Destroying manginas and sjw's and feminists

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

aeragoan wrote:

Everytime the term women empowerment,women equality,crime against women etc comes along..my mgtow brain just destroyed each n every argument of my professor,sjw,manginas n even feminazis..

If you can do this in a civil and intelligent way with no shred of anger I would say go for it. If you can’t you will just discredit yourself no matter how true or false your argument.
“It’s not what you say, it’s how you say it” This adage holds true.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

When I was younger I would have agreed with you—be unafraid to take up the mantle of verbal combat against the clueless. But as I’m older and hopefully wiser I have learned that those driven by emotionalism, dogma, and PC orthodoxy do not and never will respond to logic and reason. (I provided a lengthy analysis of this in a thread a few days ago)

This is no lie a SJW told me one time that “facts” can be racist. Really? Facts? You might find some utility in this phrase when they are trying to shame you: So you are advocating for conformity to diversity? Or we must all conform in order to be diverse?

Here is another one: I’ve seen the video of the self-righteous SJW bitch telling a guy to take his Trump hat off. Now he argues with her—mistake. You always want to ask questions that they can’t answer—not argue. Socratic method. He should have said: What is your source of authority to issue directives/orders to me or anyone else? What can she say? Then he could have followed up:
Do I have that authority as well? Does everyone? Are there limits to that authority? who decides the limits? and on and on…leaves them in the dust.

[Better without YOUParticipant 234]

Agree with many here its kind of like those people who just suddenly ask you if you’ve met your lord and savior, Jesus Christ and s~~~.

On an article the other day, someone posted a comment about mgtow.com trying to recruit people and that is fine, but the feminists alone and their pets are doing all of the recruiting on their own.

Your heart is in the right place, but what I am saying is those people with those opinions are communicating to everyone what they are, and they are going to crash and burn. I hope it doesn’t seem I am being critical just agreeing with others to not put a target on your back. They don’t deserve the truth. They are going to crash and burn with stupidity while you stand tall, and when they reach out their hand to you you just walk the f~~~ away, and save a fart for those occasions so it’s only them and the smell of their failure. F~~~ them.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

aeragoan wrote:

my mgtow brain just destroyed each n every argument of my professor,sjw,manginas n even feminazis..I liked the look on their faces fuming

You have truth on your side, and nobody can compete with that.

All truth passes through 3 stages:
First it is ridiculed.
Then it is violently opposed.
And finally, it is accepted as being self-evident.

Nicely done.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 54]

I agree with everything everyone said.

But it is a debate class yes? Good chance to practice.

[Better without YOUParticipant 234]

Anonymous wrote:

But it is a debate class yes? Good chance to practice.

Oh, I missed that. I bet when they created debate class they didn’t mean THAT kind of debate. Snow flakes were probably melted everywhere with thermal truth bombs.

[SolidParticipant 7520]

Anonymous wrote:

I agree with everything everyone said.
But it is a debate class yes? Good chance to practice.

Another good point brother ! Practise to argue is something that is good for any field of work.

Keymaster wrote:

You have truth on your side, and nobody can compete with that.

All truth passes through 3 stages:
First it is ridiculed.
Then it is violently opposed.
And finally, it is accepted as being self-evident.

I wonder, where between 1 and 2 we are, because I bet a beer that feminists aren’t that crazy to try to violently “oppress” MGTOW, several of our brothers here have guns, and they are not afraid to use it to protect themselves. When (or if) it happens someday, I would enjoy to watch it !

[FermatParticipant 3478]

Keep speaking your mind. Theres a difference between ghosting and passivism.

I have discovered a truly remarkable list of reasons why women are not necessary for a happy life, but alas this margin is too small to contain it.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Throwing facts and logic it’s mostly useless and makes you at risk.
You’ll NEVER convince most people with facts: facts need deep analysis and most people are too lazy to even try to go so deep. Also, feminism is just women nature getting into politics: they use emotions, feelings and, when it suits to their goal, gender stereotypes. EVERY person who doesn’t immediatly recognize and reject arguments purely based on emotions/feelings/stereotypes cannot be convinced using facts, NEVER.
That’s why tere’s just only a way to fight against feminazism: agreeing with them and spouting double standards and sexism against men like it’s raining. When a female agree with you, you score a point, when a declared feminist agree with you, you score ten points, when a feminist professor agree with you, you score 100 points.
People like Julie Bindel aren’t our enemies: they are our best (unwillingly) allies, they should be encouraged to spout even more hatred and bulls~~~.
There’s NO LIMIT to the hatred that some feminists have against men, they just limit themselves because they usually feel that they haven’t a proper crowd to fully express their hatred.
Give them the impression that there are people sharing their hatred, and they’ll go over the top, revealing their real intentions.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Solo MAN’S WisdomParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

However in war that would be a suicidal approach. One does not engage a superior army in frontal attack.

WE are the superior army. Superior tactics, intelligence, strength, etc. They only have numbers.

When women lead, destruction is the destination. -- Me.

[nick123Participant 137]

Anonymous wrote:

Some of us (me included) find it diffecult to remain silent. I think there is a time for stealth, when nessesary, but if you can STAND THE F~~~ UP LIKE A F~~~INF MAN and let them have it.. Well I applaud you.

It is Mens being silent that has causes all of this s~~~. F~~~ stealth.

Way to go kid!!!!!

(F~~~ stealth, the concept, not the guy!)

totally agree with this comment above. Why the f~~~ sit quiet and wimpy and do nothing? what was that famous saying???? ALL EVIL NEEDS TO SUCCEED IS FOR GOOD MEN TO DO NOTHING.
In my opinion men who opt not to speak out on a particular topic a cowards and have no backbone.

[GrumpyParticipant]

Sometimes, those assclowns need to be “educated” on how wrong their bulls~~~ is.
If one does not correct an error, that error will continue to happen, until it becomes “correct in both fact and truth” to the lemmings.

There is a time for both inaction and action.

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

We beat all 3 on november 8 and including political correctness, and the old stop pretending your offended bulls~~~.

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[Anonymous 3]

Solo MAN’S Wisdom wrote:

GhostDog wrote:

However in war that would be a suicidal approach. One does not engage a superior army in frontal attack.

WE are the superior army. Superior tactics, intelligence, strength, etc. They only have numbers.

Ever read “Tactics of Mistake” from Gordon R. Dickson?

There is this scene where Cletus Grahame proposes a shell game with Dow deCastries to show his tactics. deCastries wins a first time. Obviously everybody started laughing, because they thought Cletus had failed.
The second time deCastries wins, the laughing gets reduced. At the third win Cletus Grahame says “apparently you cannot lose in my game…”
The idea was that Cletus controlled the game, while deCastries was deceived into one layered thinking.

A superior army is exactly what many have been talking in this thread. Superior tactics is to fight only to win.

“The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.”
― Sun Tzu, The Art of War

[Author]

Posts