A man should never hit a women, but if you're a women…

[LurchParticipant 3866]

https://www.facebook.com/802040876546639/videos/911142285636497/

The crowning quote of this video is:

If you hit a women, then you’re going to get the s~~~ beat out of you by someone who’s around.

… yea, by the WOMAN!

Blue-Pill Virgin: Women hate me! That's what it is.
MGTOW Man: Hate them back; it works for me.

[Anonymous 1]

F~~~ man, that video definitely fuels the red bill rage. I was praying for a sweet hook to each one of those c~~~’s jawline’s.

[HitmanParticipant]

Hit me and I hit back.

[BeeParticipant 700]

How about instead of you should not hit a woman, you should not hit anyone! Or maybe it you’re a woman you should not hit a man because he might hit you back.

(I had a close call Sunday).

[Anonymous 42]

That one guy just stood there and took a bitch slapping him more strikes than I could count!

If for political reasons you can’t knock a bitch the f~~~ out then just run like hell, nothing to be ashamed of when you’re fleeing the scene of an attack on you by a woman, I screwed the f~~~ out of a strip joint after a stripper went psycho on me with a red stiletto, I blocked every strike while I was in full retreat. Otherwise it’s your right to neutralize an attacker.

I can’t believe that guy stood there blow after brutal blow! That bitch would have gotten a bitch slapping facial drum roll until she couldn’t see straight (if it were me).

[narwhalParticipant]

Each situation is different and everybody’s got their opinions. Every man (and woman) has a right to defend himself and those he cares about. I also think there needs to be room for misjudgment, being the decision to hit or not hit usually needs to take place in a second.

Best choice it to avoid people and situations where a physical conflict might occur if at all possible.

The woman you quote is correct though, in that if you’re going to hit a woman, you have to consider retaliation from other men and the law.

Ok. Then do it.

[chirParticipant]

Go to youtube.

Look up “Self Defense Joint Locks” or “Self Defense Wrist Locks”

Using non-striking methods of control is better. They cause intense pain and do no damage unless the person you have in a lock dislocates their own fingers or wrists.

Has a girl go bat s~~~ crazy on another girl and I had to intervene. (Bouncer, otherwise I would have let them go at it.) I broke them up and so the attacking girl turned on me. Grab a flailing wrist, put her in a lock and twist a bit to ratchet the pain up. She started screaming but it was enough for other bouncer to get a hold of her and throw her out.

You have to understand that the woman knows that she can hit and hit but if a man hits her back she has physical abuse signs and can have you arrested. Submission holds or Joint locks puts crazy under control without physical signs.

It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, it is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning; it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.

[Anonymous 42]

[XSDBSParticipant 3598]

Women hit men believing they won’t hit back.
Sometimes men do, triggering her “victim mode” with crying and tears.
Hundreds of recorded videos are shining a light on that bulls~~~…

[KeymasterKeymaster]

That video is enough to make your blood boil.
But you can shatter those f~~~~~s in seconds when they say:

“Never hit a woman.”

THat’s an incomplete sentence. The complete sentence is “Never hit a woman…. because you can do more damage – permanent internal damage – by ignoring her completely. Bruises heal. But abandonment issues are forever”.

Nobody gets to have a problem with that.

Hitting a woman (back) is not actually sign of strength. It’s a moment of WEAKNESS.
It actually takes more personal strength NOT to hit a woman. Especially if she hits you first.

A while back, a woman with a clipboard approached me as I was entering a market.
She says “Will you help stop violence against women?”

I said “SURE!!! I stop violence against women every time I DON’T beat a woman. You’re welcome.”.
You should have seen the expression on her face.

… and I just kept walking while laughing inside.

—–

You can hurt her MUCH worse by paying no attention to a toxic violent bitch. That’s WHY she hit you first. Because she would rather be hit back than ignored. Technically, as long as you’re fighting or arguing with her, you’re still paying attention to her. Which is what she wants! I wouldn’t hit her back because I refuse to give her that satisfaction.

