Blue Pill Betas Without Money Find The Truth Quickly

[Sky-OParticipant 18949]

Note: Non-scientific study. Based on my own analysis of a controlled group of ten blue pill buddies (Have known 4 of them for over 20 years. 3 of them for over a decade and the remaining 3, under a decade)

Stats:

All have consistently been blue pill betas to the core.

Group A – 5 of them come from money, and have significant wealth and passive-investment income

Group B: 5 of them are not wealthy and / would not be considered rich in addition to their source of money only coming from paychecks

The net worth and income gap between the two groups is considerable.

Now. I have noticed one significant difference between both groups.

Group B: All got hard, very brutal lessons regarding AWALT and hypergamy early on in their 20’s – Not that it changed their fundamental, core operating philosophy much. But they were handed real world lessons on female sexual behavior and hypergamy early on. And as a result of them not being able to compete financially at a level they would have liked and that would have been consistent with their blue pill beta approach to women. They learned some serious undeniable truths about women and hypergamy due to having been at the bottom of a socio-economic system that would have required them to have more money and assets in order to be able to roll the way they wanted to in terms of access to women. Their lack of wealth was the catalyst for those lessons.

They live now with the knowledge of a painful truth.

– –

Group A: Having had the ability financially to secure access to women that they considered worth the cost. They never had to deal with any real rejection. And the quality of women (all are now married) was higher aesthetically / physically than what they would have had without money. They have been able to fund and finance the charades known as their marriages and fulfill their designated and chosen roles of blue pill beta providers. They have managed up until this point to live in a delusional realm. Fortified and made possible by their money. And as a result are primarily clueless to the true, inherent nature of women. Of course that will not last forever but in the meantime. . .

They are living a comfortable lie

– –

Both groups A & B are flawed, by nature due to being blue pill beta sacrificial lambs.

But Group B actually learned the truth early on. Their lack of wealth made them conscious of it.

Group A is still naive and ultimately delusional, having been immune from the harsh truth, at least temporarily.

[Lord HumungusParticipant 270]

I also come from a wealthy background as my father was a very successful Doctor and business man… But I was red-pilled in my early 20’s by my sister and mother and a horrible she-beast slut whore POS of girl I had a child (a son which I ended up raising) with when I was 19… And that was it for me… I will be 41 years old in February and I haven’t had anything to do with women since….

[JB BooksParticipant 3182]

You got that straight, Sky Outlaw!Access to women is essentially baed on either being a Chad or your perceived financial aassets available for transfer. I have a good, albeit fairly low status job and largely remain below the radar without too much difficulty. I consider that a blessing and really don’t give a f~~~ what women think.

We just don't realize life's most significant events while they're happening. Back then, I thought, "Well, there'll be other days". I didn't realize that that was the only day. - "Moonlight" Graham

[Dark KenshiParticipant 2132]

If I had a group of IRL MGTOW friends, I would start the bets and counting the odds about when will pumpkin leave the betas of the group A, and how many of both groups probably had been cucked…

"Young was I once, I walked alone, and bewildered seemed in the way; then I found me another and rich I thought me, for man is the joy of man." Odin, Hàvamàl, stanza 47.

[StealthParticipant 5360]

As detrimental as my divorce was, I was glad for the education it brought — that it showed me who the people around me really were, and confirmed the evils of marriage to my wife which I had recognized the entire time, but had not yet put the pieces together. I lost a lot of blood and money. But had I gotten divorced much later in life, or married to someone who hid her cards better, or with whom I was more infatuated, my time on the plantation would have conceivably lasted many more years, and kept me locked in the funk of a mediocre marriage.

"Once you’ve taken care of the basics, there’s very little in this world for which your life is worth deferring." -David Hansson. "It’s not when women are mean or nasty that anything is out of the ordinary. It’s when they are NICE to you that you have to be on high alert..." -Jackinov.

[StealthParticipant 5360]

JB Books wrote:

Access to women is essentially based on either being a Chad or your perceived financial assets available for transfer.

And either way, she is using you.
Like a tampon.

"Once you’ve taken care of the basics, there’s very little in this world for which your life is worth deferring." -David Hansson. "It’s not when women are mean or nasty that anything is out of the ordinary. It’s when they are NICE to you that you have to be on high alert..." -Jackinov.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

That’s why you hear over and over that for women it isn’t all about looks. Because it isn’t. Guys make a cost benefit analysis between how attractive a woman is vs. her crazy factor. Women make the same trade-off between looks and money.

