10 MOST CRUEL PUNISHMENTS FOR CHEATING

Punishment in the rest of the world including latin america in certain cases death.

Punishment in the united states getting to keep the house and car.

I can see why those nations have had low divorce rates in the past especially once you are put in a fake elephant or dismembered and eaten for cheating.

Consider this: For all the horror and severity of these punishments for cheating, women in these countries still cheat. What does that tell you?

AWALT.

Deadly Raver wrote:

Shoved inside of a fake elephant and used as a f~~~ toy. I have to admit, I did NOT see that coming.

Did you ever see Baz Luhrmann’s “Moulin Rouge”? The prostitute’s boudoir was a giant elephant.

As for why female cheating is dealt with so harshly, it’s the same reason that promiscuous women are slut shamed… because the only real value a woman represents to a man is her ability to reproduce. In exchange for exclusive access to this ability, a man provides and protects her. His right to her sex and reproductive ability is literally worth her life and if the one is stolen from him, the other was rightfully denied to her.

This is why womens’ liberation bound sexual freedom with economic freedom. Women didn’t just want the “right to work”, they wanted material control over their own lives AND the right to grant access to their sex and reproductive capacity to whomever they chose… and to revoke that access as they pleased, as well.

They got the economic freedom and the sexual freedom… but they never bothered to take on the responsibility that goes with them, thus the situation we find ourselves in now.

“cruel”

Brutal and inhuman. I don’t like brutality, whosoever the victim is, male or female. They didn’t know that women were hypergamous. Knowledge is power really. Had they known that, there would have been no need to ‘punish’ them.

Keymaster wrote:

Punish her for it? Let the other guy KEEP her!

Done.

That really is your only play. on 2 ocassions i’ve had to hold my tongue and slip out the back door, quietly. It’s the fastest way to break any emotional attachment and allows you to keep your dignity intact (plus silence sends its own special message).

One ex broke up with me the day after telling me she loved me, and was sharing pictures with her new fella at the zoo by the weekend. The shock was indescribable.

8 months down the line and i found out he’s in prison for kicking the living s~~~ out of her, and she has a new drug dealing, boyfriend.

Woman have a knack for seeking out their own justice.

Keymaster wrote:

This is why western men are more advanced in their (our) knowledge of women – and dare I say “more evolved”……. It also explains why we sometimes see these “controlling women” monsters appear in the forums and have to kick them out.

They have this idea in their heads that women need to be dominated and controlled into submission, using fear (or even violence) confining them to the kitchen etc.. We have examples of this s~~~ in print in the litter box forum. “You stupid feminist men” they say and that got them kicked out.

Well f~~~ you, we say. You don’t know anything about WOMEN.

This is exactly the mentality I have when I over-hear people in general, talking about ‘teaching their wives a lesson’.

When I was working in a local store, there was a guy (land broker) who would cheat whenever his wife went to visit her parents with their children. A new woman on his bike every time… we would go like “How does this guy do it?”

The same guy would brag how he ‘taught his wife a lesson’ by beating her just because she spent some extra time talking to other men in the neighborhood… even regular people like the milkman, etc. I was always disgusted by him. I was even like “I wish she cheats on you; you do that to her all the time.”

Controlling women is inhuman… but in any case, it will only lead to more provocation… provocation that will give rise to feminist power.. and we all know what happens when the wrong type of feminists gain power.

The only real type of feminist women welfare workers I could stand are those do not have political agendas and work for ‘actual issues’ in places where it is ‘actually needed’.. people like her: