Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Could men have a saying about abortion?
Tagged: Abortion. Rights
This topic contains 23 replies, has 14 voices, and was last updated by 
Eric Lauder 10 months, 3 weeks ago.
- AuthorPosts
I saw there’s a topic about Alabama, but today another similar law (and even better) passed in Oklahoma, and here there’s a deeper analysis:
Could men have a saying about abortion?
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Could men have a saying about abortion?
My only desired say on abortion would be for every woman who has ever dragged a man through divorce court for “no fault” of his, she should be aborted. Stones have been traditional for such, but giving the nod to the sacrament of abortion, I would be OK with a little spinal snip.
There’s no easy answer to that question, at least not when the question is asked too late. A father is clearly effected by the decision to give birth or to abort. Besides financial, he also has emotional stake in the decision. To suggest otherwise is nonsensical. Likewise, the mother has a financial and emotional state at play.
The correct answer is to allow both men and women to legal define their intentions when it comes to birth before conception occurs. The time for debate is before it’s too late to disagree. A man should be able to legally state he will not consent to an abortion, will provide financially, will care for the child…or he can state that he will do consent to abortion and take no responsibility what so ever. The same goes for a woman. If this is all stated upfront, then the two will be well aware of the consequences of their action before have sex and potentially conceiving a child. If you don’t like that he won’t agree to pay for the kid, THEN DON’T F~~~ HIM. Likewise, if you don’t want her to abort your kid, THEN DON”T F~~~ HER.
Ok. Then do it.
The fact that this question is even asked is a sign of how utterly cucked up and gynocentric this planet has become.
A man and a woman work together to make and raise a child. A woman does more nurturing, a man does more hard work to secure the mother and child resources. It was ever thus. This is the way of mankind. The fact that the child resides inside the mother at first is a natural part of this. Later the mother will do less and the father work harder than she.
Should men have a say in abortion -its as moronic a question as should men have a part in conception. Two parents are bound together in a child forever, its in the very DNA of life.
As to abortion against one parent’s will -cursed be the heart that thought the thought, cursed be the mouth that gave the word, cursed be the hand that did the deed and cursed be all those who say it is not a wicked thing.
A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own
There’s no easy answer to that question, at least not when the question is asked too late. A father is clearly effected by the decision to give birth or to abort. Besides financial, he also has emotional stake in the decision. To suggest otherwise is nonsensical. Likewise, the mother has a financial and emotional state at play.
The correct answer is to allow both men and women to legal define their intentions when it comes to birth before conception occurs. The time for debate is before it’s too late to disagree. A man should be able to legally state he will not consent to an abortion, will provide financially, will care for the child…or he can state that he will do consent to abortion and take no responsibility what so ever. The same goes for a woman. If this is all stated upfront, then the two will be well aware of the consequences of their action before have sex and potentially conceiving a child. If you don’t like that he won’t agree to pay for the kid, THEN DON’T F~~~ HIM. Likewise, if you don’t want her to abort your kid, THEN DON”T F~~~ HER.None of that will matter. Its heresay. Even when women sign papers they claim they didnt understand what they were signing and/or were coerced or felt pressure to say something/sign something.
Stating stuff upfront doesnt work for anything eith women now. They get to retroactively change their minds and f~~~ the guy over.
Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.
The correct answer is to allow both men and women to legal define their intentions when it comes to birth before conception occurs. The time for debate is before it’s too late to disagree. A man should be able to legally state he will not consent to an abortion, will provide financially, will care for the child…
That’s my conclusion as well, but you missed its application to reality – from my article:
In my opinion the best option would be financial abortion for men, but that’s impossible to pass since both Republicans and Dems are against it, so to give to fathers a saying on abortion may be the only actually available viable strategy to some advancement for men’s rights.
We have to deal with actual political and societal landscape, to squeeze out all the good we can, not just to pursue “the best” – remember guys:
“the best, not the bad, is the worst enemy of the good“
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
I wonder how hard it would be to start a huge online group of men that will declare that men have a right to financially abort, and simply tell the various government entities that is how it is going to be, and f~~~ their laws.
If 20 million men suddenly just up and refused to comply with their rules, what the f~~~ could they do? Lock every one up? I think men should start forming “political unions”, like a labor union, except that you go on strike for political rights instead of labor rights.
Simply shut society down until the f~~~ing c~~~ politicians comply.
All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.
VASECTOMY.
To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.
VASECTOMY.
NO.
