Gold digging paradox ?

[miawmiawSpectator 81]

Hello everyone,

We often hear that women make 3/4 money of the total money men make (in US) , but the 1/4 difference is mostly composed of a minority of ultra successful hard working men and is not a big difference. Hillary Clinton even wants to reduce the gap by more female privilege.

My point is that money possession is more and more and shifting to the female side, ask many college graduates and you realize females find jobs easier, ask families of the middle class and you will see sisters having better jobs than their brothers, go to big companies and see who lands most management and office jobs…that’s the tendency in so many countries not just North America. So most females will find themselves with as much or more money than the men around them…
if they are gold diggers they will have to compete with 10000 female for each rich man, or with 100 females for a man that makes slightly more than them…Something is changing i think !

A worse scenaro is when you have women spending their money on useless things then parasitizing on men that make less than them to buy them things !!

Thank you for thoughts anyway

[Anonymous 42]

Who cares? They can have all the money and loose their souls!

How much is a good man worth that’s not for sale at any price?

How much does happiness cost?

The gluttons can have it all, JUST NOT ME! EVER!

[Anonymous 25]

It’s called communism.

The reason it collapses is because if you remove the incentive for people to work hard by equalising pay, people think, why should I work hard or train for a good job.

Ultimately the system collapses in on itself as it results in a race to the bottom and wealth generation grinds to a halt.

[Blue SkiesParticipant 15665]

as women make more money, they will have less suitable partners. this is known as hypergamy

i don’t care. i’m a MGHOW.

MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.

[AntipathyParticipant 4901]

Women can have whatever job they want. As i stated earlier, it’s meaningless in the big picture, because in the end, they aren’t willing to do a lot of what men do, and in some instances, they aren’t able bodied enough. Let them get high paying chair warming jobs. What women do is irrelevant to me, because i am a man going my own way, i do not seek to counter their actions, i just want to avoid them as much as possible.

This is not directed at you miaw, but we do tend to get threads from time to time, saying we as men had better obtain a degree, or obtain unique skills because women will take over the job market etc. While i appreciate the wisdom in that, i also think it can be counterproductive posting.

A lot of MGTOW’s are doing the best they know how currently, and i’m not here to worry about what females are up to. Herbivore guys in Japan certainly aren’t the wealthy class where they are, infact many of them have multiple roomates, or live at home. However they have sure become a big factor to the entire nation.

[The Laughing ManParticipant 1020]

The pay gap is a myth, those numbers were dirived by looking at all working men/women across all types jobs (fast food to rocket science).

Feminist and SJW types keep perpetuation this becuase they lack any basic cognitive abilities.

I thought what I'd do was I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes...or should I?

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Sorry, long post coming, I like this subject.

What happened once, not long ago, women and men worked together tending fields because they were farmers.

Then the industrial revolution occurred and jobs became plenty and with good pay in factories. While some women went to work, most thought that they could have more leisure time with the goods coming from Industry, made by the soul sucking drudgery and danger most industrial jobs worked by men who, instead of spending all day at home tending the farm, now went to work and spent 10-16 hours a day at work. There were no unions back then.

Women and men began to move apart.

If you read femalist lesbian literature in the late 18th century and early 19th century you will see that going their own way without hindarence…ie Husband and kids.

Feminism was the fruit of these early thinkers and eventually, during the sexual revolution of the 1960’s, technology became so advanced in Industry that a job for a man wasn’t so terrible or dangerous. Union rules required a 40 hour work week and 5 day work week.

The feminists got it into their heads that if women only worked instead of men, women would have their own way to gtow and we still see the effects of this conclusion. They wouldn’t have to deal with some guy they got bored of 10 years ago.

Women got the vote and we became a gynocracy. Women outnumber men in this country and many men’s ability to get laid that night relies on his casting a vote dictated to him by his wife.

That’s why once the ancient sign of success was a successful farm, only the landed could vote was over, women got the franchise within a few years.

Women continue the script. It’s just that the feminists got their math wrong.

Women had it right for eons but when they organized they lost the script.

My sister sent her daughter to law school for two insurances. Both to insure that she doesn’t need a man.

But this newly created power to tell the world to go f~~~ it self and go their own way cuts across both sexes.

Men have just begun to realize the freedom that has been handed to them on a silver platter.

Like women, men who marry for love, try their hardest, give of themselves are no longer secure in relations with the opposite sex. They face a likely chance their children will hate them for simply p~~~ing off mom.

So, don’t get married, don’t have children and avoid spending money on women allows you to have the world at your feet.

Here’s the math that feminists go wrong: Women now work two jobs, one at work and the other at home. Ain’t no kitchen bitches here right? Now women had to f~~~ for money (be a gold digger) or be a cubical roach.

Now you are the king of your world…going which ever way you choose.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22545]

Anonymous wrote:

The reason it collapses is because if you remove the incentive for people to work hard by equalising pay, people think, why should I work hard or train for a good job.

MGTOW is the relationship part of the equation. In that there is no point to attempt a relationship that is all risk and no reward.

