Search Results for 'Trump'

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant]

Branched off wrote:

Money gives one agency in the world.

Women have very little natural agency -naturally they can’t get what they want easily. If they want something doing, they need a man to do it for them -like fix the bathroom. Women spend all their energies trying to secure agency -this is why they marry men they can control through granting and withholding sex, this is why they collect friend zones. Money however trumps all these things. Money grants agency without having to manipulate men. Men will do stuff or provide stuff instantly when offered enough money.

Naturally women are obsessed with money. It is the ultimate way of getting what you want with no effort.

Everyone knows that if you want to attract a woman you must learn to act like you have money. What fewer realise is that if you want to get rid of one act just like you do not. This works like magic. It is pussy repellent in a bottle and leaves you smiling all the way to the bank.

Money is a form of potential.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Y_Participant]

It’sallbs wrote:

Forget abut the here today gone tomorrow politicians.
Forget about whether the presii
dent is Democrat or Republican.Look at what is always there, you are caught in the matrix all of you stop voting it’s pointless.

Yes it’s a pork train no doubt about that.

Just Trump getting one back (possibly) on the budget to fund his wall.

[It’sallbsParticipant]

Forget abut the here today gone tomorrow politicians.
Forget about whether the presii
dent is Democrat or Republican.Look at what is always there, you are caught in the matrix all of you stop voting it’s pointless.

Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. (Matthew 7:15)

Stop buying into Trump.

Iraq
Syria
Lybia
Lebanon
Iran
North Korea

Look at what was written by the project for the new american century and then look at who the members of the think tank were and what positions they then held in subsequent governments whilst military action occurred.

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[Branched offParticipant]

Money gives one agency in the world.

Women have very little natural agency -naturally they can’t get what they want easily. If they want something doing, they need a man to do it for them -like fix the bathroom. Women spend all their energies trying to secure agency -this is why they marry men they can control through granting and withholding sex, this is why they collect friend zones. Money however trumps all these things. Money grants agency without having to manipulate men. Men will do stuff or provide stuff instantly when offered enough money.

Naturally women are obsessed with money. It is the ultimate way of getting what you want with no effort.

Everyone knows that if you want to attract a woman you must learn to act like you have money. What fewer realise is that if you want to get rid of one act just like you do not. This works like magic. It is pussy repellent in a bottle and leaves you smiling all the way to the bank.

A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own

[Y_Participant]

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

Thanks for post. didn’t know he invoked that, or that that is what it allows him to do. Why Bush couldn’t have done it, well, now we know why.

Regardless of what people think of him (including myself), Trump is a very clever man – let no one doubt that.

Anonymous wrote:

Spending more than you make is not a “budget” it’s irresponsible debt slavery spending, no matter how it’s spent

I shudder while saying this – but Trump may be the only defense the USA has against a possible domination of Congress by the Deep State after the mid-terms.

How Trump outfoxed the Deep State on the Budget

Brian Maher
Managing Editor
The Daily Reckoning

“Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard,” said Baltimore’s own H.L. Mencken.

The American people are about to get it — good and hard…

The President signed a budget-busting $1.3 trillion “omnibus” spending bill Friday — the second largest ever of its kind.

American democracy will glory in even more spending… even more boondoggles… even more cronyism… even more debt.

As with P.T. Barnum’s circus, there is something for everyone…

The bill authorizes a 10% “defense” increase — $80 billion more than previously authorized spending levels…

And an extra $63 billion for domestic spending of every cut and flavor.

There’s the infrastructure, of course.

But also funding to battle the opioid epidemic currently ravaging the land.

21st Century Community Learning Centers nationwide will dip their hands deeper into the national collection plate.

We are not certain how these differ from 20th century learning centers— but let it pass.

Meanwhile, Planned Parenthood also extends its claim upon the American taxpayer.

The National Endowments for the Arts and Humanities will enjoy a $3 million boost.

We could continue… but mercy forbids it.

The bill’s additional $143 billion piles atop the existing federal deficit that already stretches to the sky.

Democrats declared immediate victory.

Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer exulted the bill’s “job-creating, lifesaving investments.”

Not only does the bill protect Obama’s spending priorities, says Politico, it “expands them.”

Conservative National Review declared it “the sort of legislation that would have been right at home in the Obama administration.”

Just so.

