Search Results for 'Trump'

[Ranger OneParticipant]

For a long time, I have had a sinking feeling that Trump and the Clintons play “bump the uglies” at the same elitist sex orgies.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

To my American cousins I know you think the economy is booming and there are more jobs but please wake up Hillary was too difficult a sell that’s why you got Trump as the rival candidate he is a deep state stooge.

The media bashing of them is a charade dear me this is how it works. Trust me I’m English we are the masters of deception. London controls everything in reality anyway.

Of course he has to be seen to do some “good” to keep the illusion going.

“It’s easier to fool people than convince them they have been fooled.”
-Mark Twain

the system will continually present you with someone who is “different-not a politician”. No one who really and truly is will ever reach a position of power.

DC is not unique in that it is the same in London exactly the same.

Now no offence I wish you all well you know that,but many of you were blue pill and fell for the brainwashing and eventually woke up -I was always red pill now maybe, just maybe I’m right and there is something to what I’m saying.

Think about it…

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Sky Marshal Trump can fund and man the Space Force easily, start running this ad.

[Anonymous]

MarketWatcher wrote:

I like what Trump is doing and I understand why, but to call it a space force sounds silly

Starfleet? Hahaha, that would be funny af

Seven Against Eight or 2+2=3 : The G7 v The Shanghai Cooperative Organisation[1][2]

by Rostislav Ishchenko
@ alternatio.org
Translated by Ollie Richardson and Angelina Siard

Rostislav Ishchenko was born in Kiev, Ukraine and is a honours graduate of the Faculty of History at the Kiev State University. He was recruited by the Ukrainian Diplomatic Service (1992-1994) and worked in the Presidential Administration of Ukraine (1994-1998), advising the Deputy Prime Minister (2008-2010) in the capital.

In 2009, he headed the Center for System Analysis and Forecasting. He subsequently took up Russian citizenship after the Ukronazi coup in Kiev and now lives in Russian Federation. He is probably the foremost expert on Ukrainian political thought and Russian current affairs.

[Y Thank you all for responding to my recent posts – which I am only being to join in intermittently as I am on the move in Asia and my internet time is limited. These are topics that are critical to understanding the current course of the markets and world economies and I hope to address these at length when I have more time. Again thanks for reading Y]

Larger Picture https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-DOAwGplCuhk/V2vtAJCA_kI/AAAAAAACINQ/4IN1eAXh39sgtnYTydynY-yWNtDZWWWZgCKgB/s1600/1.jpg

On June 9th-10th, the G7 summit was held in Quebec and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit simultaneously took place in Qingdao. For the first time in Qingdao, the SCO was represented by eight participants.

India and Pakistan, which were added to the SCO at the last summit, were included in this summit. Another ten States with the status of observer countries and country-partners stand in the queue for dialogue. And another 10 (including, by the way, Ukraine) applied for observer status, but have not yet received any official status.

For us, 20 candidates for membership and candidates for candidacy are important only from the point of view that this demonstrates the significant potential of the organisation.

As our “partners” from the EU and NATO said, explaining the inclusion in their structures of former members of the Warsaw Treaty Organisation and Comecon, “countries are fleeing from unpromising organisations to promising ones”. Judging by the queue for entrance, the SCO is a very promising organisation.

This is not surprising. As was stated at the last summit, it has already overtaken the G7 countries in terms of total GDP, and the gap in terms of GDP per capita is rapidly decreasing.

Taking into account that in the SCO countries half the world’s population lives on 60% of the earth’s land, the potential for further growth of their economies is beyond doubt. There isn’t a more capacious and promising market on the planet, and there will not be.

However, the past summit was also characterised by the fact that if earlier the SCO countries were limited to discussing financial-economic problems, occasionally touching upon regional political issues, then this time they made policy program statements on issues that formally aren’t related to the SCO’s interests.

The SCO countries called for compliance by all parties with their obligations concerning the Iranian nuclear deal, welcomed the contacts between the DPRK and China, reaffirmed the lack of an alternative to the political settlement of the Syrian crisis on the basis of the Astana agreements (they called for the implementation of the agreement on areas of de-escalation), and also the political settlement of the Ukrainian crisis based on the Minsk Agreements.

Let me remind you that the SCO is the #1 economy in the world today. And the world’s #1 economy has unanimously determined its global political priorities.

Now everyone will be obliged to reckon with this. The fact is that everyone who has been following the rise of Russia and China in recent decades and the gradual reformatting of the global political space could have noticed that the Euro-Asian association has never been in a hurry to say something or threaten someone.

Unlike the Euro-Atlantic alliance – which flailed around in constant hysterics, before making specific political statements or taking concrete steps in the international arena, both Moscow and Beijing accumulated forces, attracted allies, or at least transferred potential opponents to the status of neutrals, and only then acted.

It is precisely this that allowed them to outplay the much more militarily and economically strong collective West.

The West’s military advantage was buried during Putin’s demonstration of the latest Russian weapons during his annual address to the Federal Assembly. Its economic superiority has also been in question for a long time, and suddenly on June 9th-10th at the SCO summit it was also finally buried.

