14th February: “a constructive criticism to the female condition” by TIMI

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Women who hate women – “a constructive criticism to the female condition” / Donne che odiano le donne – 10a puntata – “critica costruttiva alla condizione femminile”

Excerpt:

The female is completely egocentric, trapped inside herself, incapable of empathizing or identifying with others, or love, friendship, affection of tenderness. She is a completely isolated unit, incapable of rapport with anyone. Her responses are entirely visceral, not cerebral; her intelligence is a mere tool in the services of her drives and needs; she is incapable of mental passion, mental interaction; she can’t relate to anything other than his own physical sensations. She is a half-dead, unresponsive lump, incapable of giving or receiving pleasure or happiness; consequently, she is at best an utter bore, an inoffensive blob, since only those capable of absorption in others can be charming. She is trapped in a twilight zone halfway between humans and apes, and is far worse off than the apes because, unlike the apes, she is capable of a large array of negative feelings — hate, jealousy, contempt, disgust, guilt, shame, doubt — and moreover, she is aware of what she is and what she isn’t.

Although completely physical, the female is unfit even for sexual service. Even assuming mechanical proficiency, which few women have, she is, first of all, incapable of zestfully, lustfully, tearing off a piece, but instead is eaten up with guilt, shame, fear and insecurity, feelings rooted in female nature, which the most enlightened training can only minimize; second, the physical feeling she attains is next to nothing; and third, she is not empathizing with her partner, but is obsessed with how she’s doing, turning in an A performance, doing a good plumbing job. To call a woman an animal is to flatter her; she’s a machine, a walking fleshlight. It’s often said that women use men. Use them for what? Surely not pleasure, but money.

Eaten up with guilt, shame, fears and insecurities and obtaining, if she’s lucky, a barely perceptible physical feeling, the female is, nonetheless, obsessed with money and status; she’ll swim through a river of snot, wade nostril-deep through a mile of vomit, if she thinks there’ll be a an high..-status man awaiting her. She’ll f~~~ a man she despises, any snaggle-toothed slob, and furthermore, she’ll be paid for it. Why? Relieving physical tension isn’t the answer, as masturbation suffices for that. It’s not ego satisfaction; that doesn’t explain female teacher f~~~ing underage male students.

Completely egocentric, unable to relate, empathize or identify, and filled with a vast, pervasive, diffuse sexuality, the female is pyschically passive. She hates her passivity, so she projects it onto men, defines shopping as active, then sets out to prove that she is (prove that she is a Woman’). Her main means of attempting to prove it is shopping (Big Woman with a Big Walletbuying Everything She Wants). Since she’s attempting to prove an error, she mustprove’ it again and again. Shopping, then, is a desperate compulsive, attempt to prove she’s not passive, not a man; but she is passive and does want to be a man.

Being an incomplete man, the female spends her life attempting to complete herself, to become a man. She attempts to do this by constantly seeking out, shopping with and trying to live through an fuse with the man, and by claiming as her own all manly characteristics — emotional strength and independence, forcefulness, dynamism, decisiveness, coolness, objectivity, assertiveness, courage, integrity, vitality, intensity, depth of character, grooviness, etc — and projecting onto men all female traits — vanity, frivolity, triviality, weakness, etc. It should be said, though, that the female has one glaring area of superiority over the man — public relations. (She has done a brilliant job of convincing millions of men that females are men and men are females). The female claim that men find fulfillment through money and sexuality reflects what females think they’d find fulfilling if they were men.

See?
This isn’t “misogyny”: that’s a FEMINIST text, branded as “a constructive criticism of the male condition” by a FEMINIST Italian library, I just only switched “men” and “women”…

😀

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[CarnageParticipant 22113]

Meehhh, men, women, all the same, people are c~~~s period.

Kill them first and dont look back.

To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

[UntamedParticipant]

Eric Lauder wrote:

See?
This isn’t “misogyny”: that’s a FEMINIST text, branded as “a constructive criticism of the male condition” by a FEMINIST Italian library, I just only switched “men” and “women”…

I had a hunch you’d done that, lol.
I understand now why weemins belittle men in their toilet-paper articles, it’s so damn funny, especially because it’s pseudo-science bulls~~~.

Thank you. I’d like to see more of the same, Eric Lauder.

