A Woman's Son Damages A Statue And Must Pay $132K. She Blames Museum

[ResidentEvil7Participant 9558]

I just heard this update on my local news and I wanted to find it on the Net to show.

Kansas City charged mom $132,000 for a statue her kids damaged at an art exhibit from videos

There’s this mother in Kansas who takes her son to a museum or community center, where her 5 year old son climbs and hugs an expensive statue, where it topples over and breaks. The museum is hold her and her son accountable for the $132K in damages.

Here’s the part where it gets me angry. She blames the museum for the damage, because the statue wasn’t secured down properly. Amazing! Kids are running around wild, they climb on a statue, letting it topple over and she blames the museum instead on her bad parenting. Typical woman; always putting the blame on someone else when they or their kids do something bad, and plays the victim because she needs to pay up! F~~~ing C~~~!

https://themanszone.webs.com/

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

OF course she blames the museum! The destruction Couldn’t possibly be the result of her little angle-cakes!

[Knarley BobParticipant 2219]

And, so, where is mommy dear at the time her rug rat is crawling all over the exibits at the museum? Maybe she can recoup some of the money by having a “scratch and dent sale”?

OATHKEEPERS, not on our watch. MOLON LABE

[G.O.A.TParticipant 1459]

Parents, learn how to control your little s~~~. Of course she blames the museum, and not her s~~~ty parenting.

$132k? Lol, that’s the price of a brand new Audi R8. Another reason why I don’t want to bring a little bastard into this world.

Vasectomy.

Money is God.

[ResidentEvil7Participant 9558]

I can tell you this, she’ll have to sell the house and car and the kid’s college savings to pay for her s~~~ty parenting.

https://themanszone.webs.com/

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

ResidentEvil7 wrote:

I can tell you this, she’ll have to sell the house and car and the kid’s college savings to pay for her s~~~ty parenting

Don’t bet on it. She and her rug-rat will weasel out of it–guaranteed.

[MarketWatcherParticipant]

PistolPete wrote:

Don’t bet on it. She and her rug-rat will weasel out of it–guaranteed.

Already happening. That’s why the article was written. The go fund me page will make a million.

[Anonymous 7]

ResidentEvil7 wrote:

I can tell you this, she’ll have to sell the house and car and the kid’s college savings to pay for her s~~~ty parenting.

No she won’t she will counter sue that she and womb-turd were traumatized. She aint gonna pay s~~~.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22543]

ResidentEvil7 wrote:

I just heard this update on my local news and I wanted to find it on the Net to show.

<iframe frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no” allowtransparency=”true” allowfullscreen=”true” id=”emb_lva4kb” class=”embedly-card” style=”border: none; position: relative; visibility: visible; display: block; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; max-width: 100%; min-width: 200px;” height=”483″ width=”600″></iframe>

<script async=”” src=”https://embed.redditmedia.com/widgets/platform.js” charset=”UTF-8″></script>

There’s this mother in Kansas who takes her son to a museum or community center, where her 5 year old son climbs and hugs an expensive statue, where it topples over and breaks. The museum is hold her and her son accountable for the $132K in damages.

Here’s the part where it gets me angry. She blames the museum for the damage, because the statue wasn’t secured down properly. Amazing! Kids are running around wild, they climb on a statue, letting it topple over and she blames the museum instead on her bad parenting. Typical woman; always putting the blame on someone else when they or their kids do something bad, and plays the victim because she needs to pay up! F~~~ing C~~~!

Maybe the museum could haveprotected it better, but that still doesn’t remove negligence and damaging it from her kid. He climbed on it like a jungle gym. Where was she? She didnnt stop her kid breaking it. Shes liable.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Anonymous 42]

Where were the museum ropes, glass box, or stage to protect the piece?

They allow children?

F~~~ the museum!

That’s what you get for allowing children and expecting them to think and behave like adults!

[Manspread MansplainerParticipant 4222]

0:23 c~~~ was on her phone I bet.

