existance of a higher power

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

harpo-my-“SON” wrote:

The KISS method of giving a small child understanding.
KISS= “Keep it simple son

Which is completely dishonest and overlooks real questions and objections. Just follow KISS and you will never find the truth.

harpo-my-“SON” wrote:

If you protect and provide for yourself
All that proves is you are doing God’s
work for yourself. (You are your own provider and protector)

The problem is that God is nonsense and a non requirement if i providing for myself is doing the work of God (aka God providing for me) i get the credit for the work i have done not some God that did nothing it makes no sense to give a God the credit when you did the work needed of you.

There is no difference between God’s work and my work without any involvement or need for a God.

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[harpo-my-“SON”Participant 2410]

anonymousyam wrote:There is no difference between God’s work and my work

HA! HA! HA! exactly Men are doing Gods work on this planet.

I respect you right to have your own belief.
I only ask the same respect.

I believe selfless men who have a desire to leave the
world a better place than they found it are the closest thing this planet has to a deity.

Selfish people who are so selfish they don’t respect
those with beliefs that differ from their own are simply disrespectful adult male human beings.

Everything is legal in a lawless society.

anonymousyam wrote:Which is completely dishonest and overlooks real questions and objections. Just follow KISS and you will never find the truth.

You are allowed to question the beliefs of others.

I have not overlooked any questions that I need
answered.

As for objections, I have no objections to you having different beliefs than mine.

My truth is what I say it is
unless you have evidence otherwise.

“I claim a right to choose my fathers
spirit to be my God.”
What part of my quote is not true?
That I did not make the claim? I most certainly did.
That god is not my father? Then crucify me.
If you have objections to my right to my own beliefs
that is disrespectful.

I would not lie to you about what I believe.
So please refrain from calling me dishonest.

Even if you believe I am wrong in my beliefs that
does not make me dishonest in my expressing them.

If you believed the earth was flat and said so.
It would not make you a liar as long as that was truly what you believe.
You would simply be expressing your truth.
(truthful belief)
Your truth is what you say it is.
I will never disagree.

love and respect

I was bound to be misunderstood, and I laugh at those who misunderstand me. Kind mockery at the well intentioned, but unfettered cruelty towards those would be prison guards of my creative possibilities. This so as to learn as much from misunderstanding as from understanding. Taking pleasure in worthy opponents and making language fluid and flowing like a river yet pointed and precise as a dagger. Contradicts the socialistic purpose of language and makes for a wonderful linguistic dance, A verbal martial art with constant parries that hone the weapon that is the two edged sword of my mouth.

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

harpo-my-“SON” wrote:

HA! HA! HA! exactly Men are doing Gods work on this planet.

No just no as if men are doing the work then it clearly is the work of a man not of a God. Why would men have to do the work of a God? it does not make any sense when God is all powerful and all knowing so God would not need us to do his work but he can do it since he God.

Any work that man has done is the work of man even if they claim inspiration from a God.

harpo-my-“SON” wrote:

I respect you right to have your own belief.
I only ask the same respect.

You have the right to hold any belief you want but you do not have the right to be free from any challenges or mocks to your belief. If i mock and question your belief it is my right to do so and if you state your belief as truth (not just belief) then it is your duty to back it up with evidence and if you cannot back it up with evidence the belief is completely baseless.

harpo-my-“SON” wrote:

I believe selfless men who have a desire to leave the
world a better place than they found it are the closest thing this planet has to a deity.

You need to clarify your ideas here. Do you or do you not believe in some supernatural entity known as a God and do you hold beliefs that the entity is a personal agent of any sort (having an effect on the world in the modern day like miracles, answering prayer etc)? I cannot respond till you clear up what you are saying.

harpo-my-“SON” wrote:

Everything is legal in a lawless society.

If you actually had a lawless society (just for example for the argument) then you would not have legal or illegal in the slightest thereby actions would not conform to our standard of law.

In a society without law there would be legal or illegal and no definition of it in the society thereby everything would not be legal because of the lack of definition of it.

harpo-my-“SON” wrote:

My truth is what I say it is

Which is a lie as truth is not what you say is truth but what you can actually show to be truth. Truth is what you can back up with evidence and if you cannot back it up then it isn’t truth.

It does not matter if it is true to you as your definition and belief of it being truth does not make it so rather the evidence backing up the idea. You can have belief that X is truth on faith as much as you want even to the point of death but without evidence showing X it is not truth at all. You can live and die believing in something you called truth but it turned out to be lies.

harpo-my-“SON” wrote:

unless you have evidence otherwise.

No as that reverses the burden of proof. I do not have to disprove your ideas if you have no evidence to back then up because you can pull any claim out of your anus and demand i disprove it and that is not how the burden of proof works.