I may start posting such garbage myself, while we’re having fun being hated on…

Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Untamed wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

See?This isn’t “misogyny”: that’s a FEMINIST text, branded as “a constructive criticism of the male condition” by a FEMINIST Italian library, I just only switched “men” and “women”…

I had a hunch you’d done that, lol.I understand now why weemins belittle men in their toilet-paper articles, it’s so damn funny, especially because it’s pseudo-science bulls~~~.
Thank you. I’d like to see more of the same, Eric Lauder.
I may start posting such garbage myself, while we’re having fun being hated on…

If you cite the feminist paper you’re referring to, then you can say pretty much everything, no censorship’s gonna happening, ever.
Hatred by women, misandry, is socially accepted, therefore if you cite the misandrous original paper nobody is gonna saying “that’s wrong” because “a woman said so, so it must be smart, constructive, empathetic”, at worst they’ll say “oh, it’s just irony! It’s a joke!”.

So there’s now a site, with more than 500 visitors each day (the record is well over 1,000), writing “#killallwomen” and nobody’s gonna arguing against it, because there’s a link to a feminist having an institutional role and using “#killallmen” without punishments, I just switched “men” and “women”, that’s equality nothing more.

In other words:

“What’s good for the goose is good for the gander”

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[UntamedParticipant]

Eric Lauder wrote:

Untamed wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

See?This isn’t “misogyny”: that’s a FEMINIST text, branded as “a constructive criticism of the male condition” by a FEMINIST Italian library, I just only switched “men” and “women”…

I had a hunch you’d done that, lol.I understand now why weemins belittle men in their toilet-paper articles, it’s so damn funny, especially because it’s pseudo-science bulls~~~.Thank you. I’d like to see more of the same, Eric Lauder.I may start posting such garbage myself, while we’re having fun being hated on…

If you cite the feminist paper you’re referring to, then you can say pretty much everything, no censorship’s gonna happening, ever.Hatred by women, misandry, is socially accepted, therefore if you cite the misandrous original paper nobody is gonna saying “that’s wrong” because “a woman said so, so it must be smart, constructive, empathetic”, at worst they’ll say “oh, it’s just irony! It’s a joke!”.
So there’s now a site, with more than 500 visitors each day (the record is well over 1,000), writing “#killallwomen” and nobody’s gonna arguing against it, because there’s a link to a feminist having an institutional role and using “#killallmen” without punishments, I just switched “men” and “women”, that’s equality nothing more.
In other words:
“What’s good for the goose is good for the gander”

Nice.
Thanks for the info

Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Untamed wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

Untamed wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

See?This isn’t “misogyny”: that’s a FEMINIST text, branded as “a constructive criticism of the male condition” by a FEMINIST Italian library, I just only switched “men” and “women”…

I had a hunch you’d done that, lol.I understand now why weemins belittle men in their toilet-paper articles, it’s so damn funny, especially because it’s pseudo-science bulls~~~.Thank you. I’d like to see more of the same, Eric Lauder.I may start posting such garbage myself, while we’re having fun being hated on…

If you cite the feminist paper you’re referring to, then you can say pretty much everything, no censorship’s gonna happening, ever.Hatred by women, misandry, is socially accepted, therefore if you cite the misandrous original paper nobody is gonna saying “that’s wrong” because “a woman said so, so it must be smart, constructive, empathetic”, at worst they’ll say “oh, it’s just irony! It’s a joke!”.So there’s now a site, with more than 500 visitors each day (the record is well over 1,000), writing “#killallwomen” and nobody’s gonna arguing against it, because there’s a link to a feminist having an institutional role and using “#killallmen” without punishments, I just switched “men” and “women”, that’s equality nothing more.In other words:“What’s good for the goose is good for the gander”

Nice.Thanks for the info <i class=”far fa-grin fa-2x”></i>

Don’t forget to add the link to the feminist paper, or they’ll kill you.

I have just checked the stats, Italy and USA are head-to-head: it’s actually 393 visitors form Italy and 362 from USA, but since in USA the actual hour 6-9 back, odds are that USA is gonna winning the race.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[UntamedParticipant]

Eric Lauder wrote:

Don’t forget to add the link to the feminist paper, or they’ll kill you.

Check, 10-4

Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!

[Author]

Posts