Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Anesthesiologist trashes sedated patient
This topic contains 5 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by
Klaus Windamier 4 years, 7 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
So apparently this guy going in for a colonoscopy accidentally presses record before the procedure on his phone and ends up with an audio recording of the anesthesiologist talking trash about him in various ways. The anesthesiologist also admits to falsifying patient records and doing fake pages to get doctors out of rooms faster. She says thing like “After five minutes of talking to you in pre-op,” the anesthesiologist told the sedated patient, “I wanted to punch you in the face and man you up a little bit,” and when a medical assistant noted the man had a rash, the anesthesiologist warned her not to touch it, saying she might get “some syphilis on your arm or something,” then added, “It’s probably tuberculosis in the penis, so you’ll be all right.”
I will give you three guesses on the gender of the anesthesiologist.
On the upside she lost her job and has to pay a lot of money.
Willfully turning aside from the truth is treason to one's self. -Terry Goodkind

Anonymous18That’s pretty malignant of this bitch to talk trash like that. It’s very rare that a privileged doctor goes on talking so much s~~~ about a patient they are caring for. I can bet she is divorced too 🙂
I don’t need to guess the sex of the doctors. I heard this whole thing played on the radio. Malpractice is all their just desserts.
Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?
I’m am anesthesiologist myself. I heard about this case a while back, but now it’s found its way into the national media. She has set back the public perception of medicine in general and anesthesia in particular…about 70 years. For the last three generations, a lot of very smart people have been working very hard to create better drugs and better monitors in order to reduce what were once very high risks associated with general anesthesia. There was a time when just the risk of dying from the anesthesia was as high as 20%. However, there are very few people old enough to remember that time. And this is the speed at which the public perception of anesthesia could be changed for the better. We have gotten the risk of dying from a complication of anesthesia down to about 1 in 250,000 to 1 in 500,000.
Then, a non-board certified cardiologist with zero training in anesthesia killed the most famous musician in the world with one of the most useful anesthetic drugs we have. The perception of Anesthsia took a massive hit as a result. But at least we could say, “That error was not made by an anesthesiologist…”.
Now, we have this woman who should probably never have been allowed into medical school, saying that she wanted to punch a man in the face so he would “man up”…
Anesthesia as a profession, is not to be blamed for this. Neither is medicine, or the medical school whose government mandated gender quotas required her admission. I blame this behavior on the source of the , message that this woman has likely been receiving for as long as she can remember. She’s been told that since she is a woman, she is entitled to certain privileges, that she is not accountable to the rules of professionalism or ettiquette that govern the behavior of everyone else, and that she does not owe basic respect to her own patients. It is a very rare man that receives that message, but almost all women do.
If she were in a court of law on a criminal charge, being female would offer her some protection. What’s about to be explained to her in the court of public opinion, is that after having asked/demanded to be part of a historically male world, she will not so easily escape the accountability and responsibility that men here have always had. The American public may see the medical profession as historically male, but the expectation of perfection the public imposes on medicine’s results… is genderless.
She made the mistake of assuming she did not owe basic respect to her own patient. She made another when she assumed she would never be held accountable for that. Finally, she made the mistake of allowing this to go to open court where it becomes public record and available for broadcasting in the media. She could have just written the check quietly, and made it go away, but must have mistakenly assumed that she was beyond consequences.
I don’t mind that she learned this lesson the hard way. Pain can be a very effective teacher. I just wish she could have learned the lesson in a way that didn’t cause a black eye to our whole profession…
However many women there are in medicine, the profession will not forgive her for this. A male director would never hire her for obvious reasons. And a female director (like females everywhere) will not take the risk of being associated with her. She may not realize it yet, but this will follow her forever. It has been in the media, and in the courts… Which means it will pop up in back ground checks on her forever. Those background checks are required at any hospital where she ever applies for privileges.
I can’t imagine a way for her to get a job anywhere now.
Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you
This.
"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."
I’m am anesthesiologist myself. I heard about this case a while back, but now it’s found its way into the national media. She has set back the public perception of medicine in general and anesthesia in particular…about 70 years. For the last three generations, a lot of very smart people have been working very hard to create better drugs and better monitors in order to reduce what were once very high risks associated with general anesthesia. There was a time when just the risk of dying from the anesthesia was as high as 20%. However, there are very few people old enough to remember that time. And this is the speed at which the public perception of anesthesia could be changed for the better. We have gotten the risk of dying from a complication of anesthesia down to about 1 in 250,000 to 1 in 500,000. Then, a non-board certified cardiologist with zero training in anesthesia killed the most famous musician in the world with one of the most useful anesthetic drugs we have. The perception of Anesthsia took a massive hit as a result. But at least we could say, “That error was not made by an anesthesiologist…”. Now, we have this woman who should probably never have been allowed into medical school, saying that she wanted to punch a man in the face so he would “man up”… Anesthesia as a profession, is not to be blamed for this. Neither is medicine, or the medical school whose government mandated gender quotas required her admission. I blame this behavior on the source of the , message that this woman has likely been receiving for as long as she can remember. She’s been told that since she is a woman, she is entitled to certain privileges, that she is not accountable to the rules of professionalism or ettiquette that govern the behavior of everyone else, and that she does not owe basic respect to her own patients. It is a very rare man that receives that message, but almost all women do. If she were in a court of law on a criminal charge, being female would offer her some protection. What’s about to be explained to her in the court of public opinion, is that after having asked/demanded to be part of a historically male world, she will not so easily escape the accountability and responsibility that men here have always had. The American public may see the medical profession as historically male, but the expectation of perfection the public imposes on medicine’s results… is genderless. She made the mistake of assuming she did not owe basic respect to her own patient. She made another when she assumed she would never be held accountable for that. Finally, she made the mistake of allowing this to go to open court where it becomes public record and available for broadcasting in the media. She could have just written the check quietly, and made it go away, but must have mistakenly assumed that she was beyond consequences. I don’t mind that she learned this lesson the hard way. Pain can be a very effective teacher. I just wish she could have learned the lesson in a way that didn’t cause a black eye to our whole profession… However many women there are in medicine, the profession will not forgive her for this. A male director would never hire her for obvious reasons. And a female director (like females everywhere) will not take the risk of being associated with her. She may not realize it yet, but this will follow her forever. It has been in the media, and in the courts… Which means it will pop up in back ground checks on her forever. Those background checks are required at any hospital where she ever applies for privileges. I can’t imagine a way for her to get a job anywhere now.
Well said and upvoted.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
