Chivalry is dead… Because women killed it

[VenomParticipant 310]

Tom Leykis talking about chivalry.

I used to be big on promoting chivalry. I’m so glad I don’t do that s~~~ anymore. If women want us to be chivalrous, then they have to stop being stupid little c~~~s and whores. No wonder back in Jesus’ time they were shamed if they had a child out of wedlock.

Now, I just laugh at the men who white knight for every f~~~ing woman in the world. Even if those women are ugly f~~~s who hit the wall hard.

I don’t spend time with a lot of women and aside from family, I don’t even be polite towards them. Hell, I remember one time in a college class I farted just for the hell of it. I just started laughing because a few women were sitting next to me. They didn’t even know how to react haha.

I also make it a point to run ahead of women when I’m entering casinos and the like. I never hold the door open for them at all. Some women look so p~~~ed off after that. It’s hilarious to see the look on their faces.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Venom wrote:

women want us to be chivalrous

Only because they have no clue what they are talking about and have no idea what that word even means. Like usual.

Read up on some Crétien de Troyes some time, and the next time some women tells you to be more “chivalrous”, look her right in the eye and ask her: “Seriously? Is that what you really want? Be careful what you wish for…”

If she says yes, well you’ll know what to do, and it ain’t saving her from a dragon..

[SpacemonkeyParticipant 1481]

I’ve been thinking about intrinsic masculine values and behavior over the past few days, things like honor and chivalry, strength and fortitude, honesty and bravery. Are these actually intrinsicly masculine virtues or have we been condisioned to think that they are by gynocentric society?

I guess if we look back to ancient greece the nobel masculine virtues were celebrated and I don’t think greece was gynocentric. Women could not own property nor could they vote. However a young man was obliged to marry by a certain age.

It was a similar storry in ancient rome where strength and honor were the catchphrase of the day.

Its my opinion, and I’d welcome others that in militaristic societies or in purely male military organisations that the clasic male virtues were forged. You had to be able to count on your brother standing next to you, your life depended on it and so did the lives of every other man in the unit.

I would thus submit that the clasical masculine values outlined above are indeed intrinsic masculine traits and ones we should adhere and aspire to and admire in others. Further, I think we as mgtow should practice the masculine virtues ragardless of what wimin want from us.

“Long is the way and hard, that out of Hell leads up to light.”

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Spacemonkey wrote:

Are these actually intrinsicly masculine virtues or have we been condisioned to think that they are by gynocentric society?

Some of them are, but not in the way gynocentrism would prefer.

Men have evolved to be honorable. The reason for this is simple: early monkeymen who were not brave and were not honorable and did not act on their word (or their grunt as the case may be) and did not have their fellow monekymen’s backs in a crisis tended to endanger every monkeyman on the mammoth hunt. Those are not survival traits. The monkeymen who survived to raise the next slightly less monkey like generation were the ones who understood they had to have their fellow’s backs because it could be them who needed saving the next time they ventured out onto the sabertooth infested savanna. In point of fact it’s very probable that honor evolved in men before any great intelligence, because to grow big brains you need relatively thin, easily grown cranial bones, and you can only evolve those is you don’t have to worry about one of your fellow monkeymen treacherously braining you in the back with a flint hand axe at the first opportunity.

Note that women evolved under an entirely different set of adaptive forces where honor etc. were not necessary survival traits. In other words there is a reason why the masculine virtues are, well, masculine.

[нσтησσвParticipant 830]

i hold the door open with my elbow until i’ve completely passed through; this allows the person behind me plenty of time to catch it… and if it slams in their face… Well it’s their fault for being so entitled to think that the door would move out of its way!

😛

My Goal: To Leave Society.

[DeepInThoughtParticipant 2710]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chivalry

Chivalry has NOTHING to do with women getting special treatment. Women and feminists plugged their own gender into the definition to manipulate men period!!!

[SpacemonkeyParticipant 1481]

sidecar wrote:

Men have evolved to be honorable. The reason for this is simple: early monkeymen who were not brave and were not honorable and did not act on their word (or their grunt as the case may be) and did not have their fellow monekymen’s backs in a crisis tended to endanger every monkeyman on the mammoth hunt.

I have read about an article by David P Batash but have not managed to actually find the article itself.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234650855_How_Did_Honor_Evolve

Do you have it or a link to it?

“Long is the way and hard, that out of Hell leads up to light.”

