Demographics shift

[743 roadmasterParticipant]

https://www.dailywire.com/news/43880/ocasio-cortez-people-maybe-shouldnt-reproduce-due-ryan-saavedra

Ocasio-Cortez: People Shouldn’t Reproduce Due To Climate Change

——————-Turley brings up interesting poll and connects it with political issues. Liberals of course want abortions and the like even after the child is born. If you kill off all of your offspring then there is no or a much smaller next generation. Christian thus conservative value is in the family. So it comes down to when will the change from liberal to more conservative happen,…..somewhere around 2030.
Before Trump, it looked bleak. It seems an overall change in the political and social system is in the works. Just need to make more changes in the education system.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[narwhalParticipant]

But politics and religion are far from guaranteed to be passed down from parent to child, particularly when society gears kids to learn more from schools and media than their own parents. Besides the fact that liberals currently control the methods of indoctrination, the liberal personality tends to land them in media and teaching jobs. Very few conservatives even want to do these things.

There is also the fact that kids often want to rebel against parents who put any kind of restriction on them. Meaning conservative parents are more likely to have liberal children than liberal parents are to have conservative children. There is also the fact that as population centers overpopulate, they tend grow more and more liberal.

Lastly, the very argument that liberals are aborting more than conservatives is incorrect. Conservatives do get abortions, they just talk about it less to avoid shame and avoid hypocrisy. There is more shame to having a child out of wedlock as well.

I’d say the biggest factor in demographic shift is going to be liberals taking things too far to the left, where the common man just can’t stomach it anymore. And all the current failures of socialism. But people have short memories, whatever gains the right gets now could easily be lost a few short years from now.

Ok. Then do it.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

The demographics shifts work under the theory that people will have children with members of their own race. That is not the case.

Hispanics are part white and after two generations of mixing with “white” people their “white” children that appear just as white as Anglo-Germanic mix most U.S. whites are.

Sometimes this only takes one generation. I know a few case of where one hispanic parent and one “white” parent had two children. One child had a dark skin tone, the other child was “white”.

And if you dig deep enough into the past of North America you will find that many, many “white” U.S. citizens have at least some hispanic ancestry from either spanish colonists or their escaped portuguese slaves.

I have some information from people I have personally talked to whom are deep into looking at family trees. They found that a number of southeastern U.S. native american tribes were mostly of portuguese ancestry.

This is likely why when people here they may have had a native american ancestor a few centuries ago, but they cannot find any evidence, that ancestor was likely either a portuguese slave, or descendant of a portuguese slave.

This puts whole new spin on the “one drop” rule.

It should also be noted a see a lot of white men dating asian women, and black men dating any women whom are not black.

Now, on politics. The 2018 elections cannot be used an example due to two factors.

One for the first time in history 45 members of the ruling party of the house, the republicans, quit and they refused to help those whom ran in their place.

Also, there was much open cheating by the democrats with leaving ballot places open days after the election and corrupt ballot harvesting.

[JB BooksParticipant 3182]

The younger crowd will get more conservative as they age. I try not to get real worked up over what might happen when there’s not a damned thing I can do about it.

We just don't realize life's most significant events while they're happening. Back then, I thought, "Well, there'll be other days". I didn't realize that that was the only day. - "Moonlight" Graham

[AwakenedParticipant 35201]

You really didn’t think that I would WATE MY TIME by clicking on ANYTHING that has climate change and Ocasio-Cortez in the title ???? LOL LOL LOL LOL

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[MonkParticipant 16983]

The demographic shift will continue to accelerate. There will be a backlash, but it will be too little, too late.

Collapse is now inevitable.

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

51% of the people should not be able to tyrannize 49% of the population. That was not why the Republic was set up as it was, with constitutional rights.

I tend to be more libertarian than conservative, and I absolutely hated George W. Bush as president. But it has slowly become clear that the democrats and liberals are a greater threat to individual freedom and the republic than conservatives or republicans.

