Can anyone explain what's the deal with "she was used to certain lifestyle

[freedomParticipant 5129]

When it comes to divorce laws?

I mean this is so f~~~ed up, my dad was also accustomed to the certain lifestyle before he quit his last job, since he received pay from both pension and current work and now he earns crap just so he will not get bored.
Can my 66-year-old dad sue his last workplace, because he was used to having like 10k$ every month? and now he has to live with half of it?

so how come a woman can throw that claim at you? I mean.. well if you bought the house together, and each payed 50% I can get it, hell I’ll even go an extra mile and say that if she invested 20% she deserves a decent part. But getting half the money you earn after she was the one deciding to dump you, that’s crazy!!!

what’s wrong with the system of justice, that’s insane. If she deserves getting the same lifestyle after she left her husband, then my dad deserves to get the same money he had when he left his last job, just STUPID1

[BlacqueJacqueShellacqueParticipant 6890]

MVP – Maximum Value Parasite.

[Anonymous 6]

The whole premise is, women are considered less than and can’t touch the earning potential that a man can have. So while she was with you, she was accustomed to a certain lifestyle that was provided for by you. The judge will see that without you, she cannot continue to have that lifestyle. So a divorce will cause her to go down in standard of living.

But at the same time, the man is also going down in standard of living. But he has high earning potential, so he has a better chance of making that money back. It’s stupid, I know. The same thing with child support.

The courts assume that the mother is the better parent because before women were in the workforce, they were in the home taking care of the children. So since they have a maternal instinct to raise children, the courts justify that ability by giving them custody. But that doesn’t make sense, shouldn’t the child go to the parent who doesn’t need any financial assistance??

This is why we need more MGTOW men in positions of power. I know it sounds cool to say “F~~~ College” and “F~~~ School”, but truly, the only way to change some of this stuff is too do it from the inside. We need more lawyers, more politicians, more doctors, more judges, more cops, more teachers, more city council members, more board of education trustees. We love too talk about how men run the world, well let’s put out boots on the f~~~ing ground and run this s~~~.

[Freeman_KParticipant 3524]

Like Oz-bloke would say, … all part of vagina monetization scam.

The choices we make, not the chances we take, determine our destiny

[joetechParticipant]

Double Standards.

"Don't follow in my footsteps...I stepped in something."

[Anonymous 13]

It’s all part of the bulls~~~ to justify giving women more money.

Women spend money like it’s going out of fashion, mostly on useless s~~~.

Men save money and are frugal.

Therefore,

Take Steal all the man’s money and give it to the spendthrift woman.

It’s a c~~~ of a system.

Stop marrying.
Stop cohabitating.

Stop, just stop this blatant theft from men.

[freedomParticipant 5129]

Anonymous wrote:

The whole premise is, women are considered less than and can’t touch the earning potential that a man can have. So while she was with you, she was accustomed to a certain lifestyle that was provided for by you. The judge will see that without you, she cannot continue to have that lifestyle. So a divorce will cause her to go down in standard of living.

But at the same time, the man is also going down in standard of living. But he has high earning potential, so he has a better chance of making that money back. It’s stupid, I know. The same thing with child support.

The courts assume that the mother is the better parent because before women were in the workforce, they were in the home taking care of the children. So since they have a maternal instinct to raise children, the courts justify that ability by giving them custody. But that doesn’t make sense, shouldn’t the child go to the parent who doesn’t need any financial assistance??

This is why we need more MGTOW men in positions of power. I know it sounds cool to say “F~~~ College” and “F~~~ School”, but truly, the only way to change some of this stuff is too do it from the inside. We need more lawyers, more politicians, more doctors, more judges, more cops, more teachers, more city council members, more board of education trustees. We love too talk about how men run the world, well let’s put out boots on the f~~~ing ground and run this s~~~.

they will never see it that way

[Anonymous 6]

Also have you ever noticed that the poorer the neighborhood, the more children you will see?? Seems like if you live in a bad neighborhood, you would do whatever you could to move out of it, not pop out kids and make moving not feasible.

