can't stop laughing this is so absurd

[Anonymous 43]

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/723323/Sexual-partner-fertility-disability-World-Health-Organisation-IVF

lolololololololo

best comment:

Do you realize what this opens up?

People who reject someone’s advances for a relationship or sex may be charged with a crime since that infringes on a disabled person. Stalking and sexual harassment laws may be repealed as per they “infringe” on the disabled.

I say go for it. Feminism got us to this point and it should reap what it has sowed!

[AttonParticipant]

But now in dramatic move the World Health Organisation will change the standard to suggest that a person who is unable to find a suitable sexual partner or is lacking a sexual relationship to have children – will now be equally classified as disabled.

I have just lost all the respect I have for the world health organization. This is just complete f~~~ing nonsense they would class this s~~~ as a disability.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

so if you agree to have sex with them, they’re no longer disabled? I’m a miracle worker. hallelujah

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[Jack HarperParticipant 2863]

[SandalsParticipant 4254]

Disabled means they get govt money.

I am guessing the women who made that definition are among the newly classified as disabled.

[President CamachoParticipant 941]

Does this mean it’s a hate crime to not have sex with women? I see this as a backdoor way for them to criminalize MGTOW.

It won’t get enforced against me since I’ll wear a propeller hat in public whenever possible.

A Western marriage that survives in the current year is an act of mercy and compassion by the woman.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Pure genius.

And Im still laughing because WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION spells…. “WHO”.

As in this quote from the article:

“WHO says the change will give every individual “the right to reproduce”.

F~~~ that’s hilarious. It even reads as pure satire.

This part , however, is not hilarious….

Under the new rules, heterosexual single men and women and gay men and women who want to have children will now be given the same priority as a couple seeking IVF because of medical fertility problems.

Poor kids.

Who brainwashed these people to think “I want children” is reason enough to have one?

They are completely insane. If “I want children” is their reason, then they are coldly considering an act of cruelty to children. You don’t have a child because “you want one”. Christ, even an UNINTENDED pregnancy is a better reason than “I WANT”.

A child is not a like new iPhone.
F~~~ing idiots.

If all unmarried people and gays are given the same priority and ability to have children, then there is never a reason to celebrate a wedding, give a wedding gift, give a f~~~ about “the bride”, or gay marriage, throw a woman a baby shower, give her any gifts, or celebrate a pregnancy or or treat her like she’s “special”. Because everyone is now — >> THE SAME.

Brilliant.

And finally. Its the end of facebook.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[sonofthedestroyerParticipant 318]

I agree with Camacho. This suspiciously seems like a move to stem the growing number of MGTOW. As they realise that like in Japan millions of women are going to be alone and desperate for a male servant/slave.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

The reason behind that is simple – funding. Once it’s a legit disability – now resolving it qualifies as charity work – a humanitarian cause. ($$$)

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[KeymasterKeymaster]

sonofthedestroyer wrote:

This suspiciously seems like a move to stem the growing number of MGTOW. As they realise that like in Japan millions of women are going to be alone and desperate for a male servant/slave.

Interesting times ahead, gents. Enjoy the show.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[President CamachoParticipant 941]

So what’s going to happen? Are more men going to be jailed for rape or for not having sex with women? They won’t have enough space in all the jails, nor the funding for more of them.

A Western marriage that survives in the current year is an act of mercy and compassion by the woman.

[Veritech AceParticipant 699]

What The Serious Flying F~~~! When The Hell Did I Enter Bizarro World! This has got to stop…this has got to f~~~ing stop.

Sorry for the language gentlemen… But the words, “Failure to find a sexual partner is now a disability” are a combination of words so bizarre that not even Douglas Adams could have come up with an appropriate anecdote that would somehow fit those words into the space-time continuum.

After reading that article, I seriously need a pan galactic gargleblaster…but I’m all out of lemon.

This s~~~ has got to stop…this s~~~ has got to stop…

[sidecarParticipant 35862]

President Camacho wrote:

Does this mean it’s a hate crime to not have sex with women?

Why do people persist in thinking MGTOW don’t have sex with women. That has nothing to do with Going Your Own Way.

MGTOW simply don’t pay for it. Ever.

I see this as a backdoor way for them to criminalize MGTOW.