Minimalism is the economic side of the equation. To live as cheaply, though as well as possible to not aid the system that harms us men.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

My sister sent her daughter to law school for two insurances. Both to insure that she doesn’t need a man.
But this newly created power to tell the world to go f~~~ it self and go their own way cuts across both sexes.

Yeah, the women that are smart enough to out-earn most men don’t want to “marry down” because if they got divorced she might have to pay some of her hard earned money to a piece of s~~~ man that didn’t work as hard as she did. Marriage is a bad contract for her to sign.

Isn’t it funny how clearly they understand the logic when they might get stuck with the bill….

Order the good wine

[TuneoutParticipant]

Men have always been better savers/investors than women

Whatever they earn just goes right on their credit card

and drives up overall consumer debt,since they are the

major consumers in our society.

So it’s little wonder that even the most successful

female still needs a man.

Lifes a bitch,but you don't have to marry one!

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

None of the gold digging leeches have bothered to connects the dots and realize that wealth is not measured by how much you make, but by how much you save!

[narwhalParticipant]

TaxGuy wrote:

Puffin Stuff wrote:

My sister sent her daughter to law school for two insurances. Both to insure that she doesn’t need a man.
But this newly created power to tell the world to go f~~~ it self and go their own way cuts across both sexes.

Yeah, the women that are smart enough to out-earn most men don’t want to “marry down” because if they got divorced she might have to pay some of her hard earned money to a piece of s~~~ man that didn’t work as hard as she did. Marriage is a bad contract for her to sign.

Isn’t it funny how clearly they understand the logic when they might get stuck with the bill….

I disagree with this. I don’t think women consider the bill much at all, just a matter of marrying up in one form or another. I’ve never seen stats on it, but I would bet in the rare cases that a woman makes significantly more then her husband, the husband is most likely in a profession she can brag about to her friends. He’s a police officer, fireman, paramedic, military…all things that make her look good to her friends and justify her decision to marry down.

Now, there are women who are somewhat forced to marry down because they lack much physical appeal and therefor have to settle for a boy toy of sorts.

Ok. Then do it.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

I’ve never seen a woman marry down. Never ever.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

Interesting thread.
Part 1. Women hire other women.
Debate.org conducted a poll asking “Are white males unfairly discriminated against?” 89% answered yes. 11% answered no.
In my opinion, reverse discrimination does indeed exist. It doesn’t surprise me that women are earning more. There are work arounds- work for yourself for example.

Part 2. Affluent ladies are not necessarily happy ladies. How many content ladies do you know? Every lady I’ve ever known has wanted more. Men tend to be more content with what they have

Part 3. Affluent ladies don’t marry down. Money is important to them and the big house and fancy cars also. Forget love.

Part 4. It doesn’t matter how much money a lady earns. She will almost always spend more than she makes- after all she will die without those 100 pairs of shoes. Men actually save money.

[Buller100Participant 2189]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

I’ve never seen a woman marry down. Never ever.

Nor have I , I am almost 60 and never seen it I know a women who made lots of money and stayed married, her and her husband adopt kids so there is like a common goal.

I have had Manginas and Unicorn hunters tell me not all marry up, but why have I never seen one ? I would hazard I have known maybe 50 marriages not one.

Also I know about 8 women who left their husbands all got a nice pay off and went on the carousel.

The terms and acronyms here are correct, I would like to oppose find a counter argument , but there is not one there not a grain to argue with.

They marry up, always.. Look at Jerry Hall with Rupert Murdoch

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

miawmiaw wrote:

We often hear that women make 3/4 money of the total money men make (in US) , but the 1/4 difference is mostly composed of a minority of ultra successful hard working men and is not a big difference. Hillary Clinton even wants to reduce the gap by more female privilege.

The money will be worthless soon enough anyways. Hitlery C~~~on will see to that as well.

Twenty trillion dollars in debt and counting.

if they are gold diggers they will have to compete with 10000 female for each rich man, or with 100 females for a man that makes slightly more than them…

But that is not our problem.

And speaking as a man who makes more money than any of the women I meet, I always do my damnedest to make sure none of them ever find out. And I know I am not alone in this. Stealth Wealth is the only way to go.

[Silverstone the SecondParticipant]

It will suck for them. Most men will be non existent to them because they make less money than them. Who cares? Oh no, these hysterical c~~~s who are moody and impossible to please are unhappy? What else is new?

Women are unhappy, and they will stay that way. Not my f~~~ing problem, I’m not responsible for anyone’s happiness.

Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

miawmiaw wrote:

A worse scenaro is when you have women spending their money on useless things

That would be good news if I worked in Precious Moments factory.
Joking here because my last wife had about 10Ks worth of that s~~~ and her douche son traded it all when she was moving. He traded it for drugs. Imagine a drug dealing c~~~ who valued porcelain crap as much as the cost of crack. I can’t even type it without laughing myself to death. She was so p~~~ed when she open this huge box full of little empty boxes that had those ugly ass figurines in them. That was the only good thing that lil f~~~er ever did for me.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Author]

Posts