But the swamp got in a good belly laugh at Mr. Trump’s expense.

The bill denies Trump funding for “the wall.”

The $1.6 billion the bill allocates was already agreed to and is mostly to patch existing fencing.

“I will never sign another bill like this again,” thundered the President.

Why did he sign it at all?

We can reduce the answer to two words:

The Swamp.

Written in complete secrecy, Congress heaved up the 2,232-page methane cloud just 52 hours before Friday’s government “shutdown” deadline.

No one had time to read it.

Had Trump failed in his signatory duty, parts of the United States government would have gone dark.

And Trump would not have gotten his beloved defense spending.

If you think the timing is coincidence… we suggest you climb back aboard the turnip truck from which you tumbled.

Politico:

The bill was crafted behind closed doors by congressional leaders — most back-benchers had less than a day to read its 2,232 pages — so it’s hard to say how much of it reflects genuine Republican enthusiasm for big government and how much reflects a political decision to cave to Democrats to avoid a shutdown on Trump’s watch.

And so we find American democracy cloaked in its overcoat of glory.

Surely Jefferson smiles down from his celestial Monticello.

Ah, but we had our agents give the bill a thorough ransacking over the weekend.

And their research turned up a wild card… a joker in the deck Trump could use to shock his opponents…

In December 2017, Trump declared a human rights emergency that broadly empowers the federal government to crack down on, say, human trafficking or drug smuggling.

And on Friday, Trump notified Congress that he’s invoking the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985.

These two facts, says John Salisbury — a a fellow who spent 30 years in government — “opens up new options.”

Congress allocates money to be spent, yes. But the president spends the allocated money, he reminds us.

Congress can’t say how the money is spent — as long as the spending is legal.

Salisbury on the implications:

By making these two declarations, President Trump has just communicated that he has the authority to NOT spend any funds he doesn’t deem necessary and will return them to the U.S. Treasury. So funds for Planned Parenthood? He can simply not allocate the funds…

If he determines that building a wall on the southern border is a defense against human trafficking? He can move funds from anywhere else in the Defense Department allocation and simply build the wall.

Congress is powerless to stop cash reallocations on an omnibus bill AND cannot stop the Defense Department from taking measures under a declared emergency. Despite their language in the omnibus bill about the border wall, it is trumped by the state of emergency that Trump declared.

Salisbury concludes:

I’ve worked for government for 30 years and I’ve never seen ANYONE making the moves he’s making right now.

Is Trump preparing to strike back against the swamp to fund his wall?

Citation
https://dailyreckoning.com/the-swamp-wins/

Who is doing what in Syria and why Part 1 of 3

by Ghassan Kadi for The Saker Blog [1]
10th February 2018

Ghassan Kadi is a Syrian reporter and activist who’s work is published regularly in internet sites such as The Saker Blog, Geopolitica RU, The International Reporter, The Syrian Free Press and many others

It seems that every time a chapter in the war on Syria comes to an end, a new factor surfaces. Just like the 1975-1989 civil war in Lebanon before it, and which started off with a clash between the PLO and the Lebanese rightwing Phalangist militia and then ended up with an Israeli invasion and its aftermath, the war on Syria is now a totally different war from the one that started seven years ago.

With other players gone or having their roles changed, the only persisting player is the Syrian Army [SAA] of course, fighting here for the integrity and sovereignty of Syria. We cannot include its allies, because even its allies have changed.

There is much speculation about recent events, a lot of war and fear-mongering, but if all elements of the current powers on the ground are dissected and analyzed, it becomes very easy to see what is going on and who is doing what.

Before we try to understand who is doing what and why, let us first identify who are the main players on the ground and behind the scenes; past and present. This is a short list:

Syria of course
Saudi Arabia
Qatar
Kurds
Turkey
Iran
Hezbollah
Israel
the USA [and vassal states]
Russia

Notwithstanding the inevitable continuing role and presence of Syria and popular national Syrian allied forces in the war against her, we must acknowledge that Saudi Arabia and Qatar have already played their role and walked away as losers. For the sake of historic documentation, this had to be mentioned even though they do not have much of an influence and clout at all at present.

