Article: Normalisation of child molestation

[Colin Combover in a ComaParticipant 5066]

Due to the fact I was a freckle faced anorexic with a Hitler haircut, I couldn’t get any dinner ladies, thus I used to wank at home in the toilet with the window open. Many a dimensionally challenged single mum waddled past, with one eye on my Japs eye and another on the door……yeah, I used to turn heads, now I turn stomachs.

[bstoffParticipant 4863]

I absolutely understand that there are plenty of guys 14-18 who are perfectly fine having sexual relations with an adult woman of any age.
Wouldn’t you also be able to say there are plenty of girls, 14-18 who would also be fine in sexual relationships with adult males?
Why is there such an outcry over them? Many of these teen girls could be guilty of enticing and seducing the men themselves, couldn’t they?

This is the double-standard I get p~~~ed off about.

The true victims, male or female, are the ones tricked, seduced or otherwise coerced into sex.
This is the argument or claim that grown women are making now in the BS rape culture, #METOO era, and all of the other BS women are using to demonize men, just because they are men.

The argument made here about boys and girls being “different” is bulls~~~, depending upon how the victim feels afterward.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

bstoff, I liked what you had to say, even more than any of my rambling.

it aint right to mess with kids. By kids, I mean 15 year olds and younger…. Basically, the age of consent is puberty. Anyone touching kids should have their throat slit, male or female…

[Gravel PitParticipant]

I cant understand the obsession with teen porn and worse. I actually prefer the mature and hairy ones, at least 22 and older! LOL. The sight of a twig skeleton child is not arousing at all, its just not sexually appealing. Part of what drives instinctive arousal (for normal people) is the fact that she has some hair and big enough hips to give birth. A Mature bodied woman! not some scrawny halfling. Theres something retarded in the brains of men and women if theyre going after kids, ESPECIALLY the ones that are younger than Nature’s Red Line… They are fvcked in the head, probably from sexual abuse they too suffered as a prepubescent child….

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Gravel Pit wrote:

The problem with Mens Rights as a whole, and the reason we will never see change is because these topics exceed the capacity of normal IQ people. They simply dont understand biology enough.
Case and point, reacting hypocritically to these females who have sex with young males. Its a glaring double standard of everything we stand for to demonize her. Yet apparently no one here sees that. Those boys ARE lucky. The Misogynist tunnel vision around here is discouraging sometimes.
either you believe men are different from women, and should be held to a different standard, or you dont. You cant have it both ways.

I mostly agree with everything you said.

But you missed a not-so-little detail: the law is gender neutral so we can blame women for having sex with underage boys.

We do it because we can, not because it’s “biologically fair”

Because either we use EVERY weapon against them, to throw them out of the pedestal, or we’re toasted.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Vajra VarahaParticipant 1284]

Gravel Pit wrote:

You and I both know, the boys were more than willing to engage in play and although its sickening, society thinks they were “lucky.”

I actually wonder if it’s a byproduct of social indoctrination that we all just laugh it off when a boy is raped by a woman.
Everyone laughs and gives him false praise as if he had a hand in having a conquest when in fact he was manipulated, confused, and used.
And it indoctrinates and sets him on a course to believe promiscuity is a good thing when the first woman who used him throws him to the curb.
It helps destroy the nuclear family and loving relationships furthering the feminist agenda.

You can all see how far away we are from a stable society and this s~~~ is increasing…..

And just to clarify since I know Palette is going to circle back around on this.
I’m talking boys age 10 to say roughly 14. Varies by development.
It’s not a double standard. Just because you can doesn’t mean you should.
Part of your argument implies being able to get an erection equates to being able to give consent.
And consent means you can participate as an equal. Most people under the age of 15 really can’t consent. Does it vary?
Sure. But thats where the legal arguments kick in for societal and ethical protections.

[MonkParticipant 16988]

Vajra Varaha wrote:

I actually wonder if it’s a byproduct of social indoctrination that we all just laugh it off when a boy is raped by a woman.Everyone laughs and gives him false praise as if he had a hand in having a conquest when in fact he was manipulated, confused, and used.And it indoctrinates and sets him on a course to believe promiscuity is a good thing when the first woman who used him throws him to the curb.It helps destroy the nuclear family and loving relationships furthering the feminist agenda.

Exactly.

[Vajra VarahaParticipant 1284]

Colin Combover in a Coma wrote:

now I turn stomachs.

Colin you turn mine on a daily basis LOL

[Colin Combover in a ComaParticipant 5066]

Vajra Varaha wrote:

Colin Combover in a Coma wrote:

now I turn stomachs.

Colin you turn mine on a daily basis LOL

Good!

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Vajra Varaha wrote:

I’m talking boys age 10 to say roughly 14.

I agree with your whole post bro. And even if a boy is 16, that is still technically a minor and if some 30 year old c u n t is boning him, she is a disgusting individual. Thats an understatement. I also thinks its disgusting for Men to fvck women a dozen years younger… You want to talk about destroying the “nuclear family” … well, how often to girls in their 20s fvck men in their 40s? … That is a double standard. there is wrong on both sides but YES, sex with teens is a CRIME and a massive moral failure.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Girls that are in their 20’s and are pre-wall and the most exiting…no matter the age of the male. Studies have born this out. Men are attracted to women under 18-24.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

Girls that are in their 20’s and are pre-wall and the most exiting…no matter the age of the male. Studies have born this out. Men are attracted to women under 18-23.

