BBC to be externally regulated for first time

Topic by numbCruncher

NumbCruncher

Home Forums MGTOW Central BBC to be externally regulated for first time

This topic contains 14 replies, has 13 voices, and was last updated by Unicron  Unicron 3 years, 9 months ago.

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #238019
    +6
    NumbCruncher
    numbCruncher
    Participant
    772

    For the first time in its 90 year history, the BBC is to become subject to the same complaints process as all other media organisations in the UK.

    http://www.ft.com/fastft/2016/05/12/bbc-trust-to-be-abolished-replaced-by-unitary-board/

    The UK’s communications regulator, Ofcom, will oversee the BBC in future, the minister said, while the National Audit Office will have responsibility for carrying out financial audits of the broadcaster.

    Currently, complaints against the BBC must be addressed to the BBC Trust, i.e. if you object to a broadcast, you must complain to the BBC themselves and they can simply ignore you. Under the new proposals, the media regulator Ofcom will be able to investigate complaints against the BBC like any other UK media organisation.

    In the past, the BBC Trust has been notorious for simply ignoring complaints of misandry in the BBC’s output. For example;

    Sexist BBC rejects complaints about its ban on men talking to J4MB during election campaign

    and

    J4MB official complaint to the BBC – ‘Newsnight’ piece on domestic violence was in breach of 50+ BBC Guidelines

    You say "love is a temple, love the higher law" ...You ask me to enter, but then you make me crawl. And I can't be holding on to what you got, when all you got is hurt

    #238024
    +4

    Don’t think this will particularly help. People in general don’t really care about men, and so people in general won’t really make those kinds of complaints and even if they do, the world and by extension this governing body, won’t really care. I’d like to point to other external governing bodies that exist. Take for instance those that govern schools? Like Ofsted in the UK. Full of a bunch of indifferent people there to grade the teachers, known to have given “good” reviews of teachers that turned out to be child molesters. It’s just adding another gynocentric layer of bulls~~~ to a gynocentric world. And this external governing body will most likely be beholden to yet another group for how they operate, like a national group or some public safety or standards agency.

    Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

    #238025
    +4

    Anonymous
    42

    Will they hear complaints from America? I got a thing or two ta say to them!

    I’ll make my insults to Wedgie Hates look like a complement compared to my disgust for BBC-America with it’s gynocentric narratives!

    Every program was about women, the only difference being the country or circumstances, but it was always about women! I REPEAT >WAS< BBC is permanently dismissed from my listening pleasure…

    #238026
    +5
    Keymaster
    Keymaster
    Keymaster

    It’s about time. Their journalism is complete s~~~.
    And Reggae ^ Yates should be sacked for gross dishonesty and zero journalistic integrity.

    REGGIE YATES ON BBC:
    “I’m making a BBC fraud-u-mentary! Let’s look at MGTOW. We will call it Men at War. They just need a confidence boost! “.

    REGGIE YATES SHORTLY AFTER:
    “Calling off my own wedding ‘cuz I weirded out”.

    The BBC its one great big vagina with rabbit ears.

    If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.
    #238030
    +3
    Heretic
    Heretic
    Participant
    151

    BBC? You mean Bitches Broadcasting C~~~s?

    Things like freedom of the press only work if women are banned from journalistic activities entirely.

    Once women get on board, they ruin it and only make s~~~ about them.

    As far as I’m concerned, I banned all news media from my life. I figure if there’s some great catastrophe that’s happening, I’ll hear about it from the people in my life.

    Journalism is f~~~ing s~~~ now a days.

    #238032
    +4

    Anonymous
    1

    Reggie Yates became a laughing stock during the 2012 olympics. There were so many complaints to the BBC his coverage was shortened.

    There was one hilarious clip of him reporting near the track. He gave his report then signed off “and the sun is shining here…..(silence)….in the studio” (he was standing outside)

    I was watching with my brother and we erupted into laughter. The retarded look on his face.

    Ive spent the last ten minutes trying to find the clip. Funnily enough there isn’t one. It was comedy f~~~ing GOLD

    #238109
    +5
    Franky
    Franky
    Participant
    2338

    Journalism is long dead.
    Who’s going to regulate them?
    Women and manginas?

    #238228
    +2

    Anonymous
    12

    Good they should do the same in Australia with the ABC.

    #238261
    Be Her Daddy
    Be Her Daddy
    Participant
    410

    Pirate Radio 2.0?

    I lived in London for a year during college and I was surprised by the BBC 1-4 channels. Coming from America we had hundreds of useless channels on TV, but were never restricted to 4 channels, such as the BBC. It was a big change for me.

    Speaking as an American, do the British citizenry believe it is time for more than 4 channels and an open access to regular network television?

    Not my country and not my place to call a decision, I’d like to hear what British Citizens think about it….

    #238282
    Atton
    Atton
    Participant

    It will be regulated by thunderc~~~s no real victory.

    A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

    #238313

    Anonymous
    1

    Speaking as an American, do the British citizenry believe it is time for more than 4 channels and an open access to regular network television?

    I don’t think many Brits watch the BBC channels these days. I certainly don’t.

    They can spread the s~~~ as thin as they like, though.

    #238350
    +2
    Jim01
    Jim01
    Participant
    6678

    Pirate Radio 2.0?

    I lived in London for a year during college and I was surprised by the BBC 1-4 channels. Coming from America we had hundreds of useless channels on TV, but were never restricted to 4 channels, such as the BBC. It was a big change for me.

    Speaking as an American, do the British citizenry believe it is time for more than 4 channels and an open access to regular network television?

    Not my country and not my place to call a decision, I’d like to hear what British Citizens think about it….

    used to be just 5 channels unless you had SKY(paid satellite) but now it is all digital so there are something like 100 channels.

    But we have to pay a TV Tax of £145 a year that pays for a load of liberal s~~~ that a lot of people don’t watch. It is like having a washing machine and paying a tax to run it every year – is a farce. Plus the BBC is funded by the EU and actively undermines the European nations so we pay for our own destruction

    this website is a good to read about it if you are interested

    http://biasedbbc.org/

    #238543
    +2
    Unicron
    Unicron
    Participant
    752

    F~~~ the BBC, I got rid of my TV 2 years ago and haven’t missed it since.

    Marriage is the process of finding out what kind of man your wife would have preferred.

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.