Don't talk to me you're ugly, poor, and short.

[Anonymous 42]

Don’t talk to me you’re ugly, poor, and short.

Add $$$;

Talk to me, you’re charming, nice, and need my support!

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Atton wrote:

I am convinced that governments are producing MGTOW on purpose. It is the only way these laws make any sense.

Those laws are made by manginas who have an outdated chivalrous mentality in an effort to look modern / feminists. They have not even an hint about the practical outcomes: the problem is inflated, mainly a fake (check my signature: 100% women have been sexually harassed…), but making a young boy aware of the existence of such law automatically reduces the chances of a boy hitting on a girl, and this is going to have REAL consequences. Many, probably even most, young boys are already shy and afraid of rejections, then this is just like, as we say here, “to open fire against the ambulance”, especially in northern countries where men are already shy.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Jim01Participant 6678]

Cú Chulainn wrote:

I think Amsterdam has a problem with young immigrant men groping ze young white ladies.

But, why are so many immigrants in Holland in the first place? Because of low birth rates there and the misplaced altruism of the liberal (and feminist) government. A circular problem then, a dog chasing its own tail.

And, as sure as there’s a hole in my ass – the indigenous Dutch men, will get their collars felt by the police too, by innocently offering some cute but rabid feminist a drink in a public bar.

Because a white man looking to date a women will always be worse than a brown one with his c~~~ out in the street in the minds of these imbeciles.

I think you have probably found the REAL reason for this…

oh well – women love voting for parties that import the rapists so I have no sympathy

[OldBillParticipant]

Eric Lauder wrote:

A ban on porn always have been in the feminist agenda, right now radical feminists are requiring the Swedish government to criminalize men who watch porn WHILE ALLOWING PORN ACTRESSES TO DO THEIR JOB!

That’s merely an extension of the so-called Nordic or Swedish “model” of prostitution laws; selling sex remains legal while buying sex is criminalized. The “thinking” behind it is to reduce demand rather than reducing supply.

The model hasn’t worked as predict or as well as predicted, but it hasn’t stopped activists from trying to legislate it in other nations.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[markParticipant 451]

OldBill wrote:

selling sex remains legal while buying sex is criminalized.

So how come alimony is legal? Isn’t alimony payments for past vagina usage? 🙂

[OldBillParticipant]

mark wrote:

So how come alimony is legal?

The answer, brother, is vagina.

The answer always is vagina.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

OldBill wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

A ban on porn always have been in the feminist agenda, right now radical feminists are requiring the Swedish government to criminalize men who watch porn WHILE ALLOWING PORN ACTRESSES TO DO THEIR JOB!

That’s merely an extension of the so-called Nordic or Swedish “model” of prostitution laws; selling sex remains legal while buying sex is criminalized. The “thinking” behind it is to reduce demand rather than reducing supply.

The model hasn’t worked as predict or as well as predicted, but it hasn’t stopped activists from trying to legislate it in other nations.

The difference is that watching porn is much less stigmatized, and much more common. And criminalizing watching porn would mean to make stronger both the demand for sex robots and the creation of porn made with cartoons or computer graphic: it’s really hard to argue that a virtual actress is being exploited, and actual game engines are almost there to perfectly simulate human bodies (also because, being a movie, high frame rate in real time isn’t required: the computer can output very high quality models at 3-4 fps, then post-production could adjust the final product to be a movie showing the virtual models at 240 fps or even 480 fps…)

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Check that: this has been made FOUR YEARS AGO with an high end computer, worth less than 10,000 $

Now this is achievable with a 3,000 $ system: it isn’t suitable for real time videogames due the frame rate is too low, but it’s perfect for making a movie.
Restrictions on porn on the ground that “actresses are exploited” would going to make such approach widespread in a matter of six months.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[markParticipant 451]

Eric Lauder wrote:

The difference is that watching porn is much less stigmatized, and much more common. And criminalizing watching porn would mean to make stronger both the demand for sex robots and the creation of porn made with cartoons or computer graphic

It doesn’t even matter. Even if they ban all porn and all trips to East Asia, Eastern Europe, or South America. We still have minds and hands.