A civil war may be needed to set things right. It may be necessary to nuke a few Marxist urban centers. If a civil war goes hot, nukes SHOULD be used. If you look at a map of red areas and blue areas on a county-by-county basis, the red areas are like 95% of the country and the blue areas are like 5% of the country in tight urban clusters.

When I see a tight urban cluster, I think cobalt bomb. What are they going to do, nuke all the farmland where their food comes from? LOL. Nuking 5% of the country will harm the 95% far less, than 5% of the country trying to nuke 95%.

Those Marxist blue urban areas are like tumors in an otherwise health host. How do you kill a cancer? With radiation.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[narwhalParticipant]

Ranger One wrote:

A civil war may be needed to set things right. It may be necessary to nuke a few Marxist urban centers. If a civil war goes hot, nukes SHOULD be used. If you look at a map of red areas and blue areas on a county-by-county basis, the red areas are like 95% of the country and the blue areas are like 5% of the country in tight urban clusters.

Absolutely not. First off, if you have access to nukes, then you have access to the military. If you have the military, then there really is no civil war since the left side doesn’t have any force to protect themselves. The urban gangsters certainly aren’t going to do it. All you’d really have is random protest/riots demanding free s~~~, which is pretty much what we already have.

There is also the fact that nuking our own cities is going to have serious impact on the international scale. I have little doubt that it would give justification to Russia, China to invade and/or nuke us…as a humanitarian mission. And since we are not their to police the world, the muslim front will go unchecked, and Russian and China will look to expand. We will basically have WW3.

Now, if the liberals have control over the government, then it will be loads of small skirmishes with the media painting conservatives/libertarians as outlaws. It won’t work though, as the liberals cannot function without conservatives funding them. I suspect it will end up with the US splitting into multiple countries with various governments from libertarian, conservative, to full socialism. Mass migration. In 10 years or so the socialist governments will fail and become wastelands.

Ok. Then do it.

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

narwhal wrote:

Ranger One wrote:

A civil war may be needed to set things right. It may be necessary to nuke a few Marxist urban centers. If a civil war goes hot, nukes SHOULD be used. If you look at a map of red areas and blue areas on a county-by-county basis, the red areas are like 95% of the country and the blue areas are like 5% of the country in tight urban clusters.

Absolutely not. First off, if you have access to nukes, then you have access to the military. If you have the military, then there really is no civil war since the left side doesn’t have any force to protect themselves. The urban gangsters certainly aren’t going to do it. All you’d really have is random protest/riots demanding free s~~~, which is pretty much what we already have.
There is also the fact that nuking our own cities is going to have serious impact on the international scale. I have little doubt that it would give justification to Russia, China to invade and/or nuke us…as a humanitarian mission. And since we are not their to police the world, the muslim front will go unchecked, and Russian and China will look to expand. We will basically have WW3.
Now, if the liberals have control over the government, then it will be loads of small skirmishes with the media painting conservatives/libertarians as outlaws. It won’t work though, as the liberals cannot function without conservatives funding them. I suspect it will end up with the US splitting into multiple countries with various governments from libertarian, conservative, to full socialism. Mass migration. In 10 years or so the socialist governments will fail and become wastelands.

Access to cholera is easier. Busting the water supply and bottling up cities (bridges, mines, snipers) should be easier than nuke access. Cholera is an ideal weapon to use in a civil war against cities.

So are natural gas lines.

Were nukes used against a few cities, a warning to China and Russia that ANY nukes hitting us from them or any troops invading us or our allies would result in the entire remaining US arsenal being launched against them. Inform them that any so-called humanitarian missions will result in every square foot of Russia and China being vaporized.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[743 roadmasterParticipant]

Awakened wrote:

You really didn’t think that I would WATE MY TIME by clicking on ANYTHING that has climate change and Ocasio-Cortez in the title ???? LOL LOL LOL LOL

,…placed that in to make the point the liberals do not want a next generation, which I am all to happy not having them breed.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[ResidentEvil7Participant 9543]