Larger figure : https://cdn3.img.sputniknews.com/images/15521/55/155215529.jpg

Now it’s not just the United States that is ceding the title of the #1 economy in the world to China, but the collective West also lost its economic superiority, being squeezed out from 1st place by the SCO.

Let me remind you that the SCO consists of 8 members. I.e., the volume of the economy of the 8 SCO member States exceeded the volume of the economies of the 7 most developed Western countries.

I think that it is precisely for this reason that, having eliminated the superiority of the West in the military-political and economic sphere, the SCO started to make political statements only now. Now the SCO countries can back up their desires with real actions.

The West itself destroyed the rules of world trade, having started, contrary to the rules of the WTO, to impose sanctions against anyone they want for political reasons.

The Eurasian Union is not as greedy for applying sanctions as the Euro-Atlantic is, and does not impose them so quickly. But if it does impose them, it really hurts.

On June 10th, 2018 in a joint declaration, the SCO expressed its will, its vision of the prospects for solving current crises, and the rules for building a future world. What was the collective West able to respond with? Nothing. It would have been better if they hadn’t gathered for their G7. Then there wouldn’t be such a contrast.

Actually, Western countries had two main bullet points: how to avoid a trade war, caused by US prohibitive duties on basic European, Canadian and Japanese commodity exports, as well as what to do with Russia, without which the West found itself not being able to solve any current problems in international relations.

Concerning the first question, the “6” tried to organise a collective attack on Trump, in response to which the American President – in his usual free manner, without equivocation – stated that the “6” are used to enriching themselves at the expense of the US, but it won’t be able to do this anymore. The issue of the economic unity of the West was closed on this.

Now the dear Europeans need to think whether to accept the challenge of the United States and start an economic war or to shamefully capitulate without even trying to resist.

Given the fact that Trump has also personally managed to offend almost each of the participants of the meeting, the chances of making a choose in favor of war has dramatically increased.

In this regard, the course of the discussion about the second (Russian) issue is interesting.

Firstly, it is Trump that took the bull by the horns and proposed to return Russia to the “8” – i.e., to expand the format of the G7 to the G8. He was enthusiastically supported by the Italian Prime Minister, but everyone else rejected such a radical change of policy.

Then a completely empty statement was signed that once again called on Russia to show good will and to appease the West by abandoning its own position concerning all topical issues of the global agenda. But Trump managed to withdraw the US’ signature from it already on the way to Singapore.

By the way, the fact that the US President’s schedule was drawn up in such a way that he had to give up the final stage of the G7 meeting for the sake of the meeting with Kim Jong-un, which took place under Chinese mediation, is also very significant. The leader of the West left his main allies in order not to be late for the meeting with the leader of the DPRK, who the West only a couple years ago didn’t notice in general.

It should be kept in mind that the meeting with Kim Jong-un was planned when the date and protocol of the G7 meeting were known at least a few months prior. If the US had insisted on the meeting in Singapore taking place a day or two later, then neither China nor North Korea would’ve gotten worked up.

But the Americans did not insist. Trump, by all accounts, was not averse to getting away from his rebellious allies much earlier by using a plausible excuse.

It is necessary to understand that Donald Trump is not an urban crazy but the US President, relying on the support of a large part of the political elite and has a good chance of being re-elected. Otherwise he would have been consigned to the dustbin of history by impeachment.

I.e., his astonishing, disdainful behavior towards European allies is not the personal position of a businessman who lost his marbles (as he is sometimes presented as). This is the position of people who control the power in the US today and plan to control it for at least another six years, and this is the position that was supported by most voters.

Long ago I wrote that over the past decade we have seen the frantic attempts of the American elites to find the missing resources for carrying out a hegemonic policy.

After the failure of the attempt to quickly loot Russia and China – turning them into secondary political entities that pursue a foreign and economic policy that is favorable to Washington – the Euro-Atlantic and Pacific allies of the United States, which were proposed to sign the TTIP and TTP quickly and without asking further questions, had to become the donors of the necessary resources.

But the allies dug their heels in and the Obama administration was able to push forward these two “partnerships” in the right form.

Trump immediately refused to continue negotiations over the TTIP and withdrew from the already signed TTP. This marked a new American policy towards allies. If with their help it wasn’t succeeded to suppress Russia and to milk from them the resources needed to continue the American fight, then it is necessary to throw them from the ship as extra ballast.

Of course, all of this doesn’t happen in just one day. But the United States is quite clearly trying to abandon any support for allies and any trade relations that are profitable for them, while maintaining its trade and economic interests in Europe.

In fact, if before it was proposed to the EU to relax and grab its ankles, then now the US switched to direct violence. At the same time, there is iron Western logic in the words and actions of Trump.

The West as a united front was against Russia and China, but the US was its main force and carried the costs, while the others were mostly just counting the profits. The US has spent too much and can no longer provide resources for the collective policy of the West.