Ligature of tubes for women or financial abortion for men: tertium non daturIn logic, the law of excluded middle (or the principle of excluded middle) states that for any proposition, either that proposition is true or its negation is true. It is one of the so called three laws of thought, along with the law of noncontradiction, and the law of identity. The law of excluded middle is logically equivalent to the law of noncontradiction by De Morgan’s laws. However, no system of logic is built on just these laws, and none of these laws provide inference rules, such as modus ponens or De Morgan’s laws.
The law is also known as the law (or principle) of the excluded third, in Latin principium tertii exclusi. Another Latin designation for this law is tertium non datur: “no third [possibility] is given”.
Vasectomy is gynocentrism.
Ligature of tubes for women or financial abortion for men: tertium non datur
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
I’m against financial abortion for men. Who ends up paying for it when Chad and Tyrone financially abort? If you pay taxes raise your hand.
An actual improvement to the system would be women taking more responsibility for their actions, not men taking less.
But patriarchy, pay gap, oppression, etc…. We are 100 years away from your suggestion, minimum. Women have had the narrative for the last 50 years that they are oppressed by men. Before you get what you want we first have to come to the agreement that women aren’t oppressed anymore, and then that equality has to be in place for a few generations before you can really even begin to get laws changed in men’s favor.
That’s why the best option is MGTOW. Do not cohabitate, do not impregnate. If it really bothers you, the best you can do personally today is remove yourself from the situation.
Order the good wine
in Latin principium tertii exclusi
If you don’t pay your child support you go directly to jail. That is freedom interuptus in pig latin. Get a vasectomy. Like AOC says, we have too many babies as it is.
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.
There’s no easy answer to that question, at least not when the question is asked too late.
Naw. There’s a very easy answer. It’s called equality. Actual equality.
Men should have an equal right to choose. If women cannot have motherhood imposed upon them, but instead have a right to “choose”, then men should likewise not have fatherhood imposed upon them. Where is my right to choose?
Only when women are responsible to pay for their own choices will they stop making bad ones.
The correct answer is to allow both men and women to legal define their intentions when it comes to birth before conception occurs.
Unfortunately, it’s a biological fact that conception occurs inside women, and women lie.
: “But your honor, he told me he would pay for this baby before we f~~~ed. Make him pay.”
It has to be post-conception or it worthless. Otherwise women will simply hide the conception for a few months, lie to a judge, and men will still be on the hook. Men need a right to say NO, no matter when or what.
Likewise, if you don’t want her to abort your kid, THEN DON”T F~~~ HER.
Again: women lie.
Who ends up paying for it when Chad and Tyrone financially abort? If you pay taxes raise your hand.
Cut off the welfare, too. In fact that needs to be done completely independent of the abortion issue.
We are $22,000,000,000,000.00 in debt. One way or another, the welfare is going away no matter what. We need it to go away in a controlled manner.
An actual improvement to the system would be women taking more responsibility for their actions, not men taking less.
Women will NEVER willingly take responsibility for their choices. Responsibility need to be forced upon them. And that will never happen so long as that responsibility is instead forced upon men.
So men taking no responsibility is the necessary start to putting responsibility where it should rightfully lie: on women.
R Kelly is not in jail for raping 4 women, he’s in jail for failure to pay child support. Get your ideas of societies attitude toward your fatherhood through your heads. You must pay and that is more serious than rape to these motherf~~~ers.
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.
Cut off the welfare, too. In fact that needs to be done completely independent of the abortion issue.
We are $22,000,000,000,000.00 in debt. One way or another, the welfare is going away no matter what. We need it to go away in a controlled manner.
I’m not opposed to welfare though…some people are in their position due to circumstances out of their control. I have sympathy for the single parent who’s spouse just died from a long, expensive battle with cancer, where as I don’t have sympathy for the slut who gets knocked up by Chad trying to trap him, Chad leaves, then she gets knocked up by Tyrone trying to trap him, and Tyrone leaves too.
Ultimately though, you know its never going to come down to kids starving in the streets because their parents are stupid. “Get rid of welfare” just isn’t going to happen.
Welfare completely unrelated to single moms…I had a buddy get diagnosed with MS in his early 30s. Prior to that, and even many years after that, he worked, paid taxes, and never had any problems with the law. Now he can’t even get dressed without help. When I see people like that getting some help, that is the system working. When I see loser drug addicts getting the red carpet rolled out for them, that is the system failing.
Is welfare abused and retarded in many way? Yes. Take it all away though…never gonna happen.
Women will NEVER willingly take responsibility for their choices. Responsibility need to be forced upon them. And that will never happen so long as that responsibility is instead forced upon men.
So men taking no responsibility is the necessary start to putting responsibility where it should rightfully lie: on women.
