Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › For my Canuck Brothers
This topic contains 38 replies, has 15 voices, and was last updated by 
EscapedMentalPatient 4 years, 6 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
twenty miles from town, just rite.i am in the phone book, is your 1st. name Willy ? I am in the book as Willie but you can call me mr.nelson :}
yestorday i cun’t hard lee speel Ananonamous, torday i wun’t to joen.
as the talking dawg said “i got it pretty good i’m a talking dog”
We have to Organize , not violence Just spreading Truth. I have a pdf file that prints 4 color mini MGTOW posters per page, tacked them up in three western states now that we are the North American Union, i should have just typed three western provinces. I also print return address labels, small easy to remove with water. “The Letter J is Less Than 500 yrs. Old”. So much for je$u$, the Real Hebrew Name is Yahuwah & his son Yahusha
I am looking to buy pitch forks, the hay tines type, that’s all we will have to use in fight the king and his soldiers are pushing on us.
C’Yah when the smoke clears.
Shalom Brothers !
Hi Willy…that was a great post ..I don’t think you are exaggerating one bit….the NDP would be almost as bad as Trudeau….that was quite a story about Alberta…that was the last bastion of common sense (not to mention the last healthy economy) in Canada. I didn’t get to hear much of that out here (maritimes)…this place went blue pill (and bankrupt) long ago. (Although the last NDP government was so bad it got voted out)To think what has happened to Ontario and Alberta is just depressing…Quebec…well that’s another story…the ever nagging never happy bitch province… I often think we should have kicked them out long ago. Good advice as well…I’m selling my place and am going debt free as soon as possible…that’s one of the good things about the maritimes…in some places you could get housing dirt cheap. Batten down the hatches guys…things just might go full retard. On a side note, it may be just me but in a world with ever shrinking natural resources, does North America look like a treasure trove of goodies with a mangina (or worse) guarding the gates..picture Trudeau vs Putin. Probably nothing to worry about though…China probably is already the major shareholder of Canada by now anyway.
Why do we want more people to vote? Most people are f~~~ing retarded and just vote for people based off of who looks hotter? Who has the cooler name? etc. I say we change nothing and just let the small amount of smart voters we have now continue voting because they actually give a s~~~. Or we can make it super easy to vote by making an iphone app so any dumbass can vote like the younger crowd is heavily pushing for. Either way, I don’t give a f~~~ about Canadian politics. It is LOL worthy. All we do is argue about a crack mayor for 2 years straight and Canadians bitch about the s~~~ty roads every year from the bad winters.
We don’t want more retarded people to vote. We want more people like you to vote. And if we don’t show up, we’re creating a pretty absurd, self-inflicted case of not creating a statistical asymptotically consistent estimator.
What if we held a small election, comprised of ten voters, seven of which were MGTOW’s, MRAs, SYGWDGAFAAEPAF4 (Single Young Guys Who Don’t Give A F~~~ About Anything Except Pot and Fallout 4) and some young guys who’ve got their head screwed on straight. The remaining three are feminists or undeclared white-knights. The seven of us gripe about the unabashed insanity which is the current political climate, and don’t show up to vote out of protest and disgust, or apathy. All three feminists, who’s sole platform is to vote against us, show up and cast their vote. Their 30% just became 100%, and the majority. We p~~~ and moan, while getting out our wallets and paying for our own demise. We just had the s~~~tiest service we’ve ever had in a restaurant, and we’ve decided to leave a 70% tip out of protest?? F~~~ that nonsense. I’d prefer to at least have your vote in the box, @no MAAM, along with at least one of your friends who you’ve managed to spread your wisdom to. Since “most people are f~~~ing retarded”, it shouldn’t be too difficult to have them cast a vote in your or our favour, particularly those who are close to you. Especially the types who would just sit around and talk about a crackhead mayor.
We already have a pathetically limited box of tools in dealing with our leadership, and I’m not throwing away my hammer.