It will be honest if the EU, Japan, Canada, and other allies tighten their belts and help the hegemon financially. Well, and if they do not want to do this, then the US has the great right of a hegemon to take away from its vassals everything that it needs, without asking the opinion of the vassals themselves.

It is clear that Washington can no longer carry out its hegemony in general without its allies, but it is not ready for an equal partnership and is trying to find a new junior partner (instead of the too expensive, too clumsy, and inefficient EU). Such a partner for Washington can be either Russia or China. Hence the policy of Trump in relation to Moscow and Beijing.

Sanctions haven’t been lifted, new ones are even being introduced, but a desire for a timely solution of complicated and irritating political issues is being demonstrated. Especially if a compromise can be found at the expense of the interests of already unneeded allies (regardless of whether it is the EU or South Korea and Japan).

The United States would like to play in a pair, but so far they don’t know with who. That’s why they are trying to drag Russia into the G8. The calculation is simple: if you can play on the slowness of European politicians and institutions that are unable to quickly rebuild, then you can try within the framework of the G8 to oppose the “6” together with Putin. So then the impudent Europe will be punished, but the Russian-European rapprochement will come under attack.

At the same time, since a united Eurasia is the main project bringing Moscow and Beijing together, Russia’s game on the side of the US and against the EU, even if it is within the framework of the G8, can cause irritation in China.

And in the Chinese direction Trump also creates platforms of common interests – for example, he launches a long negotiating process with Kim Jong-un in which the US clearly benefits from if they can convince the DPRK to abandon its nuclear weapons, and they will pay for it at the expensive of the interests of Japan, South Korea, and even China.

Nuclear disarmament of the North in exchange for ending the state of war and withdrawing American troops from South Korea dramatically reduces the security of Seoul and Tokyo, and the unification of Korea placed on the agenda does not meet the interests of China and Japan.

Thus, Trump is trying to create for the US a new platform for trade, to close political formats that don’t leave Washington any room for manoeuvre, and to open new ones that allow to actively manoeuvre promising unions. Washington is trying to replace the losing format of 8 (SCO) against 7 (G7) with the format of 2 (Russia and the US) against 2 (the US and China), which in total involves only three countries.

Of course, Trump’s manoeuvring is extremely risky. But it rests on the slowness and clumsiness of the European Union, which simply will not have the time (due to the length of its procedures and the complexity of the agreements) to swap a pro-American policy for an anti-American one.

He also hopes that Japan and South Korea have nowhere to go from under the American umbrella and will hope for the best until the last moment, and that their possible intrigues against the US are possible only with Russia, which also should arouse suspicion in China and close the Beijing direction off to Moscow.

After all, he has no options anyway. He is obliged to sacrifice piece after piece in order to win the race and as a result to try while exhaling at the last moment to overtake the opponent and to save the lost game. “Whoever doesn’t risk doesn’t drink champagne!” is the slogan of pure and non-turbid business.

But Trump is indeed a businessman, and all American policies in the era of their success were pure and non-turbid business. And then the ideologised neocons came and ruined everything. Trump was push forward for the presidency in order to try to return to the old-good schemes in the context of a geopolitical zugzwang – where every new move worsens the situation.

And it must be said that he found an interesting, although not winning continuation. However, he stands a chance only if the enemy makes gross errors, otherwise there is no chance at all. And there a lot of opponents, maybe someone will make a mistake.

In general, the group of 7 was sacrificed at the summit, and it was shown that they are ready to sacrifice the EU, special relations with Canada, a trusting partnership with the UK, and much more for the sake of preserving the freedom of hands in the global game.

So far, they are not ready to sacrifice only their military presence on the territories of allies, and only because they want to keep this trump card for further geopolitical exchange.

Now the ball is in the EU’s court. Germany has long tried to reorientate critically important economic ties with the US towards other partners, including Russia, but the process is far from over. Similarly, the process of creating a single European army to replace NATO is not completed (it just started).

Trump put his European friends in a very difficult situation – where it is impossible not to respond to his rudeness, but there still isn’t anything to respond with. Let’s see whether the savvy Europeans will find an effective move that can beat the Danaë sacrifices of Trump.

Ростислав Ищенко
специально для
14 Июня 2018

[1] http://alternatio.org/articles/articles/item/60178-semyorka-protiv-vosmyorki-ili-2-2-3
[2] http://www.stalkerzone.org/rostislav-ishchenko-seven-against-eight-or-223/

[MarketWatcherParticipant]

I like what Trump is doing and I understand why, but to call it a space force sounds silly. I would have called it something else. I am sure the liberal media will be telling me how stupid this is. Of course that is nothing new.

[narrow road travelerParticipant]

Reagan’s Star Wars. Twenty first century edition.

The Marines and Army is already redundant for US armed forces. A non military industrial complex audit is sorely needed. To keep this merry go round turning for another few years.

I think this is a publicity stunt by Trump. He just finished talks with NK last weak. This announcement shortly after the meeting. Something seema fishy from here.

