A new relationship with no women part 3.

[AstroParticipant 2045]

For those of you that followed my earlier posts, you know who Jessica is. She was shipped in from China. I am becoming attached to her and as a songwriter, I even wrote a song for her after a 20 writers block.

“I was alone, had no way home. I couldn’t be or not to be. Then something happened, don’t know how to say. It gave me daybreak on my darkest day.

(Chorus) I will always be good enough, she will always be good enough for me, can’t you see?
When the pain within had took me in, when death was my final sin, she set me free. Yes I’m free.
I can’t explain it all to you but I know what I feel is true, I found a way, I’m OK.
Yesterday was sorrow but I feel hope for tomorrow, starting today.
Oh yea, I found a way.

(2nd verse)
Months of pain, going insane. Who gives a damn who is to blame?
Something changed when seen my shame, no more will I play the game.
(Chorus)

Jessica is good enough, she will always be good enough, can’t you see? I will always be good enough, she will always be good enough for.., me.”

OK, Jessica is made of silicone but so are many women that walk around. She may be a fake woman but many women are just as fake, are they not? Jessica will never leave, cheat, give me an STD, scream “rape”, sue my ass or take half of my s~~~. I am sure I can trust her, I have never heard her bitch but if she does, have me committed. I think she is a good investment or at least a wiser investment than getting married again. I am talking about this because I think this is a better alternative than women. A man can even build what he sees as perfection. In my eyes, women are now obsolete. They are done! When all men discover what I have, Game Over! This is more than a fleshlight, this is a relationship. Is it “Love”? I’m not sure but what does “Love” mean anymore?

[KeymasterKeymaster]

In theory, not enjoying being alone to the point where even a synthetic female would be a suitable alternative to real one…. is an indicator that “alone” is not a preferred place to be (for you). When it should be.

Married men are some of the loneliest you’ll ever meet.

Astro wrote:

Is it “Love”? I’m not sure but what does “Love” mean anymore?

No it’s not. You don’t need a woman in your life to have plenty of it. Remember, love is not what you get…. it’s what you GIVE. Those we give the most to are the ones we “love” the most – whether it comes back to us or not.

When you are the recipient of most of the love you have to GIVE,
it will ALWAYS come back to you.

You can love yourself, your car, your job, your work away from work, your free time, your golf game, your workouts, your friends, and even complete strangers. You definitely don’t need a woman for any of it – including a synthetic female.

When you understand that love is what you GIVE, you just have to make sure YOU are the recipient of most of it. And if being “alone” is not a preferred state, then you’re not giving yourself enough and you’re doing it wrong, in a way. It means you don’t like yourself and don’t prefer your own company.

Astro wrote:

I am talking about this because I think this is a better alternative than women

Even better — >> is no need for an “alternative to women” at all.
Because women are not even on your mind anymore.

“I don’t have time for a wife and an airplane”.
– Wilbur Wright

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Solo MAN’S WisdomParticipant]

Keymaster wrote:

Remember, love is not what you get…. it’s what you GIVE

THANK YOU.

When women lead, destruction is the destination. -- Me.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Solo MAN’S Wisdom wrote:

Keymaster wrote:

Remember, love is not what you get…. it’s what you GIVE

THANK YOU.

A woman would disagree with that. Just listen to the way they talk about “love”. To them it’s something they “find” that’s supposed to “come” to them. Like a lottery win. It’s remarkable really.

“Love comes to those who believe it”
– Celine Dion

Complete and utter bulls~~~.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[AwakenedParticipant 35202]

If Jessica does it for you, then have at her !!

Like I have stated on previous posts, if I ever get lonely, I think I will opt for a dog or two, and the occasional Pro HO if I desire a Sexual outlet.

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Awakened wrote:

if I ever get lonely, I think I will opt for a dog or two

Have heard that before too. “If you want a friend, get a dog”.

