Search Results for 'Trump'

[Bestieboy666Participant]

“”Women speak behind your back, a lot?””
After driving a cab for 24 years I can assure you, you’re not f~~~ing kidding. And I hear stuff unbelievably sexist from women that makes Trump’s comment deserve a sainthood.

Women are so bad, if they changed the law so I kept the house, I still wouldn't marry one. I'd rather be homeless.

[MonkeyMindParticipant]

It’s the female version of locker room talk. This is why i couldn’t take the Trump Pussy Grabbing comment seriously.

Women are way worse than men for talking s~~~ when you get a group of them together.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

Bestieboy666 wrote:

Well I can’t blame him ILA.
I haven’t been back from work long and the BBC & Sky News can’t stop bashing him. Sky News have even taken it upon themselves to have a UK poll to see if they think Trump will be a good president. 52% said no, 30% yes, 18% don’t know. What a load of complete bollocks. They didn’t ask me. They also had a reporter sent to stir the pot in China, telling the Chinese trade guy that Trump will add huge tariffs to your trade deals. Who the hell do these c~~~s think they are. I’m still listening to the s~~~ from Brexit and now its twofold.
It has not only showed us how mindless the liberal drones are but how evil the minds at the top are. They would happily destroy nations to satisfy their own agendas.

Wait until they get the French and German votes through.

They won’t know who to fk over then.

[Bestieboy666Participant]

Well I can’t blame him ILA.
I haven’t been back from work long and the BBC & Sky News can’t stop bashing him. Sky News have even taken it upon themselves to have a UK poll to see if they think Trump will be a good president. 52% said no, 30% yes, 18% don’t know. What a load of complete bollocks. They didn’t ask me. They also had a reporter sent to stir the pot in China, telling the Chinese trade guy that Trump will add huge tariffs to your trade deals. Who the hell do these c~~~s think they are. I’m still listening to the s~~~ from Brexit and now its twofold.
It has not only showed us how mindless the liberal drones are but how evil the minds at the top are. They would happily destroy nations to satisfy their own agendas.

Women are so bad, if they changed the law so I kept the house, I still wouldn't marry one. I'd rather be homeless.

[Mr. ManParticipant]

This week I spent four days on a road trip in my home state. And in town after town after town, I saw nothing…NOTHING but Trump/Pence signs. Thousands of them.

And do you want to know how many Hillary signs I saw?

One.

[BadgerParticipant]

Samsquanch wrote:

Saw this on youtube today and this makes me feel better about Russia/US relations.

That was a worry that I had about Hillary in that she might think she was going to get tough with Putin. He is not the kind of guy she is going to intimidate. Trump and Putin both seem to understand power and seem to have a better relationship toward one another. That might change after Trump takes office, but I suspect Hillary was spoiling for a fight.

https://apnews.com/22b62277e34b47008a760c660084968a

So all you sjws can go fk.

http://edition.cnn.com/election/results

[Anonymous]

Feminism has been on a steady glide upward for generations. We have umpteen woman’s studies professors and all the soft science staff are part of the feminist apparatus. Removing this cancer on our schools will not be achievable in a generation. But perhaps with Trump we can start.

The Republican party has shown time and again that they are friendly to men’s groups. They value the men’s vote and will listen to our requests. The Dem’s ignored men at their peril.

If we can just get some traction on men’s health issues that would be great dealing with prostate cancer, homelessness and suicide.

If they listen to us, for the first time in 50 years the feminists will not own the narrative.

Remember, Trump is still under investigation due to likely false sexual misconduct charges, he’s p~~~ed at feminist sjw’s.

Greetings gents. A friend of mine is a tour guide and loves what he does. He told me a few months back that he was offered the chance to buy the tour guide company. His wife disagreed saying too risky and too much time away from the kids. I responded with… you’ve been doing this for 8 years, it’s an already established company with steady customers and being the boss you could spend more time at home if you please. Apparently his bitch wife didn’t want to hear it and eventually gave him this ultimatum…… Not buying this company is cheaper than divorce.

See boys just another c~~~ waving the divorce card holding a man back from succeeding. A month ago a friend of his bought the company insted and he regrets the missed opportunity. Btw the new owner is not married. Cheers boys and cheers to Trump!!!!

Peace is > piece.

[TriviumParticipant]

Hah, all the best wallets are trump voters… they’re not going to ditch their wallet unless they find a new one no matter what their stupid twitter says. Women have no spine unless they have a backup plan and a backup plan is going to be hard to come by since only the ‘free s~~~ army’ votes Clinton.

"Listen to all, Follow none"

[Total LeeParticipant]

Dirty hippies pushed voters to Nixon like SJWs pushed voters to Trump. Even women are sick to death of them.

[FrostByteParticipant]

Trump WON. When is she leaving? I’m line with 58 million people who want to drive her to the airport.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[SolidusXParticipant]

The_Young wrote:

What was supposed to be a harmless Facebook debate about Trump vs Hilary, and she turned it against me because I’m a white man. This is my first time standing up for myself where I truly felt attacked as a white man.