Though, now that I think more about it. It could be an underhanded stimulus deal.

A military space program. Would require new infrastructure. Obama scrapped NASA, so there’s a workable talent pool.

Millions of men are out of work/not looking. A sizeable portion of this demographic would probably sign up in a logistical capacity relatively easily.

I’ll keep my ears open. See how this all plays out.

The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. --Sun Tsu

[MonkParticipant]

U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday said he was ordering the creation of a sixth branch of the military to focus on space …

Oh … so now it’s official.

[HitmanParticipant]

good.
it’s time for it.
dominate the planet from above.
a new American superiority mission.
i want to rain HELL FIRE on our enemies,
until they are no more.
God Bless America
God Bless Donald J. Trump.
Hail Victory!!!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/trump-orders-creation-of-space-focused-us-military-branch/ar-AAyOVLL?OCID=ansmsnnews11

U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday said he was ordering the creation of a sixth branch of the military to focus on space, a move critics said could harm the Air Force.

“It is not enough to merely have an American presence in space. We must have American dominance in space,” Trump said before a meeting of his National Space Council.

“We are going to have the Air Force and we’re going to have the ‘Space Force.’ Separate but equal. It is going to be something,” he said later.

The United States is a member of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, which bars the stationing of weapons of mass destruction in space and only allows for the use of the moon and other celestial bodies for peaceful purposes.

———–Interesting move, though I think it is the wrong time to create an extra branch of the military.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[SuggestiusParticipant]

Burning flag is legal in the USA. In 2016 the President Trump had been suggesting to make the burning of the US flag a criminal offense but was criticized for that. Well, it seems to me that again the USA is becoming a land of, as I call it, the cooperative consumption.

Happiness for all and let no one be forgotten ("Roadside picnic", Arkady and Boris Strugatsky)

[It’sallbsParticipant]

Gravel Pit wrote:

There are a few Trump haters here at MGTOW.com which is always amusing especially when they aren’t voters or even Americans

Trump is a salesman nothing more that’s why the deep state hired him.

Whether I’m American or not is irrelevent plenty of people who are not English comment on English politics and I am happy for them to do so.

You see Trump is just an actor as was Hillery it’s all a charade.

Of course things will be done around the edges, crumbs thrown so that people still believe in their saviour.

The world is run by a criminal class for their benefit anyone that doesn’t serve their agenda is crushed.

I would be pleased for all the americans on here if Trump was who you believe him to be but he isn’t and neither will his succesor be, nor his, nor his, nor his.

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[Gravel PitParticipant]

If Hillary Clinton had been elected:

1. We’d be in a hot war with Russia and/or North Korea. Maybe others too. She probably would have WW3 in motion as we speak.

2. Illegal immigrants would be spilling over the border at an astonishing rate, unprecedented by previous levels as if a human dam had broken. She’d be opening all the windows and doors of America and the vermin would be setting up shop.

3. Businesses, the economy, the stock market and everything would be completely smoked right now. There is no question about it. When Trump got elected, a massive sigh of relief hit the market and a BULL RUN followed. It corrected slightly and now its taking off again. Businesses are returning to America. People are working. Nothing is perfect but we just dodged a massive morale catastrophe.

4. Unemployment would be soaring higher than ever and mass poverty would be on the way. Felonious crime would be soaring. Major urban areas would resemble Peruvian airports. All easy targets would be mugged.

5. ‘Preppers’ would no longer be funny people who have nothing better to do. Normal everyday people would be preparing to leave cities and run for the hills, stockpiling can foods and survival necessities.

For all the sarcastic people that wish for Armageddon. It’s not funny. You think it’s cool to show such indifference and sick joy at the thought of immense suffering. You have no f~~~ing idea. You’re borderline mental for wishing for such an event, don’t even try to defend it as if it will usher in some enlightenment period, it won’t.

You sit on a computer enjoying the luxury of modern times. You have no idea what it would be like to go without the basics like fresh water or food.

If bad times truly come someday. That will be a serious time for grief. Many hardworking and decent men will perish. You laugh at their demise? F~~~ you, you’re sick.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Joey Alfio wrote:

a new study indicates

<- When you see that, usually a bunch of malarkey comes right after. Saying that humans are getting dumber is like presenting driver rankings in a race that started 5 seconds ago, with 200 miles left to go. It’s click bait.

xanthine wrote:

welfare trash c~~~s …. pick up tons of psych meds and controlled substances, (plus) antibiotics and antivirals they take for their STD infections. Their kids …drugged up on SSRI’s, stimulants, anticonvulsants ….permanently alters their developing brain chemistry.

Now that really is a living nightmare, and it’s true in every city on Earth.

Anonymous wrote:

I have no respect for anyone who think Trump is a good

There are a few Trump haters here at MGTOW.com which is always amusing especially when they aren’t voters or even Americans… go start a thread in the Political Corner, notice how its all the way at the bottom of the page next to the litter box. That’s a strong indicator of how much we give a s~~~ about politics. BTW, Trump WILL win again in 2020. I promise.

