Good Paying Jobs… Means Slavery

[SandalsParticipant 4253]

“Good paying jobs” is a euphemism for slavery.

How can humanity be so oblivious to what is staring them in the face?

What is a “good paying job”? A salary that allows you to make your house payment, pay all your bills, have a good standard of living, and enough for savings.

We don’t have this now. So politicians always talk of needing “good paying jobs”, that is, raising wages.

But if a good paying job allows you to make your house payment, then instead of rising wages, lower house payments would make your existing wage a “good paying job”.

It’s simple, either multiply income by two, or divide expenses in half.

But mortgages are fixed for 30 years, at over 100% interest. Banks are allowed to call it 3.5% interest, but it’s not.

How can we, collectively, as the smartest generation ever, not be able to do fourth grade math at the bank or the voting booth?

Technology decreases wages with efficiency. That’s the point. The whole point of economics is to eliminate jobs. You create a tool, so the tool can do the work, thereby freeing you from work with more free time.

When efficiency increases, the fiat money printers multiply the money supply in exact proportion (or more) to transfer that efficiency directly to themselves. It’s f~~~ing magic.

Whenever a politician says “good paying jobs” instead of “lowering rents and eliminating fiat money”, that politician knows exactly what he is saying.

We should all be sitting around drinking Mai-tais on the beach, working about five hours a week, based on our computer and robotic technology.

Every invention of efficiency ever created has been covertly co-opted by big brother to enrich themselves and deny the inventors and society of it’s efficient.

It is only because the recent inventions have been SO efficient, that government could not keep the lid on the bottle, and we lived relatively comfortably until the banker bailouts. If the banks and corporations had been allowed to fail, we would all probably be working about five hours a day now, there would be no third-world immigration, and the people who caused this mess would be broke and probably in jail.

Anytime someone talks about “jobs”, know they are talking about perpetuating your enslavement. You can either want “good paying jobs”, or “sound money”. It’s one or the other, but not both. When people say they want a good paying job, they are saying they want to be a slave, whether they know it or not. “Good paying jobs” is a euphemism for slavery.

[FunInTheSunParticipant 8283]

Personally, I’m not interested in having a job/career. I just want money. I want to invest in other people’s hard labor and entrepreneurial goals. Then, when the investments grow, the dividends will be spent on vacations on tropical, clear water, white sand beaches.

I’d rather get some amusement from watching people hustle to make money for me than to spend my savings on trade schools & universities so I can work 40 to 50 hours a week to please bosses and customers that don’t give a s~~~ about me.

My ultimate goal is freedom from the rat race. I want a pension from a retirement fund and a lot of rental properties managed by property managers. I don’t want to worry about getting a job or getting fired/laid off for the rest of my MGTOW life.

When I retire, I’ll be like this guy (but with 10 pairs of glasses):

"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

[bladeParticipant]

Got told i should get back into been a productive member of society . I went and got some long bits of timber from my mates place and a couple of my tools . I had calmed down by the time i got home . I was planning on been real f~~~in creative and productive by making a massive banner and sitting out front of this c~~~s office . F~~~ing lying c~~~ of a corruptive thing . Tolc me and the old man she has a f~~~in ghost haunting her . She thinks that ghost is a c~~~ i tell ya i can top hef ghosts s~~~ . Done my s~~~ for society and kicked in the teeth . F~~~ em they can pay my pension

THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

[AwakenedParticipant 35202]

Salary=Slavery

I SEE it every day as the Over Worked Over Stressed beaten Down 3oo pound plus Blue Pill 35 year old MANgina “MANager” is racing himself towards a major coronary episode and early death so his Land Whale Wife and Fat Kids can feed off his Life Insurance Policy.

He’s such a SUCCESS. I wish I could be like him. LOL

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[MGTOW_MikeParticipant 6253]

Sandals wrote:

But if a good paying job allows you to make your house payment, then instead of rising wages, lower house payments would make your existing wage a “good paying job”.

Brother, nice post.

I live here in Sydney, Australia. The second most expensive place to live on the planet, following Hong Kong. A simple one-bedroom apartment 40Km away from Sydney city, in the suburbs, is $460k. It was only 20 years ago that a cleaner, on a low income, can afford to get married, raise two children and pay off a 3 bedroom home, in the suburbs, within 10-15 years. These days even an engineer will struggle to pay of an entire house in their lifetime, let alone 10-15 years.

It is insanely ridiculous the way the housing market is so inflated. Going to university and working in an average office job WILL NOT CUT IT. You will be very lucky to find a 4 bedroom house in the outer suburbs of Sydney for under $1M. A suburb called “Castle Hill”, in the suburbs, has houses that average $1.6M (one point six). Using a mortgage calculator will reveal that taking out a loan and paying it off, will mean that you end up spending almost DOUBLE the capital (e.g. you buy a house for $1.6M and end up spending $2.9M (i.e. $1.6M towards the principal and $1.3M towards interest).

If someone wanted to live in the suburbs, they have NO CHOICE but to work like a slave for the rest of their lives. Assuming an engineer was earning $100K per year, it will take them 29 years to pay off a $1.6M property @ 4.7% interest, BEFORE TAX AND BEFORE ANY COSTS TOWARDS: UTILITIES, CAR REGISTRATION/INSURANCE & RUNNING COSTS, FOOD AND OTHER EXPENSES.

It was only 15 years ago when Castle Hill prices were around $550K (land and new house kit). That’s a 3x fold increase over these 15 years (to a now inflated price of $1.6M).

A tranquil mind is neither happy nor sad, it is uninfluenced by external conditions.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22539]

I believe it should be mandatory that everyone whom is getting an office job should see the film, Officespace, at least once before entering the office environment.

I believe that would help change the dynamic some.

[MGTOW_MikeParticipant 6253]

Faust For Science wrote:

I believe it should be mandatory that everyone whom is getting an office job should see the film, Officespace, at least once before entering the office environment.

I believe that would help change the dynamic some.

Love that movie! Especially Milton.

A tranquil mind is neither happy nor sad, it is uninfluenced by external conditions.

[bstoffParticipant 4867]

Office Space is also a good reference for anyone getting into e relations~~~.

[SandalsParticipant 4253]

FunInTheSun wrote:

Personally, I’m not interested in having a job/career. I just want money. I want to invest in other people’s hard labor and entrepreneurial goals. Then, when the investments grow, the dividends will be spent on vacations on tropical, clear water, white sand beaches.

Do you just buy property for rentals? Or do you invest in stocks and bonds?

FunInTheSun wrote:

When I retire, I’ll be like this guy (but with 10 pairs of glasses):

I have seen this Twilight Zone. The glasses guy loved to read. And the show producers made him a goof-ball. He would shirk work at the bank to read, which made no sense. The women in the episode, at the bank, and his wife, would make fun of him for wanting to read so much. His wife defaced his classics books. He loved reading philosophy and the classics and educating himself, and the shows producers made sure the audience knew women would scorn you for wanting to be intelligent and a good reader, instead of paying attention to their t~~~. It was really weird. It made no sense to me.

McCarthy was 100% right about Hollywood.

[Author]

Posts