Egalitarian Outcomes, why it's impossible. (My weak logic at work)

[The Missing ManSpectator 342]

I am using binary logic to take apart Equal Outcomes, A binary one will come to represent an unequal outcome, and a binary 0 will come to represent an equal outcome.

Those that will denounce you wish for a world of equal sums, but the ideal is never realized in full. One equation of this can be, formed“A+B+….+X+Y+Z=0”. In logic this represents an OR statement “A+B=C”, If you don’t like the OR statement then you can have the AND statement “A*B=C”

One statement I have left out is the exclusive statement, the XOR statement(Its actually the XNOR statement for this case of always equaling zero). This would be spun to disprove what I’m going to say next as invalid, but I can spin it back to say that XOR could mean that you cannot have an equal opportunity with an Equal outcome

Let’s say ‘A’ represents you, and all other letter’s represent other individuals that make up societies statement of “Total Equality”.

Without getting into the complex idea of having to make a truth table to find the logic behind a C that always equals zero,, the most simplest way for the outcome to be zero is to make sure that the power to the logic statement is never turned on.

In order to have the game of equality ensuring that the outcome of all parties is Zero is for the logic circuit to never be turned on. While the rules will be set up, it will never be actually turned on. In fact, there is no circuit to be made…

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

For more conformation on this topic TFM just posted a reply to Computing Forever’s egalitation views on MGTOW.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Author]

Posts