I had the same damn silly thing happen to me, a few of my FB female friends started trashing me because I was happy Trump won. They turned into feminazi warriors on a drop of a dime and started slurring out uneducated nonsense. And of course some feminazi native chick was like native pride this white people are the devil trump is the devil blah blah blah…. Block Block Block.

And yes brothers I am still stuck on FB like the tool I am… though I now mostly only use it for looking up fun events and keeping in touch with long distance friends. My block list is huge!

Knowledge is power..... Don't waste your brain on bullshit

[Dark KenshiParticipant]

Uintatherium wrote:

Bombing them will only radicalize more Muslims. It’s like chopping the heads off a hydra.

The key to defeating radical Islam is this: Defense, Not Offense

In the past, I have supported Trump’s temporary ban on Muslim immigration. I stand by that.

We tried blowing them up under Bush and Obama. This only led to greater troubles. We need end offensive tactics. Instead, we need to rely on hardcore defensive tactics.

This transition will be hard becasue Lockheed Martin and big oil benefit from constant war, but defense will be better for the American people.

Yep, defense is ALWAYS better, brother. But, a preemptive strike sometimes is the best defense of it all. I don’t know if you are a GI, or if you are on other branches, but the thing is: It is WAY harder to fight an irregular war (and by irregular I mean not “common” wars, with two armies in an open battlefield). Irregular wars are f~~~ed up, because it is f~~~ing hard to tell who is a threat and who is not. Those goat f~~~ers can go into hiding, drop their weapons at a garbage bin, and pass as a “law abiding citizen” in a heart beat, just to shoot you in the back after you checked them, like the Green Weenie learned in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The ban is just a start, but after the ban is in place, that will p~~~ them off, way more. Obama bombed the s~~~ out of Assad, not DAESH. Obama WAS FUNDING THE DAESH, NOT FIGHTING THEM. Putin is the one bombing the crap out of them, and I am damn sure that Trump should (and will) do the same.

Thre is no way to defend against them. Look at how many things were put in action, like the Patriot Act under Obama’s, and not even a single s~~~ has been averted in his administration…

"Young was I once, I walked alone, and bewildered seemed in the way; then I found me another and rich I thought me, for man is the joy of man." Odin, Hàvamàl, stanza 47.

[Anonymous]

My Sister a while back said she didnt trust hillary further than she could throw her.I didnt ask why.(I dont talk politics with Family)I thought that was interesting, and I thought she cant be the only one.
Trumps winning didnt suprise me at all.Quiet people dont get noticed till election day!

[FrostByteParticipant]

These people never did think for themselves. They guzzled the kool-aid. Trump represents the men who have been s~~~ on for too long. Like stealthy said he represents the men who built this country. Those men, and their female supporters who get it, came out in record number, not screaming or chanting but doing what they always did “taking action” and act they did. The man who said f~~~ you to political correctness, f~~~ you to the parasites, f~~~ you to feminists, f~~~ you mangina feminist orbiters, f~~~ you lazy liberal cry babies, that’s the man who won.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

“The female vote” is exactly what they/feminists/women wanted and it’s exactly what they got. They just weren’t counting on OTHER WOMEN voting against them.

The thing I noticed about all of this is how Clintards are so shocked and stunned that other women had a BIG conflicting opinion. It’s as if they thought “the sisterhood” is all they needed. “They are all female, so they are definitely gonna be with us”.

( “I’m with HER” and all of that. )

Perhaps that’s “the woman card” Trump was speaking about. She was appealing to “women”, and forgot that women are PEOPLE too.

Voting booths didn’t have a “NOT Hilary” button. So right off the bat it’s assumed (in this article) that they were “FOR Trump”. But they are forced to accept that being “for Trump” was just as much about “NOT Clinton”.

An old married PA couple interviewed had the husband voting for Clinton, and the old lady was for Trump. When asked “aren’t you voting for the first female president?” she snapped “NO!!”.

They actually cancelled each other’s vote(!!) – in a very endearing way.

Her response was clearly “NOT Clinton”.

The newsman should have just left the “woman card” out of the question altogether. He was trying to play it too – right into her face. A Clinton supporter himself(?) treating her like she’s a sheeple who didn’t put any thought into it. And she rejected it. Hard.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[UintatheriumParticipant]

Bombing them will only radicalize more Muslims. It’s like chopping the heads off a hydra.

The key to defeating radical Islam is this: Defense, Not Offense

In the past, I have supported Trump’s temporary ban on Muslim immigration. I stand by that.

We tried blowing them up under Bush and Obama. This only led to greater troubles. We need end offensive tactics. Instead, we need to rely on hardcore defensive tactics.

This transition will be hard becasue Lockheed Martin and big oil benefit from constant war, but defense will be better for the American people.

MGTOW: because you can (and should) say anything about a woman as long as she isn't within earshot

Thought this was a nice laugh…

http://www.msn.com/en-ca/lifestyle/smart-living/forget-angry-white-men-%E2%80%93-white-women-pushed-trump-to-victory/ar-AAk878p?li=AAggNb9&ocid=mailsignout

Knowledge is power..... Don't waste your brain on bullshit