Every damn time I see or hear from Osascio-Cortez, I just want to slap that stupid c~~~ in the face real HARD! I don’t know how anyone as stupid as her can elected to high office and be as big a problem as she has been. Like I said, she is dumber than cow s~~~; she says we have 12 more years left to live if we don’t address climate change and she says to stop having kids because of climate change and all the other idiotic things she stands for in the Green New Deal. Seriously, she is dumber than cow s~~~; I don’t know how she ever got elected! And frankly I’m sick of seeing her and hearing her every night on FOX News. It’s like they’re trying to make a celebrity out of her, when they really should be shaming her all over the place! Again, I just want to slap that f~~~ing c~~~ in the face as hard as I can I would be funny!

https://themanszone.webs.com/

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

ResidentEvil7 wrote:

Every damn time I see or hear from Osascio-Cortez, I just want to slap that stupid c~~~ in the face real HARD! I don’t know how anyone as stupid as her can elected to high office and be as big a problem as she has been. Like I said, she is dumber than cow s~~~; she says we have 12 more years left to live if we don’t address climate change and she says to stop having kids because of climate change and all the other idiotic things she stands for in the Green New Deal. Seriously, she is dumber than cow s~~~; I don’t know how she ever got elected! And frankly I’m sick of seeing her and hearing her every night on FOX News. It’s like they’re trying to make a celebrity out of her, when they really should be shaming her all over the place! Again, I just want to slap that f~~~ing c~~~ in the face as hard as I can I would be funny!

You and me both. The people who voted for her are even dumber than she is.

I wish she were into bestiality, so she could die from something like a perforated rectum after being cornholed by a horse.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[narwhalParticipant]

ResidentEvil7 wrote:

I don’t know how she ever got elected!

Not that hard to figure out. She comes from a small liberal district. Less than 100k voted for her. she replaced an incumbent democrat who was too busy playing in his band to bother to campaign in the primaries. And yet she’s treated as if she represents thousands.

ResidentEvil7 wrote:

And frankly I’m sick of seeing her and hearing her every night on FOX News.

Why watch it if it makes you sick? Sadly, she get ratings. Same as news about Trump.

I honestly don’t think she’ll last much longer. The democrats are using her as a distraction, but that will only work for so long. Eventually, she’ll get tired of being treated like an idiot, Pelosi will bury her in a corner, and the media will find something else to talk about. I don’t even thing she’ll win re-election as she’s too embarrassing for her district.

Ok. Then do it.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

The democratic party has been fractured by its own insane radicals. Obama started it. This will be their undoing because previously, the Mexicans and Blacks block-voted Democrat across the board. Going forward, a more and more significant % of Blacks and Mexicans are moving Independent. This means they are waking up.

But how easily persuaded are they? It seems more likely that in the ashes of the Democratic party, a more sane and rational nominee will arise and sweet talk them all back…

We’re in for more of the same, 8 years Red, 8 years Blue, 8 years Red, …… the two party system is alive and well.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

Gravel Pit wrote:

Obama started it.

Actually, this started in the 1990’s with Hillary Clinton’s “vast right wing conspiracy” false accusations.

While the government has been almost fully corrupt for decades beforehand, Hillary Clinton’s introduced the “politics of personal destruction” to the national stage towards entire groups of people. She made things personal.

When Bush 43 won, the Clintons went to ground for a while they used Al Gore as the face to push radical environmentalism while they secretly took over the anti-war movement, this was why there were no anti-war movements under Obama’s military actions. When Obama took Hillary’s chance in 2008, she cut a deal with Obama that made her a fortune at the expense of many more people. When Hillary lost in 2016 she and her allies set into motion to fully radicalize as many people against President Trump and his supporters as possible, at all levels, in a plan that is clearly spiteful to the point if she cannot rule the nation, she will see the nation burned to the ground.

Hillary Clinton has spent the last forty years poisoning the nation’s economy and culture. And it is doubtful the nation will survive her poison.

[Author]

Posts