Guys. If the worst happens, I want you to know it has been fun.

[ForeverDoneParticipant 2928]

Wouldn’t worry too much. A former high ranking Russian General even stated a few days ago that the USA would wipe them off the map if they wanted to with little force due to the technological advances in the US military.. Plus, we have that secret attack satellite now. 🙂

[Anonymous 42]

They’re just diverting everyone’s attention away from whatever they’re doing, like covering up another economic collapse.

Things will only get worse and worse then the real changes begin, and we’re not invited…

[PuniShredderParticipant 2268]

Lolol that was funny! Almost as funny as the guy said we need UN approval like they are some kind of f~~~ing world government. Newsflash the United States funds the lions share of the UN. Just like NATO.

None of you f~~~ers know what the president knows do you? Hold your judgment.

And Russia???? Lolololol…give me a break. Seriously.

Be professional be polite but always have a plan to kill everyone you meet.

[Y_Participant 4591]

Joey Alfio wrote:

As an American I want to apologize to the Syrian people for our reckless behavior. This is not what we wanted.

Joey

The Syrians and the rest of the world do not blame everyday Americans for what your government and military do.

It is the same almost everywhere else in the world where the corruption takes over. Keep up the fight against the Deep State!

[IRuleMeParticipant]

[Old BuckParticipant 3596]

Trump is showing the world that there are lines, that if crossed, he will not hesitate to use the military. This action is completely directed at North Korea.

Syria just happens to be the easiest place to drop some old ordnance and to prove that point.

Bike is fueled up, ready to roll. Just waiting for the launch codes!

Don't chase tail. Turn yours around, walk away, and live free!

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

After the fun, it is interesting to look at the talking points from all sides on this attack.

Firstly how many modern US missiles got passed the old Russian anti-missile systems the Soviets are selling to it’s allies. Can’t trust either sides bluster.

Then there is the death toll. England, France and the U.S. are saying they are very happy with the “surgical” nature of this strike went. I tried to find the death toll but couldn’t find it yet.

Interestingly we avoided Russia’s modern anti-missile batteries. Don’t want any real test of systems should a real war break out.

Cost: Slap on the wrist by the U.N..

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Knights Templar RisingParticipant 5106]

Much like the entire Cold War, this is just their psychological posturing BS. It’s been going on since the day WWII ended, same old same old…

Sovereignty above all else.

[Anonymous 1]

How many more must die for the “UN-Holy” land?

I’m getting tired of hearing about the Mid-East, this has been going on my entire life.

All of the attention is “over there” all the money is being sent “over there.” Meanwhile, USA is rusting into ruin and no one seems to care or notice.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

BrainPilot wrote:

Russia wasn’t willing to start a nuclear war over Cuba

There was a Russian nuclear submarine that was going to strike. It came down to one guy on the sub who wasn’t even supposed to be there, but he had the authority to deny the launch while the other two guys in charge were going to do it. You can look this up, one Russian guy actually prevented dooms day.

Russia is our Allie. There will never be a war with Russia, period. Don’t believe the MSM which lies every single day. The 2016 election proves this. I stopped believing anything I hear on TV two years ago.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22525]

Well, the post information has been interesting. The Syrians claim that their Russia missiles shoot down a most of the missiles: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-04-14/syria-reportedly-destroyed-71-out-103-missiles-during-us-led-airstrikes

Given that Syria is not showing hundreds of dead civilians, I can guess there is some truth to their claim.

Just so you know. I am not against the concept of war. I believe war has its place and uses in civilization. But, I am against war where the U.S. are the aggressors, and the U.S. do not benefit from their actions, with such actions only benefiting other foreign parties.

But, war as an act of defense is justified.

I believe the U.S. going to war with Mexico would be welcome by much of the U.S. population. For the last half century Mexico has taken aggressive acts against the U.S. population and Mexico has been parasitic nature towards the U.S. population. During this time, Mexico has brought massive death and destruction in every way towards the U.S. population except through direct military act.

There is more than enough justification for the U.S. to go to war with Mexico, punish the Mexican populations, especially the richer classes, and take back what Mexico has stole from the U.S. population.

On a side note, it seems on the various forums I look at. Most U.S. citizens are not so much anti-war as being against war that does not directly benefit the U.S. population. And the argument can be made that a U.S. war on Mexico would benefit the U.S. population in a number of ways.

[It’sallbsParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

They’re just diverting everyone’s attention away from whatever they’re doing

100% correct.

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Faust For Science wrote:

U.S. going to war with Mexico would be welcome by much of the U.S. population.

It was very amusing to read the rest of your comment. I’m not agreeing or disagreeing but I have a better perspective seeing as I’ve lived my entire life in Texas and New Mexico.

Mexican Americans are the largest demographic after European Americans in America. They make up 30% of the entire population, or damn near. A war with Mexico is unthinkable bro. There is no way in hell it would fly.

The best we’re going to be able to do is secure the border and stop illegal immigration, or degrade the quality of life in America enough to de-incentivize them coming here. But a military action is off the table. What we should have done is to have prevented the act to reopen immigration in America back in the 70’s.

Hind-sight is 20/20 though. We should have done a lot of things but it’s WAY TOO LATE for the Euro-American demographic (sorry Alt-Right lol). America WILL become Amerexico within 15 years, maybe not in name or legislatively, but the population will be. There is no stopping it. Once Texas’ electorate goes ‘blue’ the Liberal Progressives will own the White House for a decade or two straight. THAT will be the end of America as a global power. We will descend in to a 2nd world status where the quality of life plummets and the population explodes into a ghetto state.