Kurds are playing a role that cannot be discussed without acknowledging the role they played between 2011 and 2015/16. Kurdish fighters, separatists or otherwise, have upheld Syrian border integrity in Syria’s north from as early as 2011 when the Syrian Army had no allies on the ground. And even though the Syrian Army and Kurdish fighters did not fight physically within the same trench, the Kurds fought fiercely in the north, holding their ground, against Turkish-facilitated incursions and against ISIS later on.

However, as Kurdish separatist movements were established and as they were not preemptively contained under the roof of Damascus, something had to give.

Kurds who are separatists will do anything and make deals with anyone to make their dream come true. History has shown that they are prepared to join hands with America and even Israel.

It must be acknowledged however that Kurds who are not separatists, and there is no way of telling their percentage any more than there is a way of telling the percentage of those who are, do not seem to have much of a voice in their community.

Furthermore, seemingly there isn’t an all-inclusive nationally-endorsed rationale where they can address their concerns against those who are separatists and in a manner that can allay their fears and apprehensions as a minority group in such a way that would quell their desire for independence.

Turkey’s role has been changing with the tides in the last seven years. From wanting to topple the Syrian Government and Erdogan praying at the Omayyad Mosque as the conqueror of Damascus, Erdogan is now in a much more humble damage-control mode hoping to at least be able to prevent the formation of a Kurdish state south of his borders.

The turn of events in the war, and the bargain plea reconciliation he has had with Russia after Turkey downed a Russian Su-24 in Nov 2015 has put Erdogan in that position. But Erdogan, the compulsive Islamist and nationalist, will always try to look for opportunities to turn and stab anyone in the back because his dreams of a great Turkey-based Muslim sultanate are bigger than any deal and treaty he signs with anyone.

That said, Erdogan will not settle for any outcome that will mean the establishment of a Kurdish state. Unless the tides change in his favour, it is highly unlikely that he will change course and demand more.

In effect, the war in northern Syria is more or less totally separate from the one heating up in the south with Israel.

Iran: The Syrian theatre has brought Iran physically closer to Israel in a manner that opened up a new border line that is bigger than the one Hezbollah has in Southern Lebanon. Israel does not have the reciprocal privilege.

That said, whilst Israeli presence is not officially recognized in states like Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, there is little doubt that the Eastern coast of the Persian/Arabian Gulf is under Israeli direct or indirect control in more ways than one.

That said, it must be remembered that Iran’s issue with Israel is doctrinal and not territorial.

In brief, Iran’s military presence in Syria is in adherence to the common defense treaty it has with Syria, but it is also aimed at protecting Iran’s own interests and establishing military presence and rocket-launching capabilities that are only a few kilometers from major Israeli cities in comparison to the one thousand or so kilometers that separate Israel from Iran, or at best a couple of hundred that separate the east coast of the Persian/Arab Gulf from Iran’s southern cities.

Given that Iran is not a nuclear power and Israel is, based on the above, any conventional military confrontation with Israel will put Iran in a position of advantage.

Iran’s status in Syria can be either seen as offensive or defensive vis-à-vis Israel. Most likely, it is defensive, and Iran is unlikely to use its Syrian-based positions to initiate an unprovoked attack on Israel given Israel’s nuclear deterrence.

Hezbollah: In more ways than one, ideologically-speaking, Hezbollah is an extension of Iran. But strategically-speaking, Hezbollah is a part of the Lebanese political process. Moreover, Hezbollah’s issue with Israel is both doctrinal, and territorial.

Hezbollah went into Syria to defend Syria of course, but in defending Syria, Hezbollah was defending itself and Lebanon.

The supply lines for Hezbollah came from Syria, and this is no secret. But even if Hezbollah had to establish alternative routes after seven years of war, Hezbollah remains dependent on Syria for ensuring the depth of its survival and ability to fight. Even if Hezbollah went further and managed to establish its own military manufacturing base, and this is not unlikely, it remains entwined with Syria at levels that are essential for its survival and continuity.

Ideologically, Hezbollah is perhaps closer to Iran than any other ally, but strategically, it cannot be closer to any other ally more than Syria. To expect Hezbollah to yield to pressure and withdraw from Syria prematurely is tantamount to expecting North Korea to surrender its nuclear arsenal.

Israel: It wouldn’t be surprising to say that the post-Kissinger USA has left Israel feeling secure and privileged to the extent that it was able to coerce the world’s single superpower to rubber-stamp what suited it; even if it was against the interests of that superpower.