Or we can make it super easy to vote by making an iphone app so any dumbass can vote like the younger crowd is heavily pushing for.
Amen to this! Or something foolproof along those lines, very good idea. My ex’s son didn’t go vote this year because he didn’t feel like driving three blocks to a church basement. I’d had a good discourse with him about what was going on, the parties which were involved, and he really agreed with what I had to say. To the point where he was slapping his fist on his knee in anger about the platform of the NDP. I really felt I had made some headway in interesting him in what was going on. He was wholly, and completely unaware of the current issues, or of the machinations which comprise our political process. And then he didn’t bother to vote. Out of sheer laziness. And I don’t think there’s any way that a person can directly address this laziness with some people, we probably have to do as you suggested and cater to that laziness.
Well-said, NO-Maam.
Hi Willy…that was a great post ..I don’t think you are exaggerating one bit….the NDP would be almost as bad as Trudeau….that was quite a story about Alberta…that was the last bastion of common sense (not to mention the last healthy economy) in Canada. I didn’t get to hear much of that out here (maritimes)…this place went blue pill (and bankrupt) long ago. (Although the last NDP government was so bad it got voted out)To think what has happened to Ontario and Alberta is just depressing…Quebec…well that’s another story…the ever nagging never happy bitch province… I often think we should have kicked them out long ago. Good advice as well…I’m selling my place and am going debt free as soon as possible…that’s one of the good things about the maritimes…in some places you could get housing dirt cheap. Batten down the hatches guys…things just might go full retard. On a side note, it may be just me but in a world with ever shrinking natural resources, does North America look like a treasure trove of goodies with a mangina (or worse) guarding the gates..picture Trudeau vs Putin. Probably nothing to worry about though…China probably is already the major shareholder of Canada by now anyway.
Thanks buddy. And you’re very right, I felt that this place was the last bastion of common sense, and I’m not partial to any province on the whole. I’ve lived all over Canada and am very much a federalist. I’ve lived out in the maritimes myself, and am glad to know you are from there. Despite our remarks about Alberta, I still find maritimers to actually be of the most logical and common-sense oriented groups of people from Canada. If a plan I have for self-employment comes to fruition, it’s Nova Scotia for me, probably around Greenwood or such. Maybe Scot’s Bay. I’ve lived in the A. Valley out there, and I count it among the more beautiful and relaxed places on earth. God’s Country, indeed. You guys have routinely gotten the shaft out there! Your provincial governments (particularly the NDP) and the feds really really insulted the oldest part of Canada by taking away all of your industries and increasing your taxes! Maddening. Imagine, taking a province which relied heavily on fishing, punish them by taking out Federal docks and adding absurd catch limits and season destroying regulations, all the while: the Japanese are right off shore doing whatever the hell they want. I think that Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, PEI and Newfoundland have been given an unrightfully imposed sentence that no political movement could fix. My heart goes out to you brother, and I hope that you are well, and have found a comfortable way to exist, despite the conditions.
And on a separate note, sorry to Keymaster and my MGTOW brethren. I should have been more conscious of where I posted this thread, and probably should have posted it in the Politics section. I apologize.
Well I’m a Canadian and I got to say the men up here are whipped. I look at the relationship between my mother and father and my mother questions why I don’t want to get married. smh
@ willie…you’re right about NS…it is very laid back and the people an the whole are quite friendly…it is true the government has screwed this province over but I have found the people pretty complacent politically. It’s interesting you mentioned the fisheries…the logging companies are absolutley decimating the forests in this area…all with the help of the government. You lived in the Valley? Beautiful spot…I can see it across the bay from here. If you get down this way lemme know…I’ll buy you a beer …it would be interesting to talk politics with you! PS thanks for the concern …I’ve got a decent pension so I do ok…I’m just selling my place as I’d rather be mortgage free. Best of luck with your plan for self employment…I would recommend this place for anyone self employed or retired…I have a nice house on 10 acres with a river running through it …that would be hard to find anywhere for $600 a month. Take care!
