Anybody in my age group notice this trend???? I'm 45 and……

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

It’s really about, c~~~s who brag about their tattoos, with no personality.

The c~~~s with one liners, are the ones who sit there and look pretty, who no longer can sit there and look pretty.

Zuberi Tau wrote:

When you look on a dating site and see “IDK wat 2 say!”.
You know you’re looking in the “Sexual Clearance Bin”.

Plus that!

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[TorchemParticipant 453]

They still act like their in their 20’s with their shopping list of what YOU must full fill before you can root em’. But who wants an old blown out vagina which excreted a few kids and now looks like it has been hit twice with an axe and then followed up with a block splitter? If I was to spend money and time on a women, it wouldn’t be one of these $100 used cars with 400000 miles you find at the back of the car lot bargain bin.

[Spank The MisandristsParticipant 2308]

these women cant even make a sandwich and now they wanna make baby? WTF?

[OldBillParticipant]

kbbroiler wrote:

Now this is what I’ve noticed it seems there is more women who are around my age that claim they don’t have kids and want to have them. I’ve seen this with 45 year olds.

I see it quite a lot. It’s simply another aspect of their delusional nature.

Checking out Voat’s Fat People Hate is one of little vices. Thanks to the many posts here featuring horrific dating ads, I’ve also begun paging through PoF and OKCupid for cheap laughs at other human beings’ expense.

What can I say? I’m no saint.

Anyway, these women in their 40s and 50s(!!!) who still believe they can bear children are self-deluded morons. The facts and other medical information are readily available. Conception will very likely require laboratory assistance, the child will very likely not be carried to term, and if the child survives it’s more likely to suffer from a whole host of medical and mental issues.

The childless, middle-aged women you see in those profiles announcing they still “want” children are doing nothing but posting their wish lists. Sadly, because women are routinely protected from the consequences of their actions, no one is there to tell them that they are dried up, barren, delusional c~~~s who p~~~ed away their chances for children while riding the c~~~ carousel in their twenties.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[EtrangereParticipant 706]

The two things I’ve noticed most are:
– The list out typical male hobbies instead of typical female hobbies. They all love fishing and shooting and watching sports. You never see them mention doing crafts, watching reality shows, and shopping.

– The expect you to pursue them in try to win them over, even though you know nothing about them. The will show lots of cleavage and pictures of them slutting it up to entice you. Yet, they will tell you outright that they will not return any attention your way and expect you take a backseat to her kids, family, social life, and everything else…because that’s what good men do.

Yeah , that was always a headscratcher for me. I want your snatch moron , not you to sit and drink beer and watch ballgames with me

They are all a trap. They all are looking for a man to support them.

Agree Jan

but I need to see someone in person, see their body language, hear their voice etc. Meeting someone online is weird.

Phoenix makes a good point. It’s much harder to bulls~~~ someone when you’re face to face and able to observe their mannerisms

If the roles were reversed and I was looking for a relationship and when I signed up on a dating site I was getting messaged by a half dozen women every day I don’t see how it’d be possible for me to stay on that website so long

Well I thought we all agreed before that online dating is just simply validation for a woman that SOMEONE wants them. It’s an ego stroke for them that men are responding to them. There is a dating app called BUMBLE where women have to make the first move within 24 hours or the match expires. I joined it when I first started coming here and matched with DOZENS of women…you know how many contacted me? 0 , because it is just validation for them.

I ignore the ‘kids come first’ comment. What they mean is that they will use their kids as an excuse to treat you poorly.

Winner Winner Chicken Dinner….I gave up on Love for women and dating them(online or otherwise). They don’t deserve what I have to give

[Dr. SableParticipant 1064]

Well my bar & grill is a live dating and that trend is happening real time there and then.
However, many a time there is infighting between bitches. Reason being that majority are in a fierce
competition over an ever shrinking pool of guys available so bitches spill beans about other bitches.
So much so, that at times I need to go into my store room so I’m not seen laughing my head off.

Zero Tolerance

[BeerParticipant 11832]

FunInTheSun wrote:

I joined this dating site a few years ago. I was a sucker for the ad: “Just text these women and get laid—-GUARANTEED.” Well, I got a lot of e-mails from “women” who were just people hired by the company to create fake profiles in order to get a lot of male traffic on their websites. I don’t understand the marketing strategy behind that if they intended to have loyal customers.

Sadly when you think about it each time their website is successful in matching a couple they actually lose customers, so its not in their best interest to actually successfully set people up, its in their best interest to offer people hope with no results. If they can trick some desperate people into thinking they are being checked out, or thinking they are close to getting a date, they’ll keep them on the hook longer.

