Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › CNN Big John and Jerry Liu and MGTOW TOO!
Tagged: MGTOW
This topic contains 37 replies, has 27 voices, and was last updated by
FunInTheSun 1 year ago.
- AuthorPosts
The site was featured on CNN!
I don’t even think I heard either of these guys mention this. Hmm. What do you guys think about the interview? Seems almost like John was on the edge about something.
You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home
Didn’t really tell much of a story. What do you expect from C~~~ Network News?
OATHKEEPERS, not on our watch. MOLON LABE
For being a self-avowed feminist she seems to take a rather balanced approach. She seems behind the current feminist doctrine, for sure.
John seemed good too.
Since the video is only part I’ll weigh in on what I saw and its affects on me. I’ve been married 27 years, wife quit 8 years ago, I keep her around so I can take care of the youngest kid. A law written in 1968 guarantees her half of my retirement income. USFSPA, check it out. No amount of time I stay screws me worse. No additional benefit to her other than my monthly contribution of her lifestyle.
This portion of the video seems better than anything else I’ve seen from CNN in years.
I failed to realize in my youth that I was the prize. I was going to work. I was going to earn. Little did I realize that due to feminism, that no longer meant I had to share. Road soon, Desert after.
I’m sure Big John dropped enough truth bombs to make her entire planet look like swiss cheese. The bitch interviewing John and CNN didn’t want all the gems about marriage and the system getting out so they edited them out. They were probably last seen on the cutting room floor. This is the watered down version and it didn’t really go in-depth about anything but I did notice that the aggressive parts that make John and men seem evil were left in-tact.
Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.
CNN feminist get’s pawned by Big John. It is not disarming. It is alarming. Once we get noticed our cover will be blown and I’m not sure they might force us to allow women in. They could enforce rules of anti-feminism. We would fail miserably.
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

Anonymous5It’s often quoted about MGTOW that “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
HOWEVER, that isn’t how women operate. We all know that.
It should be “First they shame you, then they bully you, then they pretend to side with you, then you’ve won.”Has anyone noticed the trickle and then the flow of “RED PIlled” women who “Understand and Support” MGTOW on YouTube in the last 18 months or so.
This last ditch tactic is now going mainstream with this seemingly “balanced” approach by CNN.The reality paradox of MGTOW is that more women know about MGTOW than men because women form groups and gossip all the time. It’s an evolutionary behavioral mechanism that gives them both knowledge and power.
Men tend to keep things to themselves, especially things like MGTOW which could cause them no end of grief if they discuss it, so it only tends to spread online.
Women can openly talk about MGTOW whenever and wherever they want.Beneath their thin veneer of bravado, women are terrified of men realizing their vagina juice ain’t worth the squeeze, and they’re now resorting to their final tactic of projecting empathy with fake sincerity.
Freeze that video at any point to see the Resting Bitch Face in all it’s reptilian glory.
That video must have made feminists blow a gasket. They actually told our story without too much rancor.
Watch for further censorship of the interweb.
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

