Another reminder that male paedophilia is the only type that’s bad

[ConstantineParticipant 4416]

I was just reading about Jonathan Davis, lead singer of Korn and a personal hero (at least was; now I’m not so sure), on Wikipedia, when I came across this passage in his “personal life” section. I tried to ignore it, but eventually decided that maybe it’s worth dropping off here.

Davis’ childhood is a major influence on Korn lyrics. The song “Daddy” gave rise to a rumor that he was molested by his father, Rick Davis. However, Jonathan has gone on record in many interviews saying he wrote the song about a family friend who sexually abused him. He said that when he tried to turn to his family as a child to tell them about the abuse, they shrugged it off and didn’t believe him; Jonathan revealed that his babysitter (a female) was the one he grew intamate with and that being a female that made him a man it was not really sexual abuse but love in the making. He said this in an interview about Korn’s song ‘So Unfair’.

So…thanks for clearing that up for us Jonathan, in case there was any remaining doubt. Shame. I always liked that guy.

Adding insult to injury, “intimate” was spelt incorrectly. Jesus.

To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

Well men are more honest about sexual attraction than females. Men generally at puberty want to get their dicks sucked by hot older women. Key word being hot. So we generally go just like South Park PD on the stories of a boy banging his teacher as “… Niiice.”

Women on the other hand demonize older men with younger women because women aren’t getting that dude’s attention and a younger woman is. Remember women mature FASTER than guys and no one refutes it. Historically older men fit younger women more naturally because older men are wise to the ways females manipulate and can say “no” to them with more confidence.

Even women inadvertently admit they don’t dig very young looking men. Women will say “he looks to young… like he’s not filled out. He looks “nice”. But I dunno he’s kinda scrawny. They will ALWAYS prefer a badass looking confident man who looks like he’s in the range of 25-35. Men on the other hand get boners with women in the 18-25 range. More honest guys will probably admit there are 14-17 year olds that make their cut in a fantasy too. Only in the RECENT century have people raised the age of consent to 18 in the US. It is still 15-16 in many parts of the world. This is why there are Quincineras (15) and Sweet 16’s. It is the age of approved marriage/sex for suitable bachelors for many centuries.

You can’t change biology, you can deny it, but there is a reason we recognize the wall. Because damn that girl is not going to be fertile ground soon and the amount of crops that can be grown on that soil is diminishing.

[ConstantineParticipant 4416]

That’s an interesting theory man, and you may be right in some ways.

But I’ll always maintain that just because a young boy wants to bang his older teacher/family friend/babysitter/whatever, doesn’t mean that it’s a good thing when he does. These laws exist for a reason. If they’re not going to be adhered to, what the hell’s the point of having them. At the end of the day, he’s still being taken advantage of by an adult who, at that age, should know better. And obviously has something wrong with her if she finds a child sexually appealing. Oh that’s right, it’s called paedophilia. There is nothing about it which even resembles “love in the making”.

I think what gets me the most about that comment is that Jonathan was once asked in an interview, “What’s something that totally grosses you out?” and he replied…paedophilia. Well make up your mind Jon, you’re either disgusted by it or you’re not. If you are, then don’t f~~~ing make excuses for your f~~~ed-up babysitter. It should be seen as a revolting crime regardless of whether you’re male or female, and both sexes should be punished in equal measure if found guilty of it. That woman sounds like a total headcase and should’ve been hit with charges just like a male paedophile would. Keep in mind that many prepubescent girls develop crushes on their male teachers, who they then spend all day daydreaming about. I dare say that if the guy ends up taking them up on the offer, they might be delighted to know that he returns their feelings. So does that also qualify as “love in the making”?

To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

Constantine wrote:

That’s an interesting theory man, and you may be right in some ways.

But I’ll always maintain that just because a young boy wants to bang his older teacher/family friend/babysitter/whatever, doesn’t mean that it’s a good thing when he does. These laws exist for a reason. If they’re not going to be adhered to, what the hell’s the point of having them. At the end of the day, he’s still being taken advantage of by an adult who, at that age, should know better. And obviously has something wrong with her if she finds a child sexually appealing. Oh that’s right, it’s called paedophilia. There is nothing about it which even resembles “love in the making”.

I think what gets me the most about that comment is that Jonathan was once asked in an interview, “What’s something that totally grosses you out?” and he replied…paedophilia. Well make up your mind Jon, you’re either disgusted by it or you’re not. If you are, then don’t f~~~ing make excuses for your f~~~ed-up babysitter. It should be seen as a revolting crime regardless of whether you’re male or female, and both sexes should be punished in equal measure if found guilty of it. That woman sounds like a total headcase and should’ve been hit with charges just like a male paedophile would. Keep in mind that many prepubescent girls develop crushes on their male teachers, who they then spend all day daydreaming about. I dare say that if the guy ends up taking them up on the offer, they might be delighted to know that he returns their feelings. So does that also qualify as “love in the making”?

Keep in mind that what I am talking about, is the biology and sexual attraction aspect that is natural development we humans have evolved with over more than a simple millennium to explain the general reactions of peers and attractions and actions of the beligerants. What I am addressing isn’t pedophilia, it is ephebophilia. Paedophilia means the child is a pre-pubecent.

Second, we of both sexes have self control and the laws in place are because teachers are placed as psudeo-guardians. Essentially we are using the schools as holding pens while the parents are at work and use teachers as a mix of professional nannies, teachers, guardians. So that is why we lay the ground rules.

What I am trying to explain is why males react more honestly than females. Females react as post wall women do, with sudden discovery of moral indignation. They do not react as men do with the tables flipped even though girls are acknowledged by EVERYONE as the sex to mature faster than boys.

So why do men such as FATHERS react with a bit of pride and admiration if their boy banged a teacher even though everyone acknowledges his sex as the sex that matures slower than the opposite sex?

Your a dude, tell me you would be seriously angry at this situation:

Your 16 year old son comes home late one night tired yet smelling of perfume. He doesn’t tell you, but someone lets you in on the info that he just banged TWO of his hot teachers at the same time

I personally would pretend I think it is a young girl and give him an encouraging young jab on the shoulder with a “attaboy lad, use protection. Make sure this doesn’t effect your grades.”

If he says “I’m pretty sure I’m gonna do great in my classes” I’ll simply chuckle and mentally say “You goddamn right.”

[RoyDalParticipant]

The real issue is that the age of consent law applies equally to both sexes. However, the law is rigorously enforced when the female is below the age limit.

There is no denying biology: When I was below the legal age, I would have jumped at the chance to boink a hot “older” woman, or a hot woman of any age. That doesn’t mean a sexual predator should be allowed to get away with it, even if it is a female.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[RennieParticipant]

What Big Boss said.

Big Boss wrote:

More honest guys will probably admit there are 14-17 year olds that make their cut in a fantasy too.

Yeah. Baby. Yeah!

Nothing to feel bad about. Some of them are very fine. They’re in their prime. I don’t recommend trying to do them though, since that could and probably would land one in a world of crap. But one can still appreciate them from a safe distance.

[SpacemonkeyParticipant 1481]

I looked it up and females are responsible for 14% of sexual abuse against boys and 6% on girls.

“Long is the way and hard, that out of Hell leads up to light.”

[RoyDalParticipant]

Spacemonkey wrote:

I looked it up and females are responsible for 14% of sexual abuse against boys and 6% on girls.

I am venturing a guess that this is reported abuse. When I was 15, had a 25 year old woman boinked me (she didn’t dammit!), you can be sure I would have not reported it.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[RennieParticipant]

RoyDal wrote:

Spacemonkey wrote:

I looked it up and females are responsible for 14% of sexual abuse against boys and 6% on girls.

I am venturing a guess that this is reported abuse. When I was 15, had a 25 year old woman boinked me (she didn’t dammit!), you can be sure I would have not reported it.

Looking back when I was younger(~10-12) most of the fantasies were about older women, although I can remember fantasizing about certain hot teachers in high school too, but also very much the girls my own age. That never changed even after HS.

[QuietlyquietlyParticipant 728]

Female pedophilia (or strictly, the abuse of underage males by women) is a massive undiscovered problem waiting for someone to expose it. Michele Elliott, founder of Kidscape UK, raised the issue in 1994 and was booed off stage by feminists.

The problem is one of consent – it is “deemed” that young people (under 18) are not old enough to make informed consent decisions about sexual encounters with older people, and thus it is technical rape.

Having said that, I agree that Constantine and RoyDal are right. I also nearly had an opportunity at 15 to have a 21 year old, but it didn’t eventuate. I most certainly wouldn’t have stopped it!

[RennieParticipant]

Quietlyquietly wrote:

The problem is one of consent – it is “deemed” that young people (under 18) are not old enough to make informed consent decisions about sexual encounters with older people, and thus it is technical rape.

The laws about that vary around the world and even on the North American continent, even state to state in America. Usually between 16-18. Here in Canada it’s 16, it was 14 from 1897-2008 when the law was updated. In some places of the world the age of consent is 13 or lower – not that I think it should be that low, but obviously they see it differently over there.

Now if the woman teacher did something to a teenage guy it would be statutory rape(below AOC), but it wouldn’t actually make her a pedophile since there were no prepubescent individuals involved. Real pedophiles need to be dealt with of course.

[Author]

Posts