For my Canadian brethren. In light of the recent developments in court, where a man has been charged for disagreeing with a feminist, the last tiny shred of patriotism in my being has just evaporated. I was orginally going to write this about a new anthem, but after reading it, I’ve edited it, as I found it too venemous. Even for me. Do any of my Canadian brothers here have any knowledge of anyone organizing anything against this utter bulls~~~? Thanks in advance.
Canada here (clearly) but I never heard about this. I heard something about a man uttering threats, that’s what he was charged with. If it’s the same thing the headline is intentionally inflammatory and obscuring. You have a link?
Hi CSF: Here is a recent article: Twitter Bulls~~~
I think there’s a couple threads here at MGTOW as well.
Cheers
Hi CSF: Here is a recent article: Twitter Bulls~~~ I think there’s a couple threads here at MGTOW as well. Cheers
Jeebus tittyf~~~ing christ.
“the subjects FELT like he was harassing them therefore he may have harassed them.”
They actually did harass a man up north over a videogame, but that’s ok. That other fembot f~~~face with the #killallmen movement still has her job. The black man who was asking to speak to a student advisor at college, and the white female advisor claimed he was “harassing her”.
Hopefully this f~~~ing bulls~~~ gets thrown out for what it is and the feminists have to pay court costs.
@Willy
I’m in Alberta as well and I can relate.
I actually cite Deborah Drever as an excellent example of why you need to stay on top of your social media profiles and ensure they’re professional as it can cost you a job. (DD is the NDP studnet candidate from Calgary Bow who was kicked out of the party).
I didn’t vote NDP, I didn’t vote PC either, so you can guess who I voted for. I totally agree with your lengthy post though, AB may soon end up regretting what it wished for. You wanted change? You’re gonna get change, regardless of if you like it or not.
Thus far Notley has done very little to impress, other than winnng one debate. But I digress, that’s a whole other topic.
I hear you CSF.
Deborah Drever is the classic example of “you get what you vote for”. She’s collecting a cool approximate 127,000 per annum plus change for sitting in a seat and “learning”, and now is sitting as an “Independent” which makes her twice as useless. As if the taxpayer is supposed to pay her to educate her on a job which she’s already applied for. I remember her saying “I’m here to learn”. Uh…..no. Our legislature is not a school. We aren’t here to provide you with a salary so that you can learn. Go back to soft studies and get a grant, that’s what they’re for. Maddening, at the very least. Her own ludicrous party had to give her the boot for being ludicrous, so that’s saying something. If you can get kicked out of the NDP (which I’m sure is temporary), you can pretty much get kicked out of anything.
I don’t usually divulge my voting leanings myself, but I went for Wild Rose Party myself. I read a much as I could from all of the “platforms” and they really did seem to me to be the only choice at the time. Voting PC would have been pointless, and with 1 seat going to the Libs and 1 seat going to the AP, I felt that many would be swaying to the WRP as I was. Apparently, a vast majority of Albertans felt otherwise. But, as you said, I digress.
The Notley agenda will be coming to fruition soon enough. And the irony of one of their key notes being “Full Transparency”? It’s pretty easy to be transparent when you don’t have a single goddamned thing to say. That seems to be her “Plan” so far. Although I’m actually surprised that the NDP hasn’t done more to just open the books and point the finger at Prentice and say “look what you did!” “look what you did”, rather than actually come up with a plan to deal with it.
