Home › Forums › Political Corner › Article: Feminist PM talking bollocks again
This topic contains 15 replies, has 10 voices, and was last updated by
Atton 1 year, 10 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Gender pay: Theresa May attacks ‘burning injustice’
http://www.bbc.com/news/business-43632763
More feminist misuse of terminology and using figures for their own purposes.
UK companies are required to show their “gender pay gap” which is the comparison of the average earnings of men vs women.
The gender pay gap is pretty much useless information as it does not take into account working hours, specific job role or anything like a realistic comparison.
It is not equal pay which is the same money for doing the same job.
What is the difference between the gender pay gap and equal pay?
The pay gap isn’t the same as equal pay. Equal pay – that men and women doing the same job should be paid the same – has been a legal requirement for 47 years.
Under the Equal Pay Act 1970, and more recently, the Equality Act 2010, it is unlawful to pay people unequally because they are a man or a woman. This applies to all employers, no matter how small.So, a company might have a gender pay gap if a majority of men are in top jobs, despite paying male and female employees the same amount for similar roles.
That hasn’t stopped Theresa May presenting it as a feminist outrage. In an article linked within the one above she says:
Britain’s gender pay gap is a “burning injustice” which must be tackled as the whole of society will remain “poorer” if outdated employment practices go unchallenged, the Prime Minister warned on Tuesday.
In an article for The Telegraph, Theresa May admits that the gender pay figures make “uncomfortable reading” for many businesses as she compares today’s battle for workplace equality to the struggle for universal suffrage a century ago.
The Prime Minister’s article comes ahead of Wednesday’s deadline for larger firms to disclose the average pay gap between male and female workers.
Actual equal pay figures show bugger all difference generally and in many sectors women have higher pay.
Misinterpretation of data, misrepresentation of results, indignant outrage and bulls~~~ conclusions.
Unfortunately I don’t think anyone in Parliament has a pair of bollocks to call bulls~~~ on this.
"...reinvent your life because you must; it is your life and its history and the present belong only to you.” It is Your Life, Charles Bukowski.

Anonymous42Men need to get lazy, stop working, not give a s~~~, and be bums!
Only then can we have gender equality!
As a follow up to this the Institute of Economic Affairs has issued a report explaining why it is bollocks:
https://iea.org.uk/publications/the-gender-pay-gap-reporting-measures/
Crude gender pay gap reporting measures render results meaningless
Summary:
Despite an influx of new gender pay gap data – ranging from negative gaps, to gaps exceeding 60% – the government’s new pay gap reporting measures fail to provide any meaningful insight into equal or fair pay for men and women in the workplace.
The requirement to measure pay gaps across entire organisations (rather than between comparable roles within organisations), as well as the omission of necessary data, renders the majority of the findings meaningless.
Examples in this briefing, including data from HSBC, EasyJet and Phase Eight, illustrate how the crude figures that have been released create a misleading picture, especially for companies that have hired large numbers of female staff into roles in lower pay quartiles.
The only area in which the data has been reported in a usable way is the second-to-last measurement: proportion of males and females receiving a bonus payment. Select data (as of 30 March 2018) for the FTSE 100 companies on this measure reveals a more positive picture for women than the rest of the data.
The incentives created by the pay gap reporting measures are not simply to hire more women into senior roles, but to hire fewer women into junior or lower paid roles – regardless of their qualifications – to achieve the closest calculation a company can get to a 0% pay gap.
"...reinvent your life because you must; it is your life and its history and the present belong only to you.” It is Your Life, Charles Bukowski.
Next she will be saying the world is flat and the earth is the centre of the universe and we need to base Government policies around that.
The fact that there’s a PM that is so out of touch with facts, reality, evidence and even just basic common sense is deeply disturbing.
She is not fit for office. She should be removed on mental health grounds.
Traitor May is proof of the following gaps:
gender
payeffort gapgender
paycompetence gapgender
payintelligence gapgender
paysanity gapMay you walk in peace and happiness, May you and all mgtow, near and far walk in peace and happiness.
Men need to get lazy, stop working, not give a s~~~, and be bums!
Only then can we have gender equality!
Or by not employing women at all.
By their p~~~-poor way of measuring things:
In my company, which I have just started, the figures for women’s pay will be very easy to calculate.
Number of women in company = 0
Number of women ever going to be employed by my company = 0Gender pay gap :
= Average male salary / average female salary
= divide by zero error"...reinvent your life because you must; it is your life and its history and the present belong only to you.” It is Your Life, Charles Bukowski.
Men need to get lazy, stop working, not give a s~~~, and be bums!
Only then can we have gender equality!
Sign me in.
To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.
I absolutely hate that useless c~~~
this is the type of t~~~ she is…
she belongs in a back office somewhere pushing pencils around a desk
She’s an idiot. This is why women shouldn’t be in charge.
Mind you, all the other politicians in the UK right now are Clowns. I wouldn’t trust any of them to run our country.
Oh it’s worse than incompetance far worse.
Bullingdon Club
Chatham House…,…,…
http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

Anonymous0“feminist PM talking bollocks again”
Gee, MoreSky
I thought this post was going to be about prime mistress Trudeau of Canada“feminist PM talking bollocks again”
Gee, MoreSky
I thought this post was going to be about prime mistress Trudeau of CanadaMay, Trudeau, Ardern, Merkel… could be any one of them.
They all use the same “How to talk utter bollocks” manual."...reinvent your life because you must; it is your life and its history and the present belong only to you.” It is Your Life, Charles Bukowski.
http://www.leavemeansleave.eu
http://www.leavemeansleave.eu
<iframe src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/lolJaZta6DM?feature=oembed” allow=”autoplay; encrypted-media” allowfullscreen=”” frameborder=”0″ width=”500″ height=”375″></iframe>
Two great shares It’sallbs.
The state of the police force is disgraceful.
Even those they can recruit/fund are generally meeting some equality/diversity quota inappropriate for the area they are policing.
"...reinvent your life because you must; it is your life and its history and the present belong only to you.” It is Your Life, Charles Bukowski.
Next to Blair and Boris, this cretin is third on my ‘most hated UK politicians’ list.
She is an extremely dangerous sack of s~~~. Prodding the Bear in the side is one thing – openly slapping it in the face and demanding answers is going to get the British people killed.
Men need to get lazy, stop working, not give a s~~~, and be bums!
Only then can we have gender equality!
Equally as poor we will be.
A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
