Harvey Weinstein and Briffault's Law-A Theory

Topic by Hammerdown

Hammerdown

Home Forums MGTOW Central Harvey Weinstein and Briffault's Law-A Theory

This topic contains 11 replies, has 10 voices, and was last updated by Modern Day Warrior  Modern Day Warrior 2 years, 3 months ago.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #630838
    +7
    Hammerdown
    Hammerdown
    Participant
    528

    So this is a theory I have relating to the Harvey Weinstein scandal.

    Right, so we have this sleazebag Weinstein running around sexually abusing everyone, and all the big names keep it quiet, even thanking and praising him. I saw a video somewhere that compiled a whole s~~~load of acceptance speeches, and Weinstein was thanked more than God. They made jokes about him as well; 30 Rock even lampooned him being a creep.

    So now we have all the same actresses and actors scrambling over themselves to condemn him for being a piece of s~~~ when they were talking about how awesome he was last year. Why?

    Briffault’s law.

    Simply put, the benefit that he provided is no longer useful. Now that these celebrities are well established and can get by on their own without him, they’ll throw him to the wolves, making a grand gesture of condemning him in the process because it nets them social justice brownie points, which are almost as good as cash.

    We all knew Hollywood has had a casting couch type culture for ages. These women know it too, but are so determined to be famous that they’ll do literally anything for money. Now that towing the Weinstein party line is no longer beneficial, they throw him out like a used tampon. Look at what happened when Corey Feldman talked to that c~~~ Barbara Walters about how a high ranking executive sexually abused him and childhood friend Cory Haim. He was essentially told to shut up. Now everyone is pushing each other out of the way to tell anybody that will listen about how Harvey Weinstein grabbed a titty years ago. It’s why despite fully understanding that Weinstein is a piece of s~~~, I have minimal sympathy for them.

    Anyway, that’s my two cents. Your thoughts?

    #630862
    +2
    Awakened
    Awakened
    Participant
    35200

    Personally, I simply have No F~~~s to Give about Extremely Wealthy Hollywood Libtards that wouldn’t have the inclination to P~~~ on your average Man if he was on fire in front of them.

    No need to put such thought into the behavior of a bunch of Hollywood Scumbags.

    In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

    #630863
    +2
    Hammerdown
    Hammerdown
    Participant
    528

    Fair point. I wasn’t really thinking of this as representative of Hollywood as a representative of women as a whole. This shows how they are the same everywhere, regardless of how wealthy and famous they are.

    #630868
    +1
    Awakened
    Awakened
    Participant
    35200

    Nothing personal, I’m just so SICK of seeing his name, and I do my best to AVOID the Media, but it’s EVERYWHERE including at least a couple posts on here.

    Fair point. I wasn’t really thinking of this as representative of Hollywood as a representative of women as a whole. This shows how they are the same everywhere, regardless of how wealthy and famous they are.

    AWALT

    In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

    #630871
    +1
    Narrow road traveler
    narrow road traveler
    Participant
    1680

    This Weinstein f~~~ has gotten a lot of ink in the manosphere. He’s a s~~~bag hypocrite. The left is full of hypocrites. NFG

    The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. --Sun Tsu

    #630883
    +2
    Stealth
    Stealth
    Participant
    5327

    Just read Briffault’s Law for the first time. Holy s~~~. Here is one of the sub-points of the theory:

    “If a woman promises a man to continue her relationship with him in the future in exchange for a benefit received from him today, her promise becomes null and void as soon as the benefit is rendered.”

    "Once you’ve taken care of the basics, there’s very little in this world for which your life is worth deferring." -David Hansson. "It’s not when women are mean or nasty that anything is out of the ordinary. It’s when they are NICE to you that you have to be on high alert..." -Jackinov.

    #630884
    +3

    Anonymous
    7

    A better/simpler explanation is that his brother executed a Coup de grace.

    Harvey is f~~~ed, Bob looks like a Saint.
    Follow the money.

    IMO there are no victims here. The bitches KNEW f~~~ing KNEW that giving H. Wienstien a happy dick was a shortcut to fame and cash and prizes.
    So they painted their faces and got on their knees and backs.

    Stay away from bitches!!!!!

    #630922

    Anonymous
    5

    Question some young “Aspiring” actresses and watch how they’ll jokingly brag about how they use their bodies to get what they want. Watch the “You Go Girl!” approval and smiles from other women present.
    Sleeping their way to the top isn’t confined to Hollywood, or even to our time.

    It’s hard to imagine the quality and quantity of Vag that’s thrown at someone in this man’s position, HOWEVER, it doesn’t seem that other men in similar positions have garnered such an enormous amount of stories over such a long period of time.
    Where there’s this much smoke, there’s fire.
    I especially disliked the way he licked Hillary’s sphincter.
    I’ve no time for him or men who act like him.

    #630940
    +1
    743 roadmaster
    743 roadmaster
    Participant

    Started with Bill Clinton. When the feminist went all in to protect the man. It was then say the right things, give money to the right people. Get out of jail free card for life. Even now after all of this has blown sky high people are still trying to cover for the guy.
    Twitter had to face a boycott when it closed down peoples accounts dumping on Weinstein. Precious few upper level liberals have come out against him, the few that have were shamed into it.

    mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

    #630941
    +2
    Stargazer
    Stargazer
    Participant
    12505

    On the one hand, I understand where Turd Flinging Monkey was coming from saying that Weinstein just did what everyone has always known that every Hollywood producer does and that the people who traded him sex for fame are free to roast him now that they have already received the benefits that f~~~ing him granted for their own benefit.

    In any situation where the man made a “f~~~ me and I’ll make you famous” deal with a consenting adult, he is indeed blameless. It’s scummy but consensual exchanges of value between adults are 100 fine by me.

    What I do not respect are the people who pretended to enjoy organic fame and fortune and only now are crying foul. That’s a deal breaker just as sure as eating all the M&Ms then sending back the empty bag for a full refund would be.

    F~~~ those people. And since we will likely never know who traded sex for fame and who knew about it and who said nothing until now, I say f~~~ them all. Stop supporting the Rape Culture of Hollywood with your time, money and attention. It’s a f~~~ing pit of socialists and hypocrites anyway.

    #631035
    +1
    Sandals
    Sandals
    Participant
    4253

    Watching the left turn on each other.

    On the other hand, LV shooter is completely out the news, now that we know Paddok was probably an Eff Be Eye or See Eye Aye gun runner who sold those guns to ISIS before the deal went south.

    Nothing to see here.. move along. Pay attention to Harvy’s vag deals.

    #631330
    Modern Day Warrior
    Modern Day Warrior
    Participant
    499

    I recently read somewhere that the statute of limitations on sexual harassment has been expanded to 20 years or something. So, women can go back and see if they can profit from guys they f~~~ed back in the day. This is just one case, but there are many. (Cosby, O’Reilly, that Army General, etc.) You have to wonder, if they were “assaulted” 10 years ago, why not accuse him then?

    It could be Briffault’s corollary, but I’d have to know more about the case, and I don’t care enough to look into it.

    "One must put up barriers to keep oneself intact." - Neil Peart

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.