I hear you CSF. Deborah Drever is pretty much the classic example of “you get what you vote for”. She’s collecting a cool approximate 127,000 per annum plus change for sitting in a seat and “learning”. As if the taxpayer is supposed to pay her to educate her on a job which she’s already applied for. Maddening, at the very least. I don’t usually divulge my voting leanings myself, but I went for Wild Rose Party myself. I read a much as I could from all of the “platforms” and they really did seem to me to be the only choice at the time. Apparently, a vast majority of Albertans felt otherwise. But, as you said, I digress. The Notley agenda will be coming to fruition soon enough. And the irony of one of their key notes being “Full Transparency”? It’s pretty easy to be transparent when you don’t have a single goddamned thing to say. That seems to be her “Plan” so far. Although I’m actually surprised that the NDP hasn’t done more to just open the books and point the finger at Prentice and say “look what you did!” “look what you did”, rather than actually come up with a plan to deal with it.
They’re tabling a budget in what, September, October. It better be good or they’ll get raked over the coals. Based on what I’ve seen so far, I’m not anticipating it will be that good.
Prentice and the rest of the PC’s were douches and they had to go, but ridings like Calgary Bow really should have considered voting for good candidates instead of along party lines. I’d have preferred if change had come in the form of a minority NDP government to keep them in check. Now they have free reign for 4 years.
It wasn’t Prentice’s fault that the Alberta Advantage has now been flushed after a global oil and gas collapse. Now is not the time for Notley to hit O&G with a royalty increase. For the record I don’t work in the industry, but a 2% corportate tax increase could lead to them laying off tons more employees. O&G cover their revenues by managing salaries, their one variable cost they can easily control in the short term.
Just to bring it back on topic, did you see that video with MEGAc~~~ Redford taking credit for Alberta voting for a woman Premier? Are you f~~~ing kidding me. AB would have voted for almost anyone who was a viable alternative, I can guarantee you NOBODY was thinking “you know, we just got Redford outta there, I really think I’ll vote for Notley because she’s a woman”. Come on.
I made a post with some pretty astounding figures and such, but when I clicked “Submit”, the whole thing disappeared.
At any rate, if one has a gander at the interim supply budget, particularly at the bottom of the page, we can get a pretty good idear of where we’re headed.
2015 Interim Supply Budget: 2015 Supply
Status of Women
Minister Responsible for the Status of Women, will lead initiatives for greater gender equality in Alberta. Funding of $1 million, included in Human Services interim supply, will support gender-based analysis training, policy and research, public evaluation, and community engagement in 5 key areas:- Women’s economic security and prosperity
- Violence against women and girls
- Women’s leadership and democratic participation
- Women’s health and well-being
- Women’s legal and human rights
APART from beginning to throw money at all of the industries which cost money rather than make it? They’ve started a pot for Women’s Health (separate from the rest of us humanoids Health spending), jobs for women, more organizations to protect women, and spending more money on advocacy for women.
Because we all know this is a HUGE problem. F~~~. Nothing like making things up to create jobs to deal with imaginary issues. That will be a huge wealth generator. This is just the start of what is going to become the “Women’s Ministry”.
Unreal. They’ve even set themselves apart from HUMAN SERVICES, as if to say they are another special species entirely.
@Willy
I don’t follow politics that closely other than during elections, but damn this is the first I’ve heard of that Women’s initiative.
I’ll tell you something, they’re taking over in HR, almost every single one of the people in industry with the HR designation are women. Must be an easy field for them to get into, then they can circle the wagons and hire more women.
At the C-Suite though, it’s still almost all men, which the hens affectionately refer to as “the old boys club” as if there is some unfairness preventing them from becoming a CEO. The unfairness lies in the fact that if you choose to have children, odds are you can’t put in the time at the office that is required of a senior executive role. You can’t have your cake and eat it too.
Previously worked in recruiting, attractive female graduates in business fields had zero problems finding jobs over more qualified classmates. How far they choose to go with that opportunity is up to them.
I’ll tell you something, they’re taking over in HR, almost every single one of the people in industry with the HR designation are women. Must be an easy field for them to get into, then they can circle the wagons and hire more women.