I dont care what you do with your money, and with women who are trying to make some cash … that is your business and I dont see anything wrong with BUSINESS. You’re PAYING for their YOUTH, and they know full-well that they are SELLING a FINITE resource. So long as both parties are agreed to a tranx, so be it.

I dont like it either, but I respect $$$$$. Those girls WILL be hitting the wall, so if they want to stack cash in anticipation of having zero SMV at 40… great. Im talking about the opposite which is, that its TACKY and destructive to society when 40+ yearold men do this to gullible, naive 20 year old girls who get nothing out of it… training them to ride the CC… Its like POACHING and that is the situation we’re in now, you have an ENTIRE generation of 30ish year old girls who are unsalvageable.

Ive said this before, LEGAL PROSTITUTION would create scarcity and actually have a beneficial effect on the birthrate and marriage rate. Sidecar and others disagree but Im telling you, if you stop making DICK available so easily on Chad Apps… women will have to find sex somewhere else. With prostitution legal, it will be hard to find dick because lonely dudes will not be so easy to entrap anymore… It creates HEALTHY COMPETITION in the sexual marketplace. Its a CHECKs and Balancing AGAINST WOMEN.

Tradcons want marriage to succeed and the birthrate to rise, but they refuse to let go of antiquated religious ideals that block working solutions. You can only damn up a river for so long before it breaks the levee. The levee is about to break

[Gravel PitParticipant]

what men are attracted to is a subjective argument with no bearing… just saying…

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Gravel Pit wrote:

Its like POACHING

During hunting season, you pay for a license and you get so many tags. Its regulated and keeps fresh bucks and fresh doe available for future seasons. Same with game Fishing etc…

When poachers flood an unregulated open range, and shoot every last trophy, the species goes fvcking Extinct.

Dating Apps and older men banging 20 year old girls is poaching… This sh!t needs to be regulated, sex needs to come out of the middle ages already, before WE go extinct. Show me a fvcking graph of the BIRTHRATES for the last 30 years. NO SH!T

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Older men banging much younger women has been around as long as women monkey branched. I wouldn’t sleep with a post wall slag and I’m 59. Why would I? They’re all equally available. Honestly it’s a lot easier to find a 20 something pro than a 40 something pro. There just aren’t that many 40 year old pro’s. Nobody wants to go to them.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Whatever man. Im not like you at all but I think youre missing the point where we’re on the same team. Ive explained why Escorts should be legal because it serves both our purposes. YOU, because you want to fvck girls half your age. ME, because it creates healthy competition in the Sexual Marketplace which will mean women are forced to date regular guys again.

Why would millions of lonely men waste money on Dating App subscriptions when they could use a safe, legal Escort? This means that Dating App revenue will dry up and they will fold their businesses. At minimum, it creates a large scarcity of what women have been abusing, average men, forcing women to start playing ball again, the old fashioned way.

Both our purposes are served. You get to thrash young poon by paying a premium. I get to thrash young poon because Im young. We both win. But you keep taking offense, which is fair, because Iam throwing a little sand your way. I dont think the poaching is cute. In fact, if you were standing in front of my mate on the Savannah, Id kill your old ass. What you do inside your house sickens me. Infact, that avatar sickens me. It always has.

You have an addiction you should seek help for. You know you do, that is why youre defensive. There, I said it. Its not normal to do what youre doing, no matter how many justifications you try to surface. I know scores of men over 50. None of them are trying to tag college girls or teens. Shove it. Youre just an old PUA sex addict who lost his game so he just pays for play now… Go to Vegas, youd fit right in. Youre part of the sickness.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

It makes me wonder Puff. Why the fvck are you even here? You obviously have sex weekly. Carelessly plowing the spoils of younger generations. When is your cup full? When will your thirst be quenched? You still gonna be using escorts at 80?

Men like me, carry on for decades ALONE, sentenced to a life without relationships, sex or children … you dont give a flying fvck about that. You just cream pie tomorrow because you wont be there to worry about the aftermath… go fvck another one, then look at yourself in the mirror, the pig you are.

dont ever smart off to me ya wrinkled sack of disease

[Gravel PitParticipant]

im sorry I typed that. Sorry.

im resentful because im poor and dont I bother to find women for sex.

hope ya dont get too mad. gnight

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Don’t sweat it. I’m lucky and I know it. I got to raise my son as a single dad, won the custody battle and got to retire early. I come on here to share my experience so others don’t have to slog through the bulls~~~ without help. When I was going through it, posting and hearing from other men saved my life.

I still need red pilled reminders. I’m one good blow job away from being a blue pilled moron.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Thanks Puff. None of what I said had anything to do with you. Im emotional in other matters and lash out over something trite here. Honestly, if I was a 60 year old guy with some disposable dough, Id hit vegas or asia and have my way with a few hotties. Id go on “vacation” twice a year.

Im anxious about other matters going on. I need to get off this forum for awhile. Ive been hogging all the fresh air around here for several months. Need to give yall a break. Be well man.

[Author]

Posts