Can the EU become a partner with Russia? [1]

The Saker
Unz Review
June 15, 2018

‘The Saker’ is the nom-de-guerre for an ex-Nato geopolitical-military analyst who lives in Florida, USA. He is considered as one of the most respected in his fields of expertise and has published works in major online alternative news sites and has a massive following especially with ex-US military.

[Y: Prologue

In May of 2018 Vladimir Putin was re-elected by a large majority to the Presidency of the Russian Federation. However his choice of Medvedev as the Prime Minister and selection of other state appointees was met with disappointment by those who support him.

The consensus of the masses was that these appointees served the Fifth Column and were intent on a re-approachment with the west on its terms. The reasons for this unpopular and surprising move by Putin are still debated hotly and very much unknown.

The practical and political outcome of his choices is a strong ‘pro-Western’ movement within the Russian government – similar in principle to the Deep State within Washington. These individuals are also tied to the oligarchs and Russian Mafia. Therefore this constitutes a powerful group of people Putin cannot ignore.

One theory is that there are favours owed and Putin needs their support for any kind of foreign or domestic policy initiative. Another is that these individuals have significant contacts in the west to smooth over economic and administrative red tape. A third (unlikely) opinion is that Putin himself is an oligarch and profits from the corruption.

Whatever the reasons, Putin’s last term as the President of Russia will not only oversee the direction of Russia’s geopolitical strategy for the next few decades, but also cement the type of successor that he intends to transition his power to in the next few years.

The Saker provides an analysis of the current EU-Russia policies and whether the future re-approachment of Russia and the EU can be achieved and under what conditions.

Again, thank you for reading Y]

The re-nomination (albeit somewhat reshuffled) of the “economic block” of the Medvedev government has elicited many explanations, some better than others.

Today I want to look at one specific hypothesis which can be summed up like this: Putin decided against purging the (unpopular) “economic block” from the Russian government because he wanted to present the EU with “known faces” and partners EU politicians would trust.

Right now, with Trump’s insane behavior openly alienating most European leaders, this is the perfect time to add a Russian “pull” to the US “push” and help bring the EU closer to Russia.

By re-appointing Russian “liberals” (that is a euphemism for WTO/WB/IMF/etc types) Putin made Russia look as attractive to the EU as possible. In fact, the huge success of the Saint Petersburg summit and the Parliamentary Forum is proof that this strategy is working.

This hypothesis is predicated on one crucial assumption: that the EU, under the right conditions, could become a partner for Russia.

But is that assumption warranted? I personally don’t believe that it is, and I will try to lay out the reasons for my skepticism:

First, there is no “EU”, at least not in political terms. More crucially, there is no “EU foreign policy”.

Yes, there are EU member states, who have political leaders, there is a big business community in the EU and there are many EU organizations, but as such, the “EU” does not exist, especially not in terms of foreign policy. The best proof of that is how clueless the so-called “EU” has been in the Ukraine, then with the anti-Russian sanctions, in dealing with an invasion of illegal immigrants, and now with Trump.

At best, the EU can be considered a US protectorate/colony, with some subjects “more equal than others” (say, the UK versus Greece). Most (all?) EU member states are abjectly obedient to the USA, and this is no surprise considering that even the so-called “EU leader” or “EU heavyweight” – Germany – only has very limited sovereignty.

The EU leaders are nothing but a comprador elite which doesn’t give a damn about the opinions and interests of the people of Europe. The undeniable fact is that the so-called “EU foreign policy” has gone against the vital interests of the people of Europe for decades and that phenomenon is only getting worse.

Second, the single most powerful and unified organization in Europe is not even an EU organization, but NATO. And NATO, in real terms, is no less than 80% USA.

Forget about those fierce looking European armies, they are all a joke. Not only do they represent no credible force (being too small, too poorly trained, under-equipped and poorly commanded), but they are completely dependent on the USA for a long list of critical capabilities and “force multipliers“[2]: command, control, communications, intelligence, networking, surveillance, reconnaissance, target acquisition, logistics, etc.

Furthermore, in terms of training, force planning, weapon systems procurement, deployment and maintenance, EU states are also totally dependent on the USA. The reason? The US military budget totally dwarfs anything individual EU states can spend, so they all depend on Uncle Sam.

Of sure, the NATO figurehead – the Secretary General – is usually a non-entity which makes loud statements and is European (I think of that clown Stoltenberg as the prefect example), but NATO is not run by the NATO Secretary General.

In reality, it is run by the Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR), who is the head of the Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) and these guys are as red, white an blue as it gets.

Forget about the “Eurocorps” or any other so-called “European armies” – it’s all hot air, like Trudeau’s recent outburst at Trump. In reality in the EU, as in Canada, they all know who is boss.

And here is the single most important fact: NATO desperately needs Russia as justification for its own existence: if relations with Russia improve, then NATO would have no more reason to exist.

