Groups of white knight street preachers invade target because of bathroom policy

[RennieParticipant]

Uh-oh, Pvt Pyle is on the loose again…

Despite how stupid those people look wandering around the store yelling and carrying on like some person who went nuts and thinks they’re GOD. I do feel that washroom use should be by whatever biology you were born with.

That includes no women in the men’s room.

[Frank V.Participant 2445]

Uintatherium wrote:

Most of the “conservative” arguments in this debate were invented by trans-exclusionary radical feminists.

The “conservatives” frequently talk about dickgirls who are going to rape women in bathrooms. Do they ever talk about transmen who go in the men’s room? Of course not.

Conservac~~~ery in action.

My Proposal: Cis men should use the men’s room. Both kinds of trannies should use the women’s room. If women feel uncomfortable then tough luck. We might change our minds if they stop voting and go back to the kitchen.

I really feel this is just a huge red herring.

A bunch of Tradcons who are also Religious Nutters are upset about gay marriage and a few are also upset about the “low moral standards” of young men opting out of Traditional Marriage.

So, pick a fight with trannys ! They are 1% of the population, even unpopular with the gays who throw them under the bus with alarming frequency.

It also takes attention away from what some of these White Knights are really doing. Because I would bet that for every tranny who was busted for a crime, there are ten, twenty or 100 of these Tradcon Preachers banging some beta’s daughter while telling the poor sap father to be a better mangina for his wife.

Think I am exaggerating ?

http://www.stopbaptistpredators.org/index.htm

http://www.snapnetwork.org/news/baptist/baptist_churches_vulnerable.htm

Or preachers committing fraud and enjoying young women.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/post-tribune/crime/ct-ptb-first-baptist-hammond-lawsuit-st-0506-20160505-story.html

These Religious Nutter Tradcons scream about homosexuals and trannys as being molesters, but they are often gay or molesters themselves.

If it was really not just a big diversion, it would not be a law protecting young women in bathrooms from trannys. It would be a law to keep these churches away from the schools and playgrounds where these children play.

I call BS on all this. Just a bunch of horny Tradcuck pastors making a smokescreen.

Frank V.

[The Moth Attracted to the FlameParticipant 2982]

Here’s what I say. If you have a penis, use the men’s restroom. If you have a vagina, use the women’s restroom.

I don’t understand why people make themselves shemales or men with vaginas, having male and female parts and making themselves special. That’s my issue.

[AttonParticipant]

No one actually care’s if someone is transgendered, none of this would be an issue if the trans person in question picked a gender and stuck with it. In fact how could anyone tell assuming a sex change op was done to even a half decent standard.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[narwhalParticipant]

These laws are stupid because they are essentially unenforceable. Agree with the others who say this really just a stupid morality fight, different sides trying to push their social agendas.

I have a slight concern about women appearing in the women’s bathroom, but it is rather small. I have a slightly greater concern for my kids going into public bathrooms, but only slightly greater.

The logical solution that should make everyone happy (but it won’t because it won’t push the social agenda either way) is to change building codes to require at least 1 single person bathroom on all new commercial construction or bathroom retrofits. This is already rather common as the ‘family’ one, and is needed for the non-standard sexes as well as adults with kids of the opposite sex.

Ok. Then do it.

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

narwhal wrote:

These laws are stupid because they are essentially unenforceable. Agree with the others who say this really just a stupid morality fight, different sides trying to push their social agendas.

I have a slight concern about women appearing in the women’s bathroom, but it is rather small. I have a slightly greater concern for my kids going into public bathrooms, but only slightly greater.

The logical solution that should make everyone happy (but it won’t because it won’t push the social agenda either way) is to change building codes to require at least 1 single person bathroom on all new commercial construction or bathroom retrofits. This is already rather common as the ‘family’ one, and is needed for the non-standard sexes as well as adults with kids of the opposite sex.

There is a Kmart near me (yes they still exist) that has a unisex bathroom that anyone could use but adding another bathroom could be expensive in places and might not always work.

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[Author]

Posts