Did I ever tell you about that time I was out walking my dog, and some girl walked by, and I slipped and fell and on the way down my dick went in her vagina, instantaneously blew a load, and got her pregnant? Oh wait…that time never happened, because that isn’t how it works. At the point a man gets a woman pregnant he’s already made a series of poor choices.
Man or woman, you should be responsible for your choices. Whats bulls~~~ now is from the point of conception men basically have no rights and a ton of responsibility, where as women have very little responsibility and all the rights. I’m all for making that equitable, not just shifting a system from one broken extreme to the other.
Q: Could men have a saying about abortion?
A: Yes you could. It’s called do not get a woman pregnant. Solves TONS of problems.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
If you like reading novels, then read below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________One thing I want to point out. WE are talking about regulating WOMEN. MEN CAN’T DO THAT.
So think outside the box. REGULATE MEN. This sounds f~~~ed up right? But that’s exactly why WOMEN don’t want it. If you make it so that men have temporary Vasectomy (Wax not snip-ige )
So what does this do? It eliminates the MAJORITY of the problem all together. It also shifts BLAME to men that women will agree with in their Hamster cage. And makes it so women have more freedom. (on paper)
This will make both parties happy since abortion will be such a low rate at that point in the USA, that it will stop being a major Political talking point to boast about. And women can say that “THEY DID IT”.
In the meantime, women get to f~~~ all they want. Men get to do the same without any worries. There is no need to worry about being cucked or baby jail. And all is well. It also put the man in FIRM control. There is no danger of sperm jacking. and it will raise the STD rate up a bit. So the pharmaceutical companies will still be happy.
These companies will just focus more on getting baby spare parts from Mexico, Africa, and Europe. And the best part will be that women LOVE to shame men, so this will be just a shoe in to be taught. It puts all the blame on men, and YOUNG MEN get to get all the benefits of this.
Of course, there will still be PLENTY of abortions in the Black community and hispanic community. Since you can use the racist angle, they will continue to do as they have been under the welfare state. But the amount of funding needed is going to be VERY SMALL. We are talking less then maybe 1000 per state or less. And the best part is that it makes everyone happy. Anyone who advertises “Hey I just want to have a baby-NO STRINGS ATTACHED lol” gets to fill her Womb with HOPE and DREAMS!
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
All those ugly soul women looking to trap a catch are going to be VERY busy trying to keep from being lonely. Everyone gets more sex. And, Eugenics come by as well as the Artificial womb. since so many women will have STD’s etc.
Yes, it culls the populations. Sure. But you have to argue what’s the point for kids that are not raised in families or have fathers? Really, it just makes the Idea of being a respectable man with a family more noble.
In fact, one of the reasons why women say they don’t have children is that they NEED a man to do it to make it “EASY”. Funny how that works.
It also has a side effect to the amount of men who have free disposable income. Shifts the power back to men. And makes children much more valuable. In fact, since they will be so valuable, there will be a significant cultural shift for those that chose to have children being those men that are indeed higher achieving men. This would lead to a boom in the DNA modification of Egg cells and men’s sperm. This further takes the power away from women.
The best part of this? If the Black community and young men in large understand this, then they are going to be HAPPY to do this. F~~~ing without a condom is great. Its not like its going to really slow down the STD epidemic. But it will take out the women who should not be having kids in the first place.
As a bonus? You will see the Blacks in the us have an EXPLOSION of Going to College and not falling into the parent trap. Getting a great education, and getting good jobs. Many Hispanic men may see this as a good thing as well. But I don’t see overall adoption. I do see a high market penetration. No pun intended.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I think men should start forming “political unions”, like a labor union, except that you go on strike for political rights instead of labor rights.
There is only one sure fire way to do this. Giving men back the power. One is listed above. But the only way to do this with any success would be to offer men a reason to do this. That reason would be WOMEN. In fact, its one of the reasons why women have such a strong lobby. But how to get women on board?
You don’t. You simply replace them with a better option than women. So, artificial women. We already have speech engines that can keep up with women and men in conversations. That is the first step. The next is to penetrate the market with women that are in fact nothing but “Models” that would help sway the men to do so. Like it or not, YOUNG WOMEN are still the most powerful means of persuasion there is. If you can pay these women to be twitch thoughts? You can get women to do anything. If they also see that their is LONG TERM GAIN in this system that FEMINISTS and DEMOCRATS can not provide.
Like it or not, there is no future for women in the USA that they are going to like long term. Everything is marketing. And even if the women is a doll. Watching women tear apart dolls, or MISTAKINGLY, HUMAN WOMEN is going to be a sight to see. Women are great actors. Some. But a doll A.I.? That is going to “Trump” them all.
