Can I Be Married and MGTOW? My Intro

[UntamedParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

He popped off at @keymaster and all hell broke loose. Grab a seat. @untamed has the popcorn and i brought the drinks.

He pops in here from God knows where and starts painting a picture of a perfect marriage then backpedals and says she’s AWALT and was joking about her being NAWALT then
Mentions some distasteful ways he’s treating his wife then Keymaster brought the best out of him and kicked him out to Pluto somewhere.
I finished the popcorn but I still got hotdogs. Who wants some?

Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22546]

Forcing a woman into submission is not MGTOW. That is not what is going on here. It is men going their own way. Those ways may be different, but no one here touts “forcing women into submission” as what they believe MGTOW is about.

Just using that phrase makes me question the OP. Sounds like female fantasy porn novel from Danielle Steel or Barbara Cartland. ANd I know these two because those were the books my grandma had all over her house.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[BigvernParticipant 1983]

Victoribus Spolia wrote:

“I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass, and i’m all out of bubblegum.”

fellas, wasn’t this SIGNATURE, used previously, on another profile!?

FISHY

"What made you think, there'd be a livin' in sheep?, Eat, Work, Eat Work and Sleep" - Mark Knopfler.

[Anonymous 13]

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22546]

Heres my take on it.

Married men can be MGTOW. In their worldview and mindset. Of course. Men wake up after being married. Happens all the time.

But being married they cannot put MGTOW into practice 100% all of the time. That is not possible.

That doesn’t mean they don’t want to or do not believe mgtow is the way to go. It measn they are not going to be able to implement mgtow 100% in their lives even though they would do so if it was possible for them to.

It is not possible to fully 100% IMPLEMENT mgtow because another person is involved in a marriage contract.

And you cant look down on a guy who wakes up afterwards. He has woken up. Doing his best where he is.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[CarnageParticipant 22113]

Hey, it ain’t gonna suck itself.

To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

[UntamedParticipant]

Bigvern wrote:

Victoribus Spolia wrote:

“I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass, and i’m all out of bubblegum.”

fellas, wasn’t this SIGNATURE, used previously, on another profile!?

FISHY

Who can say? This place has been under attack since it opened. Apparently going somewhere, even your own way, is somehow threatening to the feint of heart liberal femtards and their drone menginas who repeat ” I don’t need a Man ” but have to scour the Internet in search of Men who don’t kiss their arse all day long.
I’m glad I’m not them, I’d have to shoot myself!

Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!

[BigvernParticipant 1983]

It’sallbs wrote:

Victoribus Spolia wrote:
its in my instincts to protect my wife,
No its social conditioninga nd probably what you saw your father do due to his social conditioning.

spot on!!

Victoribus Spolia wrote:

If she is f~~~ing afraid to leave you because you present yourself as above the law, have her on the same page on issues pertaining to feminism & child-birth, and keep her constantly pregnant and busy…..well so far it seems to be working,

What a ‘man’

Hermit wrote:

28, submissive young wife who loves to suck dick all the time, 5 kids, all that education, all that work…????….. BULL-F~~~ING-S~~~!

Correct Sir, UTOPIA!

"What made you think, there'd be a livin' in sheep?, Eat, Work, Eat Work and Sleep" - Mark Knopfler.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

IRuleMe wrote:

He’s talking about THIS thread.

OK thanks very much for bringing it.

I now see – for the first time – Pete’s objections in that thread and thinking we are inconsistent and unfair. Let’s examine that.

1. It’s an external link and not visible here.
2. The member posted a warning before clicking on it
3. There is an additional warning before seeing it on the other site.
4. Nobody in the thread was jumping up and down with glee or got any satisfaction out of seeing it.
5. Nobody endorsed it as a solution or justifiable. It is spoken about and criticized as something that happened elsewhere
6. It was not a recommended way of dealing with it. It was an extremist way that we do not endorse or suggest.

Do you still have any problem with any of this??

On Pete’s objection about DYD, his posting privs were removed for about a week. Big f~~~ing deal. It wasn’t so out of line that he got removed. I didn’t have THE TIME to moderate him that night anymore so made him a spectator until I could review everything. And there was a lot.

TIME is required to review this s~~~ – quite a bit of it. TIME we are not paid for. And all the time required takes away from our other production… which is a further loss. I don’t give DYD permission to be a loss for us. Is that OK with you?

Why don’t you write directly instead of making it an issue in that thread? If you have an issue, PLEASE CONTACT. This notice appears almost daily for every member who logs in.

Your criticism of how this is handled is gladly welcomed.
So are your alternate suggestions. I’m listening.

But if you think the OP was treated unfairly here, that’s too bad…. because I have already determined that I was treated unfairly based on EVERY courtesy I extended to him.

Thank you very much.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[It’sallbsParticipant]

I would just bin this entire discussion. I pressed the mangina button hours ago.

We shouldn’t still be discussing this a hole.

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[Anonymous 6]

Sure has been alot of thread reaching a big number of replies lately.

[UntamedParticipant]

It’sallbs wrote:

I would just bin this entire discussion. I pressed the mangina button hours ago.

We shouldn’t still be discussing this a hole.

It’s turned into appropriate and inappropriate content and who’s getting the boot for what.
Sit down, Keymaster’s talking.

Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

Keymaster wrote:

. It’s an external link and not visible here.
2. The member posted a warning before clicking on it
3. There is an additional warning before seeing it on the other site.
4. Nobody in the thread was jumping up and down with glee or got any satisfaction out of seeing it.
5. Nobody endorsed it as a solution or justifiable. It is spoken about and criticized as something that happened elsewhere
6. It was not a recommended way of dealing with it. It was an extremist way that we do not endorse or suggest.

