A psychological link between disease and gender equality

[Mr. SmithParticipant 686]

Gentlemen,

an interesting article:

A psychological link between disease and gender equality

There seems to be a correlation between feminism in society and infectious diseases. Never thought about that, but the explanation seems reasonable.

One reason more…

"I need men, real men, men with balls, certainly not sissies. I would never ask them to take an enemy position, but I insist that they follow me to that position. If you are one of those men, raise your hand." Napoleon Bonaparte

[xenonParticipant 2007]

Certainly the popular grab-bag of STD’s are causally linked to the by products of feminism. They can have them.

[Anonymous 42]

I’m ready for the next pandemic! CLEAN LIVING IS THE ONLY ANTIDOTE FOR FEMINISM!

Their philosophy is a waste barrel full of infectious disease. For REAL!

[BoarParticipant]

I read the article and I may have missed something. It seems that they are crediting gender equality with dropping disease rates. And if you scroll to the bottom and see the dyed hair muppet who wrote it, I am not sure it is was bias free either.

Of course, I could be wrong. Caffeine is still loading….

Untamed wrote: Quit complaining and Go Your Own Way in whatever manner suits you best.

[Mr. SmithParticipant 686]

Boar wrote:

I read the article and I may have missed something. It seems that they are crediting gender equality with dropping disease rates. And if you scroll to the bottom and see the dyed hair muppet who wrote it, I am not sure it is was bias free either.

I think it is not about “scientists proofed feminism dangerous”. It is about an aspect I haven’t seen, yet. Positive or negative is not as important as the truth. If I am wrong I like to know and learn from it. This is what makes us different to ideological feminists. They claim to know the truth and all aspects of it and dismiss everything not compatible with their views. This way one will end up in a filter bubble and in the end with an unrealistic view of the world.

But back to the topic of the original article:

Higher levels of infectious disease seem to lead societies and individuals to adopt more traditional attitudes and norms. Higher levels of pathogen prevalence are associated with more conformity, more authoritarianism, less openness and tighter social norms. Given that most human societies have relatively patriarchal traditions, it seems possible that higher pathogen prevalence might also promote behaviours, norms and values that foster gender inequality.

This correlation from high pathogens leading to a more traditional society one can see from the other side: A more liberal society will lead to higher levels of infectious diseases, especially sexual transmitted diseases, as long as you expect more often changing sex partners in a liberal society, as it has been since the 1960s.

"I need men, real men, men with balls, certainly not sissies. I would never ask them to take an enemy position, but I insist that they follow me to that position. If you are one of those men, raise your hand." Napoleon Bonaparte

[RoyDalParticipant]

xenon wrote:

There seems to be a correlation between feminism in society and infectious diseases. Never thought about that, but the explanation seems reasonable.

Good find.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

There is a more conclusive correlation between female mental disorders and hormone drugs like the pill and the ring.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[SolidParticipant 7520]

There is just one thing that I can say, numbers don’t lie.

[Author]

Posts