Nah. It will be used as a justification for taxpayer funded IVF for post wall crazy cat ladies. Right now sperm banks charge from $500 to $1000 per baster load of donated sperm. This will put the taxpayer on the hook for that (and also increase the price). And of course taxpayers are mostly men.

Naturally the resulting children will immediately go on welfare, further increasing the burden on taxpayers, because any woman not able to pay $1000 for a baster full of donated sperm won’t be able to afford to actually raise the child either.

So basically it’s just one more reason to minimize your tax footprint and also never, ever, under any circumstances donate to a sperm bank.

[Veritech AceParticipant 699]

President Camacho wrote:

So what’s going to happen? Are more men going to be jailed for rape or for not having sex with women? They won’t have enough space in all the jails, nor the funding for more of them.

Given the way hypergamy works, surely it will be only men in the top 20%. They’ll keep the old rape laws around for the rest of us peons.

Actually, now that I think about it…it will be the top 10%. We’re talking a-whole-nother level of hypergamy here.

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

Yes the trollops must be “impaired” for utterly failing to
find a sex partner.

Here’s another perspective, the musty ham beasts will use this to obtain free s~~~ from the government. This will most certainly hurt male tax payers.

[SkeptiskParticipant 3679]

Just another way to scam money from the gub’mint to those poor oppressed wimmynz… And who pays for it? WHO? Nope, we do. Men do, the wimmyn just r’laxes as she opens up – yet another! – gub’mint-check from the welfare-office. Now, EVERY women is eligible, and THIS is the bachelor-tax that doesn’t hurt wimmyz…

"Expecting to find a decent woman on a dating site is like dumpster diving and expecting to come out with a gourmet meal." Won'tGetFooledAgain

[bladeParticipant]

Wonder how this will effect the gay and lesbian community.if this did become a law there will be a lot of splinter laws that will come from this.

THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

[KeymasterKeymaster]

President Camacho wrote:

So what’s going to happen? Are more men going to be jailed for rape or for not having sex with women?

Well the first thing that will happen is feminist fairies will fly out of my arse before you’re jailed for not having sex with women…. because men already invented dildos for women like that. Where do you think the expression “go f~~~ yourself” comes from?

That’s what dildos are FOR: Women and gays to go f~~~ themselves.
The existence of dildos are your get-out-of-jail free card.

So no, you’re not going to jail. You’re going to pass GO and collect $200. Because MGTOW has the Monopoly on not giving any of this your valuable time and attention – except to point and laugh.

The sex that makes a point of yelling “YOU NEED MY WRITTEN CONSENT!! OR ITS RAPE!! “ never gets to complain about not finding a sex partner. They already f~~~ed themselves beyond all comprehension.

Another get out of jail free card.

“Your honor, I couldn’t f~~~ her because she didn’t give me written consent. I need her consent every 5 minutes and she didn’t provide it. Oh well. Sorry. Better luck next time.”

Zuberi Tau wrote:

Yes the trollops must be “impaired” for utterly failing to
find a sex partner.

Women are far too promiscuous and have more sex and more sexual partners than ever before.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1093011/Women-far-promiscuous-men-says-shock-new-study.html

Not finding a sex partners is not one of their difficulties.

Or is it…..

“Disabled” isn’t really the right word.
The video producer calls her “bats~~~ crazy”.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Ned TrentParticipant 4894]

I still don’t give a f~~~ anymore …

… though it is Hillaryous indeed.

WHO is the world health organization (anyway)

Oh and Charlie Darwin would probably be like: “F~~~in’ hell…!”

I'd rather die a natual death with a clear MGTOW conscience somewhere off the grid than one within "modern" civilisation with a big stress mark on my forehead and a couple of dozen tubes plugged into my body. Back to the plantation..? Me..? Hey, literally: I won't ever fucking kid myself...YZERLMNTSIC

[Eric LauderParticipant 12053]

It’s meant for giving free IVF rights to single women, while keeping the ban on surrogacy.

It’s also meant to ban porn, on the grounds that it reduces the chances of men and women to have sex, making them “disabled”.

On the long run it could backfire in a spectacular way, with some state support to single men who haven’t sex and granting men access to the artificial womb.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Author]

Posts