However, with all the support America gave Israel, Israel was not able to find peace, real lasting peace. Military superiority and peace are two different things, and America was able to provide Israel with the former, but not the latter.

But even that military superiority that meant once upon a time that Israel was untouchable has been eroded. The rise of Hezbollah to power in a manner that enabled it to bomb “Haifa and beyond” in July 2006 has sent shivers down the spines of Israeli military strategists.

Israel now has no idea what to expect if and when another military escalation ensues with Hezbollah and it is bracing for the worst.

Given the latest confrontations with the Syrian air defenses, Israel seems to be in a similar position in not knowing what to expect from Syria either.

The USA: In all what the USA has done in supporting the initial Saudi/Qatari/Turkish attack in the war on Syria, it achieved nothing more than defeat after defeat.

If there was ever a time during the last seven years for America to launch a major attack on Syria, it would have been done on the pretext of a chemical weapon attack allegedly perpetrated by the Syrian Army on Eastern Ghouta, but Obama did not take the Saudi-orchestrated bait.

If Obama took a single and somber decision for which he will be positively remembered once all the dust has settled, it will have to be his decision not to attack Syria in early September 2013.

But Trump’s America inherited a Syria in which America has no presence or influence. The ailing nation cannot be seen to be standing still doing nothing about this.

Russia: Discussing the role of Russia was left till the end because to emphasize once again, as per previous articles, that the role of Russian diplomacy is becoming increasingly important in Syria and the Levant in general.

To put all of the above into a realistic perspective, there is a potential war brewing in southern Syria, a war that has little to do with the one raging in the north, and only Russia has the potential of dealing with the conflict.

There is no speck of doubt in my mind that Russia has a Middle East peace plan.

There is no doubt in my mind that Russia wants to catapult America out of its role as the Middle East peace talk negotiator; a role that it played for more than four decades now without any scores on the board.

It must be remembered that despite all the concessions PLO leaders gave Israel, America was unable to provide any peace to Palestine, and not even to Israel for that matter. It is highly likely that even Israel is growing tired of America’s elusive promises of peace; and the peace Israel was promised was based on quashing the axis of resistance and establishing toothless puppet Arab regimes that dance to America’s tune, and who would normalize relationships with Israel and not pose any threat at all, not now, not in the future.

So Russia is strengthening her position in the Middle East in preparation for the opportune moment to elevate herself to be accepted by all parties concerned as the single arbitrator who is capable of negotiating an all-inclusive deal.

The rest is simply posturing.

The recent escalation between Syria and Israel is not a prelude for a bigger war. Nobody wants a war; not right now, as they are all aware of the damage that can be inflicted upon them.

Israel keeps testing the waters, testing Syria’s air defense capabilities, and above all, testing Russia’s resolve and determination to create a true balance of power in the Middle East.

Some Arabs would be disappointed that Russia would not allow the total destruction of Israel, but Russia has never promised this. On the other hand however, Russia is pushing Israel to be realistic, and has never promised Israel total and unconditional support like the USA did since the days of Kissinger.

Unless Israel can safeguard itself against Hezbollah rockets, and which it can’t, it will never initiate an all-out war with either Syria, Hezbollah, or both; not forgetting the Iranian presence on the ground in Syria, just outside Israel’s borders.

Israel has to either accept that the rules of the game have changed, or risk an escalation that will inflict huge damage on its infrastructure and civilians. The recent downing of an Israeli F-16 by Syrian air defenses and the subsequent call Netanyahu made to Russian President Putin is a clear indication that Israel is not happy with the fact that Russian arm supplies to Syria are changing the balance of power.

An astute look at recent events can only propose that Russia is trying to drag Israel into peace talks that are based on a regional balance of power, but Israel is not convinced yet that it has to do this anymore than it is convinced that it has lost its military upper hand. On the other hand, Russia will find it very difficult to convince Syria, Hezbollah and Iran that they should have any peace at all with Israel.

All the while, America realizes that it has no presence in the war in the south, and is using the Kurdish pretext to have “a” presence in the north in order not to miss out on being party to any settlement.

Erdogan is doing his bit to prevent the creation of a Kurdish state in Syria. Other than that he has no role to play in the potential brewing conflict in the south.

At the end, America will stab the Kurds in the back like it did many times earlier, the Kurdish aspirations for independence will be pushed back for many decades, and the real focus will be on the south, on Russia’s yet undeclared role and plan for a Middle East peace plan.