For example if i claim magical dragons which are invisible and undectable by any form of evidence exist without providing even one shred of evidence then my assertion is completely baseless and not worth consideration same with any other supernatural claim. The more supernatural the claim the more evidence required.

harpo-my-“SON” wrote:

“I claim a right to choose my fathers
spirit to be my God.”

You would have to prove both spirits and your God existing and even if spirits and a God existed it would not prove your point as the God would be a different one from yours.

harpo-my-“SON” wrote:

What part of my quote is not true?

It is untrue because it is completely baseless and without evidence.

harpo-my-“SON” wrote:

So please refrain from calling me dishonest.

I am calling KISS dishonest not specifically you unless you show me that you are dishonest with more evidence of it. If i get proof of it then i will call you dishonest without regret.

harpo-my-“SON” wrote:

If you believed the earth was flat and said so.
It would not make you a liar as long as that was truly what you believe.
You would simply be expressing your truth.

If flat earthers honestly believe their ideas yet still push them they are wrong because of the evidence showing that the earth is not flat. They can easily become dishonest in this when they given evidence proving the earth is not flat and reject it in favor of the flat earth then proceeding to lie about it.

But even better is that truth is not relative but rather what is in line with evidence. True belief in something does not make an idea truth.

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[harpo-my-“SON”Participant 2410]

anonymousyam wrote:
You have the right to hold any belief you want but you do not have the right to be free from any challenges or mocks to your belief. If i mock and question your belief it is my right to do so and if you state your belief as truth (not just belief) then it is your duty to back it up with evidence and if you cannot back it up with evidence the belief is completely baseless.

I will not do a point by point with you. Time will not allow me.

My truth is self evident.
is it evidence you wanted?
what is evidence?

My many years of law study tells me
that Testimony can be evidence.

So I now pray in Jesus name that
my heavenly father who is also my
creator, public defender and legal guardian
guide my fingers to type his Honest
testimony. A&men

THIS IS THE SPIRIT OF HARPO’S
HEAVENLY FATHER TELLING YOU
THAT MY SON HAS BEEN ENDOWED
BY ME THE RIGHT TO PURSUE HIS
HAPPINESS.

THOSE WHO WOULD ARGUE ON THE
OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE TRUTH
REVEAL THEMSELVES AS FOOLS
FOR THE TRUTH WILL NOT ARGUE
BACK NOR WILL IT CHANGE
JUST BECAUSE YOU REFUSE TO
ACCEPT AND BELIEVE IT.
THE TRUTH JUST STANDS
SELF EVIDENT WHILE THEY
ARE LOOKING FOOLISH..

MY TRUTHFUL TESTIMONY WILL
JUST STAND SELF EVIDENT ON
THE COMPUTER SCREEN WHILE
YOU ARE LOOKING FOOLISH.
WE ALL ENJOY LAUGHING
AT THE FOOLISH WHO WILL
FOREVER FAIL TO PROVIDE
ANY EVIDENCE THAT MY SPIRIT
IS NOT ALIVE AND WELL
HOSTED BY JESUS IN MY
SON’ HEART

I RESPECT THAT YOU HAVE
ATTEMPTED AND WILL MOST
LIKELY KEEP ATTEMPTING
TO INCITE EMOTIONAL
RESPONSES FROM MY
SON HARPOMASON.

a troll (/troʊl, trɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting quarrels or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal, on-topic discussion,[3] often for the troll’s amusement.

The art of deliberately, cleverly, and secretly p~~~ing people off, usually via the internet, using dialogue. Trolling does not mean just making rude remarks: Shouting swear words at someone doesn’t count as trolling; it’s just flaming, and isn’t funny. Spam isn’t trolling either; it p~~~es people off, but it’s lame.

The most essential part of trolling is convincing your victim that either a) truly believe in what you are saying, no matter how outrageous, or b) give your victim malicious instructions, under the guise of help.
Trolling requires decieving; any trolling that doesn’t involve decieving someone isn’t trolling at all; it’s just stupid. As such, your victim must not know that you are trolling; if he does, you are an unsuccesful troll.

MY SON WILL NOT ENGAGE
YOU FARTHER ONLY
LAUGH AS I WAIT
FOR YOU TO PROVIDE
EVIDENCE THAT THE
SPIRIT TYPING TO YOU
DOES NOT EXIST.

IT IS NOT NECESSARY THAT
YOU BELIEVE THIS TESTIMONY
IS TRUE OR THAT IT EVEN
EXIST.
THE OTHER MEMBERS CAN READ IT AND
VERIFY IT FOR YOU IF YOU CHOOSE TO LOOK
THE OTHER WAY AND PRETEND YOU DID NOT
READ IT.
I WOULD BET EVERY MEMBER BUT YOURSELF
WOULD BE WISE ENOUGH TO RECOGNIZE
THE FUTILITY OF YOUR CONTINUING
TO TROLL MY SON ANY FARTHER.

