4 REASONS WHY WOMEN CANNOT AND SHOULD NOT LEAD

1. It is unnatural

The law of the leader is eternal. He is the most charismatic, the wisest or the strongest of a group, not the one that feels the most or wants to live in a carefree bubble. The law of the jungle, applied in its rawest form, chews a lone woman and spits her out.

The handful of women that led successfully in the past, such as Queen Victoria, Joan of Arc or Boudicca for the most famous, always had an army of men and a government of men to reach their goals. It was composed of male ministers, male officers, and male soldiers only. Imagine what would have been the outcome if leading an army of women.

Women do not want to lead! This is not in their nature. They want to be led. It is what defines their attraction to men. It is more out of spite and in a thirst for revenge that they seek power. Revenge on failed relationship, professional failure, personal issues… the whole world governed by men is their nemesis and must be shown that she can do it just as good as any man.

2. It is unattractive

A feminine and fragile, and therefore attractive, woman seeking power cannot be taken seriously as a leader. A leader is someone that shows more than the others. More mettle, more courage, more intelligence or more grit. Women that desire to inspire trust from weaker men (voters, subordinates, white knights, etc) have to consciously become more masculine (short hair, male clothing and masculine behavior), in order to mimic the masculine attributes that compose the archetype of the leader.

In essence, whereas power held by men is an aphrodisiac for women, it as the opposite effect on attractiveness when women hold power. Feminine attractiveness to men on the psychological level can be narrowed down to: femininity, obedience, loyalty and submission.

Let’s say that your boss is attractive. You want to f~~~ your boss because she is a physically attractive woman. She could be flipping burgers for all you care. The position occupied is irrelevant on the pure physical aspect. But you also want to f~~~ her for the pleasure of having submitted her abstract position of authority to your own, physical authority and the strength of your masculinity.

Just like the warrior of the tribe challenges the chief and prevails, having triumphed using the universal expression of power, dominance through physical strength, makes one the new guy in charge. Women f~~~ men of power in the hope of gaining access to their resources, protection, or secured environment. Men f~~~ women of power to prove a point and assert their authority over them.

3. It is dangerous

Women are governed by their emotions. People that need safe spaces are not able to be leaders. Feminists that demand power or claim that they have it are delusional. They are empowered if they are in a secluded room, where the exterior world and its dangers cannot reach them and confront them.

Female soldiers in elite corps (or willing to be) crack under pressure, being mentally and physically weaker than men. Even if they are given a favorable treatment, they cannot cope. When they access power, it is through bureaucracy and the enforcement of a political agenda, not through excellence. They also cannot be put on the battlefield as they are a liability for their colleagues and a prize if the enemy captures them.

Physical and mental tests of resistance are the absolute base on selecting future leaders. Not picking the best of the best is illogical and puts lives in danger. In professions that require calm under extreme pressure and peak physical capability, such as firefighter, their level is cruelly insufficient.

4. It is counterproductive

Focused on leading or exercising a position a power, women sacrifice their own happiness and their loved ones’, which can be achieved through a stable relationship focusing on nurturing and raising children. Women possessing any level of power are seldom happy. The distrust they inspire among men creates a void around them which turns into a vicious circle of anger and bitterness, hindering their capacity to think rationally and to reach goals

It is not easy to lead. That is part of the gig. Trials and failure are constant and keeping calm when facing adversity is what makes a chief. Women simply do not have what it takes and it is normal. What is not is that what visibly does not work is enforced to satisfy a small number of mad individuals.

Women are proven to be less effective leaders than men. They create resentment among their male subordinates as they are being dominated by an individual that is physically far weaker than them. It is a deep, visceral feeling that cannot be repressed. The results are less motivation to reach higher results for this individual and distrust.