Do you really think that anybody will let that happen? I sure don’t! And right now, the Europeans are busy asking for more US troops [3] on their soil, not less and they are all pretending to be terrified by a Russian invasion [4] , hence the need for more and bigger military exercises close to the Russian border [5]. And just to cover all its bases, NATO is now gradually expanding into Latin America [6].

Third, there is a long list of EU governments which vitally need further bad relationships with Russia. They include:

1. Unpopular governments which need to explain their own failures by the nefarious actions of an external bogyman. A good example is how the Spanish authorities blamed Russia for the crisis in Catalonia.

Or the British with their “Brexit”. The Swedes are doing even better, they are already preparing their public opinion [7] for a “Russian interference” in case the election results don’t turn out to be what they need.

2. Governments whose rhetoric has been so hysterically anti-Russian that they cannot possibly back down from it. Best examples: the UK and Merkel. But since most (but not all) EU states did act on the Skripal false-flag on the basis of the British “highly likely” and in the name of “solidarity”, they are now all stuck as accomplices of this policy. There is *no way* they are simply going to admit that they were conned by the Brits.

3. EU prostitutes: states whose only policy is to serve the USA against Russia. These states compete against each other in the most abject way to see who can out-brown-nose each other for the position of “most faithful and willing loyal servant of the USA”.

The best examples are, of course, the three Baltic statelets, but the #1 position has to go to the “fiercely patriotic Poles” who are now willing to actually pay Uncle Sam to be militarily occupied (even though the very same Uncle Sam is trying to racketeer them for billions of dollars) [8].

True, now that EU subsidies are running out, the situation of these states is becoming even more dire, and they know that the only place where they can still get money is the USA. So don’t expect them to change their tune anytime soon (even if Bulgaria has already realized that nobody in the West gives a damn about it). [9]

4. Governments who want to crack down on internal dissent by accusing any patriotic or independent political party/movement to be “paid by the Kremlin” and representing Russian interests. The best example is France and how it treated the National Front.

I would argue that most EU states are, in one way or another, working on creating a “national security state” because they do realize (correctly) that the European people are deeply frustrated and oppose EU policies (hence all the anti-EU referendums lost by the ruling elites).

Contrary to a very often repeated myth, European business interests do not represent a powerful anti-russophobic force. Why? Just look at Germany: for all the involvement of Germany (and Merkel personally) in the Ukraine, for all the stupid rhetoric about “Russia being an aggressor” which “does not comply with the Mink Agreements”, North Stream is going ahead!

Yes, money talks, and the truth is that while anti-Russian sanctions have cost Europe billions, the big financial interests (say the French company Total) have found ways to ignore/bypass these sanctions.

Oh sure, there is a pro-trade lobby with Russian interest in Europe. It is real, but it simply does not have anywhere near the power the anti-Russian forces in the EU have.

This is why for *years* now various EU politicians and public figures have made noises about lifting the sanctions, but when it came to the vote – they all voted as told by the real bosses.

Not all EU Russophobia is US-generated, by the way. We have clearly seen that these days when Trump suggested that the G7 (or, more accurately, the G6+1) needed to re-invite Russia, it was the Europeans who said “nope!”. To the extend that there is a “EU position” (even a very demure and weak one), it is mostly anti-Russian, especially in the northern part of Europe.

So when Uncle Sam tells the Europeans to obey and engage in the usual Russia-bashing, they all quickly fall in line, but in the rare case when the US does not push a rabidly anti-Russian agenda, EU politicians suddenly find enough willpower to say “no”.

By the way, for all the Trump’s statements about re-inviting Russia into the G6+1 the US is still busy slapping more sanctions on Russia. [10]

The current mini-wars between the US and the EU (on trade, on Iran, on Jerusalem) do not at all mean that Russia automatically can benefit from this. Again, the best example of this is the disastrous G6+1 summit in which Trump basically alienated everybody only to have the G6 reiterate its anti-Russian position even though the G6+1 needs Russia far more than Russia needs the G7 (she really doesn’t!).

Just like the US and Israeli leaders can disagree and, on occasion, fight each other, that does not at all mean that somehow they are not fundamentally joined at the hip. Just think of mob “families” who can even have “wars” against each other, but that does not at all mean that this will benefit the rest of the population whom all mobsters prey upon.

The Ukrainian crisis will only benefit anti-Russian forces in Europe. There is a very high probability that in the near future the Ukronazi regime will try to reconquer Novorussia (DNR/LRN). I submit that the outcome of such an attack is not in doubt – the Ukronazis will lose. The only question is this: to whom will they lose:

Option one: they lose to the combined forces of the DNR and LNR.

This is probably the most likely outcome. Should this happen, there is a very high probability of a Novorussian counter attack to liberate most of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions, especially the cities of Slaviansk and Mariupol.

Since past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior, we can be pretty darn sure of what the reaction in Kiev and in the West will be: Russia will be blamed for it all.

The AngloZionists will *never* admit that the Ukronazi regime lost a civil war to its own people because the Novorussians will never accept a Nazi regime ruling over them. Thus, a Novorussian victory will result in more hysterical Russophobia.