THe best part of this is that women will keep asking for more. More laws, more protections more money. But the one thing they can never get back again is mens affection. When a woman loses that power, its over.
Sex is the main thing that men NEED from women. After that, the long term is going to be a TRUSTED companion. Women can not offer that. By this time the laws are to bad. And just as everyone has a Google, there will be a war to be the default engines in women A.I. And here we come to the issue.
A.I. that will help men will win out. And men are not going to purchase “Feminist sex dolls”. And women sure as hell are not going to buy them. So they lose control either way.
No matter how hard a woman tries, she will age. And as looks and youth do not change for A.I. bots, that’s going to be hard for any women to compete.
The only thing they can say is that WOMEN are FREE. But that just lowers their value all the same.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Who is going to replace the population?Let me be frank. Once you have many wealthy men, there is no reason to give a f~~~. In fact, after the population of children are dwindled, in the USA. There is going to be a TON of EXTRA funds for men to retire early. And also start putting their belongings in a trust. At 45, you can retire, secure your wealth beyond the control of any woman. And have children as you see fit.
You can even raise your children in other countries as you see fit with a by far superior upbringing then you could in the USA. Mini Expatriate towns.
They KEY is NOT to get married under the US system. You could even raise your kids in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, etc. This goes on long enough, and as women keep being replaced with robots for all their “office” jobs and those in the private sector, the chances of having a large population come in to sway the politics of the nation are going to dwindle.
Either way, MEN are going to gain control in the long term. And the women that made it this way are never going to be heard from again. And the second they try to gain any kind of office or power, or do a money grab? Without the tight control that the Media has on men, there is going to be VERY little in the way of making things go back to the bulls~~~ we have now.
Deep down inside, their is going to be a REAL boiling pot of water as we start shifting our resources to start aiming the focus to children. Not women.
Once it comes out that the truth is … Well.. WOMEN SUCK. End of story. They were in charge and brought all this on themselves? Its going to be a BAD day to be woman in the usa.
At that point, you will find just how long women are going to live. And its not going to be a pretty sight. No one gives s~~~ about Poor Disease ridden older women.
The only upside to this will be that women collectively will try to keep filling the tank with mens sympathy, but none will come. Simply, pointing them to feminists that will be clutching to whatever power they once had have to keep believing in the lie or face the consequences of being responsible for all the anger of legions of men and women all over the world. lets not forget about the children that no longer have sex organs etc.
And that’s PRETTY much the easy way to get there. Not so easy, but it’s feasible.
The whole premise is just like Communism. True communism can not work since human nature defeats its purpose. If there is just ONE person that is getting a benefit out there. Then the system collapses as it always does.
This is why MGTOW will not work for all men. Red Pills don’t work for every man out there either. The only thing that works for all men is to be able to have an outlet for their sexuality & companionship.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
So what do you do about children?
Well, that would require a family. And that’s where it all falls apart. Women can not offer you that. Women are the very thing that can bring that ALL to a halt. Women ONLY want to gather more resources. They don’t really care about the kids. Abortion spells that out each day. And so is the idea that a baby is just a parasite.
So how do you fix this issue? Simple.
Most of the successful families out there use Nannies. Or other family members. Yes, this does mean that you will be living with mom or dad. Or have them around while you are at work or drop them off their. But this is the normal way anyways in Eastern countries. In fact it was normal for much of european history.
The Nuclear family model is bulls~~~ anyways. Before modern medicine, women died in childbirth all the time. The kids grew up better without a mom. And the replacement was actually a better idea since she got paid to be there. And as she is not YOUR WIFE, she does what the hell you tell her to do.
There is no shortage of women that you can hire to raise your kids. That takes care of the female aspect.You can also just go to places that are friendly to raise families as well given you have saved up enough wealth to do so. Or travel. Etc. Overall, being able to spend time with your kids is important. So later on in life when you have more time to do so really does lead to significant positives for your offspring.
Either way you stack it. Marriage in the west is on decline. The laws are not going to change. And if you change the WAY they tell you to have families, you are just adapting to the new system. Not bending over to it.
When enough men see that this new system works. THEN and ONLY then will men come together for any Group that works to keep things going. but just like in any group, one part of the group wants more then the other. So in the end, my system works. Any other way and you just don’t have long term feasibility in the West.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Times have changed.
And families need to change to. Women don’t want to be mothers. They don’t want to be wives. All they want is to by hypergamous and live their lives as single rich and productive women with little to tie them down.
Why stop them?
You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home
Why the f~~~ has that 500 internal server error still not been fixed?