I dabbled on okcupid years ago and they had a thing where they would offer you 3 “matches” a day that you might like, and you’d rate them 1-5 stars. If you rated them a 4 or 5, and you showed up on their daily “matches” and they rated you a 4 or 5 it would let you both know. I kept getting emails telling me I had a ton of people interested that had rated me high, I had to rate more people to find my mutual matches. Naturally I assumed they had coded the site so if I rated someone high, or they rated me high, you’d show up on their “matches” the next day…so when I rarely had mutual matches but seemingly a s~~~load of people were interested, I thought it was kinda fishy. I don’t live in an incredibly populated area either, so its not like I have 1,000+ women pop up for a 10 mile radius like I’d expect in a city.

Anyways, I was getting kinda sick of the site as my local options were limited and I really never planned on driving 45 minutes+ one way for a booty call, so I just logged on one day and rated every woman I could a 5. Kinda funny that in the couple weeks I had a profile I had like 30+ people that were interested in me, but apparently not a single one lived within a 25 mile radius of my town lol. I literally rated several hundred women 5 stars just to see what mutual matches popped up. It was all just a bunch of s~~~ to keep you logging in because tomorrow might be the day you discover one of those mutual matches who was interested in you, when in reality those matches weren’t real, and I highly doubt many non-local women living an hour+ away were busy searching and rating guys so far away when there are literally hundreds or thousands of guys in closer proximity barraging them with emails every day.

OldBill wrote:

Anyway, these women in their 40s and 50s(!!!) who still believe they can bear children are self-deluded morons.

Haha I’m actually getting to an age where I’m thinking finding a decent looking 40 something year old would be amazing compared to dating my own age, because chances for a whoops baby or her trying some sketchy form of paternity fraud are minimal compared to women closer to my age in their late 20s/early 30s who are all in baby rabies mode before they dry up. But then I remind myself…she’s just had 10 more years to accumulate drama, baggage, and diseases, so its not worth bothering with…well that, and decent looking 40 year old women are probably about 1 in 100 lol.

[Anonymous 42]

Women convinced me in person to stay the f~~~ away, now how the hell are they going to convince me otherwise with digital pictures and notes?

It’s like watching a garbage dump on TV instead of going there in person to smell the horrible smells and to see the awful sights!

[Won'tGetFooledAgainParticipant 3293]

Expecting to find a decent woman on a dating site is like dumpster diving and expecting to come out with a gourmet meal. Just as you would eat food from a dumpster if you were hungry enough, dating websites are only any use for pump and dump when you are desperate.

With regards to women in their 40s wanting children, well they have been led to believe they can have it all and it is never too late. Obviously the traditional path was ride the party c~~~ carousel until 33, marry a beta wallet for children and resources and then divorce him for the house and alimony so you can get back on the carousel again before you are 40.

Unfortunately these women just assumed the perfect man would just turn up without any effort so they stayed on the carousel too long and then were never able to get off. But no problem as celebrities are having babies in their 40s so why shouldn’t they?

There women are crazy and will do whatever it takes to get pregnant. They will lie about being on the pill, lie about being infertile and will be happy to get pregnant by any guy that comes along.

I have experience of this, I went on a date with a woman on POF who claimed to be 37. She later revealed she was really 43 and lied because no man is interested once he finds out you are over 40. Anyway, we went back to hers and I asked about protection. I was still blue pill back then so when she said she couldn’t get pregnant I believed her, as after all who would want to get pregnant at that age.

Few months later she is desperately trying to get in touch with me and I just ignore her. Few months pass and she sends me an email saying she is pregnant and it is a 50/50 chance it is mine as she slept with some other guy a few days later. Anyway, after a nervous few months on my part it wasn’t my kid thank god.

She was 43, her life was s~~~ and she thought the easy way out was to get pregnant by some guy and milk the government and said guy for money.

Seriously, do not trust any of these bitches.

For women, everything eventually boils down to Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.

[Deadly RaverParticipant]

The Laughing Man wrote:

Online dating;

LMFAO!!! Good one TLM

Learn from the past, Control the present, and you will know the Future.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

TREND? This ain’t no “trend”…… friend. It’s an epidemic. Because no female has EVER admit to herself or anyone that she HAD “a good man” — and blew it.

So now it’s just “I can’t find a good man”, and “where is he?”, and lets not forget “dear nice guy, I’m ready to date to you now“.

THEY.

F~~~ED.

UP.

Royally.

Too much “I don’t need no man” for the last 30 years. These chicks were in their 20s when SexAndTheCity was in it’s 3rd season.

Now they are mid 40s with the turkey necks and the next Sex and The City III movie will take place in a rest home.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

I always laugh when I see the name: “Plenty of Fish”.

What the hell were they thinking when they picked that name? Don’t they know what fish smell like when they’re past their expiration date? There may be plenty of them, but that only makes it worse, because the only thing worse then the smell of old fish is the smell of plenty of old, dried up, rotted fish.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

sidecar wrote:

What the hell were they thinking when they picked that name?

Yeah I interpret it that way too, but it comes from “plenty of fish in the sea” which is something women tell themselves (and each other) to justify not having to make any effort when they actually HAD a man around.