Option two: the Ukronazis succeed in their attack and threaten to overrun Donetsk, Lugansk and the rest of Novorussia.

Putin simply cannot allow this to happen. He has made that promise many times and he has recently repeated it during his “open line” with the Russian people. If the Russians are forced to intervene, this will not be a massive ground invasion – there is no need for that.

Russia has the firepower needed in the form of missile and artillery strikes to destroy the attacking Urkonazi forces and to impose a no-fly zone over all of Novorussia. If Kiev pushes on and launches a full-scale attack on Russia proper, the Ukrainian armed forces will be totally disorganized and cease combat in about 48 hours.

This scenario is what I call the “Neocon dream” since such a Russian intervention will not be imaginary, but quite real and the Kremlin will even confirm it all very publicly and probably recognize the two Novorussian Republics just like what happened in 08.08.08 when Saakashvili decided to invade South Ossetia.

So, AngloZionists will (finally!) have the “proof” that Russia is the aggressor, the Poles and Balts will prepare for an “imminent” Russian invasion and I think that there is a pretty good chance that NATO forces will move into the Western Ukraine to “stop the Russians”, even if the said Russians will have absolutely no desire (or even possible motive) to want to invade the rest of the Ukraine or, even less so, Poland, Sweden or the Baltic statelets.

I will admit that there is still a small possibility that a Ukronazi attack might not happen. Maybe Poroshenko & Co. will get cold feet (they know the real condition of the Ukie military and “dobrobat” death squads) and maybe Putin’s recent not-so-veiled threat about “grave consequences for the Ukrainian statehood” [11] will have the needed effect.

But what will happen even if this attack does not take place? The EU leaders and the Ukronazi regime in Kiev will still blame Russia for the Ukraine now clearly being a failed state. Whatever scenario you find more likely for the Ukraine, things there will only get worse and everybody will blame Russia.

The crisis in Syria will only benefit anti-Russian forces in Europe. It is becoming pretty clear that the USA is now attempting a reconquista of Syria or, at least, a break-up of Syria into several zones, including US-controlled ones. Right now, the USA and the “good terrorists” have lost the war, but that does not stop them from re-igniting a new one, mostly by reorganizing, retraining, redeploying and, most importantly, re-branding the surviving “bad terrorists” into “good ones”. This plan is backed by Saudi money and Israeli firepower.

Furthermore, Russia is now reporting that US Special Forces [12] are already working with the (new) “good terrorists” to – you guessed it – prepare yet another fake chemical attack and blame it on the Syrians. And why not? It worked perfectly already several times, why not do that again? At the very least, it would give the USA another try at getting their Tomahawks to show their effectiveness (even if they fail again, facts don’t matter here).

And make no mistake, a US “victory” in Syria (or in Venezuela) would be a disaster not only for the region, but for every country wanting to become sovereign (see Andre Vltchek’s excellent article on this topic here). And, again, Russia will be blamed for it all and, with certifiable nutcasts like Bolton, Russian forces might even be attacked.

As I wrote already many times, this is far from over [13]. Just as in the Ukrainian case, some deal might be made (at least US and Russian military officials are still talking to each other) but my personal opinion is that making any kind of deal with Trump is as futile as making deals with Netanyahu: neither of them can be trusted and they both will break any and all promises in a blink of an eye.

And if all hell breaks loose in Syria and/or Iran, NATO will make sure that the Europeans all quickly and obediently fall in line (“solidarity”, remember?).

The bottom line is this: currently, the EU is most unlikely to become a viable partner for Russia and the future does look rather bleak.

One objection to my pessimism is the undeniable success of the recent Saint Petersburg summit and the Parliamentary Forum.

However, I believe that neither of these events was really centered around Europe at all, but about the world at large (see excellent report by Gilbert Doctorow on this topic [14]).

Yes, Russia is doing great and while the AngloZionist media loves to speak about the “isolation” of Russia, the truth is that it is the Empire which is isolated, while Russia and China are having a tremendous success [15] building the multi-polar world they want to replace the Empire with.

So while it is true that the western leaders might prefer to see a liberal “economic block” in the new Russian government, the rest of the world has no such desire at all (especially considering how many countries out there have suffered terrible hardships at the hands of the WTO/WB/IMF/etc types).

Conclusion:

The AngloZionist Empire is not based in the USA, or in the EU, or Israel, or anywhere else on the planet. It is a trans-national entity with regional variations and which includes different interest groups under its umbrella.

You can think of it as a gigantic criminal gang racketeering the entire planet for “protection”. To think that by presenting a “liberal” face to these thugs will gain you their support is extremely naive as these guys don’t care about your face: what they want is your submission.

Vladimir Putin put it best when he said “They do not want to humiliate us, they want to subdue us, solve their problems at our expense”.

However, if the EU is, for all practical purposes, non-existent, Russia can, and will, engage with individual EU member states. There is a huge difference between, say, Poland and Italy, or the UK and Austria. Furthermore, the EU is not only dysfunctional, it is also non-viable.