End of Part 1

Citation
[1]http://thesaker.is/who-is-doing-what-in-syria-and-why/

https://www.sltrib.com/news/2018/03/29/us-attorney-for-utah-huber-probing-gop-raised-concerns-about-the-fbi-surveilling-trump-aide-ignoring-clinton-uranium-ties/

U.S. attorney for Utah is investigating GOP-raised concerns about the FBI surveilling Trump aide and about Clinton’s uranium ties

U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a letter to some congressional leaders Thursday that he appointed senior federal prosecutors — led by Huber — to review concerns raised by Republicans that the FBI ignored those issues while focusing on investigating the Trump campaign for possible collaboration with Russia.

——–I have little faith in Sessions,….not going to appoint a second special investigator.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[Anonymous]

Y_ wrote:

Survival trumps anything else (pun intended)

Show them pretty pretty pictures of what happens when there are no guns

and the all time classic that will get them in the b~~~~

Being Aussie I agree with the stats on violence down here. A lot of it also stems from Aboriginals being out of control and feeling entitled to be criminals. As well as our moronic Govt, allowing Muslims and Sudanese in.

Oh and in the state of Victoria crims get a slap on the wrist and then let out on parole so they can top their previous efforts.

[VladParticipant]

Faust For Science wrote:

I believe the AI will keep humanity alive out of entertainment value humanity.

Who said it hasn’t already happened 🙂 ?
Don’t you nave that nagging feeling some super AI is trolling us with Bush, Hillary, Obama, Trump, Putin, feminism, trying to figure out boundaries of our stupidity and proving we have none, one by one 🙂 ?

Marriage is the tomb of love (c)Giacomo Casanova

[Y_Participant]

Survival trumps anything else (pun intended)

Show them pretty pretty pictures of what happens when there are no guns

and the all time classic that will get them in the b~~~~

[Faust For ScienceParticipant]

It’sallbs wrote:

The image is a spoof of powell with his vile that he claimed was chemical weapons when justifying Iraq.

Faust For Science wrote:

The UK government seems to upset all the wrong people.

?

American & British governments have colluded for years on joint bulls~~~ this is probably just another example of it.

Exactly. The deep states of the two nations have colluded for years.

The UK government are arresting and imprisoning those in the UK whom speak out at the abuses of the UK government and those the UK government sponsors.

The whole fake Steele Dossier came from the UK. The false Russian-Trump collusion mess came from the Steele Dossier.

The UK government blames powerful foreign nation, Russia, for a chemical attack, but the UK government refuses to share the evidence.

In effect the UK government has upset their native population, and caused problems for both U.S. President Trump and Russian President Putin.

I wonder if the UK government will upset China President Xi. Then, the UK government will have a trifecta of upsetting the leaders of the three most powerful nations on Earth.

[Anonymous]

Limited nuclear war with Mad Dog Maddis and Bolton whispering in Trumps ear about a preemptive strike.

So Trump unleashes a tactical nuke in North Korea to take out their forward artillary.

China responds with a tactical nuke on an atole in the pacific ocean. Russia holds it’s breath and Iran sharpen it’s swords.

[Anonymous]

Y_ wrote:

One more thing – they need a catalyst – something big like a stock market crash or war with North Korea or a really big riot to make it happen. Watch for these.

War with Iran/Russia is my guess. U.S. still hasn’t left Syria after Trumps “Get ISIS and get out” nonsense…

[Y_Participant]

Faust For Science wrote:

That is a major risk on their part. That they are willing to take such risks worries me the most. Because even if President Trump was in for eight years in office, even with the best of circumstance, he would not be able to get rid of half the deep state. So what is driving those in the shadows to do all this?

+100
I have the same question. Something is driving up the timetable. There seems to be a deadline ‘they’ have to meet.
The North Korean issue. The Skripal case. The Austin bomber. Now the SJW/student riots for gun control. The coordinated DDoS attacks on anti-DS servers over the last two months. Not coincidence. Planned. But for what?

Is it the fall mid-terms? Certainly I see these as part of that plan. Or is there something else besides winning this?

