Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Article: Female ‘soldiers’ – victims again.
This topic contains 22 replies, has 14 voices, and was last updated by
Grumpy 4 months, 1 week ago.
- AuthorPosts
Source: Mark Nicol, Daily Mail. “Female Marine and Army recruits suffer career-threatening injuries from £79 million battle kit designed for men”. 15/09/2019.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7464293/Female-Marine-Army-recruits-suffer-injuries-79million-battle-kit-designed-men.htmlSo much for equality.
Lawsuits and options in pink to follow.
I thought they weren’t being “fair” to her, but the article states that her Virtus rucked at 70lbs while the full capacity of the gear is 80lbs. “Front line service” measns just that,….the baddest of the bad. EVERYTHING you need is on your back. Did they let her carry a few less battle clips so she could fit her tampons in there? Maybe they let her carry training clips instead of battle clips?
Don’t yell at me: It’s just a suggestion for an easier solution than redesigning equipment.Marry again, Hell NO ! ( Even JESUS was hung on a cross just once)

Anonymous3You cant win.
First they say women are equally capable to do all jobs, ignoring scientific reason. Then they bully themselves in, then they need “special conditions” derived from scientific support that women are different!!Now, what happens is that society will once again bend over and “adapt” to their specifications. In no time there will be no commandos, because they will weak elements and cannot get rid of them. Commandos will be a kind of social club.
The next military top performers will be the waste management unit!Women are good at being victims. Victims do not belong to the victorious. Presumably we want armies that are victorious (or maybe they are only there now for handing out aid to poor little nations that are in need of white saviours).
If you want victory, boot the victims.
Women make good booty for victorious armies and comfort for soldiers.
A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own
£79 million battle kit designed for men
*facepalm*
The battle kit is not designed for men. It’s designed for BATTLE.
That’s why it’s called a battle kit, not a man kit.
If a woman can’t carry a full battle kit, then she has no right to presume she belongs in battle.
The price of equality is having to actually be equal. Women demanding special treatment like this proves that they aren’t.
Women are good at being victims. Victims do not belong to the victorious. Presumably we want armies that are victorious (or maybe they are only there now for handing out aid to poor little nations that are in need of white saviours).
If you want victory, boot the victims.
Women make good booty for victorious armies and comfort for soldiers.Good at being victims, at being able to complain about anything and everything, at blame shifting, at rationalizing, and of course, always being able to make anything a man’s fault.
Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.
A thought occurs.
Do they believe that vagina makes them immune to bullets? Does their sense of entitlement stretch that far?

Anonymous3A thought occurs.
Do they believe that vagina makes them immune to bullets? Does their sense of entitlement stretch that far?They dont plan that far. Vagina makes them immune to consequences of bad decisions, like joing elite military units. But at the small hint of trouble (like carrying their own backpack), they resort to the vagina “get out card”.
When THEY don’t have “equal rights”; THEY play the Victim Card….
When they have “equal rights”; THEY play the Victim Card….
TYPICAL, Like Most things that involve Women You Can’t Win….So, Why Bother Playing????
In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash
Women love to complain.
It’s too much to ask for a women to stay quiet and do her job.
Female soldiers probably want to be driven round by a general. They also want to be assigned men to lift and carry the battle kits.
But then again, all we have to do is drop a few snowflake behind enemy lines. They would probably nag the enemy to death very quickly.
If a war ever breaks out, and female soldiers die in greater numbers than male soldiers, due to their lack of battle field ability, I wonder if they will accuse the enemy of sexism?
Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you
If women can’t pull even 80% of the expected gear necessary; how “Combat Effective”is she??
here’s a look at what they must carry…
Marry again, Hell NO ! ( Even JESUS was hung on a cross just once)
The battle kit is not designed for men. It’s designed for BATTLE.
FACT.
If a woman can’t carry a full battle kit, then she has no right to presume she belongs in battle.
Ditto for any man.
If you cant carry the kit you need to fight and survive in battle. You are just meat, dead meat to be precise.
You are also the additional threat of mission failure and/or death to the soldiers who actually can and do carry it and fight.Frikkin individual snowflakes in a damn blizzard.
There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it
When THEY don’t have “equal rights”; THEY play the Victim Card….
When they have “equal rights”; THEY play the Victim Card….
When they have special, extra privileges, because vagina, they STILL play the victim card.
If a war ever breaks out,
A lot of men won’t bother turning up for it. Where’s the reward in risking your skin to preserve and protect a gynocracy? What’s in it for me?
Women better get used to those heavy battle kits. It’s high time they EARNED their voting privileges.
Ditto for any man.
Well that’s just it, isn’t it? To hear these whiny, privileged, entitled cunts bitch, the standard battle load out was intentionally designed to be too heavy for them to carry.
They can’t wrap their heads around the fact that the standard kit has been designed to be as light as possible. Everything that can be left out to save weight already has been left out. Whatever remains, heavy though it may be, is a necessary weight. And because it’s necessary, if these princesses can’t carry their equal share, their equal share will only have to be carried as additional weight by a real soldier, limiting his combat effectiveness thereby. That makes these female “combat troops” a liability, not an asset.
Again, the price of equality is having to actually BE equal.
tl;dr: Soldier bitches need to shut the fuck up and soldier.
Women have a “special” status that makes all men around her vulnerable. In peacetime, it’s the “one phone call” problem.
In battle it’s the “white knight” problem.
Either can get you killed.
Sexist or not, women should only work in supporting roles.If a war ever breaks out, and female soldiers die in greater numbers than male soldiers, due to their lack of battle field ability, I wonder if they will accuse the enemy of sexism?
The survivors will accuse THEIR OWN SIDE of sexism.
And sue.
My daughter is a doctor in the Navy. She gets sick and tired of female sailors whining, bitching, and crying about everything. She said with females everything is drama. Everything is an issue. Everything has to be fair. Men just do what they’re told. She completes her obligation in June. She’s getting out of the service.
My daughter is a doctor in the Navy. She gets sick and tired of female sailors whining, bitching, and crying about everything. She said with females everything is drama. Everything is an issue. Everything has to be fair. Men just do what they’re told. She completes her obligation in June. She’s getting out of the service.
Not just the Navy, or the Services in general.
That’s just the way life is.There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it
It’s been proven multiple times that women in combat positions are a liability and actually weaken units. Women should NOT be allowed in combat postions! Period! Battle kit problem solved.
Either can get you killed.
Not if you kill her first.
Or just walk away and let her die.
In Vietnam it was a thing for officers to get shot by their own troops. Now consider the same situation with female “combat” troops.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