And in those neighborhoods, the women are having kids by alot of the same men. Sad cycle

[Back in BlackParticipant 1732]

Well….I am the rare man to receive alimony. I am in California and when my snowflake decided she was “not happy” I thought I was going to end up homeless and living under a bridge.
fortunately my attorney informed me of this clause “lifestyle accustomed to”.

Not to ruin your narrative my ex had to pay ME alimony. I had no idea it was even a thing but I am grateful and use all my energy, time and love being a good dad and taking care of myself and children.

I am not sure if it is fair or not but I am extremely grateful and it allows me to provide for my children to the life they are “accustomed to”.

"Women are directly adapted to act as the nurses and educators of our early childhood, for the simple reason that they themselves are childish, foolish, and short-sighted—in a word, are big children all their lives, something intermediate between the child and the man, who is a man in the strict sense of the word. Consider how a young girl will toy day after day with a child, dance with it and sing to it; and then consider what a man, with the very best intentions in the world, could do in her place.” Quote from Arthur Shopenhauer, 17th century philosopher

[freedomParticipant 5129]

Anonymous wrote:

Also have you ever noticed that the poorer the neighborhood, the more children you will see?? Seems like if you live in a bad neighborhood, you would do wherever you could to move out of it, not pop out kids and make moving not feasible.

And in those neighborhoods, the women are having kids by alot of the same men. Sad cycle

Anonymous wrote:

Also have you ever noticed that the poorer the neighborhood, the more children you will see?? Seems like if you live in a bad neighborhood, you would do whatever you could to move out of it, not pop out kids and make moving not feasible.

And in those neighborhoods, the women are having kids by alot of the same men. Sad cycle

I don’t like that either, in my opinion if you can’t raise children well, then don’t raise them at all.

Some dumb people will have 5 children even if they earn nothing, and then the kid is raised with no education because he is more focused on surviving.

Eventually other people who were responsible enough, have to pay the price with the increase of taxes

[Anonymous 6]

Yep and that’s not fair to the child because the child did not ask to be born.

[FunInTheSunParticipant 8283]

Good point.

Whenever I read about celebrities divorcing, I’m amused at what these strong, independent women need from their ex-husbands: pony rides for the kids, annual trips to Europe, maids, nannies/day care, new clothes, luxury cars, spa memberships, etc. Lawyers read off this list of luxuries in courts and expect to be taken seriously.

If women can be compensated for the benefits they had during a marriage, why can’t men? If a divorced man was accustomed to having the house chores done by his wife, why can’t he sue his ex-wife to give him money for maid service? And if he was accustomed to getting a handjob from his wife once a week, why can’t his ex-wife pay him $100 a week so he can hire a cheap whore to do the deed (in a place where prostitution is legal) ?

"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

[BushidoParticipant 637]

FunInTheSun wrote:

Whenever I read about celebrities divorcing, I’m amused at what these strong, independent women need from their ex-husbands: pony rides for the kids, annual trips to Europe, maids, nannies/day care, new clothes, luxury cars, spa memberships, etc. Lawyers read off this list of luxuries in courts and expect to be taken seriously.

The joke about the US a few years ago was that people would sue for the darnedest things – now, the joke’s on us; they GET these things!

This fact v. feelings nonsense needs to promptly disappear. Facts say a woman is not entitled to a damn thing if they didn’t earn it in some way. Their feelings don’t change that!

Logic guides your actions, emotion guides your morals. Only you may decide how you use them.

[Anonymous 13]

She’s used to being a c~~~.

Pay her all your money so she can carry on being a c~~~.

DO NOT MARRY.
DO NOT COHABITATE.

[NerdTunnelerParticipant]

LOL…If only you can reply to the judge that you are used to your wife sucking your dick, that this is your lifestyle and must be maintained…quid pro quo…

I stand with feet apart and let my balls hang free...Manginas dont have balls...See how they stand and sit at the whim of their masters...

[Author]

Posts