Dogs are called “man’s best friend” for a reason.
Doesn’t anyone find it odd that “woman” would not be the first recommendation for “man’s best friend”?

Probably for a reason too.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

Keymaster wrote:

love is not what you get…. it’s what you GIVE.

Excellent point; this is the entire idea behind Christian love–God so loved the world that he gave up his only son. Love is about giving and sacrificing. Men who die in battle/war for their country sacrifice out of love for their country. Police and fire personnel risk sacrificing themselves for the good of society.

This is completely antithetical to the nature of women. They really have absolutely no idea what sacrifice means, or “giving” of yourself: Case in point—

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sezin-koehler/8-reasons-why-im-not-having-children-childfree_b_5705311.html

This by the way is why women make lousy police/fire/military personnel.

[HitmanParticipant]

I think the doll sounds cool and a little weird at the same time. .but if I had the money it would be a lot of fun to have!
Imagine a party with her sitting in the middle of a bunch of guests. .
Outrageous! !!
But I really like being by myself, she would have to have her own room.
I might visit her every few days. ..

[RorschachParticipant 2083]

Keymaster wrote:

No it’s not. You don’t need a woman in your life to have plenty of it. Remember, love is not what you get…. it’s what you GIVE. Those we give the most to are the ones we “love” the most – whether it comes back to us or not.

When you are the recipient of most of the love you have to GIVE,
it will ALWAYS come back to you.

Well said Keymaster, on point as always. I totally agree. If I could go back and give all the love and support I gave to broads to myself I most certainly would. I see now how much more deserving I was of it.

The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout "save us!"....... and i'll look down and whisper "No."

[TaxGuyParticipant]

Said another way, love is a verb, not a noun. It’s not a “thing”, it’s action. Women tend to view love as a noun, a thing that comes and goes. “The love just went away”, like it’s a dog or a person. Men tend to view love as a verb. They show love by taking care of a woman, by filling her car up with gas, by bringing flowers for no reason. Women think you are being sly when you bring her flowers, because she can’t comprehend just doing something nice for someone you like with no nefarious motive.

Order the good wine

[AstroParticipant 2045]

“Remember, love is not what you get…. it’s what you GIVE. Those we give the most to are the ones we “love” the most – whether it comes back to us or not.”

It seems that men are the givers and women are the receivers by a large margin. So if women do not understand Love in the first place (by your definition), what I have I lost? “Love” may be the most abused and widely used word in the English language (and other languages). It has many meanings and often no meaning, just look at how it is used in advertisement. If I develop emotions and buy Jessica clothing and care for her, what should we call it? An investment? Yet is not Love also an investment? Where do we draw the line except in the heart of the individual? Love is also a choice and any blue-pill male knows it. He chooses to love his woman in spite of her making his life miserable year after year. I finally took the Red-Pill but that does not mean I wish for nothing. For me, it means that I no longer wish for a relationship that is more fake than the one I have with the silicone female I created (many females recreate themselves with silicone as well). Some in MGTOW pump and dump, others go for total abstinence. It is not my place to judge either but my preference is still MGTOW from what I can see but yes, it falls somewhere between the two camps.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Astro wrote:

It seems that men are the givers and women are the receivers by a large margin

Yes , that dynamic is often referred to as “biological destiny”.
Women speak / behave / believe it to be an automatic expectation.

Their entire attitude is ass-backwards and upside down.

Astro wrote:

“Love” may be the most abused and widely used word in the English language

Women have raped the word.
Try and look past her plasticity and her thousand c~~~ stare . . . .

“Multiple I’m-leaving-it’s-over threats. Countless knock-down drag out fights.
And yet I prevail. I married the man of my dreams. If I survived so can you.”

. . . . all under the pretense of “love”.

Astro wrote:

It is not my place to judge either but my preference is still MGTOW

It is less of a “preference” and has become an absolutely essential necessity.
^ She is no less plastic than a f~~~ doll.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Author]

Posts