Gay Marriage

[RoyDalParticipant]

Credit: Scary Gary by Mark Buford – August 03, 2015

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[BiG_WeaselParticipant 116]

 

[Anonymous 9]

Nope.

[stopmockingmanParticipant 441]

Let them marry, why should they be happy?………….I’m hungry.

[BiG_WeaselParticipant 116]

Agreed. Let them have it, if they really want it. I’m most interested in seeing the gay divorce rates and the fallout from them. Who gets what? Whose life gets destroyed while one walks away with the entire thing? Alimony? I’m not anti-same-sex marriage, just anti-marriage. Why would ANYONE put themselves at risk like that?

[FunInTheSunParticipant 8283]

Yeah, I wonder if the gay divorce rates will someday be the same as strait divorce rates…with child support payments and alimony to boot.

"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

[MGTOWhomoParticipant 111]

Well it’s been quite a while since I posted anything here, and after the Supreme Injustice’s latest folly on shoving gay marriage down everyone’s throats, a decision right down there with Obamacare and Dred Scot in my opinion, I came on here today – after having fumed for the past few weeks about it – determined to start a form topic about it and fume some more, but I see someone already did, so I’ll just toss in my few cents’ worth of rant. .

Gay marriage?

I’m totally opposed to it. Here’s why:

This whole thing isn’t about gay marriage, it’s about shoving a collectivist and feminist agenda down EVERYONE’s throats, for the consequences are going to be that any group – like churches, synagogues, etc – that has certain traditional doctrinal or moral objections to homosexuals, or, for that matter, wimmin in the rabbinate, priesthood, or ministry, are going to have to go along with “changes” in their religious life to continue their “tax exempt” status. For the moment, there are “religious” exemptions to such things, but what happens the first time a “gay” couple decides they want to be married – say – in a Roman Catholic Church. Since ministers, rabbis, and such, are often agents of the state licensed to perform both a civil and ecclesiastical marriage, will they too face jail time if they refuse on religious grounds? For the moment, no, but watch, eventually these feminized radicals in the gay community will demand it, and certain political groups not associated with the “community” will push for it. We won’t be able to have any freedom of association, any bar, any group, any club, any association whatsoever of a voluntary nature – say, an all men’s club or bar – without violating some statute of “equality”. I have a friend who is homosexual, and he goes to one of those “trendy” churches … with a woman “priest.” ‘Nuff said.

[Author]

Posts