Have you ever noticed that this "objectification" of women B.S is never blamed .

Topic by bcroger

Bcroger

Home Forums MGTOW Central Have you ever noticed that this "objectification" of women B.S is never blamed .

This topic contains 11 replies, has 10 voices, and was last updated by Darth Sin  Darth Sin 4 years, 7 months ago.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #74848
    +2
    Bcroger
    bcroger
    Participant
    113

    Have you ever noticed that this “objectification” of women B.S is never blamed on women who do the acts themselves? Women choose to go half naked on T.V, expose their dumb asses, objectify themselves (because they have no self respect or are too retarded to get at least an associates degree and get a normal job like everyone else) and then men get blamed for it. If millions upon millions of dumb bitches never never posted half nude photos of themselves on Facebook ,texts etc. then women would not be “objectified.” Men rarely ever post nude photos of themselves.

    If feminists complain about women being objectified, then they should talk to women about not objectifying themselves. Simple as that. Thoughts?

    #74855
    +3
    Wolf
    Wolf
    Participant
    890

    If feminists complain about women being objectified, then they should talk to women about not objectifying themselves. Simple as that. Thoughts?

    They are doing the complete opposite with “slut walks”.

    What they may or may not realize: women need to be objectified in order to have power over men. Take away sex and pussy from women, and they would have no power over men.

    #74866
    +2
    KingOfTheSea
    KingOfTheSea
    Participant
    1270

    They are doing the complete opposite with “slut walks”.

    What they may or may not realize: women need to be objectified in order to have power over men. Take away sex and pussy from women, and they would have no power over men.

    Exactly. Notice how bitches like Kim Kardashian are never complaining about objectification? It’s because they know EXACTLY where their livelihood is coming from. The closest thing you’ll get to such “poisoning the well” scenarios would probably be the girls who cosplay at conventions and it’s usually because they feel they’re not getting enough money and that they (semi)secretly despise their clientele.

    #74874
    +2

    Anonymous
    12

    Women want it all their own way, the trouble is their own way changes with the wind.

    I would argue that most men when they meet a woman they really like or love want to treat them with respect and all the s~~~ they have seen on porn goes out the window and they just want to love and respect her. Women on the other hand will want to reenact porn scenes even more than they did before.

    Women like being objectified and that is why Feminism clashes with itself, Feminist is at war with Female nature.

     

     

    #74878
    +4
    Chir
    chir
    Participant

    Spot on.

    They want to objectify themselves on their terms only.  If women did not want to objectify themselves for men there would be no fashion or cosmetics industry.

    It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, it is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning; it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.

    #74886
    +1
    Experienced
    experienced
    Participant

    Chir is correct, “Spot on.     They want to objectify themselves on their terms only.  If women did not want to objectify themselves for men there would be no fashion or cosmetics industry.

    For a second I thought it would be marvelous in no uncertain terms if they could be cutoff from reality to illustrate just how far they would dissociate themselves from it.

    Then it hits, they already have. Just look at online dading. No connection with the reality of “actual market value” just some well beyond inflated view of themselves.

     

    "It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

    #74889
    +2
    K
    Hitman
    Participant

    no objectification , no power. they take selfies and critique themselves and each other real hard. superficial , little depth of character.. and they call men shallow .. wow..

    #75057
    Chir
    chir
    Participant

    God save us all from another goddamn ducklip selfie.

    F~~~ I hate those.

    It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, it is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning; it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.

    #75072
    FullMetalExo
    FullMetalExo
    Participant
    2383

    If feminists complain about women being objectified, then they should talk to women about not objectifying themselves. Simple as that. Thoughts?

    They are doing the complete opposite with “slut walks”. What they may or may not realize: women need to be objectified in order to have power over men. Take away sex and pussy from women, and they would have no power over men.

    hmm but why even call it objectification ? we know its not a plank of wood and is a live being, person. I have no idea why this term even lives.

    Some find a person attractive/sexually attractive for X reason = objectification ?

    I’v read about the term (to actually understand WTF it is, as here in LV we don’t even have a term like that used, I don’t see it used anyway and can’t think of a translation really for it of the top of my head…. ) :

    I could understand to use that term, if a crazy person stops thinking about some human as a live being and starts to treat him as an object, but its rare and not a norm or normal in any way.

    And it’s like every situation is labeled as objectification, showing any part of a human is objectification of a person….makes zero sense to me.

     

    So, how  I see it: Feminism takes live, human attraction and labels it as objectification in order to make man look like monsters.

    So why help them by using the term ?  I see no substance behind it and it’s a lie told over and over. It’s like a belief/religious view I don’t share. Someone looks and sees an UFO, and all I see is a blue sky. “oh no there is xxxxxx there, you are just XXXX for not seeing it like I do”.

    We don’t even have the term here and even if we do, it’s not used as there is zero use to it in daily life…

     

    -----------

    #75078
    +1
    FullMetalExo
    FullMetalExo
    Participant
    2383

    In short, they hate when you like them, hate when you don’t. They hate.

     

    Liking someone, finding someone attractive got labeled as objectifying. …right, F~~~ logic.

    BS term designed to undermine human feeling and attraction, imho.

    I was skinny, I was muscular, I was fat, now Im average and I don’t care if someone draws a muscled superhero in spandex, or someone likes my butt IRL, I don’t feel insulted over it or “objectified”, If Im being ….liked for something. Liked is the word.

    Someone likes someone for looks or smarts or good character, whatever.

     

    Someone likes to get naked, and complain about imaginary problems 99% of the time and Evil Rapists, Rapists everywhere, well, I have no thoughts about someones fantasy-problems. 😀

    -----------

    #75277
    BD
    BD
    Participant
    1146

    If I am a wallet, she is a vagina.

    Because in order to be able to think, you have to risk being offensive.

    #75281
    Darth Sin
    Darth Sin
    Participant
    576

    One does not simply expect women to be logically consistent.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.