A woman once threw a remote control at my face for saying something she didn’t like. She missed, because women are s~~~ at throwing things. So I took her purse and threw it off the balcony FAR into the street. When she ran out screaming after it (and they always do), I bolted the door behind her and didn’t even mail her her shoes.

I have even said to a woman once “If you ever hit me again, I will have NO PROBLEM spending a couple of nights in jail for the satisfaction of bashing your f~~~ing face in until you’re unrecognizable. CHOOSE. I’m f~~~ing BEGGING you.”.

When delivered properly, it packs worse than a punch.
And no violence required.

She never did it again, because I permanently ejected that toxic violent c~~~ from my life.

Aside from these examples, if a woman even has a hostile tone – of any kind – she is OUT long before she ever gets the chance. Don’t even associate with bitches on any level.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[The Laughing ManParticipant 1020]

I could have swore that bus driver yelled SHORYUKEN!!!

I thought what I'd do was I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes...or should I?

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

I get the feeling that most of the time women attack men with intention to bait him to hit back in order to receive moral superiority, lifetime victimhood status and to destroy man’s character and social standing.
They know that the worst thing that can happen to them – is a bruise or a busted lip – they’re not risking their life, bones or teeth. If they sense there is a risk of that – being extremely risk averse – they would have never started anything. But they know that men are bound socially and legally – almost as if our hands are tied behind our backs, that’s why they’re so brazen.

This also explains why sometimes men snap and fight back with more force than necessary. It’s because they sense this total disrespect and women feeling like they’re invincible and can get away with anything. so in order to restore their self-respect and natural leadership status – they snap and do a serious beatdown and even kill or stab women knowing that now their life and social standing is ruined anyways and a disrespectful creature in front of them is the cause of that.

Women never take credit for violence against them, but the reality is that most of the time they’re the primary cause

P.S. Because I have been arrested for DV before – I won’t touch a woman again unless I risk injury or death by not doing so. Instead – I’ll try to completely steal her frame – get as much evidence as possible (bruises, marks, witnesses, audio/video recording), and put her in the slammer. It will feel much better than landing a punch -trust me – Imagine showing up to court to see her face on the stand. Even if she gets community service – it’s totally worth it – I’d pack a picnic basket and binoculars, watch her pick up garbage by the freeway while eating a sandwich.

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Russky wrote:

I get the feeling that most of the time women attack men with intention to bait him to hit back in order to receive moral superiority, lifetime victimhood status and to destroy man’s character and social standing.

Of course. It’s a tired and totally predictable formula.

Remember that most women born in the last 50+ years have been raised in the toxic, corrosive negative world of feminism. They initiate violence because they WANT to get hit back. It satisfies them and validates their core belief system that men are all “violent abusive assholes”… and they will initiate it so they can scurry off to their feminist asshole friends and say “AHA!! I told you! Men are violent exactly as we said”.

This is more valuable to them than actually meeting and knowing a “good man”.
That’s why they initiate breakups and divorce because “he’s too nice”.

Just look at this toxic c~~~. She’s exactly what Im talking about. Initiating divorce because he’s “too nice” and she’s disappointed because she’s waiting for the punch to come and they aren’t! . That’s the problem she has. Even the female judge tells her she’s out of her f~~~ing mind.

The “good man” doesn’t validate her toxic mentality.

GOOD. Let it drive her f~~~ing CRAZY. Because she’s already there.

Thats why I “never hit a woman”. Because being ignored hurts her WORSE.

Much worse.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22557]

Russky wrote:

I get the feeling that most of the time women attack men with intention to bait him to hit back in order to receive moral superiority, lifetime victimhood status and to destroy man’s character and social standing.
They know that the worst thing that can happen to them – is a bruise or a busted lip – they’re not risking their life, bones or teeth.