From the sex that actually initiates a break up because “he’s too nice”, they can get a cat.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[RealityBitesParticipant 2198]

I once was curious about why I got so few responses from women on Online Dating sites..so I created a fake profile with a picture of a fairly good looking middle aged woman. In the profile I made some pretty high demands.

That profile got hundreds of messages within 3 days. It was absolutely mobbed. I got all kinds of unsolicited responses, everything under the sun.

So I realized this:
(a.) Men vastly outnumber women on dating sites maybe 3 to 1.
(b.) The women on these sites just make even greater hypergamous demands (ie they might be a 3 on a scale of 1 – 10 but are holding out for a really wealthy and great looking guy who is maybe an 8 or 9)
(c.) Women tend to knock 5 years off their age, and they use old photos 8 years or more and describe themselves as Athletic (but they are really average), Average (Overweight), a few extra pounds (hideously obese).
(d.) Responses from the women are simple and stupid and the game playing is unreal

In contrast to online dating, I found that I get a much better quality woman when I meet them in person for the first time in a social setting and not online.

Still even then: there is a lot of hypergamy..and every single one that I ever dated has far less money than I do. Basically women are after either Money, Chad Thunderc~~~ or (insert miracle here) both.

Most women don’t give a s~~~ what they guy does for fun, who he is, etc. They only give a damn about money and/or being an absolute male porn star in bed.

When they ask what you do for a living, or where you live: they are just trying to figure out roughly how much money you have.

And yeah…women tend to overestimate their SMV by huge margins, and haven’t realized that Men have finally caught on to their game.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Keymaster wrote:

but it comes from “plenty of fish in the sea”

Oh I know where the expression comes from. I just can’t understand how the idiots who chose it missed the other connotations.

It’s like tinder. To my thinking, tinder gets burned. Is that the impression they really wanted to make?

[Frank V.Participant 2445]

@narwhal wrote:

– The expect you to pursue them in try to win them over, even though you know nothing about them. The will show lots of cleavage and pictures of them slutting it up to entice you. Yet, they will tell you outright that they will not return any attention your way and expect you take a backseat to her kids, family, social life, and everything else…because that’s what good men do.

They expect us to chase them, post wall ? Sheer insanity. This is the only thing I can say to that:

Frank V.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

sidecar wrote:

I just can’t understand how the idiots who chose it missed the other connotations.

sidecar wrote:

tinder gets burned

Hadn’t thought about it. But “tinder” yeah I guess you’re right! And maybe they called it plenty of fish as a joke on purpose. I tried “online dating” years ago when I moved to another city and quickly realized it’s not “dating” at all. It’s online EMAILING. For a man, it’s the most whacked and f~~~ed concept there is.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Won'tGetFooledAgainParticipant 3293]

RealityBites wrote:

So I realized this:
(a.) Men vastly outnumber women on dating sites maybe 3 to 1.
(b.) The women on these sites just make even greater hypergamous demands (ie they might be a 3 on a scale of 1 – 10 but are holding out for a really wealthy and great looking guy who is maybe an 8 or 9)
(c.) Women tend to knock 5 years off their age, and they use old photos 8 years or more and describe themselves as Athletic (but they are really average), Average (Overweight), a few extra pounds (hideously obese).
(d.) Responses from the women are simple and stupid and the game playing is unreal

Absolutely, even women who get no attention at all in real life will suddenly get so many messages they do not have enough time to read them all. This makes them overestimate their sexual market value and think they can get an 8/9 out of 10 when they are only a 4.

I must have dated 30+ women on dating sites and I would say that maybe 1 or 2 looked exactly like their photos. For some of them it was so bad I couldn’t even believe it was the same person. They will photo shop the photos, get professional shots done, use 5 year old photos or use the 1 in 1000 photos where they look OK. They are also masters at getting a flattering angle that hides the fact that they are massively overweight.

Online dating should only be used for sport and pump and dump. They are constantly looking for someone better than you so they will be dating 5 other people at the same time as you. In the past I have chatted to them on Whatsapp and they claim to be tired and want to go to bed. When I checked on them the next day I saw they were up to 2am chatting to someone else.

For women, everything eventually boils down to Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Won'tGetFooledAgain wrote:

maybe 1 or 2 looked exactly like their photos

Don’t get me started on that. And the goddam SELFIES. Don’t you have any FRIENDS who can take a photo of you?

A few days ago I was being picked by a friend and was waiting by the curb. I watched a woman (40?) walking uphill with her yoga pants and earbuds in. She took out her phone and took selfies holding the camera up and faking a smile and between each snap, she was looking for the best one. She didn’t know I was watching her from across the street, but I know she uploaded them to POF that night.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Won'tGetFooledAgain wrote:

Online dating should only be used for sport and pump and dump.

Not even that. Unless you have a fascination for the macabre, I can’t see what use online dating is.

You meet a much higher quality pump and dump out in the real world. Female rock climbers are particularly entertaining.

[Author]

Posts