JESUS IS NOT THE TRUTH BECAUSE
MY SON CAN PROVE IT.
JESUS IS THE TRUTH BECAUSE
YOU CANNOT PROVIDE EVIDENCE
THAT WILL DISPROVE IT.

ALL THREE OF US DO LOVE AND RESPECT YOU.
THE FATHER, SON AND HOLY SPIRITUAL HOST JESUS.

SELF EVIDENT TRUE TESTIMONY
THAT PROVIDES THE HAPPINESS
MY SON IS PURSUING..ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

I was bound to be misunderstood, and I laugh at those who misunderstand me. Kind mockery at the well intentioned, but unfettered cruelty towards those would be prison guards of my creative possibilities. This so as to learn as much from misunderstanding as from understanding. Taking pleasure in worthy opponents and making language fluid and flowing like a river yet pointed and precise as a dagger. Contradicts the socialistic purpose of language and makes for a wonderful linguistic dance, A verbal martial art with constant parries that hone the weapon that is the two edged sword of my mouth.

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

harpo-my-“SON” wrote:

I will not do a point by point with you. Time will not allow me.

Time however will allow long drawn out poetry. Of course you cannot just poetry for even one post to argue any points but ill see what i can work with here.

harpo-my-“SON” wrote:

My truth is self evident.

The truth can only be based on evidence. If you cannot prove something to be true then it isn’t actually truth and just your mere belief in it, and your belief does not make it truth.

harpo-my-“SON” wrote:

is it evidence you wanted?
what is evidence?

Data, facts and proof of whatever you claim to be truth to fall in line with reality and evidence is needed before i can buy any your magical assertions to be true.

harpo-my-“SON” wrote:

So I now pray in Jesus name that
my heavenly father who is also my
creator, public defender and legal guardian
guide my fingers to type his Honest
testimony. A&me

That does not make any sense since how can you explain Jesus actually helping you type this? what mechanism can be shown that Jesus would use in the helping you type this out? how would Jesus even help you type this out?

What test or demonstration could you show proving Jesus helped type this out in any way?

harpo-my-“SON” wrote:

THIS IS THE SPIRIT OF HARPO’S
HEAVENLY FATHER TELLING YOU
THAT MY SON HAS BEEN ENDOWED
BY ME THE RIGHT TO PURSUE HIS
HAPPINESS.

So the spirit of a God is speaking through text on a forum? prove it or you are just a nutcase.

harpo-my-“SON” wrote:

THOSE WHO WOULD ARGUE ON THE
OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE TRUTH
REVEAL THEMSELVES AS FOOLS

Those who have no truth in their arguments and refuse to provide evidence of it are the biggest fools in town. If you can’t show it you don’t know it.

harpo-my-“SON” wrote:

FOREVER FAIL TO PROVIDE
ANY EVIDENCE THAT MY SPIRIT
IS NOT ALIVE AND WELL
HOSTED BY JESUS IN MY
SON’ HEART

Hitchens razor asserts that what can be claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence and that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence thereby it is your burden to prove your religion as truth not mine to disprove it.

If you have no evidence you have no basis and your ideas are completely worthless, so i do not have to disprove that your spirit is being hosted by your magic God rather you got to prove it and if you assert i must disprove it then simply that i am God given into mortal flesh as a figure speaking on his behalf that has reincarnated from other figures throughout history.

harpo-my-“SON” wrote:

JESUS IS NOT THE TRUTH BECAUSE
MY SON CAN PROVE IT.
JESUS IS THE TRUTH BECAUSE
YOU CANNOT PROVIDE EVIDENCE
THAT WILL DISPROVE IT.

I am God and you cannot disprove me being God thereby i actually am God. The truth is Jesus Christ is my brother and after reading your lunacy i have communicated with him and the reality now being is that you will be barred from heaven by spreading lies in his name.

You mocked Jesus Christ my younger brother in your postings here thereby you are not getting into heaven and your spirit will just die.

Now disprove my ideas here? show me evidence that i am not the brother of Christ reborn?

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[harpo-my-“SON”Participant 2410]

THIS IS HARPOMASON’S HEAVENLY FATHER SAYING ONCE AGAIN
STOP TROLLING MY SON HE LOVES YOU AND RESPECT YOUR RIGHT TO BELIEVE WHAT EVER YOU LIKE.
HE WILL NOT ARGUE
WITH YOU POINT BY POINT.

