Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Even being cautious costs you
This topic contains 29 replies, has 26 voices, and was last updated by
narwhal 3 years, 11 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
yup. first it was marriage now its cohabitation.
This is why men are replacing women for fleshlights and prostitutes.
Hell, 70% of men in japan went full mgtow monk and dont care about women any more.
The goverment screams and threatens but more and more men go mgtow in that country.Japan is the 20 to 30 years future of western society.
Yet another fugitive slave law, brothers. I’ve been warning and writing about the coming tide of new fugitive slave laws since my first week here.
As more and more of us avoid and escape the existing methods of control used by women and society, women and society will fashion new methods of control.
Palimony is already on the books in Italy and being seriously discussed throughout the Angloshpere and West. Common law marriage is back with a vengeance in jurisdictions that never had it and with lower time requirements. Bachelor taxes, which already covertly exist in “user fees” like auto and health insurance, are being seriously examined as overt taxes. Government “sponsored” – read mandated – matchmaking is on the table in Japan. Paternity testing is illegal in France and soon to be illegal in many other places.
The mob is roaring, the torches are flaring, the pitchforks are being waved aloft, and the hounds are baying.
This is why the MRAs thinking is fatally flawed: You cannot negotiate for your rights with a group and society which views your life, your labor, and your assets as their property.
A dark tide is coming, brothers. Stand fast.
Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.
Pump and dump or straight monk.
Thankyou MgtowMonkey well said.A man is a better friend than a woman by far.
A dog is a man’s best friend for a reason.
Until and long after women get the picture that we see them for what they are they will never change.That may never happen.
frankly my dear i don't give a damn
Why do judges still think it’s 1856 or something?
Women should be able to look after themselves these days, get with the programme!
Just say no to drugs and women.
I hope somebody learns something from this.frankly my dear i don't give a damn
That’s unbelievable. Can he appeal that?
In another kangaroo court?
They consistently rob men blind after nearly every divorce, so men start walking away from marriage. In response, they demand that just co-habiting should entail some kind of benefit. So men start taking more precautions when it comes to that commitment. And lo and behold, that doesn’t work either.
Women these days literally offer nothing but vagina. Guys realized marriage wasn’t worth the price of vagina when you could just cohabitate and get vagina. Now they want to punish guys for cohabitating…so guys will just take another step back and just come over for booty calls when they want vagina…maybe spend an occasional night or weekend over, but ultimately maintain a separate residence so she has no legal claim to their assets.
maybe spend an occasional night or weekend over,
Always at her place, NEVER at yours. EVER.
Don’t even let her know your home address if at all possible.
The irony of all of this is that in the end…the entire scenario plays out just as KMs sigh just. Or in other words.. that step back eventually becomes turning ones back completely… resting in the mental rebirth of yet another MGHOW.
Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...
I’m not surprised that he lost. Although it’s UK and rules may be different, but Common Law is common knowledge around here.
What I do find surprising is the reasoning stating in the article. He promised he’d take care of her? He needs to be held to his word? No signed contract, not even a real verbal agreement? Wow. That is down right dangerous precedent.
But no, that man was not being cautious at all. He asked to a woman to quit her job and move herself and 2 kids in with him? There is nothing cautious about that. When kids involved and you want to live with her, I think you are actually better off marrying the woman then cohabitation. It seems like you would get better legal protection from issues as a legal guardian then just “my mom’s BF”. And obviously, it’s not any protection from a divorce settlement.
Ok. Then do it.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
