Global Warming will Turn Women into Prostitutes

[peterfaParticipant 833]

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-113hconres36ih/html/BILLS-113hconres36ih.htm

 

Whereas women will disproportionately face harmful impacts from climate change,

particularly in poor and developing nations where women regularly assume

increased responsibility for growing the family’s food and collecting

water, fuel, and other resources;

 

Whereas food insecure women with limited socioeconomic resources may be

vulnerable to situations such as sex work, transactional sex, and early

marriage that put them at risk for HIV, STIs, unplanned pregnancy, and

poor reproductive health;

 

Whereas the ability of women to adapt to climate change is constrained by a lack

of economic freedoms, property and inheritance rights, as well as access

to financial resources, education, family planning and reproductive

health, and new tools, equipment, and technology;

Whereas, despite a unique capacity and knowledge to promote and provide for

adaptation to climate change, women often have insufficient resources to

undertake such adaptation;

Whereas women are shown to have a multiplier effect by using their income and

resources, when given the necessary tools, to increase the well being of

their children and families, and thus play a critical role in reducing

food insecurity, poverty, and socioeconomic effects of climate change;

and…

So… women need our help so they don’t turn into whores. It’s our fault because we made the cars. They don’t have access to the resources they need to take care of themselves and their children. The solution, obviously, is to give them stuff, but that won’t be available in a disaster situation. Despite that, they are better at adapting. They are apparently better at pooling resources and such.

Someone need to tell this woman that it’s hard work to plow a field and it’s dangerous to hunt. Not only that but even gathering is hard work.

[OasidParticipant 116]

Sounds like a fun place to live….. yay climate change!

May the Force Be With You

[RoyDalParticipant]

I don’t think I’ll get married again. I’ll just find a woman I don’t like and give her a house.
– Lewis Grizzard

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[OasidParticipant 116]

Does this apply?

I like how the guy starts all prim and proper and in the end is disheveled and doesn’t give a s~~~ anymore. I can relate! 15-30 I watched my looks, made sure I was ready for the one and to get married. Fast forward to today, tattoo’s, shaved head, ripped jeans, spending my money and time on my hobbies, borderline rude to most women (I will still hold the door open for the elderly women, I think in their time they actually had souls). But other than the cool gadgets I’m completely out of society and proud.

May the Force Be With You

[peterfaParticipant 833]

There’s more to it than that. You missed the contradiction: look, it’ll either suck for women because it hits them harder or women will handle it because they pool resources; where do those resources come from? Men? Why the f~~~ do we care about this anyways? If civilization fails, it’s every man for himself. How many manginas are going to take on the burden? Even they won’t do it. If they tried they’d drop dead.

The implication is, “Please save us.”

Still, if they’re going to do it by prostitution then fine, but men still have to pay. In the end, men will be paying according to them. The question is how honorable is it that we do it.

If civilization fails, there will be no government to enforce the crazy gynocentric laws. I’d be happy for that. It would restore order and law, ironically. Nature would discipline the narcissism and people would come back to live once again.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

peterfa wrote:

So… women need our help so they don’t turn into whores.

LOL!!! What a GREAT find that article is.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

peterfa wrote:

So… women need our help so they don’t turn into whores.

A little late for that, isn’t it?  By a million years or so.  I mean never mind global warming, evolution got there first.

When I read that article I replaced every instance of “whereas” with “Why should I care”:

Why should I care if women will disproportionately face harmful impacts from climate change?…
Why should I care if food insecure women with limited socioeconomic resources may be vulnerable to situations such as sex work?…
Why should I care if the ability of women to adapt to climate change is constrained?…
Etc.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Oh look an open admission that women can’t cope with the world, will never survive without men and should best retreat to the kitchen.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[peterfaParticipant 833]

Oh, that’s what they meant by, “Pooling and multiplying resources.”

[Author]

Posts