populism either, so I get why it’s hard for you. You can read about your many missteps in the book “Shattered,” so we don’t have to go over them here. It is worth noting, however, that this is second time you lost a presidential race that everyone presumed you would win. In both races you outspent your opponent (just in case you were going to blame Citizens United).

Here’s what didn’t happen. Russia didn’t win the election for Trump. There is not a single piece of evidence that proves Putin, though I’m sure he would if he could, altered, changed, swapped, etc., a single vote in this country. This is a partisan-driven fantasy and a conspiracy theory. You have far better case blaming the media for its incessant coverage of Trump during the GOP primaries, which I’m sure delighted you.

Nor did James Comey lose you the election. It’s not Comey’s fault that you set up a secret server to circumvent transparency — likely to hide favor-trading that you were engaging in for your foundation. It was you who then sent unsecured classified documents through that server, although you have constantly bragged about your long experience on these matters. It was your staff that was responsible for attempts to destroy all the evidence related to that server. It was your staff that had “cleaned their devices in such a way as to preclude complete forensic recovery.” And it was your top aide that failed to inform the FBI about classified emails on her computer that she did not hand over when she should have.

All these things would have landed most people in hot water, so you should probably be thankful you escaped with nothing more than a lost election.

That’s what happened.

Thoughts??

[Anonymous 25]

I will just leave this here:

Erin Pizzey: “Hillary Clinton is behind a huge amount of the feminist evil empire.”

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

Can’t Make This Up: Hillary Clinton Steals Book Title “What Happened” From Former Bush Press Secretary

Ripping off book titles is poor taste.

This is the second time she has done this.

Carly Fiorina’s book “Tough Choices” came out in 2007.

Hillary’s book “Hard Choices” came out in 2014.

Look at the two covers. No only are the title’s similar, the pose and hair style on the covers are similar.

[Anonymous 42]

Jue chit hit de fan Amiga! jue chit hit de fan!

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

What happened?

Hillary’s face hit the Wall warp speed, and so did her brain, and the rest of her body.

Perhaps brain damage from syphilis from Bill.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[MGTOW KnightParticipant 7477]

What happened?

You lost c~~~!

Your race baiting, Marxist/feminist ideology didn’t prevail!

What is even more astounding is this c~~~ lied, cheated and killed to become the Democratic nominee.

What happened is good prevailed over wickedness

Now you have the gall to play the victim? Are you kidding me?

F~~~ you, and your libtard cronies, bitch!

Fuck bitches... literally and metaphorically

[AposematicParticipant 2671]

Pretty sure Hillary is severely challenged trying to keep her wife happy, and the secret service apomorphine shots as subtle as possible.

Afinogyny.. from the Greek Afino {to abandon/ to set down/ to leave /to allow/ to let } + Gyny {Women} MGHOW’s philosophy to not engage women without “hating them”. Narcorca =Narcissistic Orca typically spouting to a bathroom mirror taking an arms length selfie ; Wallinate describes post wall females whose SMV is terminally negligible New Years resolution "To not make women happy" . Instadestitue: yet another Neologism for Men that cohabit with women that decide to pull the handle of intervention orders.

[WPLParticipant 2390]

If she needs to write an entire book to explain “what happened”, then she has bigger problems than losing an election.

[SamsquanchParticipant 4226]

“What happened” to the Nasty Bitch campaign with you and samantha bee?

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

The woman is politically tone deaf. The best example was the coal miners during the election. Early in the campaign, she spoke to environmentalist crowd where she directly stated she would make coal miners lose their job.

Then, later in the campaign she went to the coal miners, she caught herself in her own lie by the coal miners when she stated she will help the coal miners. The coal miners saw the speech she gave the environmentalists where she promised to destroy their jobs. She was all but booed off the stage by the coal miners.

Meanwhile, Donald Trump noticed the other candidates lack of message for jobs and he played up the message for jobs. Since winning the election, President Trump has been trying to create jobs for the American people.

[Joey AlfioParticipant]

Δεν υπάρχει τίποτε αδύνατο γι’ αυτόν που θα προσπαθήσει. - Μέγας Αλέξανδρος

[Solo MAN’S WisdomParticipant]

It should sell 50 more copies than her last book, which would be a total of 325 copies.

When women lead, destruction is the destination. -- Me.

[Author]

Posts