I have sympathy for the single parent who’s spouse just died from a long, expensive battle with cancer, where as I don’t have sympathy for the slut who gets knocked up by Chad trying to trap him, Chad leaves, then she gets knocked up by Tyrone trying to trap him, and Tyrone leaves too.
The problem is that a federal bureaucrat in an office somewhere inside the beltway will NEVER be able to tell the difference. And if they actually can, then they’ll see the welfare parasite as potential captive votes, paid for by the taxpayer.
This is how we became $22,000,000,000,000.00 in debt.
There are ways to care for widows and orphans that don’t enable irresponsible sluts. Governments are incapable of implementing those ways.
Ultimately though, you know its never going to come down to kids starving in the streets because their parents are stupid.
Oh, but it is. It really is. Kids are already starving in the streets because the welfare check goes to momma, not to them.
But besides that, children always suffer becuause their parents are stupid. That’s how natural selection works. However, those parents will never see a reason to not be stupid if they know they’ll get monthly checks for making stupid selfish choices.
“Get rid of welfare” just isn’t going to happen.
One way or the other, the welfare IS going away. People WILL starve. There is no changing that. $22,000,000,000,000.00 in debt is simply not sustainable.
If we don’t cut liabilities now, if we don’t cut off the welfare queens, if we don’t stop paying them monthly checks for each new hungry meal ticket they pop out, then the whole system WILL collapse. And if it collapses in an uncontrolled manner like that, it WILL take everyone, the widows, the orphans, your friend with MS, down with it.
At the point a man gets a woman pregnant he’s already made a series of poor choices.
And she has made even poorer choices. But she is never responsible for her choices. Only he is.
And yet she gets one more “choice”. She gets to “choose” if she really wants to be a parent or not.
He doesn’t get that one more choice. He only has a responsibility to pay. Or the taxpayer has the responsibility to pay.
She never does.
And then there are all the men who never made any choices at all, but merely had their names rubber stamped onto a birth certificate without their knowledge or consent. Pay up, sucker, in the interest of the child.
She has all the rights and none of the responsibilities. He has none of the rights and all of the responsibilities. We hae none of the rights and all the responsibilities. That’s the problem.
Splitting this response into two posts due to 500 errors.
I’m all for making that equitable, not just shifting a system from one broken extreme to the other.
What’s broken or extreme about properly balancing rights with responsibilities?
If women have a sole right to choose, then women should have the sole responsibility to pay for their choices. Not the man. Not the taxpayer. Her, and her alone.
Oh, but it is. It really is. Kids are already starving in the streets because the welfare check goes to momma, not to them.
But besides that, children always suffer because their parents are stupid. That’s how natural selection works. However, those parents will never see a reason to not be stupid if they know they’ll get monthly checks for making stupid selfish choices.
You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home
Do you know why so many companies give away free food, or have food banks? Why they serve kids Lunches during the summer at parks? Why they serve free food in schools in the USA or have a free lunch program?
It’s not the goal to get kids to play outside. And yea, many adults go their too. And from what you see these days, it’s not a pretty sight.
THis post of your sidecar could be a thread all onto itself.
Its scary when you think about children here in the USA going hungry. Thirsty even. But it’s true. Its one of the only reasons why I am okay with abortion. But the only people that seem to have kids are the ones that should never have them in the first place. And use it as a credit card for Welfare.
You would think that once they made it so that food was something you could only purchase with a card, that would solve the problem. No. They just find more ways to use that to buy drugs when they can’t turn tricks anymore.
You have to wonder why there are so many items of Junk food. Well, what else are you going to do? Welfare moms don’t cook. Most of the food better be microwavable. And the reason why they make those soup in a cup is to try to get vegetables down kids throats. If you look, almost of all of them have the veggies in the soup cup. That’s not a Marketing preference.
In fact, if you look at Top Ramen, they ADD nutrients to it. THey know full well that they had families out there that ate nothing but this. And there was actually signs of malnutrition in the USA of all places.
In fact, and this is true, but you won’t get anyone to OFFICIALLY say this. The Dollar tree stores go out of their way to put these stores in poor areas if possible. THey started to carry food as not a great source of income. But in fact as a charitable thing. The companies that sell their items there make little to no profit from the food items they send in. And the dollar tree for the food area of the place, just breaks even. If it was not for the tax incentives, and some other “Charitable Accounting” THey would not have a food section in their stores.
If people actually knew how many folks go out of their way to make sure KIDS and poor children have some semblance of a normal life, I think Bernie and the democrats would shut their pie holes about “GREEDY” billionaires.
You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