Yes, I’ve experienced this personally. I’ve been interviewed by women, who when I actually begin to go into actual details about the job I’m being interviewed for? They immediately divert the question over to something else because they don’t have a solitary clue about what the hell I’m talking about, after acting very authoritatively while interviewing me. They are reverting back to the 80’s mistake where people thought that if you could “Manage” widgets, you could therefore “Manage” anything at all. If you’re going to interview a guy for a candidacy, particularly a “specialized” one, you should probably at least know what the job-title means, and what the job entails.
At the C-Suite though, it’s still almost all men, which the hens affectionately refer to as “the old boys club” as if there is some unfairness preventing them from becoming a CEO. The unfairness lies in the fact that if you choose to have children, odds are you can’t put in the time at the office that is required of a senior executive role. You can’t have your cake and eat it too. Previously worked in recruiting, attractive female graduates in business fields had zero problems finding jobs over more qualified classmates. How far they choose to go with that opportunity is up to them.
I’d have to disagree with you there. I don’t see that at all, and have seen quite the opposite in the past twenty years. There are virtually no positions on this planet which aren’t open to women. Whether or not women choose to utilize their massive “inner strength” and vastly superior “independence” in order to achieve something by not having it directly handed to them on a silver platter (complete with a box of Kleenex, so they can wipe away their tears that the tray is not Gold), is entirely up to them. Except it’s not. They’ve created laws and policies which guarantee that they’ll succeed in securing the position, even if they are in fact incompetent and a miserable failure. Particularly in my experience while working for the government. Oh how I miss the days when internal senior government job openings came up on the intranet, and I wasn’t allowed to even apply due to the following clause: “This position is open to women and visible minorities only”. *Sarcasm Off*. If ten people applied for a position, nine of which were experienced, valuable, highly intelligent men, and one was a woman currently working for the government with no experience? She automatically gets the job. Here again, we have women designated as “Special Entities” who stand outside of the boundaries of actual law and principle in the labour movement.
The unfairness lies in the fact that if you choose to have children, odds are you can’t put in the time at the office that is required of a senior executive role. You can’t have your cake and eat it too.
I can’t even begin to fathom how “unfairness” enters into this whatsoever. Firstly, they’ve long ago enacted legislation which guarantees a woman be able to keep her job after getting pregnant, and retain her job while on pregnancy leave. In some instances, some organizations even pay her during this. Pregnancy Leave. This does not include Parental Leave, another nice little vacation. So she can take pregnancy leave to have the child, and then parental leave to eat chocolate, drink wine and post stupid pictures of her soon to be retarded child all over Macebook, Pinterest, and probably AshleyMadison.com, all while never losing her job. All the while someone else then has to be paid to fill her position, so that she can come back after the leave with her job still guaranteed to her. I would pretty much call that “having your cake down to the last crumb, and f~~~ing ordering a pie to go with it”, never mind “unfair”.
Let’s not even throw into the mix that someone else’s company or organization has been legally forced to “allow” these things, all so that she can make a “choice”. Trust me, we don’t as a society NEED for a woman to have both options. Or either of them for that matter. Who gives a s~~~ if she has a baby? Who gives a s~~~ if she wants a career? Who gives a s~~~ if she wants to wear a tutu, show her t~~~, paint her face with some rape slogan and bounce down Young Street waving a sign about how oppressed she is while on parental leave, all while probably having paid for her getup with her husband’s f~~~ing credit card? We’re talking about a group of people who can actually design their own job by getting f~~~ing divorced. There would be nothing better than being the CEO of pure insanity, while getting paid for it.
We’ve been financially and legally bound to women wanting s~~~. We don’t need the average woman to have a child; quite the contrary, we’d be better off in North America at this point if more of them opted out of reproducing their entitled insanity.
I really dislike how society would like us to swallow the “fact” that we somehow oh so desperately need women doing ANYTHING at all. Hell, if you could point out one solitary instance of how all of this benefits us, I’d be indebted to you. And even then, I’d pretty much not give a s~~~.
