Elite men hurt non-elite men just like large corps foster socialism

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

I had the thought after reading a comment by a Brit in reaction to feminism dominance in British politics, that the reason why elite men throw non-elite men under the bus in order to favor women, is very similar to the behavior of large corporations. Elite men want to ensure their privately-educated sons face no threat of competition from the sons of non-elite-men.

Large corporations frequently (and counter-intuitively) support socialist and SJW policies that are bad for business and create an environment hostile to business. But it occurs to me, they can weather those difficulties more than a newly emerging competitor probably can. So large corps are willing to take a small profit cut to avoid the possibility of a disruptive competitor emerging.

It seems counter-intuitive, sort of like it was counter-intuitive that the big tobacco companies supported banning tobacco advertising. Until you realize how much money spent on marketing could now go straight into profits.

The support for SJW, Marxism and socialism by very large corporations is corroborating evidence that the US economy (like the Italian economy) is primary a Crony Capitalist system and not a Market Capitalist system.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22531]

Ranger One wrote:

Elite men want to ensure their privately-educated sons face no threat of competition from the sons of non-elite-men.

It all eventually collapses.

These elitists pass laws that grind non-elite-men into the dirt until these men have nothing but hatred in their hearts towards the elitist

But, the elitists do not stop their, they abuse and claim that if they hate the elitists, the elitist win, and if they do not accept the abuse and access the abuse done to them that they will be declared criminals and jailed for dare to complain about the abuse done to them.

Claim that the victim feeling hate towards the abuser means the abuse winds is another level of abuse by the abusers to control the emotions. This also turns the victim into a sociopath.

The level of evil is beyond reproach.

The elites do everything to drive non-elite-men into suicide and homeless and jail for the “crime” of being born.

But some non-elitist-men have taken red pills and black pills, which allow them to see the bigger picture.

That no leadership lasts when those leading make enemies of those keeping society going.

That elitists and their companies are heavily in debt.

That their true enemies, such as China, is slowly advancing on them in every way. That within two decades China will likely pull the rug on these elitists, leaving them without wealth, property, and power.

Then, the elitists come to a horrible conclusion. They lack the able to maintain their power and they do not dare draft the non-elitist-men because they are no sure which way the non-elitist-men will turn their rifles.

And there will be nowhere for the elitists to run to.

Meanwhile, those whom took the red and black pills are biding their time, quietly preparing, waiting for the collapse, which will signal the time of the great hunt.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

Just like the feudal/ Manor system.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22531]

Jan Sobieski wrote:

Just like the feudal/ Manor system.

Such systems lead to massive rebellions by the people.

And the internal politics of the leadership has countless assassinations and poisons within the group. Also, the leaders did not stray far from their homes and places of power, for fear someone would invade and take what they have.

During feudal times, most of the soldiers were part of the lower nobility class and none of the common people were soldiers, because the nobility worried the common people would teach these skills to other commoners and eventually use these skills against the nobility.

The current system has spoiled many of the elitists into believing that total control will lead to even more power. The truth of the matter is they do not know how good they got it. At the moment many of the rich do not have to watch their backs and they can move freely without worry.

Checks and balances in government are not to free the people, but keep the elitists in power. The checks and balances are relief valves to keep the pressure of the situations from building and eventually blowing up into rebellions.

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

Faust For Science wrote:

During feudal times, most of the soldiers were part of the lower nobility class and none of the common people were soldiers, because the nobility worried the common people would teach these skills to other commoners and eventually use these skills against the nobility.

Probably why so many rich and powerful people like Bloomberg want to disarm Americans. They already have their “knights” in the form of security or mercenaries.

Faust For Science wrote:

Checks and balances in government are not to free the people, but keep the elitists in power. The checks and balances are relief valves to keep the pressure of the situations from building and eventually blowing up into rebellions.

Sounds like you have also read up on Machiavelli. He’s very good reading if you want to know about Republics and the rationale for them.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22531]

Ranger One wrote:

Probably why so many rich and powerful people like Bloomberg want to disarm Americans. They already have their “knights” in the form of security or mercenaries.

Yes. But, one much never forget that mercenaries are in the job for money. Their loyalty is the money. They will not take foolish actions to save their clients if it means dying and not being able to spend their money.

Ranger One wrote:

Sounds like you have also read up on Machiavelli. He’s very good reading if you want to know about Republics and the rationale for them.

Yes. It is interesting that Machiavelli stated the best way to run a nation is to allow the common people to have stable jobs with homes and families because then these people would have a stake in fighting for their leader.

Also, Machiavelli stated that the people should be armed because the bandits and rebels will be armed no matter what happens.

On a side note, even Karl Marx was for firearm ownership of the people, and he directly stated the people should resist any attempts to disarm them.

[Author]

Posts