I may exaggerate but the Mexican Americans will take over. The only question is how long will they remain ignorant. Probably forever since they damn near swung Texas’ votes to Hillary. Never forget, Hitlery Clunton almost won. We’d probably already be at war with Russia if she had. And the Mexican-Texas border would be a joke.

[It’sallbsParticipant]

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22525]

Gravel Pit wrote:

I’m not agreeing or disagreeing but I have a better perspective seeing as I’ve lived my entire life in Texas and New Mexico.

I can take from your comment you have thought about it, but you cannot figure out how such a war would work.

Gravel Pit wrote:

Mexican Americans are the largest demographic after European Americans in America. They make up 30% of the entire population, or damn near. A war with Mexico is unthinkable bro. There is no way in hell it would fly.

That occurred to me. Any such war would make any Mexican, or those of Mexican descent, a potential terror suspect.

A war Mexico would likely leave part of the U.S. burning from guerrilla warfare.

But, those whom have been the victims of Mexico would likely still welcome a war with Mexico by the U.S.

The fact of the matter, the U.S. is in a cold war with Mexico and with the traitors in government and industry, Mexico is winning.

But, those in power in Mexico are using President Trump’s election, and the threat of the U.S. pulling out of NATFA, to ramp up the hatred the Mexican people have for the U.S. to eleven.

Every angle I look at less, I see the U.S. and Mexico eventually going to war. Ironically, likely quickest way for the U.S. to start a war with Mexico would be amnesty, with the Mexicans in the U.S. taken control of the U.S. government and using the U.S. military to “retake the homeland”.

The fact of the matter is domestically, President Trump is trying to stop the economic bleeding and help those whom voted for him. But, it might be to little and to late. With the American people outside of the coasts only have their guns and their bibles to cling to. At which point a class war will likely start. Any such war would quickly spill over in someway to Mexico. Even if it is Mexicans and others fleeing to Mexico to avoid the fighting.

Gravel Pit wrote:

Hind-sight is 20/20 though. We should have done a lot of things but it’s WAY TOO LATE for the Euro-American demographic (sorry Alt-Right lol).

Never discount tens of millions of armed people.

Gravel Pit wrote:

America WILL become Amerexico within 15 years, maybe not in name or legislatively, but the population will be. There is no stopping it.

And when many of the hispanics vote to purge the whites all hell will break loose, if that has not already happened by then.

The globalists have tried to start a race war between whites and blacks in the U.S. The globalist do not under that while most whites and blacks in the U.S. do not like each other, it is more of a sibling level of dislike. Most on each side just want to respect of their personal boundaries by the other side and live their lives in peace.

Even the most fanatical Nation of Islam member (black supremacists) or Neo-Nazi member (white supremacists) will tell you that they do not want a race war. They only want to be left alone.

Gravel Pit wrote:

I may exaggerate but the Mexican Americans will take over.

Never for get the illegal invaders and their children came to the U.S. to live off of the U.S. population, not to pay taxes. Any money they have they send back to their families in their home countries.

You need to take into account the hastening of the collapse of the tax revenue coming in and the collapse of the welfare state.

[Anonymous 14]

Faust For Science wrote:

I believe the U.S. going to war with Mexico would be welcome by much of the U.S. population.

I would damn sure welcome it. I’ve always wanted to be able to blame WWIII on the mexicans and jews.

Gravel Pit wrote:

Faust For Science wrote:

U.S. going to war with Mexico would be welcome by much of the U.S. population.

Mexican Americans are the largest demographic after European Americans in America. They make up 30% of the entire population, or damn near. A war with Mexico is unthinkable bro. There is no way in hell it would fly.

The best we’re going to be able to do is secure the border and stop illegal immigration, or degrade the quality of life in America enough to de-incentivize them coming here. But a military action is off the table.

Are you high? The Texas Rangers could probably defeat the mexican army and I am not talking about the police force but the ball team.

Leave it to me, I’ll have us a war with those sons of bitches in ten days and I’ll make it look like their fault!

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22525]

Anonymous wrote:

I would damn sure welcome it. I’ve always wanted to be able to blame WWIII on the mexicans and jews.

Do not forget the Chinese. If Mexico is threaten, China might come to Mexico’s defense given the amount of China shipping that goes through Mexico.

So, you will have a trifecta there.

[Anonymous 14]

Faust For Science wrote:

Dark Lord of the Sith wrote:

I would damn sure welcome it. I’ve always wanted to be able to blame WWIII on the mexicans and jews.

Do not forget the Chinese. If Mexico is threaten, China might come to Mexico’s defense given the amount of China shipping that goes through Mexico.

So, you will have a trifecta there.

I’d cut them a deal beforehand and let them have the mineral rights to the Southern half of mexico and possibly let their companies move in there to extract them. No population transfers though.

[MACHOParticipant]

This thread made me think of a joke..

2 guys talk about nuclear war⬇

.. What would you do right before they launch the missiles?

.. I would screw anything that moves! and You?

..I Wouldn’t Move! 😜

You must own a better Crystal ball than I

[SolidParticipant 7520]

Good luck brothers !! Hope nothing bad happens to you !!

[Author]

Posts