Columnist defense: My Daughter, the feminist

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

So, a woman by the name of Patrice Lewis has presumably taken it upon herself to defend her daughters choice to join the Navy. In the article, My Daughter, The Feminist she goes on to speak, no so much about her daughter, but MGTOW.

Supposedly, a snide remark left her reeling and running to the aid of her daughter, defending her choice to join the military. She goes on to state that ” I believe MGTOW divvy women into one of two categories: either TradCons or Feminists, both equally revolting. MGTOW believe both formats are tied to gynocentrism and are out to “get” them.”
My thoughts?: Nobody cares about what you BELIEVE… not only do you have it all wrong, but it was you that actually started off the article talking about “ASSumptions”..

Continuing further, she states”For the most part, I take a long view on the MGTOW movement. For decades, men have gotten the short end of the stick in our culture. With feminism presiding over the court system, the educational system, employment laws, and so many other aspects of modern society, a backlash was inevitable. But MGTOW members are more than just disgusted with a feminist-dominated culture. Almost to a person, they were so badly hurt by a woman in their past (mother, wife, girlfriend) that they developed a seething irrational hatred of every XX chromosome on the planet. That’s the only explanation. Baby boys do not emerge from the womb hating women, after all.

This doesn’t mean I absolve MGTOW members – it’s hard to appreciate a group whose entire existence is dedicated to loathing me simply because I’m female – but OK, whatever. However, I do feel compelled to probe this accusation that our daughter is a feminist.”
My thoughts?: No, but there are plenty of articles and pictures portraying women that outright seek to ‘abort’ or kill innocent boys. Do you even read anything outside of your own articles ?? Meh, clearly she just likes to hear herself talk. More importantly, of course she wouldn’t absolve men of anything, despite the fact that she damn near nailed the issue right on the head….because you know… vagina.”

Now, she goes on to try and speak as though she is using some common sense… and then, the AWALT in her shows the hidden witchery within the comment “Now all of this rhetoric is rather pointless since I don’t give a diddly-do what MGTOW’ers think of our daughter’s career decision. I know it would please their angry little minds to witness conflict or dissent in a loving family, but it’s not happening here. Head back to your basement and wait for your mom to bring you lunch – unless you hate her, too.”
Dumb C~~~… you just went and validated your own worthlessness and lack of understanding with that comment. Thanks for wasting everyone’s time..”

Smfh… the idiocy continues…

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[Anonymous 25]

The Pink Pill Rage is strong in her

She appears to be operating under the mistaken assumption that anyone gives a s~~~ what she thinks or believes.

It’s clear from her article that the only hatred is her own, I believe the psychological term is called projection.

mghow must be doing something right to make her so angry. the women aren’t getting their own way any longer and now they are pink pill raging

[surfdude12Participant 4103]

Note the incoherency: she says “I don’t give diddy doo what MGTOWs think” yet “I feel compelled to address this allegation my daughter is feminist”

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

surfdude12 wrote:

Note the incoherency: she says “I don’t give diddy doo what MGTOWs think” yet “I feel compelled to address this allegation my daughter is feminist”

And thus, you’ve witnessed the hamster wheel spinning into full operation.

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[MarketWatcherParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

pink pill raging

Coined a new term. LOL

[AttonParticipant]

Meanwhile our daughter – all 5-foot-1-inch of her – will be serving her country in the Navy. If the North Korean Pillsbury Doughboy should suddenly go postal, she’ll be among those who could be helping to save the stateside butts of all MGTOW’ers.

The draft even where it is not in law it will be passed and ratified in days. Without the ERA the gender ratio would be 100 to 1 and that is beyond extremely generous. She should do some homework because this isn’t a gotcha moment.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[joetechParticipant]

That daughter knows full well that if she ever gets unhappy in the Navy all she has to do is get pregnant. They’ll let her out on a hardship discharge “for the good of the child”. Feminist my ass. She’s just another snowflake.

"Don't follow in my footsteps...I stepped in something."

[surfdude12Participant 4103]

Atton wrote:

Meanwhile our daughter – all 5-foot-1-inch of her – will be serving her country in the Navy. If the North Korean Pillsbury Doughboy should suddenly go postal, she’ll be among those who could be helping to save the stateside butts of all MGTOW’ers.

The draft even where it is not in law it will be passed and ratified in days. Without the ERA the gender ratio would be 100 to 1 and that is beyond extremely generous. She should do some homework because this isn’t a gotcha moment.

I loved Hillarys dodge of Anderson Cooper asking “should women be required to sign up for draft?”

Answer: “uh…I think they should be required to sign up to vote!”

[Anonymous 6]

A “TradCon” woman, for those unfamiliar with misogyny in general and with the MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) movement in particular, is a contemptuous term referring to “traditional conservative” women (and let it be known all MGTOW terms for women are contemptuous; there are no other types).

So she paints MGTOWs as misogynists in the beginning, this shows her prejudice. Let’s see if she describes the contemptuous terms that feminists use towards men shall we? Examples are: f~~~boy, manwhore, patriarchal, toxic masculinity, etc.