Faust For Science wrote:

If they spark a revolution or dictatorship, the current election system will not exist. (Control of the politicians) The current welfare state would not exist. (Voter plantations) The current pension systems will not exist. (Keeping law enforcement, unions, and other government employees loyal) By doing this, they are flushing most of their systems of control down the toilet

As Yuri Bezmenov said – these things needed to overthrow the state become unnecessary once the trap is sprung. In fact they become liabilities in their own right.

I really think it is about the guns Faust. Everything else is in place. Then locking the system down is easy

[Faust For ScienceParticipant]

Y_ wrote:

The next Democratic candidates for the mid-term (my ongoing series of posts) are the new wave of military and deep state operatives openly running for Congress this fall.

Is this the kind of false flag attack(s) they need to get the Democratic numbers in Congress? And after that repeal the 2nd amendment? I fear this may be their agenda.

Meaning there will be likely more false flags leading up to the mid-terms to cause more fear and panic in order to elect the Democrats.

We have seen Washington wage war on Trump. Now the next stage is on for the local deep state in all levels of the administrative, judicial and public service sectors to do their bit to end this one way or the other.

If this is the case, if the situation is not stop, this situation will end in either revolution or dictatorship.

Those supporting President Trump see the witchhunts for what they are. They are being censored and attacked by SJWs

The only good news this is all in the open because those behind it feel they have no time to do this slowly and secretly in the shadows.

I wonder what is pushing their time table up. It cannot just be that President Trump was elected.

If they spark a revolution or dictatorship, the current election system will not exist. (Control of the politicians) The current welfare state would not exist. (Voter plantations) The current pension systems will not exist. (Keeping law enforcement, unions, and other government employees loyal) By doing this, they are flushing most of their systems of control down the toilet.

That is a major risk on their part. That they are willing to take such risks worries me the most. Because even if President Trump was in for eight years in office, even with the best of circumstance, he would not be able to get rid of half the deep state. So what is driving those in the shadows to do all this?

[LurchParticipant]

… and the libtarded left, high school puppets of the deep state and brainwashed feminazi’s will find a way to blame the bombings on Trump and AR-15’s.

Blue-Pill Virgin: Women hate me! That's what it is.
MGTOW Man: Hate them back; it works for me.

[Y_Participant]

iMickey503 wrote:

Why did I have to post like this?
500 server error. Hmm. Odd.

Happens – not your end. I’ve had it too. When you try to post it’s probably server side script.

Anyway great posts from you.

iMickey503 wrote:

I wonder what the motive was behind all this. Do we have any more info on his motives since everything else is being kept silent.

This is no lone wolf. If all of this profiling is available plus people knowing he was a crazy then it’s a false flag aimed at something else. Most likely repealing the 2nd amendment.

The next Democratic candidates for the mid-term (my ongoing series of posts) are the new wave of military and deep state operatives openly running for Congress this fall.

Is this the kind of false flag attack(s) they need to get the Democratic numbers in Congress? And after that repeal the 2nd amendment? I fear this may be their agenda.

Meaning there will be likely more false flags leading up to the mid-terms to cause more fear and panic in order to elect the Democrats.

We have seen Washington wage war on Trump. Now the next stage is on for the local deep state in all levels of the administrative, judicial and public service sectors to do their bit to end this one way or the other.

[Space CowboyParticipant]

Princess moves to China thinking it will make her stand out more and she will be more of a prize. Western men get showered with slim, horny, less feminazi ideal obsessed Chinese women and ignore cupcake. Cupcake writes an article bemoaning being invisible. Bring on that wall please, make it Trump size.

"Have you ever thought about any real freedoms? Freedom from the opinions of others...even from the opinions of yourself?"

[Faust For ScienceParticipant]

PistolPete wrote:

Faust For Science wrote:

Sadly, with a disarmed populace, a state control media system, and the continued purging of any political dissent, that Brexit is a losing battle.
I would suggest you create a charity design to help UK citizens leave the UK while they still can.

I’ve tried and tried to explain to Itsallbs that government’s simply ignore those without political power. If these powers can ignore the national will as expressed in a nationwide referendum then why would you think they would pay any attention to a “letter”…albeit…strongly worded letter?

Exactly. During the Tea Party movement, those in power not only ignored the people, they used the government to politically attack the people.

But, when the people were able to elect an political outsider, President Trump, those in power went completely apes~~~.

With the way the UK government is organization, such a political upset is not possible in the UK.