[pabsawakeParticipant 1761]

it is sad what our society has become, chivalry is dead because feminist killed it. there once was a day when a man would honor a women and she would reciprocate and show some form of appreciation. today “as we all know” women walk around with this bulls~~~ sense of entitlement. an arrogance that is so unbridled I cant find strong enough adjectives to describe it. the last time I held a door for a women she didn’t even look at me or simply say thank you. its so pathetic. I only help and hold doors for women that were born before the sixties. I e 65 years old and up.f~~~ the rest. I don’t need anything from them, ignoring them is a pleasure.

"You can either love women or understand them, you can't do both". Truth over everything

[Silverstone the SecondParticipant]

sidecar wrote:

Venom wrote:

women want us to be chivalrous

Only because they have no clue what they are talking about and have no idea what that word even means. Like usual.

Read up on some Crétien de Troyes some time, and the next time some women tells you to be more “chivalrous”, look her right in the eye and ask her: “Seriously? Is that what you really want? Be careful what you wish for…”

If she says yes, well you’ll know what to do, and it ain’t saving her from a dragon..

Yes, women want us to be chivalrous, today. Tomorrow they want us to be a criminal who slings dope and robs the liquor store, and the day after they want the knight back. Women want whatever benefits them.

Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

There is a feminist paper out there that declares chivalry to be benevolent sexism.

And then there is this.

http://newchivalrymovement.com

I wonder if he’ll change his tunexpected after he is divorce raped.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Spank The MisandristsParticipant 2308]

нσтησσв wrote:

<iframe width=”500″ height=”281″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/klznYfng-l8?feature=oembed” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen=””></iframe>

Holy s~~~….

[Spank The MisandristsParticipant 2308]

Venom wrote:

Now, I just laugh at the men who white knight for every f~~~ing woman in the world. Even if those women are ugly f~~~s who hit the wall hard.

You have to understand that these bastards are weak inside and they can’t even get one walling hitting biatch to sleep with them.

[RoyDalParticipant]

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[VenomParticipant 310]

What I always found to be a bitch about opening doors for women is that they never even acknowledge you did it. I’ve had doors open for me plenty of times (mostly other guys) and I’ve always said thanks at the very least.

The thing is with women, they EXPECT you to do it without question.

There’s even been cases of boys 5 years old getting sexual harrassment charges filed against them because they kissed a girl’s hand (like in those old movies)

Or writing love letters get you sexual harassment charges on those same women. No matter how old the guy is.

This is why other than family, I never do anything to help other women unless they’re doing the same project as I am and I have to work with them (like in my past college classes)

[Anonymous 12]

Women want everything on their own terms. I won’t and can’t be chivalrous as when I used to be that way I found I did expect some kind of response in return, a smile, a thank you, something! I rarely got that and quite often I found I actually got a look of annoyance in return instead.

It made me examine my own motivations for being chivalrous, I was basically seeking female validation and approval. It seemed to be a subconscious thing but that is very much what I was looking for, the more hopeful/sad part of me was even looking for a woman to see how much of a nice guy I was and it would end up becoming a chat and a date.

So yes, women have killed chivalry, and it has no place in a society where the sexes are equal, it also is degrading for men. I cringed a while ago at work, one of the females had her son in and was teaching him to open doors for women and say ladies first, she has no idea what sort of hell she is preparing for him and it makes me laugh as no doubt women will think he has been taught to be this way by his father!

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Spacemonkey wrote:

Do you have it or a link to it?

No, but I suspect I just wrote a synopsis of it. I’ll have to look into it to see what he has to say.

Silverstone the Second wrote:

Yes, women want us to be chivalrous, today.

Women what us to be what they think is chivalrous, which benefits them, not what chivalrous actually means, which doesn’t benefit them in the slightest. What they are thinking of is more along the lines with the worst of that namby pamby courtly love drek, and even then they limit themselves to a bowdlerization of the variety of courtly love espoused by Eleanor of Aquitaine, NOT the more correct version of courtly love espoused by her father, the infamous Duke William of Aquitaine.

[Anonymous 5]

I never open doors for c~~~s. I make sure to NEVER put myself in that situation in the first place. I will gladly wait so I don’t have to do it. Ladies first right? So they can open the f~~~ing door themselves and hold it for ME!

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

Last week a female held the door open for me. Sexism!

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Anonymous 42]

Come on ladies (it’s your turn) it’s your time to be chivalrous! Equality right? Ladies, it’s also your turn to work like a dog and have a men fleece you for all they can, and have you support them and all their needs,,, right?
Yea, I didn’t think so, that’s why there’s MGTOW. The stallions have left the stable for good, it’s time to a cat….

[TheroniusParticipant 975]

Jan Sobieski wrote:

Last week a female held the door open for me. Sexism!

She door raped you? Did you check her privilege?

"I am is reportedly the shortest sentence in the English language. Could it be that I do is the longest sentence?" - George Carlin

[Author]

Posts