Anonymous18Women are emotional creatures. Under the umbrella of NAWALT she obliterates male rational. Her hamster can’t stop spinning.
Thank god I am born a man.
I’m no fan of the Clinton news network, but it’s good to see that MGTOW is starting to be noticed.
I’m no fan of the Clinton news network, but it’s good to see that MGTOW is starting to be noticed.
That is terrible, if mgtow doesnt stay underground it will be a problem.
We are a minority of men refusing to play, we could be hunted like dogs.
To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.
When MGTOW goes mainstream, its message and philosophies will be subverted to the feminist agenda….But true MGTOWs will be gone from the plantation and wont care for the s~~~ and drama that will be stirred up…
I stand with feet apart and let my balls hang free...Manginas dont have balls...See how they stand and sit at the whim of their masters...
“You seem to have an aversion to women”.
This is , of course, a classic feminist tactic: “YOU have a problem with women”. and “YOU dislike / mistrust / hate women”.
When a feminist tried that on Tom Leykis in a TV interview, he had a great response:
“I don’t have a problem with women. I LOVE women! I have a problem with BITCHES”.
Now it’s not HIS™ problem anymore. It’s hers.
—–
HER: “I always think of feminism as being about equality”.
Boy that kind of plausible deniability sure sounds good doesn’t it.
RESPONSE: “Really? because a gender-equality movement called “FEM-inism” is like a racial equality movement called WHITE-ism.”
She’ll cut to commercial right quick.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.Well now that the site is getting featured in the main stream media, we will ALL have to be on the look out for undercover tuna.
You all know what women are like, when they find a “male only” space. Expect an immigrate invasion caravan of women to be assaulting our beloved site soon.
The price of red-pill freedom, is eternal tuna vigilance.
Blue-Pill Virgin: Women hate me! That's what it is.
MGTOW Man: Hate them back; it works for me.I hate these kind of stories. There’s a thousand different reasons why a guy chooses to go his own way. And she picks one loud mouth dickhead off of the internet to speak for the group. I thought he looked like a f~~~ing idiot in that interview. Which is just what you want if you are trying to show a group of butt hurt men that can’t cope.
How about interviewing a young guy that watched what his dad went through, getting escorted out of the house he paid for and into a one bedroom apartment, while mom is banging Uncle Chad’s left and right? And maybe finding out that there’s a long term impact in his view of relationships? And on his view of marriage contracts. How about pointing out that for a long part of their life Paul Allen and Bill Gates could have been considered MGTOW? They put their heart and soul into building a business instead of chasing tail all day long. They only had interest from women when they became billionaires.
MGTOW is as simple as not putting getting a woman at the top of the list of accomplishments. It’s putting my self interest first. As a feminist, you are putting your self interest first, how could you possibly have a problem with me treating me the same way you treat you?
Big John came off as a butt hurt cry baby. Which I’m pretty sure is why they put his interview on TV.
Order the good wine
Whatever happened to the empty chair?
Why is a MGHOW talking to CNN… ?
That interview was a con-job… designed/edited to take a big dump on Big John… what else did anyone expect? No substance, no facts, just subtle knife in the back style journalism we’ve come to expect from MSM. Why any self-respecting man would fall for that crap, I dont know…. oh yeah….$$$$$$
Don’t ever believe for a second that any MSM outlet will ever give MGTOW a fair shake. You will never hear about sexual dimorphism or hypergamy as defined through evo-psych, period. Case and point, Casey Jaye, Paul Elam, Karen Straughn…etc… All you will see is shaming of men and MAN UP non-sense.
I remember when that content producer (John) started… I related to him because I’m a former Marine 0311 but I never understood the appeal to his channel and never kept up with it. JUST MY OPINION (I think he is a great guy). Two dozen other channels like him also popped up around that time… all of them equally late to the party and not terribly useful.
Im sure John’s channel was useful to many men, which is great (there are MANY terrible mgtow channels out there that brutally sought to cash in off the meme… I don’t think John was particularly one of them but he sort of checked certain boxes). I never faulted him for this as he was very likeable! His is also pretty humble of a guy, ..whiskey and cigars, semper fi.
For my entrance into MGTOW 5 years ago. I soon wearied of shallow content like Sandman and needed PULP rationale and FACTS to convince me that ignoring relationships/sex with women was a desirable course of action. The WHY of the thing mattered… I needed to understand why AWALT. I got my answers in the Stardusk Compilation as uploaded by Phil G Knowbody. Look no further. That is the MGTOW gold-standard.
There have been many content producers that also gave us some epic content, John was perhaps one of them but this little stunt with CNN was definitely not his finest hour, infact I think it may be one of his most funniest lol, maybe even something to regret… F~~~ CNN

Anonymous6Was waiting for his “I have the penis” line.
Last night I watched the entire This is Life episode. This is only one segment. It’s all about the disposable dad in today’s society. It was a pretty damn good hour. Lisa Ling did a good job showing the plight of today’s dad that has been disposed of. It’s definitely worth watching.
Order the good wine
Dear iMickey503,
The thing that he should have stated is that the problem isn’t women the problem is the legal system that assumes 100% health never taking a day off and tax. Tax plus support are often mutually exclusive events and failure to pay support leads to jail.
If the financial situation changes it takes months or years for your case to be heard leading to bankruptcy suicide etc. The system is more than flawed, its draconian. We do not hate women, it’s not that all women do this that but that ANY WOMAN CAN do this. Not everybody does, but the knowledge that every women CAN do this is hardly a reassuring for the marital construct. The risk is ENTIRELY the man’s….there’s no guarantee he will EVER see his children. He has zero reproductive rights and 101% responsibility.
Needless to say a good business deal has to be good for both parties. with today’s third wave feminism, gynocentric courts, MGTOW’s definitely believe the juice isn’t worth the squeeze and the LAWS have to change.
This fundamental point wasn’t communicated to CNN, resulting in them msunderstanding MGTOW’s as a bunch of extremists…which we are NOT.
We are real not extreme and fundamentally like women…but if the law gives unrestricted power to one entity without a check and balance to the other then, suicides and unfortunate results happen. Sharia Law gave ownership of children to the man… and I agree with it …why because men do not hold women hostage for child visitation, the way the current law does to men.I waited nine years and still did not get a divorce. (ps it’s 3.5 years in jail for armed robbery with a sawed off shotgun injuring a store clerk …..and 9 years for my divorce.!!!!) Nuts!! People don’t live forever in perfect health.
I’m getting a Sharia Law divorce in the new year and forming a parent company NOT in Canada.One can only wait so long!!! It’s UNconstitutional to hold someone for extortion for nine years!!! (and the EX is bankruptcy exempt and I am not–talk about a two tiered system!)
L. Euler
The only thing I have to offer to CNN, feminists and women in general is this:
.Long live the MGTOW monk lifestyle.
John made a huge mistake, which will cost him dearly, in the next months. His life will be torn apart by everyone with a hand in feminism and its movements, be it the government or anything else. He did it to himself, anyway.
"Young was I once, I walked alone, and bewildered seemed in the way; then I found me another and rich I thought me, for man is the joy of man." Odin, Hàvamàl, stanza 47.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