AT LEAST NOT UNTIL YOU PROVIDE EVIDENCE I DO NOT EXIST.
I AM MY SON’S CREATOR AND HIS CHOSEN GOD.
MY TESTIMONY IS TRUTH ENOUGH FOR MOST PEOPLE..
THE COURTS DO ALLOW TRUTHFUL TESTIMONY AS EVIDENCE.
YOUR COURT HAS NO JURISDICTION OVER MY SON HARPOMASON.

I HEREBY ACCUSE YOU WITH BEING AN INTERNET FORUM TROLL.

In Internet slang, a troll (/troʊl, trɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting quarrels or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal, on-topic discussion,[3] often for the troll’s amusement.

ANONYMOUSYAM WROTE: you do not have the right to be free from any challenges or mocks to your belief.

THIS IS WHERE YOU HAVE BEEN PROVEN WRONG.
HARPOMASON HAS TURNED THIS MATTER OVER TO HIS HEAVENLY FATHER AND WILL BE FREE OF YOUR TROLLING MOCKERY.

I AM JUST A HEAVENLY SPIRIT THAT YOU DO NOT BELIEVE IN.

WHY WOULD YOU ARGUE WITH A BEING YOU CLAIM DOES NOT EXIST?

WOULD THAT ACT ALONE NOT BE STUPID?

KEEP ARGUING THAT I DON’T EXIST.

I WILL KEEP LAUGHING AT YOU.

I was bound to be misunderstood, and I laugh at those who misunderstand me. Kind mockery at the well intentioned, but unfettered cruelty towards those would be prison guards of my creative possibilities. This so as to learn as much from misunderstanding as from understanding. Taking pleasure in worthy opponents and making language fluid and flowing like a river yet pointed and precise as a dagger. Contradicts the socialistic purpose of language and makes for a wonderful linguistic dance, A verbal martial art with constant parries that hone the weapon that is the two edged sword of my mouth.

[harpo-my-“SON”Participant 2410]

ANONYMOUSYAM WROTE:I am God and you cannot disprove me being God thereby i actually am God. The truth is Jesus Christ is my brother and after reading your lunacy i have communicated with him and the reality now being is that you will be barred from heaven by spreading lies in his name.

You mocked Jesus Christ my younger brother in your postings here thereby you are not getting into heaven and your spirit will just die.

Now disprove my ideas here? show me evidence that i am not the brother of Christ reborn?

MY SON BELIEVES YOU.

YOUR TRUTH IS WHAT YOU SAY IT IS
HE WOULD NEVER DISAGREE.
HE RESPECTS YOUR RIGHTS TO HAVE YOUR OWN BELIEF.
I AM HIS GOD AND MY KINGDOM IS HIS ALREADY.
YOU CANNOT BAR MY SON FROM A KINGDOM HIS
FATHER HAS PREPARED.

WE ARE CONVICTED BY OUR OWN WORDS.

YOU CLAIM YOU ARE GOD BUT DO NOT BELIEVE IN GOD.

cognitive dissonance

In the field of psychology, cognitive dissonance is the mental discomfort (psychological stress) experienced by a person who simultaneously holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values.

I was bound to be misunderstood, and I laugh at those who misunderstand me. Kind mockery at the well intentioned, but unfettered cruelty towards those would be prison guards of my creative possibilities. This so as to learn as much from misunderstanding as from understanding. Taking pleasure in worthy opponents and making language fluid and flowing like a river yet pointed and precise as a dagger. Contradicts the socialistic purpose of language and makes for a wonderful linguistic dance, A verbal martial art with constant parries that hone the weapon that is the two edged sword of my mouth.

[harpo-my-“SON”Participant 2410]

ANONYMOUSYAM.
HATE CHRISTIANS MUCH?
ANGRY?
COMBATIVE AND ARGUMENTATIVE MUCH?
I GET IT YOU WANNA ARGUE
GOD DOES NOT EXIST.

FOR YOU HE DON’T

WHAT EVER YOUR TRUTH IS, MY SON HAS ALREADY
ACCEPTED AS YOUR TRUTH.
WHAT EVER YOUR BELIEFS ARE MY SON HAS ALREADY
ACCEPTED AS YOUR BELIEF.

STATED FOR THE RECORD HARPOMASON RESPECTS
ANONYMOUSYAM’S RIGHT TO HIS OWN TRUTH AND BELIEFS.

YOU FIND SOME RESPECT FOR HIS PLEASE?

LOVE AND RESPECT TO ALL

I was bound to be misunderstood, and I laugh at those who misunderstand me. Kind mockery at the well intentioned, but unfettered cruelty towards those would be prison guards of my creative possibilities. This so as to learn as much from misunderstanding as from understanding. Taking pleasure in worthy opponents and making language fluid and flowing like a river yet pointed and precise as a dagger. Contradicts the socialistic purpose of language and makes for a wonderful linguistic dance, A verbal martial art with constant parries that hone the weapon that is the two edged sword of my mouth.

