28 reason to HAVE a feminist marraige–F~~~ YOU!

I tried to read it, but I just cant get very far.

Arogance. Pure f~~~ing arogance.

PistolPete wrote:

I really have to wonder who the audience is that this is aimed at?

First you would have to know what bulls~~~ she’s selling to know the intended audience.

She’s not really pushing or selling a marriage contract – because she can’t. No woman can give a man a good reason to sign a marriage contract, and no man should even sign a marriage contract with a bitch who HATES him enough to actually let him go through with it.

She’s also the “DIVORCE Editor”.

Thats’ why she recommends a “feminist marriage” with garbage advice, so that it will end in divorce like any person with any iota of common sense can predict with absolute certainty. She should have just called it “28 ways for colossal idiots to give a feminist your house, cars, sanity and retirement fund.”

She’s trying to brainwash pathetic “male” readers.
It’s addressed to them specifically.

“Want to be a stay-at-home dad while your wife brings home the bacon? Go for it.”

That’s like the best way to ruin a marriage, a sex life and everyone knows it (link above). Her job is to fail at marriage and she gave 28 excellent ways to do it.

The C~~~ington Post are intentional failures.

PistolPete wrote:

If you are a merchant and there is no market then MAKE a market!

Right on. The whole “starter husband” concept is just disgusting. They create and cultivate their own failures. One minute it’s “have a feminist marriage”….. and then it’s “I wish my husband were the love of my life” and she resents the s~~~ out of him because she hasn’t been properly bent over and f~~~ed in years.

Cultivate their own failures. Deliberately.
“The Case For The Starter Marriage”.

F~~~ing worthless trash.

—

Whenever women pretend to talk about “marriage”, get her to talk about how she feels about divorce. Because that’s what she’s really after. Let her sit across from you and giggle about “starter husbands” and then get up and leave her there, because any woman who thinks divorce is acceptable is simply NOT MARRIAGEABLE right out of the gate.

Her vows are worthless and they reveal it immediately.

Guys, she got you right in the first paragraph. She is defining a feminist marriage as one where the two partners treat each other as equals. That should be called a marriage. Why would you marry someone you don’t see as an equal? What f~~~ing Neanderthals are she excluding?

The real reason why this is a fail is because a man will almost always treat a woman as an equal. But what woman actually thinks that a man is her equal? Which woman will climb off the pedestal all by herself and bring herself down to a man’s level? Because that’s what it requires to have a “feminist” marriage: A marriage where an arrogant self-entitled bitch actually lowers herself to the level of a man.

Don’t hold your breath waiting for that to happen.

Keymaster wrote:

It’s a lie. She’s lying to herself and the reader. That doesn’t exist, and by the C~~~ington Posts own admission, it make vaginas dry up too.

That’s really the biggest paradox with dating today. I don’t have any problem treating someone as my equal. Hell, I’m not ALL that, who is? But being an equal means equal accountability. And women don’t want to be an equal to a man when accountability is involved. AND, it causes vaginal dryness.

Women don’t want what they say they want. What they SAY that want makes sense, what they REALLY want doesn’t. But instead of admitting that they aren’t logical, they just pout like a brat when you point out the paradox. Which isn’t very logical. But don’t tell her that….

Anonymous wrote:

I tried to read it, but I just cant get very far.

Arogance. Pure f~~~ing arogance.

“Pride before destruction and a haughty spirit before the fall.”
Replace fall with wall.

narwhal wrote:

How the hell do you define equal in a marriage anyway?

You can’t it’s a crap lie, and they don’t even believe it themselves.

Like a “50/50 relationship”.
Sounds good, right? But she’s lying her ass off.

… and lying is the most fun a woman can have without taking her clothes off.

She presents you with 2 controlled choices and asks you to choose – to make it look like its’ YOUR idea. Tell her you don’t want either ( and you would rather do X ) and you’ll see what kind of “equal” 50/50 relations~~~ you’re in.

• ATTRACTION is not a choice and everyone knows it.
• Equality is a bulls~~~ feminist FRAUD Pretense and everyone knows it.

But the C~~~ington Post’s divorce editor thinks she can persuade hideous feminist readers that “males” can be shown a list of 28 non-existent “benefits” of signing a marriage contract to “feminist” under the guise of “equality” – while saying it “PAYS?”

Another bong hit anyone?

“28 Reasons It Pays To Have A Feminist Marriage!”

“It will never pay. It ONLY costs. Marriage is for gays. None of your retarded 28 items “pay”. Not even ONE. “

“#28. Your partner understands why you felt compelled to go to the Women’s March. Hell, they probably joined you and wore a “this is what a feminist looks like” shirt. It doesn’t get any sexier than that. “

“The Bitter Bitch March wasn’t “sexy”. It was you mentally sick feminists finally getting dumped by the boyfriend America you couldn’t keep f~~~ing, ….. and your reaction to your own cratering SMV and being discarded like childless Ashley Judd. We have seen your idea of “sexy” and we would rather drink bleach.”

How about just ONE reason to not sign a marriage contract of any kind?

AWALT.

What a load of total s~~~e!

Bulls~~~ beyond belief, it’s meaningless yet dangerous to those blue pillers that swallow every word.

Marriage by definition should have meant equality and respect, love, honour. Sickness and in health etc etc.

But it’s not it’s a croc of s~~~.

What was that expression?

‘What’s the simularity between marriage and a septic tank? Both are so full of s~~~ it’s only a matter of time before the lid blows off!’

F~~~ing marriage should be made illegal and a total abuse of human rights. Aka men’s rights!