MGTOW have many benefits, of their own design. Chiefly, the ability to not be a part of this by owning ourselves, and not allowing this nonsense into our lives.
I’ll tell you something, they’re taking over in HR, almost every single one of the people in industry with the HR designation are women. Must be an easy field for them to get into, then they can circle the wagons and hire more women.
Yes, I’ve experienced this personally. I’ve been interviewed by women, who when I actually begin to go into actual details about the job I’m being interviewed for? They immediately divert the question over to something else because they don’t have a solitary clue about what the hell I’m talking about, after acting very authoritatively while interviewing me. They are reverting back to the 80’s mistake where people thought that if you could “Manage” widgets, you could therefore “Manage” anything at all. If you’re going to interview a guy for a candidacy, particularly a “specialized” one, you should probably at least know what the job-title means, and what the job entails.
At the C-Suite though, it’s still almost all men, which the hens affectionately refer to as “the old boys club” as if there is some unfairness preventing them from becoming a CEO. The unfairness lies in the fact that if you choose to have children, odds are you can’t put in the time at the office that is required of a senior executive role. You can’t have your cake and eat it too. Previously worked in recruiting, attractive female graduates in business fields had zero problems finding jobs over more qualified classmates. How far they choose to go with that opportunity is up to them.
I’d have to disagree with you there. I don’t see that at all, and have seen quite the opposite in the past twenty years. There are virtually no positions on this planet which aren’t open to women. Whether or not women choose to utilize their massive “inner strength” and vastly superior “independence” in order to achieve something by not having it directly handed to them on a silver platter (complete with a box of Kleenex, so they can wipe away their tears that the tray is not Gold), is entirely up to them. Except it’s not. They’ve created laws and policies which guarantee that they’ll succeed in securing the position, even if they are in fact incompetent and a miserable failure. Particularly in my experience while working for the government. Oh how I miss the days when internal senior government job openings came up on the intranet, and I wasn’t allowed to even apply due to the following clause: “This position is open to women and visible minorities only”. *Sarcasm Off*. If ten people applied for a position, nine of which were experienced, valuable, highly intelligent men, and one was a woman currently working for the government with no experience? She automatically gets the job. Here again, we have women designated as “Special Entities” who stand outside of the boundaries of actual law and principle in the labour movement.
The unfairness lies in the fact that if you choose to have children, odds are you can’t put in the time at the office that is required of a senior executive role. You can’t have your cake and eat it too.
I can’t even begin to fathom how “unfairness” enters into this whatsoever. Firstly, they’ve long ago enacted legislation which guarantees a woman be able to keep her job after getting pregnant, and retain her job while on pregnancy leave. In some instances, some organizations even pay her during this. Pregnancy Leave. This does not include Parental Leave, another nice little vacation. So she can take pregnancy leave to have the child, and then parental leave to eat chocolate, drink wine and post stupid pictures of her soon to be retarded child all over Macebook, Pinterest, and probably AshleyMadison.com, all while never losing her job. All the while someone else then has to be paid to fill her position, so that she can come back after the leave with her job still guaranteed to her. I would pretty much call that “having your cake down to the last crumb, and f~~~ing ordering a pie to go with it”, never mind “unfair”.
Let’s not even throw into the mix that someone else’s company or organization has been legally forced to “allow” these things, all so that she can make a “choice”. Trust me, we don’t as a society NEED for a woman to have both options. Or either of them for that matter. Who gives a s~~~ if she has a baby? Who gives a s~~~ if she wants a career? Who gives a s~~~ if she wants to wear a tutu, show her t~~~, paint her face with some rape slogan and bounce down Young Street waving a sign about how oppressed she is while on parental leave, all while probably having paid for her getup with her husband’s f~~~ing credit card? We’re talking about a group of people who can actually design their own job by getting f~~~ing divorced. There would be nothing better than being the CEO of pure insanity, while getting paid for it.
