Child Support Laws Changing in the U.S.

[The man in the mountainParticipant 4102]

You can now add single mothers to the list of species that are now heading for extinction….

First video and this is a change fairly recent in Illinois.

This is a random prediction made on the internet that the time is over for the single motherhood and their beehive of hell or its ride…

Our voices have been quietly heard, but it is too late, the damage has been done by these gynocentric laws, we will not rest, we will NOT go quietly back to the plantation to be wiped for no reward in the near future again, But gentlemen i have to say that this is a step in the right direction, a little too late for those men that have lost everything including hope…..How can they expect us to be OK with this? i say let the f~~~ing system burn into the ground…

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

Don’t make babies and you won’t have that problem.

Guard your sperm like it is worth $300k, because it is.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

Gotta wonder what happened here. Did some prestigious politician get ran through the ringer and decide something had to change? I will have to do my research and find out what the motivation behind this was.

While it is good news, I’ve got to agree that it’s too little too late. Maybe Illinois got the idea that they’ve been holding men hostage by their wallet, and wasn’t really as effective as it once was. Or perhaps they see that the environment they’ve created is rich with single mothers, and they have decided to take aim at the more target rich demographics. Either way, I’ll go get the Keg if someone want’s to get started on the popcorn, because this is going to be nothing short of a s~~~ show once it starts to spread.

First section 8, now this! LOL. Oh my!!!!

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[Anonymous 3]

Didn’t watch the video, but from what I know locally, the only reason laws would be changing is that women are making more than men. The recession slaughtered men mostly. Out where I am, almost every woman makes a six figure salary doing easy white collar work, but men struggle badly. I know a lot of men that are dependent on their wives.

It makes sense to me that eventually the wives would get bored of them and want to get rid of them, and if the courts would give any type of alimony or child support, men would be getting money. Sure a lot of courts ignore that and still hammer the man, but if a man makes enough of a stink about it and keeps appealing and taking things higher, eventually the law has to be applied, and women don’t like that. So women went to the government and demanded the laws be changed, so they don’t have to pay out.

Women make the laws, and they aren’t about to go against their own interests. Always remember that. The government is not your friend and won’t behave altruistically or objectively or with any notion of fairness. It’s just not geared to be that way.

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

Looks like the child support hustlers are going the way of the dinosaurs.
Good riddance.

[Anonymous 43]

my c~~~ makes 3X what I make. I am smacked with a mandatory 20% of Gross salary. F~~~.

[Anonymous 5]

Anonymous wrote:

Women make the laws, and they aren’t about to go against their own interests. Always remember that.

This is how all civilizations work.
Men make civilizations with conquest, construction and ingenuity then women’s superior verbal manipulation powers hijack and rule them.
All civilizations from Mesopotamia to our own have run the same.

The core belief system of our civilization is formed by a gynocentric media and social media.
Women and women’s rights and entitlements totally dominate every aspect of social interaction.

Anonymous wrote:

almost every woman makes a six figure salary doing easy white collar work,

BINGO!!!!
This is the real reason child support laws are changing.
Women excel in bureaucracy. The bigger governments grow, the more state invented “jobs” there are. The more money and power women have.
The video below shows how the tables are really changing. It’s definitely not because of some noble reason.
MORE WOMEN PAYING ALIMONY
It’s all because women with money don’t give a f~~~ about men, or other women for that matter. They know they’re ruining it for their gold digging sisters as well.
MORE WOMEN ARE P~~~ED OFF PAYING ALIMONY

[AttonParticipant]

One state

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[Sky-OParticipant 18936]

It’s a trap!!

Continue to protect sperm from being used for financial extortion.

Any laws that can be arbitrarily changed can also be changed back.

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

Anonymous wrote:

Women and women’s rights and entitlements totally dominate every aspect of social interaction.

Trail428-

Good point. I’m suspicious. It seems the only reason laws change is to somehow benefit women.

If a woman earns 100k, I expect to see her spend 150k.
If a man earns 50k, I expect to see him spend 35k.
Women don’t want to pay alimony or child support, so a change in the laws to benefit women wouldn’t be surprising.

[IRuleMeParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Didn’t watch the video, but from what I know locally, the only reason laws would be changing is that women are making more than men. The recession slaughtered men mostly. Out where I am, almost every woman makes a six figure salary doing easy white collar work, but men struggle badly. I know a lot of men that are dependent on their wives.

It makes sense to me that eventually the wives would get bored of them and want to get rid of them, and if the courts would give any type of alimony or child support, men would be getting money. Sure a lot of courts ignore that and still hammer the man, but if a man makes enough of a stink about it and keeps appealing and taking things higher, eventually the law has to be applied, and women don’t like that. So women went to the government and demanded the laws be changed, so they don’t have to pay out.

Women make the laws, and they aren’t about to go against their own interests. Always remember that. The government is not your friend and won’t behave altruistically or objectively or with any notion of fairness. It’s just not geared to be that way.

Women are delusional if they think men have all the power. Women do all the voting, and who do they elect? MEN. Where’s all the women running for office? There was two last year. TWO. Fact is, women talk all kinds of s~~~ about men and their “power” and “discrimination”, but the reality is, they never want to f~~~ing do the work. There’s almost no women in politics as far as senate and congress. How is such a thing possible if women outnumber men, and women do so much voting?

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Many states are changing child custody laws all across the country. Is the problem fixed? Please, but when did these issues ever get better for men?

Never.

At least some progress is happening.

Child custody law reform is happening all over the country. The most recent reform takes effect this week: It is Missouri’s policy recommendation that encourages courts to maximize time children have with each of their parents.

The research shows that children want open contact with both parents and that meaningful involvement with both parents produces the best outcomes for children. The idea of shared parenting polls around 70 percent approval, yet few people realize that shared arrangements are not typical until they or someone close to them goes through divorce. It is a shock how quickly courts separate children and one parent, usually their fathers.

Shared parenting has powerful detractors. In fact, Missouri Gov. Mike Nixon felt the need to sign Missouri’s reform over the Fourth of July weekend, likely to avoid provoking the two main groups opposed to shared parenting: bar associations and feminists. Those groups prefer the status quo for the common reasons: money and power. (They are particularly successful at cowing Republican states. See, for example, North Dakota, Nebraska and Florida.)

Hush-hush signing or not, Missouri has joined a handful of states who have passed child custody reform with more to follow. According to the Wall Street Journal, 20 states had shared parenting reforms pending last year.

https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2016-09-01/child-custody-reform-is-spreading-from-arizona-to-missouri-to-the-nation

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[OldBillParticipant]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

At least some progress is happening.

Progress? More like placating mouth noises rather than concrete actions.

Let’s all re-read the first sentence in the article you quoted and pay attention to what it actually is saying:

The most recent reform takes effect this week: It is Missouri’s policy recommendation that encourages courts to maximize time children have with each of their parents.

Notice the phrase “… encourages the courts…”. Not directs, not mandates, not requires, but encourages.

The same judges with the same mindset following the same ideology are still sitting in the same courts where they’ve been routinely ripping fathers out of their children’s lives for decades and they’re now being encouraged to “maximize” the amount of time children spend with each parent.

That’s far cry from equitable child custody arrangements being mandated by law.

Yes, the conversation may have been raised in some locations and, yes, a few “suggestions” may have made it into the law over the rabid objections of c~~~s, lawyers, and lawyers with c~~~s.

Deeds, not words, are what truly counts. They talk can talk and talk and talk and talk but until actual concrete substantial actions occur, it’s nothing but talk and talk and talk and talk. Like the large numbers of anti-feminist and tradcon women sudden;y making their voices heard, these limited and laughable “reforms” are little more than a new kind of bait meant to lure men back to the plantation.

We need to remain focused on what they do instead of what they say.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[Deadly RaverParticipant]

That may be good news for future generations of men. Me? I’ve walked alone and shall continue to do so.

Learn from the past, Control the present, and you will know the Future.

[Author]

Posts