BAN ASSUALT HAMMERS NOW!

Topic by PistolPete

PistolPete

Home Forums Political Corner BAN ASSUALT HAMMERS NOW!

This topic contains 24 replies, has 18 voices, and was last updated by Y_  Y_ 1 year, 8 months ago.

Viewing 5 posts - 21 through 25 (of 25 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #801974
    +4
    PistolPete
    PistolPete
    Participant
    27143

    OK Forsaken wins the prize—MC Hammer is the most lethal!

    #801982
    +1
    IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)
    IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)
    Participant
    2572

    The U.S Constitution doesn’t provide a right to bear hammers. Get the context right for what the second amendment says and means, and then maybe this can be discussed. Equating a tool that can be used to build thing, with a tool that is designed just to kill, and then calling for a ban of the tool used to build because it was used as a weapon, is false equivocation. One can go the other way to, and say that people shouldn’t be banned from having their own personal nukes, because a terrorist detonated one. In the hands of a responsible nuke owner, they can do real good with a nuke, so there shouldn’t be any restrictions to having a personal nuke.

    Heck, why even ban anthrax either? Why even restrict militant Muslims from having weapons of mass destruction? The Unabomber had ever personal right to whatever weapon he wanted, because the U.S Constitution says that, right?

    The way I see the Constitution reads, the citizens have a right to every single weapon they can have to collectively defend themselves against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Where does the Constitution say they can’t, if the effort is part of a well regulated militia? But, keep saying the right is meant to be primarily for personal use, and go ahead and then try to say that nothing should be done so the environment has its own form of regulating itself.

    "I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

    #802022
    +3

    Anonymous
    7

    The U.S Constitution doesn’t provide a right to bear hammers. Get the context right for what the second amendment says and means, and then maybe this can be discussed. Equating a tool that can be used to build thing, with a tool that is designed just to kill

    Un-bunch your panties.

    #802032
    +3

    The Constitution exists to stop people like you, @iggy

    You’re correct that it is a false equivocation, but that isn’t what the message is here. The message, iggy, is that we like freedom.

    I like freedom.

    I don’t trade freedom for safety.

    Is that ok, iggy?

    The answer, is no.

    #802156
    +3
    Y_
    Y_
    Participant
    4591

    JOHN WICK INTRODUCES – THE ASSAULT PENCIL

    HORROR OF HORRORS – THIS INSTRUMENT OF DEATH IS GIVEN TO PRE-SCHOOL CHILDREN !!!

    BAN THE ASSAULT PENCIL – NOW!!!! ABOLISH PENCIL OWNERSHIP!!!
    OUTLAW THE NATIONAL STATIONARY ASSOCIATION!!

Viewing 5 posts - 21 through 25 (of 25 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.