We’ve been financially and legally bound to women wanting s~~~. We don’t need the average woman to have a child; quite the contrary, we’d be better off in North America at this point if more of them opted out of reproducing their entitled insanity.
I really dislike how society would like us to swallow the “fact” that we somehow oh so desperately need women doing ANYTHING at all. Hell, if you could point out one solitary instance of how all of this benefits us, I’d be indebted to you. And even then, I’d pretty much not give a s~~~.
MGTOW have many benefits, of their own design. Chiefly, the ability to not be a part of this by owning ourselves, and not allowing this nonsense into our lives.
Hi Willy…that was a great post ..I don’t think you are exaggerating one bit….the NDP would be almost as bad as Trudeau….that was quite a story about Alberta…that was the last bastion of common sense (not to mention the last healthy economy) in Canada. I didn’t get to hear much of that out here (maritimes)…this place went blue pill (and bankrupt) long ago. (Although the last NDP government was so bad it got voted out)To think what has happened to Ontario and Alberta is just depressing…Quebec…well that’s another story…the ever nagging never happy bitch province… I often think we should have kicked them out long ago. Good advice as well…I’m selling my place and am going debt free as soon as possible…that’s one of the good things about the maritimes…in some places you could get housing dirt cheap. Batten down the hatches guys…things just might go full retard. On a side note, it may be just me but in a world with ever shrinking natural resources, does North America look like a treasure trove of goodies with a mangina (or worse) guarding the gates..picture Trudeau vs Putin. Probably nothing to worry about though…China probably is already the major shareholder of Canada by now anyway.
Thanks buddy. And you’re very right, I felt that this place was the last bastion of common sense, and I’m not partial to any province on the whole. I’ve lived all over Canada and am very much a federalist. I’ve lived out in the maritimes myself, and am glad to know you are from there. Despite our remarks about Alberta, I still find maritimers to actually be of the most logical and common-sense oriented groups of people from Canada. If a plan I have for self-employment comes to fruition, it’s Nova Scotia for me, probably around Greenwood or such. Maybe Scot’s Bay. I’ve lived in the A. Valley out there, and I count it among the more beautiful and relaxed places on earth. God’s Country, indeed. You guys have routinely gotten the shaft out there! Your provincial governments (particularly the NDP) and the feds really really insulted the oldest part of Canada by taking away all of your industries and increasing your taxes! Maddening. Imagine, taking a province which relied heavily on fishing, punish them by taking out Federal docks and adding absurd catch limits and season destroying regulations, all the while: the Japanese are right off shore doing whatever the hell they want. I think that Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, PEI and Newfoundland have been given an unrightfully imposed sentence that no political movement could fix. My heart goes out to you brother, and I hope that you are well, and have found a comfortable way to exist, despite the conditions. And on a separate note, sorry to Keymaster and my MGTOW brethren. I should have been more conscious of where I posted this thread, and probably should have posted it in the Politics section. I apologize.
Just came back from a vacation in the Maritimes myself, very refreshing to be around the older relatives and their ways. Unfortunately due to their age, in a few years they will be gone.
Do any of my Canadian brothers here have any knowledge of anyone organizing anything against this utter bulls~~~?
Hi Willy, why yes, The Rebel Media has covered the story and has a further link to a legal fund set up for the father:
@dagigisup.
Yes sir, a beer would most definitely be in order and I look forward to the day where we can arrange that. It might well be sooner than we think. Working on some plans to leave Hellberta at the moment.
Glad you enjoyed your vacation man. I always feel really rested when I come back from the maritimes. There’s always been a couple of places in particular where I find peace. I’ve more than once sat on the rocks at Peggy’s Cove with a six pack of Newcastle, a camera, a good book, and an open mind to contemplation. There’s something ancient and reflective about that place for me.
@jack Reacher.
Thank you sir, for pointing that out, I really appreciate it. Awesome that you’ve found that link.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