If women ran the world = It would become the shithole you are seeing.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22557]

ResidentEvil7 wrote:

I just heard this update on my local news and I wanted to find it on the Net to show.

Kansas City charged mom $132,000 for a statue her kids damaged at an art exhibit from videos

<script async=”” src=”https://embed.redditmedia.com/widgets/platform.js” charset=”UTF-8″></script>

There’s this mother in Kansas who takes her son to a museum or community center, where her 5 year old son climbs and hugs an expensive statue, where it topples over and breaks. The museum is hold her and her son accountable for the $132K in damages.

Here’s the part where it gets me angry. She blames the museum for the damage, because the statue wasn’t secured down properly. Amazing! Kids are running around wild, they climb on a statue, letting it topple over and she blames the museum instead on her bad parenting. Typical woman; always putting the blame on someone else when they or their kids do something bad, and plays the victim because she needs to pay up! F~~~ing C~~~!

My questions are.

Did not the museum have insurance that would pay for the damage? Or, is the museum attempting to double-dip?

As much as foolishness is obvious, one should the circumstances for even, was the statue roped off a few feet from the public? This is common in museums when is comes to expensive items.

Or, better yet, why was the statue not in a translucent case?

It would be expected that the museum would make sure precautions were taken for anything worth more than a thousand dollars.

It is possible this could be a set-up with the child and mother being the “marks”.

[SH3LLZParticipant 5569]

I noticed the other women in the room just watched the kid climb on the statue and didn’t think,

“hey, some one should stop him.. He could hurt himself or break something”..

They just sat there and let the little s~~~ break the thing???

Heh, there goes his college fund.

#ICETHEMOUT!!! #MANOUT!!! #HIDEYOURWEALTH #VAGINAISWORTHLESS

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

ResidentEvil7 wrote:

She blames the museum for the damage, because the statue wasn’t secured down properly.

Stupid bitch needs to be dragged to the front of the building and shown the sign where it says “Museum” and not “Child Safe Kindergarten”.

Then add the haulage fees for dragging her ass out there into the bill.

I swear, it’s Harambe all over again.

[Anonymous 42]

They’d be singing an entirely different tune if the statue crushed the boys head spilling his brains on the carpet, then we can ask who’s really liable? And what exactly are the damages?

[BigDParticipant 3024]

What’s sad is if the statue landed on the kid and hurt him they could have sued the museum.

Don't stick your dick into anyone you aren't willing to put up with for eighteen years and nine months.

[RASmanParticipant 1994]

Why is she taking a 5 year old in to an art museum? The little s~~~s don’t know art from fart and are bound to screw something up; like a bull in a china shop. The sign should say “Children under 18 must be on a leash”.

[Anonymous 6]

I’d like an art exhibit where someone holds down the woman and then someone else poops on her. Maybe some Tejano music could be playing in the background and some bodybuilders could flex while this is going on. Just my 2 cents.

[Anonymous 3]

RASman wrote:

The sign should say “Children under 18 must be on a leash”.

Good idea. Children are a bunch of uncontrollable energy, they never get tired, are loud, run around and do bulls~~~. It is what they are. They need to be locked into kindergarten or put on a leash. Otherwise they may run to the road, climb stuff and fall down, and so on. They have also no feeling / concept of dangers until a certain age.

I am always asking, if one has to take a srict exam before car driving, why do wannabe parents not have to take education and exam before having the child? It is comparable (or more) level of dangers and responsibility.

RASman wrote:

The little s~~~s don’t know art from fart

spot on!

By the way, if the museum did not have insurance and some physical protection of such an expensive thing, they also made a big mistake. That statue could have peen properly fixed or put into some glass box for a couple hundred dollars, no more.

[channel-zParticipant 228]

That happened where I live (adjacent suburb). Even the women in my newsroom were quick to chide the mom for her absent parenting.

This is not an art museum. This is a community center. Why a community center has a $132,000 sculpture in open display, I do not know. But they are insured. The battle is between insurance providers right now. I don’t think the family will pay anything to the city.

[Author]

Posts