A Fat Girl I Can Stand to Look At!

[RoyDalParticipant]

(Click on the link and scroll down. I can’t lift the image. -RD)

Sports Illustrated model responds to weight criticism
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2016/02/24/sports-illustrated-model-responds-to-weight-criticism/

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[The Long WalkParticipant 1282]

If only all the fat girls in my area were as ‘fat’ as she is..

[SpacemonkeyParticipant 1481]

No t~~~! Fat girls with no t~~~ are an abomination, a crime against nature!!

“Long is the way and hard, that out of Hell leads up to light.”

[Anonymous 42]

Ask her to stand up and touch her knees and I’m betting you’ll see the silhouette of a pear with sagging t~~~! She’s hovering the wall and posing in a way to hide it!
May I suggest a 13th century rack with a lever extension for more pull? She’ll be thin and TALL just the way they like it!
MG-Tower knows how to give em what they want!

[hellraiderParticipant 2837]

That girl isnt fat, she’s normal.

Women, by evolution are supossed to have some body fat.
Seeing ribs and pelvic bones in women is not normal, it never was, if you look at pictures of female models of the 1950’s 1960’s era you see that they are a lot more attractive than the anorectic, big silicone t~~~ that advertising tries to promote.

You see advertising promoting more and more extreme shapes in the human body.
Hell, Sean connery won fitness competitions.
Compare his shape then with monstruous, steroid fueled apes like the rock or the rest of the nearderthals in tv.

[experiencedParticipant]

THIS:
https://tribwpix.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/screen-shot-2015-02-04-at-3-41-27-pm.png

NOT THIS:
http://static3.businessinsider.com/image/54d29f0a6da8113626d78859-480/ashley-graham-plus-sized-model.png

http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/default/files/styles/article_large/hash/25/8f/258f8d310880a0444f0e4b24514eea6b.jpg?itok=jCvsHWP9

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/02/04/255586C300000578-0-image-m-85_1423067226019.jpg

http://starcasm.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Ashley-Graham-Swimsuits-For-All-Sports-Illustrated-490×555.jpg

http://www.etonline.com/news/2015/02/24129556/640_curvesinbikinis_swimsuitsforall.jpg

https://tribwpix.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/screen-shot-2015-02-04-at-3-41-27-pm.png
I remember more attractive cheese in ropes as a kid

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[experiencedParticipant]

THE “THIS” was supposed to be:

http://i.usatoday.net/communitymanager/_photos/lifeline-live/2011/02/15/sicovergirlx-large.jpg

That’s right, a cover model for Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue should cause any Man within 10 feet to spontaneously ejaculate in her general direction verses pause for recalibrating to massive femalely mass.

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[hellraiderParticipant 2837]

yup, experienced, the plus size model is just a fat chick.

A little fat is ok, 10cm of fat around her hips IS NOT.

[HitmanParticipant]

she is teetering on the edge ..
i prefer to see thin,young women..

i see she is attractive in the face..not a bad body type..
but she could lose 25 or 30 lbs. for sure ..in my book . a few drinks to get the “beer goggles ” would fix it ONE time though …heh heh heh ….

[jack reacherParticipant 751]

I don’t think we need to be parroting the feminist sjw talking point of “beautiful at any size”

Rather than promote the abilities of fat women in areas other than looks, feminists still focus on external appearance. They don’t say, she may be fat but she is a math genius, or a great mother, or any other f~~~ing thing except something to do with looks.

Because at the end of the day, it is women who are the ones doing the objectification. They are the ones obsessed about looks. And like all women they refuse to acknowledge their accountability in this. And deep down in their core, women realize that despite all the equality rhetoric, deep down they realize ALL they have to offer is their looks. They recognize in their core that beyond looks, they are essentially worthless.

They are s~~~ mothers – just look at their support for abortion, look at the declining birth rates, look at them destroy children in divorces and single mother households. Look at them gloat over the declining educational success rates of boys and young men in the west.

The so called compassionate and care giving identity is nothing but a lie that society desperately needed to believe in because it needed to think the being responsible for taking care of the family while the man was out getting killed in a hunt or battle, was actually a decent person. But we know that was wishful thinking. If anyone is going to take a bullet for you, it will be a man. How is that for women are the “more compassionate and care giving sex” for you?

They have had decades of affirmative action and the vote, yet they still are not performing in positions of power where skill and individual talent are measured. They are essentially useless. They will be tourists in male dominated fields. They will get in, realizing there was no impediments to them being there, but them staying in the field depends on endurance and talent. So they quit after a few years, but still expect the respect that comes to men who have stayed in the field and put in the long hours, hard work, made the personal and physical sacrifices.

[Author]

Posts