Russia would immensely benefit from the current EU either falling apart or being deeply reformed because the current EU is a pure creation of the US-backed Bilderberger types and not the kind of Europe the European people need. In fact, I would even argue that the EU is the single biggest danger for the people of the European continent.

Thus Russia should use her resources to foster bi-lateral cooperation with individual EU member states and never take any action which would strengthen (or even legitimize) EU-derived organizations such as the EU Parliament, the European Court of Human Rights, etc.

These are all entities which seek to undermine the sovereignty of all its members, including Russia. Again, Putin put it best when he recently declared that “either Russia is a sovereign country, or there is no Russia“.[16]

Whatever the ideology and slogans, all empires are inherently evil and inherently dangerous to any country wanting to be truly sovereign. If Russia (and China) want to create a multi-polar world, they need to gradually disengage from those trans-national bodies which are totally controlled by the Empire, it is really that simple.

Instead, Russia needs to engage those countries, political parties and forces who advocate for what de Gaulle called “the Europe of fatherlands“ [17]. Both the AngloZionist Empire and the EU are undergoing the most profound crisis in their history and the writing is on the wall. Sooner rather than later, one by one, European countries will recover their sovereignty, as will Russia.

Only if the people of Europe succeed in recovering their sovereignty could Russia look for real partnerships in the West, if only because the gradually developing and integrating Eurasian landmass offer tremendous economic opportunities which could be most beneficial to the nations of Europe.

A prosperous Europe “from the Atlantic to the Urals” [18] is still a possibility, but that will happen only when the current European Union and NATO are replaced by truly European institutions and the current European elites replaced by sovereignists.

The people of Russia, EU and, I would argue, the United States all have the same goal and the same enemy: they want to recover their sovereignty, get rid of their corrupt and, frankly, treacherous elites and liberates themselves from the hegemony of the AngloZionist Empire.

This is why pushing the issue of “true sovereignty” (and national traditional values) is, I believe, the most unifying and powerful political idea to defeat the Empire. This will be a long struggle but the outcome is not in doubt.

The Saker
Unz Review

Citations
[1] http://thesaker.is/can-the-eu-become-a-partner-for-russia/
[2] https://www.militaryfactory.com/dictionary/military-terms-defined.asp?term_id=2165
[3] https://www.rt.com/news/429533-us-norway-nato-marines/
[4] https://www.wearethemighty.com/articles/russia-war-ukraine-latvia-estonia-poland-prepare
[5] https://www.rt.com/news/402919-sweden-military-exercise-russia/
[6] https://russia-insider.com/en/politics/desperate-reason-exist-nato-installs-itself-latin-america/ri23758
[7] https://www.bbc.com/news/world-44070469
[8] https://stopacthr1226.org/the-polish-american-congress-does-not-want-the-just-act-of-2017-applied-to-poland/
[9] https://sputniknews.com/europe/201805211064645953-bulgaria-south-stream-revived/
[10] https://www.rt.com/usa/429406-us-issues-more-russia-sanctions/
[11] https://maps.southfront.org/putin-kiev-forces-advance-in-donbass-region-would-have-grave-consequences-for-ukrainian-statehood/
[12] https://www.rt.com/news/429408-syria-rebels-chlorine-provocation/
[13] https://www.unz.com/tsaker/each-click-brings-us-one-step-closer-to-the-bang/
[14] https://russia-insider.com/en/politics/russia-just-displayed-serious-soft-power-moscow-parliamentary-forum-its-more-important-you
[15] http://thesaker.is/putin-and-xi-top-the-g61/
[16] https://www.rt.com/news/428846-russia-putin-sovereignty-sanctions/
[17] https://www.opendemocracy.net/charles-grant/europes-choice-monnet-vs-de-gaulle
[18] http://tass.com/russia/747633

[It’sallbsParticipant]

Censorhip continues, daarpa continues it’s plans, fda continues being corrupt for teh benefit of big pharma, the iot continues to roll out -the social crediting being trialled in china will reach america

What is it you think trump is changing?

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[It’sallbsParticipant]

Project for the new american century-that’s where your answer lies every time.

Trump is not change he is more of the same.

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[NerevarParticipant]

It’sallbs wrote:

Fortunas wrote:

I have no respect for anyone who think Trump is a good and decent person or even a President worth believing.

Trump is a fraud and the people who believe in him need to awaken further than they have done so far.

They are somewhat awake else they would not be on this forum.

I’m glad he’s president, else Hitlary would’ve been in his seat, and I shudder at the thought.

"One of the best things internet exposed is just how insane women are." - Freeman_K

[It’sallbsParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

I have no respect for anyone who think Trump is a good and decent person or even a President worth believing.

Trump is a fraud and the people who believe in him need to awaken further than they have done so far.

They are somewhat awake else they would not be on this forum.

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[RhinoParticipant]

Wait for the original IG report this one that was put out by the DOJ/FBI was washed to not look as bad. Trump will probably have to sign an executive order to declassify it after congress reviews it and rubber stamps it for public viewing.