Are feminist going to chop of my hands and lobotomize me?…oh wait…

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

mark wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

The difference is that watching porn is much less stigmatized, and much more common. And criminalizing watching porn would mean to make stronger both the demand for sex robots and the creation of porn made with cartoons or computer graphic

It doesn’t even matter. Even if they ban all porn and all trips to East Asia, Eastern Europe, or South America. We still have minds and hands.

Are feminist going to chop of my hands and lobotomize me?…oh wait…

There’s a chance that 20 years from now we’ll be able to generate our own customized porn movies by simply downloading virtual models (furtherly customizable by the users in many details) and using an editor that simply translate words of a text in actions to be watched in the VR visor, all that synchronized with a motorized fleshlight/blowjob machine.
Those laws are paving the way for such developments.

Feminism is based on the wrong equation:
more restrictions on men’s sexuality = higher price for the pussy.

They do it because they think that men will keep hitting on women no matter how many restrictions on male sexuality the state enact.
They’re wrong: victimhood can work just only as long as real women are involved in the process, if you take away real women (sex robots instead of escorts, virtual models instead of porn actresses) then feminists aren’t going to be able to convince politicians.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[OldBillParticipant]

Eric Lauder wrote:

The difference is that watching porn is much less stigmatized, and much more common.

And remarkably common among women.

Thanks to the internet the data is there, no matter how much women want to ignore it. The book Everyone Lies, which we’ve discussed here before, contains all sort of pesky facts women will never admit to.

While women do not search for porn online as often as men, they watch porn for longer periods of time so the amount of porn being watched by both sexes is roughly the same. Women also search for and watch violent porn at rates far exceeding men and do so worldwide. While 5% of pron searches by men involve homosexuality, 20% of searches by women do.

Facts like this mean women will make a lot of noises about banning porn while never taking any real action.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

OldBill wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

The difference is that watching porn is much less stigmatized, and much more common.

And remarkably common among women.

Thanks to the internet the data is there, no matter how much women want to ignore it. The book Everyone Lies, which we’ve discussed here before, contains all sort of pesky facts women will never admit to.

While women do not search for porn online as often as men, they watch porn for longer periods of time so the amount of porn being watched by both sexes is roughly the same. Women also search for and watch violent porn at rates far exceeding men and do so worldwide. While 5% of pron searches by men involve homosexuality, 20% of searches by women do.

Facts like this mean women will make a lot of noises about banning porn while never taking any real action.

And 84% of homosexual porn searched by men is lesbian porn: a straight or bi man watching two women.
While 97% of homosexual porn searched by women is…lesbian porn again.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[OldBillParticipant]

Eric Lauder wrote:

And 84% of homosexual porn searched by men is lesbian porn: a straight or bi man watching two women.
While 97% of homosexual porn searched by women is…lesbian porn again.

When I wrote “homosexual” I should have been accurate and written gay and lesbian. Five percent of searches made by men is for gay porn and 20% of searches made by women is for lesbian porn.

I’ve yet to read the book and only have read reviews, interviews, and various synopses.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[Anonymous 42]

Eric Lauder wrote:

The difference is that watching porn is much less stigmatized, and much more common. And criminalizing watching porn would mean to make stronger both the demand for sex robots and the creation of porn made with cartoons or computer graphic: it’s really hard to argue that a virtual actress is being exploited, and actual game engines are almost there to perfectly simulate human bodies (also because, being a movie, high frame rate in real time isn’t required: the computer can output very high quality models at 3-4 fps, then post-production could adjust the final product to be a movie showing the virtual models at 240 fps or even 480 fps…)

I think the high end sexbots are gonna be programmable and interactive, a robot that “jumps you’re bone”, selecting a fuzzy logic predetermined disposition, kinda like the old fashioned high-medeum-low dials when things were analog.