[harpo-my-“SON”Participant 2410]

ANONYMOUSYAM WROTE:You mocked Jesus Christ my younger brother in your postings here thereby you are not getting into heaven and your spirit will just die.

Now disprove my ideas here? show me evidence that i am not the brother of Christ reborn?

MY BIBLE SAYS CHRIST RETURNS AS THE FIRST FRUIT OF THE DEAD. THIS WOULD MAKE HIM THE OLDEST SON AND COULD NOT BE YOUR YOUNGER BROTHER FOR THIS SIMPLE REASON.
REASON AND LOGIC TELLS ME YOU STARTED THIS TROLLING ACTIVITY AGAINST A BELIEF IN GOD AND NOW CLAIM TO BE THE OLDER BROTHER OF JESUS AND GOD YOURSELF.

TROLL ACTIVITY DETECTED
TROLL ALERT

I was bound to be misunderstood, and I laugh at those who misunderstand me. Kind mockery at the well intentioned, but unfettered cruelty towards those would be prison guards of my creative possibilities. This so as to learn as much from misunderstanding as from understanding. Taking pleasure in worthy opponents and making language fluid and flowing like a river yet pointed and precise as a dagger. Contradicts the socialistic purpose of language and makes for a wonderful linguistic dance, A verbal martial art with constant parries that hone the weapon that is the two edged sword of my mouth.

[IRuleMeParticipant]

Posting as God to talk to another member… Yeah.. Nothing deranged about that.. [/sarcasm]

[harpo-my-“SON”Participant 2410]

nWo wrote:Posting as God to talk to another member… Yeah.. Nothing deranged about that.. [/sarcasm]

I believe the quote
“There is but one God”
to be a true but incomplete misleading
and deceptive statement.

Your god is who you say it is and I will never disagree,
I respect your rights to have your own beliefs.
My god is a chosen god for I chose him and he chose me.
its my father in heaven who’s spirit lives inside of me..

We all have individual rights in a republic.

The only way there could be only one god is if
we finish the quote..

“There is but one God each.”

Yours has ultimate and supreme authority over you and you alone…

Mine has ultimate and supreme authority over no one
but me..

If we love each other that fills gods law.

But respect should be given not earned.

Respecting the beliefs of others is the only way we can make a justifiable claim of our own beliefs..

My rights end if I fail to respect yours..

yours end if they infringe on my rights.

love and respect to all

I was bound to be misunderstood, and I laugh at those who misunderstand me. Kind mockery at the well intentioned, but unfettered cruelty towards those would be prison guards of my creative possibilities. This so as to learn as much from misunderstanding as from understanding. Taking pleasure in worthy opponents and making language fluid and flowing like a river yet pointed and precise as a dagger. Contradicts the socialistic purpose of language and makes for a wonderful linguistic dance, A verbal martial art with constant parries that hone the weapon that is the two edged sword of my mouth.

[Anonymous 42]

[harpo-my-“SON”Participant 2410]

MGtower

What a laugh..

smoking a Camel toe HA! HA! HA! HA!

A camel toe smoking.

I was bound to be misunderstood, and I laugh at those who misunderstand me. Kind mockery at the well intentioned, but unfettered cruelty towards those would be prison guards of my creative possibilities. This so as to learn as much from misunderstanding as from understanding. Taking pleasure in worthy opponents and making language fluid and flowing like a river yet pointed and precise as a dagger. Contradicts the socialistic purpose of language and makes for a wonderful linguistic dance, A verbal martial art with constant parries that hone the weapon that is the two edged sword of my mouth.

[Anonymous 42]

When it cums to sense, if I didn’t have a sense of humor, I wouldn’t have any sense at all!!!

[Anonymous 38]

I was asked this recently by two freemasons. I do believe in the existence of a higher power: the Tao.

The Tao is simply the universe. It is everything in it. So we are part of it.

The universe is like a body, and we are like the body’s cells and particles.

There are always bad agents but generally the good overcomes the bad; the body fights and usually overcomes disease. The human race is still going despite all the crap within it.

That’s what I have faith in. That’s also why I don’t want the world to burn, how could I destroy myself?

[harpo-my-“SON”Participant 2410]

MGTOW_TAOIST wrote:

I was asked this recently by two freemasons. I do believe in the existence of a higher power: the Tao.

The Tao is simply the universe. It is everything in it. So we are part of it.

The universe is like a body, and we are like the body’s cells and particles.

There are always bad agents but generally the good overcomes the bad; the body fights and usually overcomes disease. The human race is still going despite all the crap within it.