That is not exactly true.

In this day and age a man can be charge with rape just for walking by a woman. And more and more men are waking up to the fact that we men have no rights in this society. Trials are just a formality.

And should a woman hit a complete stranger of a man, that man may think. “Not matter what happens, I am going to jail for being the male in the situation. Chances are she will accuse me of trying to rape her and I am looking at spending the rest of my life in prison, being raped and abused by everyone. While she does all this to inflate her ego and to play the victim card. So, instead I will just snap and kill the bitch. And I will get the satisfaction of knowing I will be her last victim.”

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Someone should really take that video above, and make a follow up. When they say “never hit a woman”, just freeze it there and append it properly with the message “Because you can hurt her worse by ignoring her and ejecting her the f~~~ out of your life”.

Now THAT would be effective.

Less effort than anything, and more effective results.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 1]

Keymaster wrote:

Someone should really take that video above, and make a follow up. When they say “never hit a woman”, just freeze it there and append it properly with the message “Because you can hurt her worse by ignoring her and ejecting her the f~~~ out of your life”.

Haha boom. Just another fine evening spent gathering with the Gods and playing truant.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Anonymous wrote:

Haha boom

Some of these idiots actually try to pretend “There is never any reason to hit woman”.
But even Bill Burr will correct that s~~~ in front of an audience.

—

The entire “issue” becomes a non-issue when a man determines what he’s not wiling to put up with. A “no bitches” policy turns it all into a non-discussion. When I see as much as finger wave, or a neck bobbing from side to side, or those raised eyebrows , or I hear any feminist keywords…… she immediately ceases to exist.

Solved.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[narwhalParticipant]

I’m going to disagree slightly on two point.

I don’t think that women want you to hit back, at least not as there first option. They’re hoping that you feel like you can’t. They want you to feel helpless, tearing down your confidence and self esteem. Then they can either get you to do what they want, or they throw you out with the trash because you aren’t a ‘real man’.

If you do hit back though, it’s still a win most of the time. They can still challenge your manhood and make you feel helpless after the law comes after you.

Second point, agreed that not hitting hurts them more, but that’s not the reason you do it. You do it because that’s the best response for you in most cases. You make sure she knows that it is not allowed and will not be tolerated. You don’t give her any control over you, and let her know that it won’t work with you (if you even let her hang around after that). Whether or not she is hurt by that or whatever is irrelevant to me.

Ok. Then do it.

[Anonymous 1]

Keymaster wrote:

But even Bill Burr will correct that s~~~ in front of an audience.

Always amazes me how you hear the women laugh the loudest – they know its SO f~~~ing true.

Anonymous wrote:

the red bill rage

The typo from my first post suddenly seems ever fitting ha.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

narwhal wrote:

I don’t think that women want you to hit back, at least not as there first option. They’re hoping that you feel like you can’t. They want you to feel helpless, tearing down your confidence and self esteem. Then they can either get you to do what they want, or they throw you out with the trash because you aren’t a ‘real man’.

On a second thought I agree. They want to humiliate you and show who has all the power
but if you respond – that’s an added bonus – you’ve just opened the door to humiliation of the highest degree and they will gladly try to take it

Also, if you didn’t know – always remember that even holding doors, punching drywall, holding wrists, pushing and shoving, making threats – if you admit to any of this – prosecution will use it against you as a proof of assault. If you ever get arrested – don’t try to explain away your actions – remain silent and give them nothing. If there is no proof of assault taking place – chances are the case will be dismissed.

Even if there is no evidence of bodily harm – police will try to deceive you into making a statement on a record. They’ll lie to you and tell you: “We believe you have done nothing wrong, we just want to hear your side of the story” – don’t fall for it. All they want – is your admission of guilt by admitting to anything that can be construed as assault (see above) so prosecution has something to keep the case going. Zip it and give them nothing and the judge will dismiss the case. Thank me later

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Author]

Posts