Gillette losing Billions.

[SwimcatParticipant 3589]

Procter and Gamble’s Gillette brand just wrote down 8 billion dollars of loses. You think their feminazi commercial might have had anything to do with it?
https://pjmedia.com/trending/gillette-loses-billions-by-shaming-men/

[ResidentEvil7Participant 9544]

It’s kind of hard to feel sorry for them considering they insulted men by a man-hating young feminist. If I were in charge I would get rid of that feminist women who coasted the company that much money.

https://themanszone.webs.com/

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22510]

It wasn’t just one commercial. This was a campaign to shame men.

They even had one with a guy teaching his tranny girl thinking shes a boy, how to shave.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[EGParticipant 1852]

#GetWokeGoBroke

[EGParticipant 1852]

Let it not be forgotten that Gillette is owned by Proctor&Gamble. Schick was always my preferred shave anyway so Gillette didn’t lose a customer in me. But since this hate campaign against humans like myself I’ve gone through my shopping list and purged any brands owned by P&G, and replaced those products with alternative brands or generics. It’s an easy change to make and my consumer dollars will add up over the remainder of my life. This is how you do it.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

I accidentally bought a small Dawn soap bottle. Thats the only P&G product Ive bought this year. Time to double down and keep buying the other brands. Persil for laundry. Fantastik for disinfectant spray. Kroger brand razors.

[QuellParticipant 2538]

For some reason businesses don’t seem to realize that becoming political is a recipe for financial disaster.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

I wish I could upload photo of sidewalk sign I see daily, “Female Run Business” it states…

I always wanted to ask them, why not just put on there, “White Female Run Business” ?
See how well that goes, same difference. Stupid caunts

[FunInTheSunParticipant 8283]

“Gillette’s CEO and president, Gary Coombe, says that angering some consumers with its #metoo campaign was a “price worth paying” if it meant the brand could increase its relevance among younger consumers and turn around its falling market share…”

A responsible corporate board of directors would immediately FIRE Gary Coombe for making a stupid ass statement like that. They are supposed to represent shareholders, and no shareholder wants to see an 8 BILLION DOLLAR LOSS! If I was the new CEO of Gillette, I’d immediately pay penance by featuring Andrew Dice Clay in the TV commercials. Badda boom, badda bing.

By the way: I was in the store today, and I saw a man buying a pack of Gillette razors. I felt like saying, “Dude, didn’t you get the message?”

High five to all who boycotted! Personally, I’ve used Bic razors for a long time, so I wasn’t missing anything.

"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

[AutoliteParticipant]

EG wrote:

Let it not be forgotten that Gillette is owned by Proctor&Gamble. Schick was always my preferred shave anyway so Gillette didn’t lose a customer in me. But since this hate campaign against humans like myself I’ve gone through my shopping list and purged any brands owned by P&G, and replaced those products with alternative brands or generics. It’s an easy change to make and my consumer dollars will add up over the remainder of my life. This is how you do it.

Be sure to contact P&G and let them know. And tell them why…

[AutoliteParticipant]

FunInTheSun wrote:

“Gillette’s CEO and president, Gary Coombe, says that angering some consumers with its #metoo campaign was a “price worth paying” if it meant the brand could increase its relevance among younger consumers and turn around its falling market share…”

A responsible corporate board of directors would immediately FIRE Gary Coombe for making a stupid ass statement like that. They are supposed to represent shareholders, and no shareholder wants to see an 8 BILLION DOLLAR LOSS! If I was the new CEO of Gillette, I’d immediately pay penance by featuring Andrew Dice Clay in the TV commercials. Badda boom, badda bing.

I can’t believe the CEO even said this! He told the shareholders that we obliterated our market share to see if the brand could do a “turn around”?!?

[bstoffParticipant 4863]

“turnaround” and go backwards

[SwimcatParticipant 3589]

I hate to see P&G suffer. I live in Cincinnati. They have done so much for our city and I have many friends who work there or are retired from P&G, but that campaign was just inexcusable. Procter and Gamble is a strange company. They are located in the heartland of America yet they recruit most their employees from the Ivy League schools in New England. These transplants have an arrogant air superiority to them. They really look down their nose at Midwest people. With those New Englanders comes a climate of East coast politically correct liberalism. So this whole mess is not that surprising.

[StealthParticipant 5330]

I just looked up PG stock to confirm the report, and it has exploded upward this year (really, since May ‘18) to an all-time high, outdoing the s&p 500.

"Once you’ve taken care of the basics, there’s very little in this world for which your life is worth deferring." -David Hansson. "It’s not when women are mean or nasty that anything is out of the ordinary. It’s when they are NICE to you that you have to be on high alert..." -Jackinov.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

The whole stock market is a charade on stilts, a big lie. Why is any stock UP for the year? Why is any stock UP for the last 5 years? What is different in our nation? People try and say that the crypto market is based on speculative VALUE, ummm how is that any different from the regular MANIPULATED market?

P&G stock was $90 in January this year (when all those ads happened) and now their stock is at $120. How is that possible with a 8 billion dollar loss?

Pardon my Millennial, 33 year old naivety but Im not putting ONE RED PENNY in this inflated and psychotic Wall St. game whether its futures, options, stocks, 401K, CDs, Treasury Bonds or whatever SCAM they come up with.

Im dollar cost averaging my disposable income into crypto and living off canned beans, driving a cheap Taiwanese scooter to maximize savings on insurance and gasoline. ITS COMING! The whole fvcking LIE is DUE for collection. I need to buy a Pick Up truck but I refuse to in this economic sh!tshow. If you like Gold and Guns, GREAT — I cant afford those luxuries; I make $29K a year and was stripped on my right to purchase a weapon.