That’s what I have faith in. That’s also why I don’t want the world to burn, how could I destroy myself?

In the 17th Chapter of St Luke it is written: “the Kingdom of God is within man” – not one man nor a group of men, but in all men! In you! You, the people have the power – the power to create machines. The power to create happiness! You, the people, have the power to make this life free and beautiful, to make this life a wonderful adventure.

Wonderful and very much correct..
My father said: “Son, you only have two binary choices in life and if you choose correctly on both then you
will eventually become connected to your higher authority.”

1. you choose to be honest trustworthy and do righteous
works or you choose to lie, cheat, steal and do evil works.

2. You choose to believe and show faith or you choose
to let your own flawed human free will guide you.

He told me If I choose to do good works and show
faith and patience I would find the science of
evolution to be not only true but in know way
contradictory to the Bible. I would become an
evolved human because humans are birthed.
Men are created.

Men are fished from the sea of
selfish humans and pressed through gods wine-press
of wrath.
The longer the struggle and suffering the sweater
and more valuable the wine will be.

So help a man carry his cross, but never steal
his struggle. His struggle through this life is
his test to pass or fail.

Selfish Humans will accept the truth and evolve into a created spiritual being that is a selfless man or
become a bitter human being always taking the long way
around the obvious self evident organic truth.

Yes I believe what my father said is true and
only by giving my life to his spiritual guidance
will I evolve and be created into A man who’s
rights are as unalienable as his spirit.

Many will argue on both sides of the human evolution
question but many created Men who have lived before us and found the spiritual afterlife are ready to testify
and confirm that they have truly evolved past the slavery of their own human instincts.

We live in a lawless society where JUSTICE has
evolved into an incredible accusation industry.

I claim a right to face my accusers.

I want nothing from this world and love everyone.

I challenge all accusers to find an evil motive
and an injured party so that I may face them and ask the nature of their injuries.

The professional accusers have put a profit motive
on the incarceration of human flesh. These accusers
avoid the accusations of corruption by many well known methods but the most used and most well known is
the changing of definitions and meanings of our
common words.
Here are some examples:
66 SECRET CANONS OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT Tongue in cheek but pathetically true.

1. A.B.A.
1. short for American Bar Association or 2. Arrogant Bulls~~~ Artists.

2. Abuse Of Discretion:
1. original meaning, now rarely used, was to describe a faulty process of reasoning when performing a discretionary act 2. now term means whatever suits our fancy 3. synonymous with term “Black Hole”, i.e. we know its out there but damn if we know what it is.

3. Ad Hoc Decision:
1. Whatever 2. A screwing so fine tuned it can target a specific hemorrhoid

4.Aerobic Activity:
1. the healthy practice of going to and returning from back room meetings.

5. Appeal:
1. that which makes injustice impossible 2. the process where time and financial cost to litigants must never be taken into consideration 3. the process which allows us to do as we damn well please 4. that which covers our ass.

6.Arrogance or Arrogant:
1. Judicial self esteem 2. term used by the unenlightened to describe Judges and Lawyers who are confident and comfortable in their position 3. term applied to those with power to decide right from wrong without regarding right from wrong.

7.Attorney:
1. business partners 2. club members.

8.Back Room Meetings:
1. term synonymous with “open court.”

9.Bulls~~~:
term commonly used by the unintelligent, uneducated or unenlightened when describing misunderstood Legal Analysis and Judicial Determinations.

10. Civil Rights:
1. formerly things like right to life, liberty and property 2. more recently things like the right not to be pinched in the ass and the right to marry insects.

11.Constitution:
1. common cause of rectal pain in the Judiciary 2. great document for the resourceful and effective 3. should be condensed for the unresourceful and ineffective.

12.Common Sense:
1. form of logic reserved for common people 2. objectively unverifiable form of logic 3. form of logic that minimizes or eliminates the highly specialized hair splitting , perpetuitous analysis that helps us appear more intelligent than the masses 4. form of logic non expert in nature.

13. Contempt:
1. due process for the assertive or uncooperative 2. the means by which the Judiciary molds attorneys.

14.Discretion:
1. judicial free will 2. a great “catch all” to justify whatever it is we do. 3. former meaning dealt with judicial exercise in areas where there was no clear law or hard and fast rules. Today discretion is omnipresent.

15. Discretionary Act:
1. the exercise of judicial free will unencumbered by law, reason, logic or common sense.

16.Due Process:
1. perpetuity 2. perpetual motions 3. legal and procedural minutiae 4. selective adherence to the Secret Canons Of Judicial Conduct 5. process which is not paid for. 6. First, decide how we want the case to go. Second, formulate a legal logic to support our decision. Third, manipulate, dissect or eliminate the facts and evidence to support our decision. Then the rubber stamp doctrine of “judicial discretion” will prevent most decisions from being overturned!