And absolutely none of those criteria are in the forum rules—And yes utilizing criteria which no one is aware of is the very definition of arbitrary. I’ve never seen them before now. Has anyone else? I didn’t “report it” because I think the forum should be open to any content. I note that posting content is not the same as representing the site–posts don’t represent the site they represent the opinion of one of 24K+ members. I’m simply interested in folks being treated fairly.

Anyway the plain fact is VP was not a tuna, and his question is relevant when one considers Howard Dare. Now Howard is MGTOW–I don’t think anyone would argue that—but unless I’ve missed something HE IS married isn’t he? So do we delete his stuff from the site now? Do we purge him as non-MGTOW?

[KeymasterKeymaster]

“Can I Be Married and MGTOW?”

Can I be a dog and a cat?
Can I be black and white?
Can I be Married and MGTOW?

No you f~~~ing can’t. That’s why you’re “married”. You got married to be publicly recognized as “married” in the eyes of everyone including the law. Are you a f~~~ing thoughtless moron?

—

^^ Thats’ how I should have answered him.
Live and learn.

But I didn’t, because there is something to be said about “being the better man”. It’s how I live with myself. At least I’m not stuck in a marriage with AN AWALT who doesn’t even want to be there…. who I have to “psychologically manipulate” on a daily basis just to make it work. Jesus Christ.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Joey AlfioParticipant]

That’s like saying you want to be crazy and sane at the same time.

Δεν υπάρχει τίποτε αδύνατο γι’ αυτόν που θα προσπαθήσει. - Μέγας Αλέξανδρος

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22546]

Anyone think his choice of Archie Bunker as a avatar seem weird? AB is not mgtow, and he’s a stereotyped negative male character. Struck me funny as to why you’d actually pick HIM unless you were not mgtow but believing other guys you don’t understand who are mgtow would think is a good avatar for.

Just like saying “forcing his wife into submission by psychologically controlling her” – trying to pass that crap off as somehow being attractive to mgtow guys. It isn’t. It’s not what mgtow is about.

Two red flags for me.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

PistolPete wrote:

And absolutely none of those criteria are in the forum rules—And yes utilizing criteria which no one is aware of is the very definition of arbitrary. I’ve never seen them before now. Has anyone else?

OK I see.

But do you really think those things REALLY need to be said??

I am taking a problem situation and doing my very best to determine certain variables which factor in to the kind of atmosphere and environment we set out to create and maintain.

This is OK.
That’s not OK.
But this is OK.
But that’s not OK.

F~~~ that s~~~. Every MEN-ber can admin themselves and in that thread, nobody LOWERED the level of website or kind of people we are. Nobody vandalized principals “MGTOW” or attempted to make us look like f~~~ing animals.

My points were not “criteria for approval”. There are variables used to determine whether or not dis-approval is warranted. Do you think it is? I have NO problem deleting it from here. But in good conscience, I can’t. I actually looked for reasons to delete it, and can’t find any.

PistolPete wrote:

I didn’t “report it” because I think the forum should be open to any content.

Then you don’t have a problem with the content itself. You have a problem with my decisions determining what is NOT acceptable. I understand better now.

We are Men. And I happened to know that MGTOW are “better” men than a great deal of what’s out there. If I am wrong, and everything must be allowed here, then I don’t want to be a part of it and this website wouldn’t exist.

It certainly wouldn’t be public.

We would have otherwise created “alltrashwelcome-dot-com”.
Not my style. I’m BETTER than that. Are YOU?

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Can’t Stump TrumpParticipant]

Apparently, this is what happens when I’m away at work. You guys literally wrote 10 f~~~ing pages, and the OP got the boot before I had a chance to write anything.

TFM made a good video about this very topic. His take is that, while different people have different ideas about what it means to be MGTOW, there are three rules that exclude you without qualification: (1) marriage, (2) cohabitation, (3) intentionally impregnating a woman. He suggested people who take the red pill after marriage might be called “awakened while married,” though titles are pretty arbitrary and unimportant to begin with.

Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

Can’t Stump Trump wrote:

Apparently, this is what happens when I’m away at work. You guys literally wrote 10 f~~~ing pages, and the OP got the boot before I had a chance to write anything.
TFM made a good video about this very topic. His take is that, while different people have different ideas about what it means to be MGTOW, there are three rules that exclude you without qualification: (1) marriage, (2) cohabitation, (3) intentionally impregnating a woman. He suggested people who take the red pill after marriage might be called “awakened while married,” though titles are pretty arbitrary and unimportant to begin with.

All you have to go is go back and read page 4 where he admits that he is really here to write a college paper and decided to pick MGTOW as a topic. He wants a PhD and for us to do all the work. He even admitted he had to spend a certain amount each day on the forums of the websites he picked.

Order the good wine

[KeymasterKeymaster]

TaxGuy wrote:

All you have to go is go back and read page 4 where he admits that he is really here to write a college paper and decided to pick MGTOW as a topic. He wants a PhD and for us to do all the work. He even admitted he had to spend a certain amount each day on the forums of the websites he picked.

Well he can write about how he’s stuck in a marriage with AN AWALT who doesn’t even want to be there . . . who he has to “psychologically manipulate” on a daily basis just to make it work. Jesus Christ.

I give him an A+ in marriage studies.
Together with a token, it will get him on the subway.

His registered email is actually associated with a religious bent. A picture of the bible on their website, and quotes and ramblings about the lord.

I would be concerned about saying “Jesus Christ” as an exclamation, but he didn’t have any problem threatening violence and calling members cucks, so I don’t really give a f~~~. He waltzed into the wrong forum on the wrong day.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Author]

Posts