Women, in general, value relations~~~s with men who are jerks or are dysfunctional in their societies because these men give them an emotional roller coaster ride. They value these men more than the good men they claim they want: the men who will treat them with respect, try to accommodate their wishes in order to AVOID DRAMA, and will provide them with financial stability…as well as their children.
The good man makes the mistake of avoiding drama for his sake instead of creating drama for her sake. He’ll get more loyalty out of the woman if he creates chaos instead of trying to create peace. No good man can win in this situation! He will create a bratty bitch who doesn’t get the vaginal tingles the “bad boys” give her. If a series of romantic relations~~~s fail, despite honest efforts and good intentions, many good men will give up their quest to please women in order to maintain their own sanity.
I used to wonder why some women choose to be with men who are alcoholics, drug addicts, gang members, cult leaders, con-artists, and evil dictators. Then I realized how much they value drama and excitement. They crave it like heroin! And like heroin addicts, it doesn’t matter what the consequences are as long as they can get a certain feeling. These women are willing to destroy good relationships with people that love them in order to feed their addiction—-the crazy situations that come with a man that doesn’t love them or give a damn about their well-being. You can carefully point out all this information to them, and give them better options, yet they’ll say, “I know (he’s f~~~ed up)…but I love him.” A man that will make her laugh, cry, and scream is more valuable to her than a man who is reliable, loyal, caring, pays the rent, loves children, and tries his best to pacify her negative emotions.
So, basically, a man has to be a combination if he wants a long-term relations~~~ with a woman: a good man so the bills can get paid, and a bad boy so he can get laid. He has to put up this act for a lifetime to gain a woman’s respect, loyalty, and good behavior. Ironically, if he cares too much about his woman and is afraid of losing the benefits of his relations~~~ with her, he’s more likely to lose her. A rational-minded man thinks he can win loyalty by trying to please a woman. He is taught that mutually beneficial relationships work on a quid pro quo basis. That’s okay for friendships and business relationships, but not for girlfriends and wives! Their role is to serve a dominant man. But feminism tells them they shouldn’t do that. Instead, they must strive for liberation: climbing the corporate ladder and competing with men in all aspects of life. Then, when these women get older, they realize that they can’t get a man with good character traits to come home to them after a hard day at work—because what they have to offer is a liberated, bossy, demanding attitude instead of a hot meal. Who wants to come home to a boss after dealing with a boss all day? A weak man. The kind of man that women don’t respect and will cheat on.
A nice guy or even an assertive guy who demands a reasonable, stable, honest, long-term relationship cannot win. He has no idea how deep the rabbit hole of a woman’s psyche goes. Suppose a man is a computer programmer for eight hours a day. He comes home from work, psychologically tired from office politics, to a wife that has to be “debugged” before she’ll function properly. He may have to work “overtime” to get some sort of usefulness out of her or he may give up and spend a few hours with his buddies at a nudie bar.
Women don’t realize that a man doesn’t want to come home from work to work on their insanity. They want a woman with a cool head to give them hot “head”…and a clean household AND a good meal. A young girl raised to be a feminist will not do this for her man when she becomes ripe for marriage. And many of her kind will be amused to see their men frustrated…only to wonder why they end up in their 50s—with a house full of pets—watching reruns of Sex and the City. No man worth his weight in gold wants to date them at that stage in their lives. These men have better options. But the talk shows and magazine articles will tell these spinsters that their character traits are not appreciated—to stroke their egos—instead of telling them to change their bitchy attitudes in order to accommodate good men.
"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)
FunInTheSun 1 year, 11 months ago.