17.End Result:
1. one of the things not to be considered [others being race, color, sex etc.] when rendering legal decisions except when professional embarrassment, media attention or upsetting the status quo will result 2. that which can negatively affect objectivity.

18.Evidence:
1. matters we choose to accept as relevant utilizing a standard which may be disconnected from objective reality 2. matters that allow us to direct the course of a trial 3. sometimes called judicial slight of hand.

19.Ex parte:
1. rule prohibiting inappropriate contact or discussion with a party other than a Pro Se litigant or the unresourceful and ineffective.

20.Experts:
1. one of the best tools devised to deny jury trials to the unresourceful and ineffective 2. those who organize or disorganize, identify or misidentify and label or mislabel particulate matter into a truth or evidence for recognition by and consideration of the trier of fact 3. people whose job is similar to the replicators on Star Trek.

21.Fair:
1. term means what the Judiciary says it means 2. adherence to the Secret Canons of Judicial Conduct 3. a festival or gathering.

22.Fair and Just:
1. term describing a pipedream or fantasy 2. term describing strict adherence to the Secret Canons Of Judicial Conduct 3. common names for twins in the Netherlands.

23.Free Will:
1. judicial discretion

24.Honorable:
1. worthy of honor because of position instead of performance.

25.Impartial:
1. unbiased, objective…whatever the hell that means.

26.Income Taxes:
1. the best damn hoax in history 2. Washington KY jelly.

27.Independence Of The Judiciary:
1. Judicial rationale to justify Judicial Determinations 2. effective argument to cover up mistakes 3. that which assists Judicial self esteem.

28.Injustice:
1. justice for the unenlightened 2. term used by those not understanding Justice 3. synonymous with term “Judicial Efficiency”.

29.IRS:
1. the second best damn hoax in history [see Income Taxes] 2. the organization Congress pretends to desire changing 3. the biggest bluffers and liars in the Country 4. the congressional ATM 5. organization which forcefully collects voluntary income taxes. 6. sometimes synonymous with organized crime.

30.Judicial Determinations:
1. legal decisions which may or may not be based on the arguments raised 2. decisions made after every possible method of delay has been utilized 3. usually synonymous with Status Quo.

31. Judicial Discretion:
1. See Discretion, Discretionary Act and Free Will.

32.Judicial Efficiency:
1. Fancy word for ‘railroading’ 2. Synonymous with term Injustice and phrase “Screw, we don’t have time for you.” 2. that which takes priority over full and fair justice.

33.Judicial Misconduct:
1. term commonly misapplied to a Judge’s attempts at efficiency. 2. mythical, non existent conduct
3. a paradox.

34.Judiciary:
1. group of Judges forever more impressed with themselves than they should be 2. group of Judges highly respected and regarded regardless of their production or quality of work. 3. synonymous with Royalty.

35.Jury Nullification:
1. formerly power of informed jury to vote their conscience 2. term now considered as offensive and as unmentionable as f~~~~~, n~~~~~, jew, bitch etc.

36.Just:
1. abbreviation for the name Justin or Justina.

37.Justice:
1. the precious and proper administration of laws effectuated by legal analysis and the Secret Canons of Judicial Conduct; said administration being unaffected by the end result, even when the end result is the improper administration of laws. 2. more of a privilege than a right. 3. due to the value of Justice, every possible option of denial should be considered so it never is dispensed casually, freely or indiscriminately.

38.Justice For All:
1. “all” in this phrase means those who are left standing after judiciously applying the Secret Canons of Judicial Conduct and legal analysis to their case 2. phrase really means the possibility of Justice for all provided the person desiring Justice knows or can pay for skills effective in the manipulation of legal and procedural minutiae and the Secret Canons of Judicial Conduct.

39. Law:
1. the vast selection of written and unwritten ingredients which we recipe to make Judicial Decisions. 2. analogous to the Bible in that it can be made to say whatever one desires 3. impossible to break provided a Judicial Decision incorporates it in some form or fashion. 4. synonymous with the terms “Silly Putty” and “Whatever” 5. written word with the power to create illusion of equal and fair justice for all.

40.Legal Analysis or Legal Reasoning:
1. thinking usually independent of and unaffected by objective reality 2. the process of using legal terms to alter, create or deny reality 3. process used to maintain or assist the status quo, power structure and the resourceful and effective 4. a thought process commonly raised to the level of stupidity while maintaining the appearance of brilliance 5. sometimes called inverted intelligence.

41.Limine, Motion in:
1. selection or elimination of evidence for the purpose of directing a trial in the direction we feel it should go 2. legal tool which can never result in injustice due to the right of appeal.