A new truck is not worth $30,000+ off the dealer lot. FVCK THAT!!! I will wait until the Auto Loan industry and distributors go bust on BAD DEBT and buy a new truck for half that price in 5 years.

[StealthParticipant 5330]

Gravel Pit wrote:

The whole stock market is a charade on stilts, a big lie. Why is any stock UP for the year? Why is any stock UP for the last 5 years? What is different in our nation? People try and say that the crypto market is based on speculative VALUE, ummm how is that any different from the regular MANIPULATED market?
P&G stock was $90 in January this year (when all those ads happened) and now their stock is at $120. How is that possible with a 8 billion dollar loss?
Pardon my Millennial, 33 year old naivety but Im not putting ONE RED PENNY in this inflated and psychotic Wall St. game whether its futures, options, stocks, 401K, CDs, Treasury Bonds or whatever SCAM they come up with.
Im dollar cost averaging my disposable income into crypto and living off canned beans, driving a cheap Taiwanese scooter to maximize savings on insurance and gasoline. ITS COMING! The whole fvcking LIE is DUE for collection. I need to buy a Pick Up truck but I refuse to in this economic sh!tshow. If you like Gold and Guns, GREAT — I cant afford those luxuries; I make $29K a year and was stripped on my right to purchase a weapon.
A new truck is not worth $30,000+ off the dealer lot. FVCK THAT!!! I will wait until the Auto Loan industry and distributors go bust on BAD DEBT and buy a new truck for half that price in 5 years.

This might be for another discussion, but if the stock market seems too unpredictable for you, speculating in crypto is possibly not something to be doing. If I were you I’d check out “The Boglehead’s Guide to Investing” for a decent intro on investing.

"Once you’ve taken care of the basics, there’s very little in this world for which your life is worth deferring." -David Hansson. "It’s not when women are mean or nasty that anything is out of the ordinary. It’s when they are NICE to you that you have to be on high alert..." -Jackinov.

[Branched offParticipant 10926]

Oh dear Stealth, well done for fact checking it. I was getting all pleased. We will have to wait for them to get what they deserve it seems.

Crypto seems a bit risky to me. Gold on the other hand must come good soon. I have accrued for a decade now and some day patience must pay off. Its rising but it is still to early to know if this is the big one.

A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own

[RumpoleParticipant 994]

Can anybody be held accountable for not fulfilling their fiduciary responsibilities to the stockholders?

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

ResidentEvil7 wrote:

It’s kind of hard to feel sorry for them considering they insulted men by a man-hating young feminist.

Meanwhile it’s kind of amusing seeing them try to weasel word their way out of it. Excuses excuses excuses.

And, like everyone else, they’re blaming their own failure on “millennials”.

Gravel Pit wrote:

Time to double down and keep buying the other brands. Persil for laundry. Fantastik for disinfectant spray. Kroger brand razors.

Buying brands is just paying extra for a label. I only buy the store “brands” or generics.

Quell wrote:

For some reason businesses don’t seem to realize that becoming political is a recipe for financial disaster.

Oh they realize it all right. They just don’t care. You see these decisions aren’t being made by the businesses. They’re being made by a small number of executives, almost always feminists “music composition majors”, hired by those companies for the sole purpose of filling some bullsh​it quota. And since these quota hires never actually earned their positions, and they know they are unfireable, they don’t value their positions or the companies that hired them. So they have no problem with dirving those companies into bankruptcy to pushing their bullsh​it politics.

And our tax laws have left shareholders so unbelievable cucked that they can’t do anything about it.

For those same reasons, P&G are more likely to spin off the Gillette brand than ever admit they fu​cked up.

FunInTheSun wrote:

By the way: I was in the store today, and I saw a man buying a pack of Gillette razors. I felt like saying, “Dude, didn’t you get the message?”

You should have.

Or just called him whipped. “Naw man. Why would you buy that sh​it? Why would you do that to yourself?”

A LOT of business relies on word of mouth (advertisers hate that). Be that mouth.

Stealth wrote:

I just looked up PG stock to confirm the report, and it has exploded upward this year (really, since May ‘18) to an all-time high, outdoing the s&p 500.

Stock price has very very little to do with earnings or losses, again because shareholders have been so badly cucked. Also consider that Gillette is only a small part (and getting smaller) of the whole P&G empire. Their other brands are doing very well.

But that begs the question: “If P&G is doing so well that their other brands covered their Gillette losses so they only had to write down $8 billion, how much higher must their actual losses from just Gillette have been?”

Rumpole wrote:

Can anybody be held accountable for not fulfilling their fiduciary responsibilities to the stockholders?

No. Shareholders, especially small shareholders, are utterly cucked. Most of them are isolated from any control over their own money by mutual fund managers and their ilk, who are usually also very feminized.

[Branched offParticipant 10926]

There is a reckoning coming.

Gordon Brown cooked up a plan to save the West from the sub prime debt crisis by making the governments take on the debt. To save us from bad debt more debt was needed (the man was a genius you see). Bush bought in and so did the EU. Brown was, after all, very experienced -he had been chancellor of the UK for longer than just about anyone else in office had been around and he had successfully taken the UK from being in the black to being deep in debt so he clearly knew what he was doing. So they propped up all the zombie businesses and banks with really cheap debt (they could afford to make it cheap debt because they were not lending real money just fiat money made from the magic money tree). They then tried their best to inflate the world economies out of the new bigger debt bubble. The genius thing was it didn’t matter how crap the companies were because cheap debt would keep all but the very worst afloat whatever. They could even appoint female bosses and p~~~ all their customers off and really it would be OK and take on larger obligations to their staff like more pension contributions. You see Brown knew the secret of the magic socialist money tree. The stock markets loved the magic money tree and climbed to all time highs on amazingly high P/E ratios.

Like I say there is a reckoning coming.

A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own

[Author]

Posts