Ghosting at an all time high

[ScandinavianParticipant 590]

“To find a mate, college-educated women should consider dating working-class men.

“In the future, we’re going to see more of what I call ‘mixed collar’ marriages,” Birger says.”

So NOT going to happen. Because hypergamy.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

We already do see a lot of “mixed collar” marriage. One way only.

We will never see white collar female – blue collar male marriages in any number, though. Not just because of hypergamy, but because what man, of any education or employment level, wants to deal with the hassle of an “educated” woman?

A degree in “gender studies” is about as attractive as a full blown case of eyeball herpes.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

sidecar wrote:

A degree in “gender studies” is about as attractive as a full blown case of eyeball herpes.

Lol, so true man. Whenever I’m talking to a girl and the topic of education/work comes up, I pretty much just cringe unless they got a teaching degree or a nursing degree, as pretty much every other degree women chase after means they have a lot of debt and a low income.

Whats the point in dating some dumbass with a liberal arts degree and a s~~~ty job…they just want you to pay their debts while championing “equality’ and feminism. Yeah…no thanks, I’m good with that.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Beer wrote:

Whenever I’m talking to a girl and the topic of education/work comes up, I pretty much just cringe unless they got a teaching degree or a nursing degree, as pretty much every other degree women chase after means they have a lot of debt and a low income.

I find the best are usually the ones with legitimate degrees in STEM who are actually passionately into their field. All three of them.

I’ll have to take your word about the teaching degrees, but with reservation. The teachers I remember were all boring government job worker drones. I couldn’t stand most of them in the classroom growing up, and I can’t imagine tolerating any of them in the bedroom as an adult.

[tripvanParticipant 193]

Of course if men are unavailable to marry, it’s the men’s fault for choosing to be unavailable. Unbelievable.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

What I write here below I see is generally true, and maybe someone can point to exceptions, but I say such would be true:

I consider this next point debatable as to why it is so, but I consider it valid (for the most part): Women will sit around passively and do nothing and project out, expecting the world to change. So long as there are men desperate enough, they will listen and do all the initiating and do things, and allow themselves to be judged. It works really well from a negotiation standpoint, which is likely a big reason why things are how they are. Now, if men are willing to walk away, don’t expect women to follow suit and make any changes. They will still just sit around complaining about how there are a lack of men. A woman who took care of herself, and was proactive, could find herself a good man. With them, they don’t do that, because they would rather be passive.

As I see it, what you have women doing is try to make themselves items that attract men, and have the men to do all the work (courting) to win their favor. They see themselves as things to be pursued and bought by men. They work on being and the men do all the doing. In short, they end up acting as landlords, and men are renters. They get favors this way. Society pushes it along also.

I would say, one reason why I don’t see MGTOW as a tool to try to change the world, and get women to be different, is that they aren’t going to respond. They will still sit there, not make any changes, and complain there aren’t enough good men out there.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[Tiga KParticipant 1693]

@ Richard

Something has to change. Marriage is dying and it will either adapt or finally die. I can’t predict what will happen but the times they are a changing.

[Lee from DGMParticipant 21]

Calhoun’s Mice Utopia experiments point the way, and none of it is good.

Basically MGTOW is where ”the beautiful ones” are, The single male mice eat well, look good, healthy, live long, and have zero interest in mating ever.

This is the stage before the colony reaches permanent decline and complete and utter extinction to -0- population.

MGTOW basically shows that societies that reach this stage will have reproductive collapse.

IOW, MGTOW proves that it is over.

[нσтησσвParticipant 830]

How rich… blaming MEN for the LACK of GOOD Men.

OH Noes! Men aren’t getting useless college degrees! D:

I hope these articles prove to be some big redpills for someone, because they blatantly show how EVERY WOMAN IS A GOLD DIGGER!

My Goal: To Leave Society.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

These studies always consider a man’s marriageability, but forget to take into consideration what makes a woman marriageable:

My Opinion:

Not be fatter than me
Not have any children
Not be divorced (widow is OK)
Not have debt.
Not have more sex partner than I’ve had

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

Jan Sobieski wrote:

These studies always consider a man’s marriageability, but forget to take into consideration what makes a woman marriageable:

My Opinion:

Not be fatter than me
Not have any children
Not be divorced (widow is OK)
Not have debt.
Not have more sex partner than I’ve had

Those are pretty close to what my standards are as well…my list is a little different…but still you start looking around at what is out there to marry and what do you get…a carousel rider with a ton of debt, a fat single mom, etc….no thanks. I’d rather just stay single. Its not because I always wanted to be a loner or anything, its because being single is better than the alternatives at this point.

But yeah its always the men’s fault…if I’m going to stand clear of some chick because she’s already at partner number 30…its my problem, I shouldn’t be judging? F~~~ off c~~~s. They want to judge men by a million ridiculous standards but we aren’t supposed to have any to judge them by.

[Author]

Posts