TradCon women, I gather, are despised among the MGTOW set because they supposedly want to force men (and presumably women) back into rigid gender roles, which includes “male disposability.” The man is expected to behave like a slave at the woman’s bidding and earn money while the woman “just sits back, plays with the kids, and goes shopping for shoes and handbags.”

It’s not just Tradcom women who want this, but feminist women as well! The hypocrisy and double standard is that feminism says women can do everything that a man can do, but women BEHAVE in a way that is opposite. They want all of the benefits traditionally afforded women while forcing men to hand over benefits they think were only for men. Let’s see if she clears this up.

But of course, by these definitions, a woman’s lot is no piece of cake either. TradCon women must never set foot outside the position of housewife. Young unmarried daughters must remain living at home until they are, I don’t know, auctioned off to the highest bidder or something. The dutiful daughter must twiddle her thumbs and contemplate her navel until a suitably Bible-thumping man comes along, pays her purchase price, forces her into irrevocable vows, then chains her to his kitchen, removes her shoes and expects a new baby every year.

Nope, she doesn’t clear anything up. In fact, she goes even further and creates a fictitious definition and puts words in the MGTOW mouth, i.e. she is creating a straw man argument. How so very convenient.

For the most part, I take a long view on the MGTOW movement. For decades, men have gotten the short end of the stick in our culture. With feminism presiding over the court system, the educational system, employment laws, and so many other aspects of modern society, a backlash was inevitable. But MGTOW members are more than just disgusted with a feminist-dominated culture.

I was impressed with the above quoted line, she almost gets it, almost. In fact she has one foot there and the other one close by, if we were to just go off of that line alone. But then we get this gem:

Almost to a person, they were so badly hurt by a woman in their past (mother, wife, girlfriend) that they developed a seething irrational hatred of every XX chromosome on the planet. That’s the only explanation. Baby boys do not emerge from the womb hating women, after all.

Bam!! The female shaming tactic of old. Actually this is an ad hominem attack. Rather than attack the argument she attacks the person. Essentially she’s saying that the MGTOW view(s) is/are wrong because the people making them are somehow flawed. This is an ironic statement from her considering that the line that she wrote that came right before this one gives a great description as to where a lot of MGTOW stuff comes from. But she fails to make the connection. That’s weird isn’t it? (sarcasm there in that last question)

This doesn’t mean I absolve MGTOW members – it’s hard to appreciate a group whose entire existence is dedicated to loathing me simply because I’m female – but OK, whatever. However, I do feel compelled to probe this accusation that our daughter is a feminist.

Another mischaracterization and a personal attack.

Smart parents raise up their children to become mature, responsible, independent adults.

She indicted the parents of most women and didn’t even realize it. That’s funny to me.

Our younger daughter (age 19) is ready to spread her wings and see the world. She enlisted in the Navy in the Advanced Electronics Computer Field, where she will have the double advantage of superb technical training (essentially a Bachelor’s degree without the feminist-studies nonsense) and serving her country. She maintains the traditional conservative faith, values, morals and attitude she grew up with. Would someone please explain to me how this makes her a feminist?

Now the author points out the double standard in her own words that I mentioned earlier but doesn’t see it. Hey does your daughter plan on making a boyfriend or husband pay only 50 % at all times?

she knows she cannot serve with men on the battlefield. She cannot hoist packs amounting to 70 percent of her body weight. But she can serve her nation using her brainpower instead.

Yet she want’s all of the same benefits and pay that the men who do what your daughter can’t. Double standard, and that’s just what we as MGTOW point out!!!

Much of the freedom America enjoys is due to the sacrifices these TradCons have made on our behalf,…

Tradcon men that is.

Now all of this rhetoric is rather pointless since I don’t give a diddly-do what MGTOW’ers think of our daughter’s career decision. I know it would please their angry little minds to witness conflict or dissent in a loving family, but it’s not happening here. Head back to your basement and wait for your mom to bring you lunch – unless you hate her, too.

And MGTOWS don’t care what you think. That’s a big part of what makes us MGTOW. And notice the ad hominem here. Basement dwellers waiting for mom. That’s all she has, shaming tactics. Little does she know that she’s reinforcing AWALT to ta tee.

Meanwhile our daughter – all 5-foot-1-inch of her – will be serving her country in the Navy. If the North Korean Pillsbury Doughboy should suddenly go postal, she’ll be among those who could be helping to save the stateside butts of all MGTOW’ers.

She just had to point out that women are strong hear them roar. Oh but her daughter won’t be in combat and can’t handle it according to her. Just pointing that out. By the way I do agree that her daughter will be contributing in a positive way in the Navy, I’m just pointing out the hypocritical statements of mom and her hysterical nature. Thanks mom for making me ever more certain about Going My Own Way!!! It does take a woman sometimes!!

[AkanbiParticipant 2120]

Dear Patrice Lewis,

My brother make you no follow sheeple o. Look them and Go Your Way.

[IRuleMeParticipant]

Travis smashed it out the park.

[Author]

Posts