The next sex bot down the price-line will sit in your lap and strap to your torso with all the pussy pulling, contracting, and lubrication functions as the full size bot, 3D HD goggles will give you a selection of programmable eye candy that moves in seamless unison with the lap-bot.

Most men will be poor from the collapse and stuck with jerking off! One thing’s for sure, real pussy is no longer economically viable, no matter where you are on the hypergamy $cale! Money doesn’t buy your way out of this one, it can only buy you a top of the line sexbot that can outperform any woman!

Look into my crystal unicorn ball:

[markParticipant 451]

This.

When this happens, the fun will begin. Women will burn their calories and pink underpits real fast. Then they will turn against their elder “sisters” and kill them all.

Too bad the female robots will be sitting down waiting for the survivors to come home, lure them with some government entitlement of some sort, and kill them all.

I am saving up for one Asian and one blonde, both bisexual of course.

[OldBillParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

I think the high end sexbots are gonna be…

I’ve written about this before, but now is as good a time for a recap as any.

The first “sexbots” you’ll see are going to be adjuncts to gaming systems. The “animatronic” Real Dolls many either worry about or wish for aren’t going to be the norm for several very good reasons like price, storage, maintenance, variety, and so forth.

The gaming industry is already working on tactile feedback for an ostensibly better gaming experience. Because it would bring down a storm of criticism on an industry already in the cross hairs of feminists and their allies in media and governments, what isn’t talked about is the fact that tactile feedback is the primary requirement for any simulated sexual act.

Once gaming consoles begin to offer peripherals like gloves, shoes, and vest which produce tactile feedback, simulated sex is not very far away.

The “sexbot” most men will own will not differ much from any high end gaming system. There will be a 3D visor, ear buds, a neck-to-knee tactile feedback garment, gloves, perhaps even a hood. The biggest difference between the gaming system and the “sexbot” will the presence of a “fleshlight” controlled by the console and the programming the console is running.

Such a system will cost far less than a full sized android. It will be much easier to store. It will be much easier to keep clean. Maintenance will amount to little except buying new peripherals. Upgrades and updates will be handled the same way. Most importantly, variety is simply a matter of buying different programs instead of buying different ‘bots or parts for bots.

Just as currently where a few men own Real Dolls and many more own fleshlights, there will be full on android sexbots. It’s just that far more men will own the type of system I’ve described even if they can afford the android. The benefits of a easily stored, cleaned, maintained, and above all variable system outweigh the ‘bot.

I’ve met and worked some of the people working on tactile feedback and this is a distilled version of what they’ve told me. They’ll never say it in public, but they’re all aware of what tactile feedback really means, what it will really be used for, and the vast amount of money that will made when it is achieved.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

What is really clear is that MGTOW is much more suited to deal with the foreseeable future than everyone else in the manosphere: look at that s~~~, it’s going to be very dangerous for PUAs, somewhat dangerous and for sure uncomfortable for all other men who keep to pursuit women (including many MRAs) and practically beneficial to MGTOWs in monk mode…actually MGTOW monks get more benefits from that than the average woman! 😀
The next years are going to be very interesting 😀

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

These laws are used for women to control it better, but as usual it backfires on them. Because they assume men will always want them.

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

bigboy83 wrote:

These laws are used for women to control it better, but as usual it backfires on them. Because they assume men will always want them.

The only problem for MGTOW I can see in such kind of laws is that it’ll create more boys who remain virgins due they’re afraid to approach girls, and that it’s going, in the long run, to pollute MGTOW with new menbers who doesn’t understand real benefits from MGTOW lifestyle and are just angry because they didn’t get laid.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[trader1913Participant 1577]

This is the evolution of previously apparent female behaviours.

In the past if you hit on a woman and she didnt like it, she would either slap you or get one of her male acquaintances to threaten you. Now she is using daddy government to do this.

MGTOW and technical innovation is man’s response to this female behaviour.

[Author]

Posts