42.Logic:
1. the word “cigol” spelled backwards 2. term meaning Logistically Organized Gobbledygook Intended to Confuse 3. form of mental masturbation 4. a great video arcade game.

43.Militias:
1. fruitcakes under the delusion the Constitution, Bill Of Rights and the principles this Country were founded on are still in full effect. 2. terrible followers who won’t listen and ask too many questions.

44.No one or Noone:
The secret last name of all Judges so they won’t be lying when they say, “No one is above the law.”

45. No one is above the law:
Phrase is analogous to “Santa or the Easter Bunny is coming.” 2. Phrase which results in roars of laughter amongst drunken Judges and Lawyers.

46.Objective Reality:
1. that which is unwritten and usually not incorporated into Legal Analysis or Judicial Decisions 2. that which can not be verified 3. that which requires expert testimony for verification and identification.

47.Objectivity:
1. whatever is the preferred viewpoint of the judiciary 2. opposite of “reality based”

48.Open Court:
1. a court having a door that opens and closes without obstruction.

49.Plea Bargain:
1. an effective tool to avoid those damn juries and hide prosecutorial misconduct, overcharging and abuse. 3. justice for the unresourceful and ineffective

50.Poor:
1. the Unresourceful and Ineffective 2. those that shouldn’t ask for what they can’t pay for.

51.Pro Se Litigant:
1. litigants with invalid arguments 2. bastards who forget we are trying to run a business here 3. those who don’t understand what “members only” means 4. those unfamiliar with their place in this world.

52.Prosecutorial Misconduct:
1. term commonly misapplied to Prosecutor’s attempts at efficiency. 2. mythical, non existent conduct

53.Relevance or Relevant:
1. that which suits the fancy of the Judiciary 2. synonymous with “Judicial personal opinion”.

54.Res Judicata:
1. legal term describing revolving door used to give the bum’s rush out the courtroom to the Unresourceful and Ineffective 2. Latin term meaning, “we made up our mind before you came in and this procedure covers our ass.” 3. legal doctrine used to deny the Unresourceful and Ineffective a full and fair hearing on the merits 4. legal tool used to create the illusion of due process.

55.Resourceful and Effective:
1. terms used to describe those having the means or ability to command our attention [i.e. wealthy, connected to a power structure, able to attract media attention] 2. those effective in the manipulation of legal and procedural minutiae and the Secret Canons of Judicial Conduct 3. those whose financial, political or social status and resources are incorporated into our Legal Analysis 4. can be used to describe the rich Compare to Unresourceful and Ineffective

56.Right:
1. A turn one can take at some red lights. 2. our spin on the events before us 3. Judicial Determinations 4. regulated privileges or favors granted by Government.

57.Right To Bear Arms:
1. regulated privilege granted by the Constitution giving Citizens the right to wear tank tops, athletic T-shirts, sleeveless blouses or in some form or fashion leave their arms exposed in public.

58.Rights:
1. The turns one can take at some red lights. 2. regulated privileges 3. favors of Government.

59.Royalty:
1. not used, but in principle refers to the Judiciary or the resourceful and effective

60.Sovereign:
1. outdated term commonly used by anti-government groups. 2. threatening term which is best avoided 3. vague, undefined.

61.Status Quo:
1. golf on Thursdays 2. Judicial “comfort zone” 3. synonymous with term “loyalty.”

62.Truth:
1. whatever experts say for pay 2. whatever the Judiciary decides through the use of Legal Analysis.

63.Unenlightened:
1. litigants unknowledgeable regarding our position and power.

64.Unresourceful and Ineffective:
1. terms used to describe those not having the means or ability to command our attention [i.e. the poor, unconnected to a power structure, unable to attract media attention] 2. those not effective in the manipulation of legal and procedural minutiae and the Secret Canons of Judicial Conduct 3. those whose financial, political or social status or resources is not incorporated into our Legal Analysis unless said status commands influence. 4. can be used to describe the Poor 5. Compare to Resourceful and Effective

65.Voice Of The People
1. who the hell knows what this means, all voices sound different to us.

66.Will Of The People
1. legally unsound, everyone should make out their own will.

Remember these sixty six secret cannons and the conduct
of the judiciary will not be hard to understand.

I was bound to be misunderstood, and I laugh at those who misunderstand me. Kind mockery at the well intentioned, but unfettered cruelty towards those would be prison guards of my creative possibilities. This so as to learn as much from misunderstanding as from understanding. Taking pleasure in worthy opponents and making language fluid and flowing like a river yet pointed and precise as a dagger. Contradicts the socialistic purpose of language and makes for a wonderful linguistic dance, A verbal martial art with constant parries that hone the weapon that is the two edged sword of my mouth.

[Author]

Posts