Did Women’s Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government?

Topic by Crazy Canuck

Crazy Canuck

Home Forums MGTOW Central Did Women’s Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government?

This topic contains 5 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by RoyDal  RoyDal 3 years, 10 months ago.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #209006
    +5
    Crazy Canuck
    Crazy Canuck
    Member
    4215

    We all know there’s plenty of anti feminists will claim it’s the elite’s fault. However in reality before the bankers funded feminism, women themselves created a big government what we see today. In a short amount of time when women were allowed to vote, laws like alimony and child support were passed. I’m talking about 1 st wave feminism not the 2nd wave. It continued obviously and yes it was the fault of the women because they voted for the benefits.

    The sad thing is women are destroying everything men have built which wasn’t easy. Women continue to ask for free stuff which men end up paying like free birth control, free tampons. Unlike the idiots in Canada I know the country will out of money and eventually we will f~~~ed. Thanks women and this is why we don’t care because we can’t stop you worthless sad women. Men have always been disposable so I guess it is in our very nature.

    http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~iversen/PDFfiles/LottKenny.pdf

    "If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

    #209013
    +4
    Blue Skies
    Blue Skies
    Participant
    15665

    yes, thats right

    the high taxes today is the reason why it takes two incomes in a family to raise kids…

    before the world wars, there was no such thing as income tax. Imagine that!

    the government will get bigger and bigger cuz women are mostly socialists….they want the government to replace fathers.

    MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.

    #209030
    +1
    Rennie
    Rennie
    Participant

    That’s why I said before, feminism was bad from the very day it was connived. They don’t ask for free stuff, they demand and believe they are entitled to it.

    It disgusts me that women are ruining what took centuries to build up. They eagerly give away our wealth and prosperity to people who aren’t entitled to it. Men made it and they purposely waste it out of spite.

    Canada will be bankrupted down the road too, because of the idea being floated by liberals to give everyone the equivalent of a welfare check.

    #209039
    +2
    Prefer Peace to Piece
    Prefer Peace to Piece
    Participant
    10809

    It seems our country went downhill after women’s suffrage. Women demand endless benefits and entitlements. I don’t know how we will change this (if it can be changed). All men can do is be indifferent towards women, and avoid some of the personal land mines such as marriage, sperm jacking, false rape/dv accusations etc.

    #209050
    +3
    Bob__
    bob__
    Participant
    946

    Men have always been the real victims of the patriarchy. While women were screaming for the right to vote, men were being turned into Swiss cheese just because the patriarchy wanted to play Risk in real life.

    #209206
    +1
    RoyDal
    RoyDal
    Participant

    I, RoyDal, subscribe to the social cycle theory, while recognizing its flaws of course.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_cycle_theory There are too many examples throughout history that fit the theory’s general template to ignore.

    Social cycle theory would have Western Civilization in its decline phase. I agree. All around we see otherwise sensible people (meaning highly educated academics, lawyers and politicians) demanding security in the form of a police state and discarding freedom for us all in order to get it. The feminists are in their front ranks, and the herd is either following or passively letting it happen. Gone are the days when the slightest attempt to contravene the US Constitution would have caused an uproar in Congress and with the public at large. Long gone. Grandpa might remember those days from his early childhood, but his protests are easily ignored.

    [If we are not living in a secret police state, then we’re scary-close. All the mechanisms are in place. They have been accreting since the death of JFK, if not sooner. — RD.]

    Did women’s suffrage cause the decline, or is it a symptom? I am leaning toward symptom — that is, it arose out of the decline without being a direct cause. It is a positive feedback. Meaning, women’s suffrage is one of the many factors that are hastening the decline, and, at the same time, are growing in strength because of it. The enforced effeminization of men is another classic symptom, as is the masculinization of women combined with an utter disregard for what used to be common sense proprieties.

    [The value of proprieties is aptly demonstrated in that thread comparing Marilyn Monroe with Miley Cyrus. — RD.]

    Overall, the takers are in charge and the achievers have been relegated to a form of serfdom: Pay your taxes or else, peasant! If things continue on this course, then the day will come when they run out of peasants to tax. Everyone will be on the socialist dole. Why work when some bitch is going to take my money to spend it on junk food?

    [Fun fact: In the US, 94-million adults are out of work; 132-million are working. — RD.]

    My favorite example of the rise and fall of civilization is Ancient Rome. (This is mostly because I enjoy reading historical novels about that time and place.) Gibbon got it basically right, and we see the same social movements (adapted for our time and place) at work in Western Civ.

    Edit: I’ve read Gibbon in summary. I haven’t plowed through the entire original, and my hat’s off to anyone who has. — RD.

    Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.