What betas fail to realize is that a large percentage of women figured out how to beat the system: bang one for money and others for looks. And somehow men are the ones known for being able to compartmentalize their feelings. Go figure.

Order the good wine

[Bob DylanParticipant 1352]

IMHO, women rate men on their ‘points’ in these categories :
Looks
Social status
Resources

..it ain't me babe...it ain't me you're looking for, babe...

[Dark KenshiParticipant 2132]

Bob Dylan wrote:

IMHO, women rate men on their ‘points’ in these categories :
Looks
Social status
Resources

Nailed, but got the order wrong, as there are two disctinct phases of their lives:

If they are ahead of the wall, your order is pretty much exactly.
If they are past the wall, the order is: Resources, social status then looks.

"Young was I once, I walked alone, and bewildered seemed in the way; then I found me another and rich I thought me, for man is the joy of man." Odin, Hàvamàl, stanza 47.

[Bob DylanParticipant 1352]

Dark Kenshi wrote:

Nailed, but got the order wrong, as there are two disctinct phases of their lives:

You are correct Sir !
Thanks for the clarification….lol.

..it ain't me babe...it ain't me you're looking for, babe...

[narwhalParticipant]

Group B isn’t hard to understand. When a woman divorces him he basically has three choices to make.
1 – I married a bad one, NAWALT. This is so easy to believe because it’s what society tells you repeatedly. It’s convenient to believe as well, because that means you can find another one that won’t be the same.
2 – I wasn’t good enough. I didn’t make enough money, give her enough attention etc. It’s easy to believe again because society tells you this and it means you have control because you can make changes and get it right next time.
3- Face the reality that it’s not your fault, and you didn’t pick a bad one. This is so difficult to believe. It’s not what you want to hear and not what most people will tell you. It’s world shattering.

So it’s hard to blame your Group B for picking door number 1 or 2.

For group A, I don’t think door number 2 is really much of choice. Clearly not a money issue, but perhaps he things he could have been more attentive. Perhaps they might be more willing to accept #3 as they have not based their entire worth on the acceptance of a woman, they have income to prove they have value.

I don’t think I really fit into group A or B personally. I am not rich or poor. In evaluating ‘what went wrong’, I couldn’t fully conclude that I had married a bad one. I couldn’t see characteristics she had that were particularly bad in comparison to other women I knew. I also couldn’t conclude that I failed. I knew I made better than average money, as good or better than what her friends were getting. I knew I wasn’t perfect but I was better than many other husbands and was clearly willing to do what it takes. Still I didn’t fall on option #3 just yet. I was determined to take what I learned and refuse to make the same mistakes again. And I knew that I needed to be financially responsible for the sake of me and my kids.

It really wasn’t till a couple years after the divorce that I realized #3 was the answer. I didn’t want to spend my life fighting to be a more compelling husband than ex-husband, considering the odds were stacked against me.

Ok. Then do it.

[LurchParticipant 3866]

Bob Dylan wrote:

IMHO, women rate men on their ‘points’ in these categories :LooksSocial statusResources

Close, but the order is:

1. Resources.
2. Physicality.
3. Alpha Traits.
4. Personality.

Blue-Pill Virgin: Women hate me! That's what it is.
MGTOW Man: Hate them back; it works for me.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Bob Dylan wrote:

IMHO, women rate men on their ‘points’ in these categories :
Looks
Social status
Resources

All these labels like Alpha and Beta only go so far. I’m the META guy… or maybe not even that…

Poor, quiet, intelligent, skeptic, emotional, rational, philosophical/psychological
athletic but not varsity, timid but will fight to blood and prone to anger, meek but built like a linebacker.
reads books but only fiction, highly intelligent yet no degree, owns real estate yet makes less than $40K a year.
Served in the USMC as a Rifleman and has a lot of weapons training yet he can also tell you your horoscope and astrology sign!

See? Some people are neither Alpha or Beta…. we call them Meta I guess LOL.

Every rose has it’s thorn! hehehheheh

[Gravel PitParticipant]

I can disassemble an M249 Squad Automatic Weapon yet I can also paint flawless oil paintings worthy of Gallery space.

I can run 6 miles in under an hour yet I don’t like sports much at all, I’d rather daydream about Sci-Fi

The brain is a really interesting organ. It just too complex to toss in Alpha Beta boxes… I take those terms with a grain of salt.

[Author]

Posts